1. 吉林省水土保持科学研究院,吉林,长春,130033
2. 吉林省墒情监测中心,吉林,长春,130033
纸质出版:2014
移动端阅览
许晓鸿, 任丽, 崔斌, 等. 暗棕壤坡耕地水保耕作保水保土效益分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(1):54-57.
XU Xiao-hong, REN Li, CUI Bin, et al. Benefit Analysis of Soil and Water Conversation on Dark Brown Soil Sloping Farmland Under Different Tillage Systems[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(1): 54-57.
结合东北黑土区坡耕地实际利用情况
以不改变原坡面参数为前提
在天然降雨条件下
对5°和8°坡耕地3种不同耕作方式下的径流量和产沙量进行了观测
并分析了暗棕壤坡耕地不同坡度下不同耕作方式的保水保土效益及其产流主导因子。结果表明:(1)不同耕作措施对地表径流量影响差别很大
表现为8°横垄玉米> 8°横垄玉米+秸秆还田> 5°横垄玉米> 5°横垄玉米+秸秆还田> 8°横垄玉米+秸秆还田+地埂植物带> 5°横垄玉米+秸秆还田+地埂植物带。(2)不同小区的产沙量与产流量变化趋势较为一致
即产流量越大
产沙量越大
但二者并不呈线性关系。(3) 8°横垄玉米小区最易产流
而产流与否可根据I
30
进行判断
当I
30
≥ 6 mm/30 min时
产流的概率达到了91%
产流时的最小降雨量为6 mm。(4) 8°和5°横垄玉米+秸秆还田+地埂植物带小区的产流与否受降雨强度的影响远大于受降雨量的影响。
Combined with the actual utilization of sloping farmland in the black soil area of Northeast China
surface runoff and soil loss from natural slope under natural rainfall condition were monitored and the benefits of soil and water conservation and their dominant driving factors were analyzed for three different soil tillage systems on 5° and 8° sloping farmlands of dark brown soil. Results showed that:(1) Surface runoff was greatly affected by soil tillage systems in corn field. These tillage systems were in the order of 8° ridged cross slope> 8° ridged cross slope with straw returning> 5° ridged cross slope> 5° ridged cross slope with straw returning> 8° ridged cross slope with straw returning and field bund with plants> 5° ridged cross slope with straw returning and field bund with plants. (2) The trends of runoff and sediment from different plots were similar
i.e.
the more runoff
the larger sediment
but no line relationship appeared. (3) The largest runoff was found in the plot of 8° ridged cross slope. I30 could be used to determine whether surface runoff occurred or not. There was 91% probability of runoff yielding when I30 ≥ 6 mm/30 min
and the minimum rainfall for runoff yielding was 6 mm. (4) Rainfall intensity
not rainfall amount
greatly affected whether or not runoff occurred in the two plots of 8° and 5° ridged cross slope with straw returning and field bund with plants.
张海林,高旺盛,陈阜,等.保护性耕作研究现状、发展趋势及对策[J].中国农业大学学报,2005,10(1):16-20.
郭清毅,黄高宝.保护性耕作对旱地麦豆双序列轮作农田土壤水分利用效率的影响[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(3):165-169.
常旭虹,赵广才,张雯,等.作物残茬对农田土壤风蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(1):28-31.
邓嘉农,徐航,郭甜,等.长江流域坡耕地"坡式梯田+坡面水系"治理模式及综合效益探讨[J].中国水土保持,2011(10):4-6.
邸敬会,靳书坤,郝俊灵.成安县保护性耕作主要技术模式及效益分析[J].河北农业科学,2012,16(11):7-11,66.
吴红丹,李洪文,李问盈.中美两国保护性耕作的管理与应用对比分析[J].干旱地区农业研究,2007,2(25):40-44.
王晓燕,高焕文,李洪文,等.保护性耕作对农田地表径流与土壤水蚀影响的试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2000,16(3):66-69.
0
浏览量
1181
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621