石羊河流域近53 a参考作物蒸散量的敏感性分析

张春玲; 张勃; 周丹; 张调风; 安美玲

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

石羊河流域近53 a参考作物蒸散量的敏感性分析

试验研究

- 石羊河流域近53 a参考作物蒸散量的敏感性分析
- Sensitivity Analysis of Reference Crop Evapotranspiration in Shiyang River Basin in Recent 53 Years
- 水土保持通报 2014年33卷第1期页码：303-306
- 作者机构：
  
  西北师范大学地理与环境科学学院,甘肃,兰州,730070
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目"水资源约束下的黑河流域土地利用/覆盖变化模拟研究"(40961038);生态经济学省级重点学科(5001-021);西北师范大学知识与科技创新工程项目(NWNU-KJCXGC-03-66)
- DOI：
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2014
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
张春玲, 张勃, 周丹, 等. 石羊河流域近53 a参考作物蒸散量的敏感性分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(1):303-306.

ZHANG Chun-ling, ZHANG Bo, ZHOU Dan, et al. Sensitivity Analysis of Reference Crop Evapotranspiration in Shiyang River Basin in Recent 53 Years[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(1): 303-306.
张春玲, 张勃, 周丹, 等. 石羊河流域近53 a参考作物蒸散量的敏感性分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(1):303-306. DOI：

ZHANG Chun-ling, ZHANG Bo, ZHOU Dan, et al. Sensitivity Analysis of Reference Crop Evapotranspiration in Shiyang River Basin in Recent 53 Years[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(1): 303-306. DOI：

摘要

利用国家气象信息中心提供的地面气候资料日值数据集

基于FAO Penman-Monteith公式计算了石羊河流域4个测站1959-2011年的逐日参考作物蒸散量(ET

)。利用敏感系数法计算了其对平均最高气温、平均最低气温、风速、平均相对湿度和日照时数的敏感系数

并分析了敏感系数的时空变化特征。结果表明

石羊河流域ET

对相对湿度最敏感

其次为风速和气温

而对日照时数的敏感性最低。由于气象要素分布不均

敏感系数的空间差异显著

相对湿度的敏感系数在上游祁连山区形成高值区

同时

气温在该区的敏感系数也相对较大

而风速的敏感系数在下游民勤盆地较大

日照时数的敏感系数在全区无明显差异。各气象因子的敏感系数均存在一定程度的波动

风速的敏感系数冬高夏低

气温和日照时数的敏感系数均为夏季最高

相对湿度敏感系数的绝对值持续上升在秋季达到最大。53 a来

相对湿度敏感系数波动变化

近20 a来其绝对值上升趋势显著

而风速、日照时数和气温的敏感系数无明显变化趋势。

Abstract

The sensitivity coefficients of daily reference evapotranspiration(ET0) to average temperature

wind speed

relative humidity and sunshine hours in the Shiyang River basin during 1959-2011 were calculated by using Penman-Monteith equation recommended by FAO

based on daily meteorological data provided by the China Meteorological Administer. Moreover

temporal variations of the sensitivity coefficients were analyzed. Results show that relative humidity was the most sensitive factor of ET0 in the Shiyang River basin

wind speed and temperature were in the second place

and sunshine hours had the lowest sensitivity. Because of climate factors contrast and significant spatial difference of the sensitive coefficients

the sensitive coefficient of relative humidity formed high value area in the upstream area of the Qilian Mountains. Meanwhile

the sensitive coefficient of temperature was relatively large. But the sensitive coefficient of wind speed was the largest in the downstream area of the Minqin basin. The sensitive coefficient of sunshine hours had no significant difference in all the areas. The sensitive coefficient of each of the meteorological factors showed a certain degree of volatility. Wind speed was high in winter

but low in summer; temperature and sunshine hours were all high in summer; and the absolute value of relative humidity continued to rise to the maximum in fall. The sensitive coefficient of relative humidity fluctuated in the past 53 years

absolute value showed a significant upward trend

but the wind speed

sunshine hours and temperature had no obvious trend in the last 20 years.

关键词

Keywords

references

秦大河.中国西部环境演变评估:综合卷[M].北京:科学出版社,2002:73-78.

Zhang Qiang, Song Lianchun, Huang Ronghui. The bulk transfer coefficients of the atmospheric momentum and sensible heat over desert and Gobi in arid climate region of Northwest China[J]. Sci. China:Series D, 2002,45(5):468-480.

Zhang Qiang, Song Lianchun, Huang Ronghui.. Characteristics of hydrologic transfer between soil and atmosphere over Gobi near oasis at the end of summer[J]. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 2003,20(3):442-452.

梁丽乔,闫敏华,邓伟,等.松嫩平原西部参考作物蒸散量变化过程[J].地理科学进展,2006,25(3):22-31.

Gong Lebing, Xu Chongyu, Chen Deliang. Sensitivity of the Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration to key climatic variables in the Changjiang basin[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2006,329(3/4):620-629.

梁丽乔,李丽娟,张丽,等.松嫩平原西部生长季参考作物蒸散发的敏感性分析[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(5):1-5.

曾丽红,宋开山,张柏,等.东北地区参考作物蒸散量对主要气象要素的敏感性分析[J].中国农业气象,2010,31(1):11-18.

刘小莽,郑红星,刘昌明,等.海河流域潜在蒸散发的气候敏感性分析[J].资源科学,2009,31(9):1470-1476.

Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, et al. Crop Evapotranspiration:Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements[M]. Rome:United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, 1998.

Yin Yunhe, Wu Shaohong, Zheng Du, et al. Radiation calibration of FAO 56 Penman-Monteith model to estimate reference crop evapotranspiration in China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2008,95(1):77-84.

Penman H L. Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London(Series A):Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1948,193(1032):120-146.

蔡毅,邢岩,胡丹.敏感性分析综述[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2008,44(1):9-16.

McCuen R H. A sensitivity and error analysis of procedures used for estimating evaporation. Water Resource Bulletin[J].1974,10(3):486-498.

Beven K. A sensitivity analysis of the Penman-Monteith actual evapotranspiration estimates. Journal of Hydrology[J].1979,44(3/4):169-190.

曹雯,申双和,段春锋.西北地区近49年生长季参考作物蒸散量的敏感性分析[J].中国农业气象,2011,32(3):375-381.

Coleman G, DeCoursey D G. Sensitivity and model variance analysis applied to some evaporation and evapotranspiration models[J]. Water Resource Research, 1976,12(5):873-879.

刘明春.石羊河流域气候干湿状况分析及评价[J].生态学杂志,2006,25(8):880-884.

Hupet F, Vanclooster M. Effect of the sampling frequency of meteorological variables on the estimation of the reference evapotranspiration[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2001,24(3):192-204.

浏览量

1408

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于景观连通性优化的坝上地区张家口段生态安全格局构建

植被毯覆盖对高寒矿区煤矸石基质热性质的影响

吉林省西部地区新增耕地变化及其驱动机制的多尺度探测

中国典型河口三角洲生态系统服务价值的时空异质性

青海省2009—2023年农业面源污染结构及变化特征