1. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
2. 西北农林科技大学林学院, 陕西杨凌,712100
纸质出版:2002
移动端阅览
李鹏, 李占斌, 赵忠, 等. 渭北黄土高原不同立地上刺槐根系分布特征研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2002,21(5):15-19.
LI Peng, LI Zhanbin, ZHAO Zhong, et al. Researches on Root Distribution Characters of Robinia Pseudoacacia on Different Sites in Weibei Loess Plateau[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2002, 21(5): 15-19.
采用土钻法对渭北黄土高原地区的主要造林树种刺槐的根系分布特征进行了调查研究。结果表明
不同立地上的刺槐根系分布特征具有明显的差异
阳坡立地上的根系密度和生物量均小于阴坡立地;不同林龄根系分布在深度上没有明显的差异
但是其根系的生物量和根系密度具有明显的差异。不同立地上刺槐的根系消弱系数(root extinction coefficient)β值之间也存在明显的差异。阴坡立地的β值均在0.982以上
而阳坡立地上的β值则一般小于0.982
说明阴坡立地上的刺槐根系分布深度要大于阳坡立地。其细根 (Φ<1mm)的分布深度大于较粗根系 (Φ<3mm)的分布深度
有利于刺槐对深层土壤中水分、养分的吸收
适应干旱环境
促进地上部分的正常生长
Soil drilling method is applied for root distribution characters investigation of the main forestation tree species on the loess plateau. The results indicate that there is obvious difference in the root distribution characters on different sites
both root density and root biomass on southern slope are smaller than that on northern slope. There are no obvious differences in root distribution depth on stand of different age
but root biomass and root density increased with age. Root extinction coefficient β
is one of the most important parameters in determining the vertical distribution depth of tree species. In this study
results showe that the value of β on northern exposition was more than 0.982
while the value of β on southern exposition was less than 0.982
which indicates that the vertical root distribution depth of Robinia pseudoacaciaon southern exposition is deeper than that on southren exposition. And the distribution depth of fine roots (Φ<1mm) is deeper than that of thicker roots(Φ<3mm)
which is in favor of the uptake of water and nutrients from deeper layers
helps the trees to adapt the arid environment
and promoted the growth of the upper parts of the tree.
王文全,王世绩,刘雅荣,等.粉煤灰田立地上杨、柳、榆、刺槐根系的分布和生长特点[J]. 林业科学,1994,30(1):25-33.
Stone E L, Kalisz P J. On the maximum extent of tree roots[J].For. Ecol. Manage, 1991(46):59-102.
Gale M R, Grigal D E. Vertical root distribution of northern tree species in relation to successional status[J]. Can J For For, 1987(17): 829-834.
Gale M R, Grigal D E, Harding R B. Soil productivity index of site quality for white spruce plantations[J]. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1991(55):1701-1708.
赵忠,李鹏,王乃江.渭北黄土高原主要造林树种根系分布特征的研究[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(1):37-39.
Jackson R B, Canadell J, Mooney H A. A global analysis of root distribution for terrestrial biomes[J]. Oecologia, 1996 180: 389-411.
Farrish K W. Spatial and temporal fine-root distribution in three Louisiana forest soil[J].Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1991(55): 1752-1757.
宋长贵,张献义. 深翻对杉木根系的影响[J].湖北林业科技通讯,1992(4):1-3.
黄瑞冬,赵君实.植物根系研究方法进展[J].沈阳农业大学学报,1991,22(3):164-168.
廖兴其.根系研究方法评述[J].世界农业,1995(7):23-24.
刘建军.林木根系生态研究综述[J].西北林学院学报,1998,13(3):74-78.
W.伯姆.根系研究法[M].北京:科学出版社,1985.
陈金林,许新建,姜志林,等.空青山次生栎林细根周转[J].南京林业大学学报,1999,23(1):6-10.
单建平,陶大立.国外对树木细根的研究动态[J].生态学杂志,1992,11(4):46-49.
吕士行,余雪标.杉木造林密度与根系生长的关系[J].林业科技通讯,1990(11):1-3.
Marashall J D, Waring R H. Predicting fine root production and turnover by monitoring root starch and soil temperature[J]. Can J For Res, 1985,15:791-800.
孙时轩.造林学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1995.
董长贵.不同土壤条件下欧洲赤松和西伯利亚落叶松根系的形成[J].国外林业,1995,25(1):5-9.
Lyr H, Hoffmann G. Growth rates and growth periodicity of tree roots[J]. Int. Rev. For. Res., 1967,2:181-236.
Coile T S. 1936. Distribution of forest tree roots in North Carolina Piedmont soils[J]. J. For. 35:247-257
赵忠,李鹏,王乃江.渭北主要造林树种根系抗旱性研究[J].水土保持研究2000,7(1):92-94.
刘秉正,王幼民,李凯荣,等.人工刺槐林改良土壤的初步研究[J]. 西北林学院学报,1987,2(1):48-57.
0
浏览量
1601
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621