
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.北京林业大学 环境科学与工程学院 北京市水体污染源控制技术重点实验室, 北京 100083
2.水利部 水利水电规划设计总院, 北京 100120
3.北京国环清华环境工程设计研究院有限公司, 北京 100084
Received:08 November 2024,
Revised:2025-04-08,
Published:20 August 2025
移动端阅览
马茗远, 张浩然, 赵钟楠, 等.基于水资源利用的长江流域横向生态保护补偿标准研究[J].水土保持通报,2025,45(4):304-315.
Ma Mingyuan, Zhang Haoran, Zhao Zhongnan, et al. Inter-provincial ecological compensation standards in Yangtze River basin from perspective of water resource utilization [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2025,45(4):304-315.
马茗远, 张浩然, 赵钟楠, 等.基于水资源利用的长江流域横向生态保护补偿标准研究[J].水土保持通报,2025,45(4):304-315. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2025.04.020. CSTR: 32312.14.stbctb.2025.04.020..
Ma Mingyuan, Zhang Haoran, Zhao Zhongnan, et al. Inter-provincial ecological compensation standards in Yangtze River basin from perspective of water resource utilization [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2025,45(4):304-315. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2025.04.020. CSTR: 32312.14.stbctb.2025.04.020..
目的
2
评估建立长江流域内横向生态保护补偿标准的测算方法,为推动流域水资源保护和水生态环境的恢复以及流域内经济社会的可持续发展提供科学依据。
方法
2
首先基于水域面积,利用调节因子修正当量因子表,进而测算2010—2020年长江流域水资源生态系统服务价值;其次,计算流域内各地区水资源淡水及水污染生态足迹与生态承载力,以此评估各地区水资源超载状况;最后,以全流域水资源生态超载系数为基准线界定各地区补偿主客体身份,基于公共物品属性及外部性相关理论,结合水资源生态系统服务价值计算各地区生态保护补偿的理论额度与下限值。
结果
2
①2010—2020年,长江流域水资源生态系统服务价值分别为1.17×10
12
,1.18×10
12
,1.19×10
12
元,有逐年上升的趋势。 ②2010—2020年长江流域淡水资源生态足迹先升高后降低,而水污染生态足迹持续升高,结合水资源生态承载力概念来看,长江流域未出现超载的情况,但在上海、江苏及河南地区存在水资源供需缺口。 ③在研究期间内,青海、西藏、广东、广西、湖南、江西和福建始终为生态保护补偿的客体,而安徽、云南、浙江、河南、江苏和上海始终为生态保护补偿的主体,支付补偿省份的额度均在地方财政一般预算收入之内,且逐年下降。
结论
2
本文研究建立的测算模型将水生态、水资源以及社会经济发展紧密关联,可以为长江流域水资源保护、水生态维护以及全流域生态保护补偿标准的制定等工作提供科学且合理的切入点与范例,有望推动中国一级流域生态保护补偿工作持续深入开展。
Objective
2
A calculation method for horizontal ecological protection compensation standards within the Yangtze River basin was evaluated and established in order to provide a scientific basis for promoting the protection of water resources, restoration of the water ecological environment, and sustainable development of the economy and society within the basin.
Methods
2
Firstly, the value of ecosystem services provided by water resources in the Yangtze River basin during 2010—2020 were calculated using water surface area and a modified equivalent factor table. Secondly, the freshwater and water pollution ecological footprints and carrying capacities across the basin regions were estimated to evaluate water resource overload status. Finally, using the watershed-wide water resource ecological overload coefficient as a baseline, the identities of the compensation individuals and objects in each region were defined. Based on the theory of public goods attributes and externalities, the theoretical amount and lower-limit value of ecological protection compensation in each region were estimated by combining the water resource ecosystem service value.
Results
2
① From 2010 to 2020, the value of ecosystem services from water resources in the Yangtze River basin increased annually to 1.17×10
12
,1.18×10
12
, 1.19×10
12
yuan. ② From 2010 and 2020, the freshwater ecological footprint of the Yangtze River basin first increased and then decreased, whereas the water pollution ecological footprint continued to increase. Based on the concept of ecological carrying capacity, the basin did not experience an overload during the study period. However, water supply-demand gaps were observed in regions such as Shanghai, Jiangsu City, and Henan Province. ③ During the study period, Qinghai, Xizang, Guangdong, Guangxi, Hunan, Jiangxi, and Fujian Province (autonomous regions) were consistent ecological protection compensation recipients, whereas Anhui, Yunnan, Zhejiang, Henan, Jiangsu Province, and Shanghai City were consistently compensation payers. The compensation amounts paid by the payer regions were within the scope of their general fiscal budgets and exhibited a year-on-year decline.
Conclusion
2
In the proposed calculation model, water ecology, water resources, and socio-economic development are closely integrated. It can provide a scientific and rational entry point and exemplar for water resource protection, water ecology maintenance, and the formulation of ecological compensation standards across the Yangtze River basin. It is expected to promote the continuous and in-depth development of ecological protection compensation work for first-level river basins in China.
Evenson G R , Golden H E , Lane C R , et al . Depressional wetlands affect watershed hydrological, biogeochemical, and ecological functions [J]. Ecological Applications , 2018 , 28 ( 4 ): 953 - 966 .
庄超 , 尹正杰 . 长江流域跨省横向生态补偿机制实践反思与完善 [J]. 长江科学院院报 , 2023 , 40 ( 6 ): 7 - 13 .
Zhuang Chao , Yin Zhengjie . Practices of cross-provincial transverse ecological compensation mechanism in the Yangtze River basin:Refelctions and improvement suggestions [J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute , 2023 , 40 ( 6 ): 7 - 13 .
Chi Chen , Shen Juqin , Gao Xin , et al . Spatiotemporal changes of ecosystem services value and cross regional ecological compensation in the Yangtze River basin [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability , 2024 : 1 - 35 .
官冬杰 , 姜亚楠 , 严聆云 , 等 . 基于生态足迹视角的长江流域生态补偿额度测算 [J]. 生态学报 , 2022 , 42 ( 20 ): 8169 - 8183 .
Guan Dongjie , Jiang Yanan , Yan Lingyun , et al . Calculation of ecological compensation amount in Yangtze River basin based on ecological footprint [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica , 2022 , 42 ( 20 ): 8169 - 8183 .
Lv Cuimei , Xu Xueyan , Guo Xi , et al . Basin water ecological compensation interval accounting based on dual perspectives of supply and consumption:Taking Qingyi River basin as an example [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production , 2023 , 385 : 135610 .
Zhou Zixuan , Sun Xinrui , Zhang Xuantao , et al . Inter-regional ecological compensation in the Yellow River basin based on the value of ecosystem services [J]. Journal of Environmental Management , 2022 , 322 : 116073 .
卢新海 , 柯善淦 . 基于生态足迹模型的区域水资源生态补偿量化模型构建:以长江流域为例 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境 , 2016 , 25 ( 2 ): 334 - 341 .
Lu Xinhai , Ke Shangan . Establishment of regional water resources ecological compensation model based on ecological footprint model: Take the Yangtze River for example [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin , 2016 , 25 ( 2 ): 334 - 341 .
谢高地 , 张彩霞 , 张雷明 , 等 . 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进 [J]. 自然资源学报 , 2015 , 30 ( 8 ): 1243 - 1254 .
Xie Gaodi , Zhang Caixia , Zhang Leiming , et al . Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area [J]. Journal of Natural Resources , 2015 , 30 ( 8 ): 1243 - 1254 .
Costanza R , d’Arge R , de Groot R , et al . The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Ecological Economics , 1998 , 25 ( 1 ): 3 - 15 .
赵海燕 . 安徽省生态系统服务价值核算及其影响因子研究 [D]. 安徽 合肥 : 合肥工业大学 , 2019 .
Zhao Haiyan . Study on ecosystem service value accounting and its influencing factors in Anhui Province [D]. Hefei, Anhui : Hefei University of Technology , 2019 .
Wu Xutong , Wang Shuai , Fu Bojie , et al . Land use optimization based on ecosystem service assessment: A case study in the Yanhe watershed [J]. Land Use Policy , 2018 , 72 : 303 - 312 .
Zhang Bowen , Wang Ying , Li Jiangfeng , et al . Degradation or restoration? the temporal-spatial evolution of ecosystem services and its determinants in the Yellow River basin, China [J]. Land , 2022 , 11 ( 6 ): 863 .
Rees W , Wackernagel M . Urban ecological footprints: Why cities cannot be sustainable: And why they are a key to sustainability [J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 1996 , 16 ( 4/5/6 ): 223 - 248 .
段锦 , 康慕谊 , 江源 . 基于淡水资源账户和污染账户的生态足迹改进模型 [J]. 自然资源学报 , 2012 , 27 ( 6 ): 953 - 963 .
Duan Jin , Kang Muyi , Jiang Yuan . Improvement of ecological footprint model based on freshwater resource account and pollution accounts [J]. Journal of Natural Resources , 2012 , 27 ( 6 ): 953 - 963 .
黄林楠 , 张伟新 , 姜翠玲 , 等 . 水资源生态足迹计算方法 [J]. 生态学报 , 2008 , 28 ( 3 ): 1279 - 1286 .
Huang Linnan , Zhang Weixin , Jiang Cuiling , et al . Ecological footprint method in water resources assessment [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica , 2008 , 28 ( 3 ): 1279 - 1286 .
Pan Zhenzhen , Gao Guangyao , Fu Bojie . Spatiotemporal changes and driving forces of ecosystem vulnerability in the Yangtze River basin, China:Quantification using habitat-structure-function framework [J]. Science of The Total Environment , 2022 , 835 : 155494 .
Gao Xin , Shen Juqin , He Weijun , et al . Changes in ecosystem services value and establishment of watershed ecological compensation standards [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health , 2019 , 16 ( 16 ): 2951 .
刘雅鸣 . 深入贯彻实施长江流域综合规划着力推进流域水生态文明建设 [J]. 人民长江 , 2013 , 44 ( 10 ): 1 - 4 .
Liu Yaming . Deeply implementing the comprehensive planning of Yangtze River basin, strenuously promoting the construction of water ecological civilization in the basin [J]. Yangtze River , 2013 , 44 ( 10 ): 1 - 4 .
申梦姝 . 长江流域生态系统服务价值及空间转移评价 [D]. 广东 东莞 : 东莞理工学院 , 2023 .
Shen Mengshu . Evaluation of ecosystem service value and spatial transfer in the Yangtze River basin [D]. Dongguan, Guangdong : Dongguan University of Technology , 2023 .
付艳淙 . 长江经济带水资源承载力综合评价及影响因素分析 [D]. 湖南 长沙 : 湖南大学 , 2021 .
Fu Yancong . Comprehensive evaluation of water resources carrying capacity and analysis of influencing factors of Yangtze River economic belt [D]. Changsha, Hunan : Hunan University , 2021 .
周飞 , 邱卫国 . 2013—2019年上海市水资源可持续利用程度评价 [J]. 人民黄河 , 2022 , 44 ( 增刊1 ): 51 - 53 .
Zhou Fei , Qiu Weiguo . Evaluation on sustainable utilization degree of water resources in Shanghai from 2013 to 2019 [J]. Yellow River , 2022 , 44 ( Suppl.1 ): 51 - 53 .
Jin Changsheng , Liu Yuxi , Li Zhongwu , et al . Ecological consequences of China’s regional development strategy:Evidence from water ecological footprint in Yangtze River economic belt [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability , 2022 , 24 ( 12 ): 13732 - 13747 .
周思儒 . 青藏高原水资源时空变化及其影响因素研究 [D]. 北京 : 北京林业大学 , 2022 .
Zhou Siru . Temporal and spatial changes of water resources in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and its influencing factors [D]. Beijing : Beijing Forestry University , 2022 .
岳晨 , 钱永 , 崔向向 , 等 . 福建省2010—2019年水资源生态足迹与生态承载力 [J]. 水土保持通报 , 2021 , 41 ( 6 ): 282 - 287 .
Yue Chen , Qian Yong , Cui Xiangxiang , et al . Ecological footprint and ecological carrying capacity of water resources in Fujian Province during 2010-2019 [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation , 2021 , 41 ( 6 ): 282 - 287 .
Yi Ying , Li Zhenqiang . The impact of environmental regulation on water resources carrying capacity in the Yangtze River economic belt [J]. Journal of Water and Climate Change , 2024 , 15 ( 7 ): 3361 - 3376 .
刘红光 , 陈敏 , 唐志鹏 . 基于灰水足迹的长江经济带水资源生态补偿标准研究 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境 , 2019 , 28 ( 11 ): 2553 - 2563 .
Liu Hongguang , Chen Min , Tang Zhipeng . Study on ecological compensation standards of water resources based on grey water footprint:A case of the Yangtze River economic belt [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin , 2019 , 28 ( 11 ): 2553 - 2563 .
吴蕾 , 官冬杰 , 姜亚楠 , 等 . 基于灰水足迹的长江流域生态补偿额度量化及应用 [J]. 重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版) , 2024 , 41 ( 1 ): 51 - 64 .
Wu Lei , Guan Dongjie , Jiang Yanan , et al . Quantification and application of ecological compensation in the Yangtze River basin based on grey water footprint [J]. Journal of Chongqing Normal University (Natural Science) , 2024 , 41 ( 1 ): 51 - 64 .
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621