冀北山地不同林分枯落物及土壤的水源涵养功能评价

张伟; 杨新兵; 张汝松; 曹云生; 姚卫星

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

冀北山地不同林分枯落物及土壤的水源涵养功能评价

试验研究

- 冀北山地不同林分枯落物及土壤的水源涵养功能评价
- Evaluation on Water Conservation Functions of Litter and Soils Under Different Forests in Mountainous Area of Northern Hebei Province
- 水土保持通报 2011年30卷第3期页码：208-212
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 河北农业大学林学院国家北方山区农业工程技术研究中心,河北,保定,071000
  2. 河北木兰围场国有林场管理局,河北,承德,068450
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  林业公益性行业科研专项“冀北山区典型森林生态系统健康经营技术研究与示范”(200804022F)
- DOI：
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2011
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
张伟, 杨新兵, 张汝松, 等. 冀北山地不同林分枯落物及土壤的水源涵养功能评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2011,30(3):208-212.

ZHANG Wei, YANG Xin-bing, ZHANG Ru-song, et al. Evaluation on Water Conservation Functions of Litter and Soils Under Different Forests in Mountainous Area of Northern Hebei Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2011, 30(3): 208-212.
张伟, 杨新兵, 张汝松, 等. 冀北山地不同林分枯落物及土壤的水源涵养功能评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2011,30(3):208-212. DOI：

ZHANG Wei, YANG Xin-bing, ZHANG Ru-song, et al. Evaluation on Water Conservation Functions of Litter and Soils Under Different Forests in Mountainous Area of Northern Hebei Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2011, 30(3): 208-212. DOI：

摘要

以冀北山地6种典型林分为对象，对其凋落物及表层土壤的水源涵养功能进行了初步研究。结果表明，各林分枯落物有效拦蓄量排序为:山杨林(3

t/hm

)>白桦林(

8.59 t/hm

)>蒙古栎林(

6t/hm

)>油松蒙古栎混交林(19.49 t/hm

)>华北落叶松林(13.53 t/hm

)>油松林(13.

3 t/hm

);各林分土壤最大持水量排序为:山杨林(1709 t/hm

)>油松蒙古栎混交林(1 551 t/hm

)>白桦林(1 549 t/hm

)>油松林(1547 t/hm

)>华北落叶松林(1357 t/hm

)>蒙古栎林(1 303 t/hm

);各林分土壤渗透性能排序为:油松蒙古栎混交林>山杨林>白桦林>油松林>蒙古栎林>华北落叶松林。采用层次分析法确定指标权重，对评价指标值进行计算分析，比较不同林分综合水源涵养功能，结果认为，油松蒙古栎混交林的综合水源涵养功能最好，其次为山杨林、白桦林、蒙古栎林、油松林，华北落叶松林最差。

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to study the water conservation functions of litter and surface soil under six forest types in mountainous area of Northern Hebei Province.The results show that in terms of effective interception capacity

the rank of litter layers was poplar forest( 32.32 t/hm2)>birch forest(28.59t/hm2)>Mongolian oak forest(20.26t/hm2)>chinese pine-Mongolian oak mixed forest(19.49t/hm2)>Larix principis-rup prechtii forest( 13.53 t/ hm2)>chinese pine forest(13.23t/hm2);in terms of soil maximum water-holding capacity

the order was poplar forest> chinese pine-Mongolian oak mixed forest>birch forest>chinese pine forest>Larix princip is:rupprechtii forest> Mongolian oak forest; regarding soil infiltration characteristics

the rank was chinese pine-Mongolian oak mixed forest> poplar forest> birch forest> chinese pine forest> Mongolian oak forest> Larix principis - rupp rechtii forest.The values of evaluation indices were calculated based on weights that were determined using the method of hierarchy analysis.The evaluation results show that chinese pine-Mongolianoak mixed forest had the best water conservation function

followed in order by poplar forest

birch forest

Mongolian oak forest

chinese pine forest

and Larix principis-rup prechtii forest had the worst.

关键词

Keywords

references

浏览量

1530

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

晋西黄土区小流域典型植被水文功能优化研究

河北省水源涵养生态功能保护区划分研究

祁连山不同林地类型土壤特性及其水源涵养功能

不同针叶林对祁连山森林灰褐土理化性质和水源涵养功能的影响

燕山北部山地典型植物群落水源涵养能力研究