华中农业大学公共管理学院,湖北,武汉,430070
纸质出版:2014
移动端阅览
员开奇, 董捷. 低碳视角下的城市圈土地可持续利用评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(1):226-231.
YUAN Kai-qi, DONG Jie. Sustainable Land Use Evaluation for Urban Agglomerations from Perspective of Low Carbon[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(1): 226-231.
资源环境与经济发展的矛盾日益突出
低碳视角下的资源节约集约利用是增强发展可持续性的根本途径。以武汉市为例
采用文献资料法等结合已有研究成果
立足低碳视角
与城市圈土地利用特点相结合
建立低碳视角下的城市圈土地可持续利用评价指标体系。综合CSDEA(指标凝聚法)和熵值法对各指标值进行分析综合
在获得评价结果后进一步计算得到各评价对象的改进方案。结果显示
黄石市、黄冈市、咸宁市、潜江市为土地可持续利用CSDEA有效
仙桃市、天门市、孝感市、武汉市、鄂州市为土地可持续利用CSDEA无效
综合评价值分别为0.9849
0.9791
0.9725
0.9574
0.8082
评价值最低的是鄂州市
在地均农业产值等9个指标上均存在不足
需要降低的指标包括农村恩格尔系数、地均碳排放量等
其中地均碳排放量应降低97.33 t/hm
2
。综合来看鄂州市仍需较大提升。评价结果和改进方案客观反映了城市圈土地利用的现状和不足
经济发展应更加注重对环境的保护和资源的节约和集约利用
不断提高可持续发展能力。
The contradictions between resource and economic development have become increasingly prominent. Resource saving and its intensive use from the perspective of low carbon is a fundamental approach to enhance the ability of sustainable development. Taking Wuhan City as a study area
By literature referring method
the low-carbon perspective was combined with the land use characteristics of urban agglomeration to establish a sustainable land use evaluation index system. Integration of CSDEA(indicators coacervation) with entropy method was used to analyze each index value and get comprehensive evaluation result. An improvement program was obtained by further calculations. Results show that Huangshi
Huanggang
Xianning
Qianjiang Cities are relatively effective in the CSDEA of sustainable land use
while Xiantao
Tianmen
Xiaogan
Wuhan
Ezhou Cities are ineffective
with comprehensive evaluation values of 0.9849
0.9791
0.9725
0.9574
0.8082
respectively. The evaluation value is the lowest for Ezhou City that has nine big shortage indicators such as agricultural production. Indicators for Ezhou City needed to be reduced include the rural Engel coefficient
garbage transport volume and other five indicators
of which carbon emissions should be reduced to 97.33t/hm2. Overall
Ezhou City should be greatly improved in sustainable land use. The evaluation results objectively reflect the status and lack of urban agglomerations land use and improvement program. In economic development
more attention should be paid to environmental protection and intensive and economical resource utilization and continuously improve the capacity for sustainable development.
Smyth A J, Dumanski J. FESLM:An International Framework for Evaluating Sustainable Land Management[M]. Rome, Italy:FAO, 1993.
Gameda S, Dumanski J, Acton D. Farm level indicators of sustainable land management information for sustainable land management[Z]. ISSS/I TC, Enschede, Netherlands, 1997.
Berroteran J, Zinck A. Criteria and Indicators of agricultural sustainability at national level geo-information for sustainable land management[Z]. ISSS/I TC, Enschede, Netherlands, 1997.
孙雁,刘友兆.基于细碎化的土地资源可持续利用评价:以江西分宜县为[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(5):802-810.
李长健,钟涨宝,伍文辉.基于发展权理论的土地资源可持续利用问题研究[J].生态经济:2006,10(4):139-143.
袁磊,雷国平,张小虎.基于循环经济理念的黑龙江土地可持续利用评价[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(1):127-133.
赵艳,濮励杰,张建,等.基于三角模型的城市土地可持续利用评价[J].经济地理,2011,31(5):810-815.
薛进军.低碳经济学[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2011:6-11.
刘建红,李仁东,王宏志,等.基于遥感和GIS武汉城市圈土地资源利用研究[J].世界地理研究,2009,18(1):83-90.
马占新.数据包络分析[M].北京:科学出版社,2009:196-207.
尹君.土地资源可持续利用评价指标体系研究[J].中国土地科学,2001,15(2):6-9.
陈百明.区域土地可持续利用评价指标体系框架的构建与评价[J].地理科学进展,2002,21(3):204-215.
赖力.中国土地利用的碳排放效应研究[D].南京:南京大学,2011.
傅伯杰,陈利顶,马诚.土地可持续利用评价的指标体系与方法[J].自然资源学报,1997,12(2):113-118.
中华人民共和国国家统计局.中国城市统计年鉴2011[DB/OL].http://www.stats.gov.cn.,2011.
湖北省统计局.湖北省统计年鉴2011[DB/OL].http://www.stats-hb.gov.cn,2011.
湖北省统计局.湖北省国民经济与社会发展统计公报2011[DB/OL].http://www.hubei.gov.cn,2011.
0
浏览量
1435
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621