
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 云南省水利水电勘测设计院有限公司,云南,昆明,650021
2. 云南省水利水电勘测设计研究院,云南,昆明,650021
3. 玉溪市水土保持工作站,云南,玉溪,653100
4. 云南省水土保持生态环境监测总站,云南,昆明,650100
Published:2024
移动端阅览
Gu Xiaohua, Yang Zhi, Zhang Lanlan, et al. Characteristics of Runoff and Sediment Yield Under Different Land Uses and Its Influencing Factors in Central Yunnan Plateau—A Case Study at Jianshan River Small Catchment[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 44(5): 75-82.
Gu Xiaohua, Yang Zhi, Zhang Lanlan, et al. Characteristics of Runoff and Sediment Yield Under Different Land Uses and Its Influencing Factors in Central Yunnan Plateau—A Case Study at Jianshan River Small Catchment[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 44(5): 75-82. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.05.009.
[目的] 研究滇中高原山区小流域不同土地利用类型植被措施的水土保持效益,为合理种植及改善土地利用现状提供科学依据及理论指导。[方法] 以玉溪市尖山河小流域为研究区,采集研究区2012—2022年的降雨数据结合径流小区径流量和产沙量数据,研究分析次生林地、人工林地、灌草丛地、农耕地、经果林地径流量和产沙量特征及影响因素。[结果] ①径流量排序为:农耕地>经果林地>灌草丛地>次生林地>人工林地,产沙量排序为农耕地>人工林地>经果林地>次生林地>灌草丛地。相同降雨条件下农耕地较其他土地利用类型的抗侵蚀性差。②产沙量与径流量二者之间呈明显的正相关性(p<0.01),产沙相较于产流具有滞后性,当次生林地径流量≥0.02 mm,灌草丛地≥0.46 mm,人工林地≥0.4 mm,经果林地≥0.62 mm,农耕地≥0.09 mm时才会携带泥沙。③径流量和产沙量与植被盖度、降雨特征因子之间的相关性显著(p<0.05),与土壤理化指标中的毛管持水量、毛管孔隙度、总孔隙度之间存在显著相关性(p<0.05),与其余的理化指标相关性不显著(p≥0.05)。[结论] 研究区内应科学设置植被类型布局,合理分配土地种植模式,科学布局农田整地。
[Objective] The soil and water conservation benefits of vegetation measures were analyzed under different land use types for the small catchment from the mountainous areas in the Central Yunnan Plateau to provide scientific basis and theoretical guidance for rational planting and improvement of land use status in the area. [Methods] The Jianshan River small catchment from Yuxi City of Yunnan Province was selected as the study area
and the rainfall data were collected from 2012 to 2022. The runoff and sediment yield characteristics and their influencing factors under different land use types (secondary forest
artificial forest
shrub land
cultivated land
economic fruit forest) were analyzed based on the runoff and sediment data from the runoff plots. [Results] ① The order of runoff from different land uses was in the order of cultivated land >economic fruit forest >shrub land >secondary forest >artificial forest
and the order for sediment yield was cultivated land >artificial forest >economic fruit forest secondary forest>shrub land. The erosion resistance of cultivated land was worse than that of other land use types under the same rainfall conditions. ② A significant positive correlation was determined between sediment yield and runoff (p<0.01). The sediment delivery lagged behind the runoff generation. Only when the runoff was ≥0.02 mm for the secondary forest
≥0.46 mm for shrubland
≥0.4 mm for artificial forest
≥0.62 mm for economic fruit forest
and ≥0.09 mm for cultivated land could they carry sediment. ③ Runoff and sediment yield were significantly correlated with vegetation coverage
rainfall
soil capillary water-holding capacity
soil capillary porosity
and total soil porosity (p<0.05). [Conclusion] This study has an important practical significance for scientifically setting up the layout of vegetation types
reasonably allocating the land planting pattern
and laying out the farmland consolidation.
关冰,刘金萍.基于GIS和RS的重庆市南岸区土壤侵蚀定量研究[C]//天津:第三届全国农业环境科学学术研讨会论文集,2009. Guan Bing, Liu Jinping. Quantitative study on soil erosion in Nan’an District, Chongqing City based on GIS and RS [C]. Tianjing: Proceedings of the 3rd National Symposium on Agricultural Environmental Science, 2009.
汪景宽,徐香茹,裴久渤,等.东北黑土地区耕地质量现状与面临的机遇和挑战[J].土壤通报,2021,52(3):695-701. Wang Jingkuan, Xu Xiangru, Pei Jiubo, et al. Current situations of black soil quality and facing opportunities and challenges in Northeast China [J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2021,52(3):695-701.
赵成,顾小华,姜宏雷,等.云南省坡耕地现状及水土流失综合治理探索[J].中国水土保持,2015(4):11-12. Zhao Cheng, Gu Xiaohua, Jiang Honglei, et al. Present situation of sloping farmland in Yunnan Province and exploration of comprehensive control of soil erosion [J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2015(4):11-12.
吕清华.高原区坡耕地水土流失综合治理[J].区域治理,2019(38):32-34. Lv Qinghua. Comprehensive control of soil erosion in sloping farmland in plateau area [J]. Regional Governance, 2019(38):32-34.
侯淑艳,刘绪军,刘建新,等.水土保持措施对黑土坡耕地产流产沙的影响[J].中国水土保持科学(中英文),2022,20(4):26-33. Hou Shuyan, Liu Xujun, Liu Jianxin, et al. Effects of soil and water conservation measures on the runoff and sediment yield in black sloping farmland [J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,20(4):26-33.
王忠禹,刘国彬,王兵,等.黄土丘陵区典型植物枯落物凋落动态及其持水性[J].生态学报,2019,39(7):2416-2425. Wang Zhongyu, Liu Guobin, Wang Bing, et al. Litter production and its water holding capability in typical plants communities in the hilly region of the Loess Plateau [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019,39(7):2416-2425.
Vaezi A R, Ahmadi M, Cerdà A. Contribution of raindrop impact to the change of soil physical properties and water erosion under semi-arid rainfalls [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017,583:382-392.
朱锐鹏,刘殿君,张世豪,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同土地利用类型水土流失效应[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(4):10-17. Zhu Ruipeng, Liu Dianjun, Zhang Shihao, et al. Characteristics of runoff and sediment yield in different land use types in hilly and gully region of the Loess Plateau [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,29(4):10-17.
Vásquez-Méndez R, Ventura-Ramos E, Oleschko K, et al. Soil erosion and runoff in different vegetation patches from semiarid Central Mexico [J]. CATENA, 2010,80(3):162-169.
Xiao Peiqing, Yao Wenyi, Shen Zhenzhou, et al. Effects of shrub on runoff and soil loss at loess slopes under simulated rainfall [J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2017,27(4):589-599.
Mongil-Manso J, Navarro-Hevia J, San Martín R. Does forest restoration influence soil infiltrability?: A case study in the restored woodland of Sierra de Ávila (Central Spain) [J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2021,18(7):1778-1793.
阿茹·苏里坦,常顺利,张毓涛.天山林区不同群落土壤水分入渗特性的对比分析与模拟[J].生态学报,2019,39(24):9111-9118. Aru Sultan, Chang Shunli, Zhang Yutao. Comparative analysis and simulation of soil moisture infiltration characteristics in different communities in the forests of Tianshan Mountains, China [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019,39(24):9111-9118.
周梦玲,郭建斌,周金星,等.丹江口库区喀斯特坡地不同植被覆盖类型的产流产沙特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2020,18(2):77-83. Zhou Mengling, Guo Jianbin, Zhou Jinxing, et al. Characteristics of runoff and sediment yield from different vegetation types in the Karst region of Danjiangkou Reservoir area [J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020,18(2):77-83.
曹光秀,王克勤,赵洋毅,等.中亚热带地区常绿阔叶林地表径流和产沙影响机制[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(4):30-36. Cao Guangxiu, Wang Keqin, Zhao Yangyi, et al. The mechanism of surface runoff and sediment yield of evergreen broad-leaved forest in the middle subtropical region [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018,32(4):30-36.
赵一鹤,杨时宇,周祥,等.巨尾桉工业原料林地与不同土地利用类型坡面产流产沙特征对比分析[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(1):77-81. Zhao Yihe, Yang Shiyu, Zhou Xiang, et al. Comprative analysis of slope runoff and sediment yield from
Eucalytus grandis
×
E. Urophylla
industrial plantations and other land use types [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012,32(1):77-81.
陈鹏飞,陈丽华,王宇,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同土地利用类型对坡地产流、产沙的影响[J].生态与农村环境学报,2010,26(3): 199-204. Chen Pengfei, Chen Lihua, Wang Yu, et al. Effect of land use pattern on runoff and sediment yield on slope lands in loess hilly region [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2010,26(3):199-204.
张华渝,王克勤,宋娅丽.滇中尖山河流域不同土地利用类型土壤抗蚀性[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(5):50-57. Zhang Huayu, Wang Keqin, Song Yali. Soil erosion resistance under different land use types in Jianshan River watershed in middle Yunnan Province [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019,33(5):50-57.
淡彩虹,许欢欢,王兵,等.模拟降雨下前期含水量对黄绵土坡面产流产沙过程的影响[J].水土保持学报,2023,37(1):31-36. Dan Caihong, Xu Huanhuan, Wang Bing, et al. Effect of antecedent soil moisture on runoff and sediment yield on loess slope under simulated rainfall [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,37(1):31-36.
覃光莲,谭劲英.Mantel方法在生态学中的应用[J].生物数学学报,2014,29(3):507-512. Qin Guanglian, Tan Jinying. Mantel test and its applications in ecology [J]. Journal of Biomathematics, 2014,29(3):507-512.
Mantel N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach [J]. Cancer Research, 1967,27(2):209-220.
刘振滇.滇池湖滨带生态恢复过程中陆生植物群落构建机制研究[D].云南昆明:云南大学,2021. Liu Zhendian. Terrestrial plant community assembly mechanisms during the ecological restoration process in Dianchi lakeside zone [D]. Kunming, Yunnan: Yunnan University, 2021.
张万儒,杨光滢,屠星南.森林土壤分析方法[M].北京:中国标准出版社,2000. Zhang Wanru, Yang Guangying. Forest Soil Analysis Methods [M]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2000.
周健民,沈仁芳.土壤学大辞典[M].北京:科学出版社,2013. Zhou Jianmin, Shen Renfang. Dictionary of Soil Science [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2013.
肖珊美.土壤检验技术[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2012. Xiao Shanmei. Soil Testing Technology [M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2012.
张晶玲,周丽丽,马仁明,等.天然降雨条件下横垄与顺垄坡面产流产沙过程[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(5):114-119. Zhang Jingling, Zhou Lili, Ma Renming, et al. Runoff and sediment yield process on longitudinal and cross ridge slopes under natural rainfall [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017,31(5):114-119.
张玉斌,郑粉莉.近地表土壤水分条件对坡面土壤侵蚀过程的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2007,5(2):5-10. Zhang Yubin, Zheng Fenli. Effects of near-surface soil water conditions on soil erosion process [J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2007,5(2):5-10.
Zhang Xiao ping, Zhang Lu, McVicar T R, et al. Modelling the impact of afforestation on average annual streamflow in the Loess Plateau, China [J]. Hydrological Processes, 2008,22(12):1996-2004.
吴光艳,成婧,祝振华,等.黄土高原南部人工林林冠对降雨特征的影响分析[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(4):32-35. Wu Guangyan, Cheng Jing, Zhu Zhenhua, et al. Rainfall characteristics under canopy of plantation forest in the southern Loess Plateau [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011,18(4):32-35.
Meng Xianmeng, Zhu Yan, Yin Maosheng, et al. The impact of land use and rainfall patterns on the soil loss of the hillslope [J]. Scientific Reports, 2021,11(1):16341.
Wei Wei, Chen Liding, Fu Bojie, et al. The effect of land uses and rainfall regimes on runoff and soil erosion in the semi-arid loess hilly area, China [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2007,335(3/4):247-258.
0
Views
32
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621