Quantitative Evaluation of Ecological Compensation Policy in Yellow River Basin Based on PMC Index Model

Cheng Mengzhi; Fang Yongheng

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.03.012

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Quantitative Evaluation of Ecological Compensation Policy in Yellow River Basin Based on PMC Index Model

- Quantitative Evaluation of Ecological Compensation Policy in Yellow River Basin Based on PMC Index Model
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 44, Issue 3, Pages: 104-112(2024)
- 作者机构：
  
  西安建筑科技大学公共管理学院,陕西,西安,710055
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.03.012
  CLC： X321
- Published：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Cheng Mengzhi, Fang Yongheng. Quantitative Evaluation of Ecological Compensation Policy in Yellow River Basin Based on PMC Index Model[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 44(3): 104-112.
DOI：

Cheng Mengzhi, Fang Yongheng. Quantitative Evaluation of Ecological Compensation Policy in Yellow River Basin Based on PMC Index Model[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 44(3): 104-112. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.03.012.

摘要

[目的] 生态补偿政策的有效推进对黄河流域生态环境保护和高质量发展发挥着重要作用。对黄河流域生态补偿政策进行梳理和科学评价，旨在促进生态补偿政策的进一步优化与完善。[方法] 基于黄河流域9省(区)2001—2022年颁布的170份生态补偿政策文本，利用ROSTCM软件和政策一致性(PMC)指数模型，构建生态补偿政策社会网络图谱和量化评价指标体系；选取9项生态补偿政策为研究对象，使用文本挖掘和内容分析方法，通过PMC指数测量、凹陷指数计算、PMC曲面绘制等量化评价所选政策各维度的情况。[结果] 评价的9项黄河流域生态补偿政策整体质量较高，6项评价结果为优秀，3项为良好；所选9项政策在政策性质、政策措施、政策评价、政策保障等方面得分较高，而在政策设计、政策目标、政策内容等方面得分偏低。[结论] 黄河流域生态补偿政策的设计和内容有待完善，且忽略了政策目标在生态治理中的重要作用；应从制定长短时期相结合的政策规划，探索多元化补偿方式，提升对“补偿标准”和“资金监管”的关注度等方面进一步优化。

Abstract

[Objective] The effective promotion of ecological compensation policies will play an important role in ecological and environmental protection and high-quality development of the Yellow River basin. The sorting and scientific evaluation of ecological compensation policies in the Yellow River basin were conducted to further optimize and improve ecological compensation policies. [Methods] Based on 170 ecological compensation policy texts promulgated by nine provinces (districts) in the Yellow River basin from 2001 to 2022

a social network graph and quantitative evaluation index system of ecological compensation policies were implemented using the data analysis software ROSTCM and the policy modeling consistency (PMC) index model. Nine ecological compensation policies served as research objects. Text mining and content analysis methods were used to evaluate each dimension of the selected policies through the PMC index measurement

the depression index calculation

and PMC surface drawing. [Results] The overall quality of the nine ecological compensation policies evaluated in the Yellow River basin proved to be higher. Six of the evaluation results were excellent

and three were good. All nine policies scored high in terms of policy nature

policy measures

policy evaluation

and policy guarantee

but scored lower in policy design

policy objectives

and policy content. [Conclusion] The design and content of ecological compensation policies in the Yellow River basin need to be improved

and the important role of policy objectives in ecological governance has been overlooked. Further optimization should be made in terms of formulating a policy plan that combines long and short periods

exploring diversified compensation methods

and increasing attention to both compensation standards and fund supervision.

关键词

Keywords

references

史歌.高质量发展背景下黄河流域生态补偿机制的建设思路[J].经济与管理评论,2023,39(2):49-58.Shi Ge. The construction idea of ecological compensation mechanism in the Yellow River basin under the background of high-quality development [J]. Review of Economy and Management, 2023,39(2):49-58.

张倩.黄河流域横向生态补偿的协同治理困境与实践路径[J].人民黄河,2023,45(8):54-58，67.Zhang Qian. Synergistic governance dilemma and practical approach of horizontal ecological compensation in the Yellow River basin [J]. Yellow River,2023,45(8):54-58，67.

王怀毅,李忠魁.流域生态补偿研究的演进与热点分析[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(3):304-311.Wang Huaiyi, Li Zhongkui. Evolution and hotspot analysis of ecological compensation research in watersheds [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,42(3):304-311.

贺辉.论黄河流域高质量发展之生态补偿机制优化[J].人民黄河,2022,44(8):13-16.He Hui. Research on the optimization of ecological compensation mechanism in the high-quality development of the Yellow River basin [J]. Yellow River, 2022,44(8):13-16.

梁静波.协同治理视阈下黄河流域绿色发展的困境与破解[J].青海社会科学,2020(4):36-41.Liang Jingbo. The dilemma and solution of the green development of the Yellow River basin from the perspective of collaborative governance [J]. Qinghai Social Sciences, 2020(4):36-41.

何慧爽,单蓓.基于机会成本的黄河流域上游地区生态补偿标准研究[J].华北水利水电大学学报(社会科学版),2021,37(4):15-21.He Huishuang, Shan Bei. Study on ecological compensation standard in the upper reaches of the Yellow River basin based on opportunity cost [J]. Journal of North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power (Social Science Edition), 2021,37(4):15-21.

焦士兴,刘家乐,王安周,等.基于水足迹的黄河流域生态补偿标准研究[J].水资源与水工程学报,2023,34(4):7-14.Jiao Shixing, Liu Jiale, Wang Anzhou, et al. Ecological compensation standards of the Yellow River basin based on water footprint [J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2023,34(4):7-14.

苏杨,苏燕,慕博.黄河流域生态补偿标准研究: 以宁夏隆德县为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(8):39-42.Su Yang, Su Yan, Mu Bo. The Yellow River basin ecological compensation standard：Taking Ningxia Longde as an example [J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2017,38(8):39-42.

张伊华.基于机会成本法和生态系统服务价值核算的水资源生态补偿标准研究: 以黄河流域为例[J].灌溉排水学报,2023,42(5):108-114.Zhang Yihua. Determining the ecological compensation standards for water resources in the Yellow River basin using opportunity cost and ecosystem service value accounting [J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2023,42(5):108-114.

王怀毅,李忠魁,俞燕琴.中国生态补偿: 理论与研究述评[J].生态经济,2022,38(3):164-170.Wang Huaiyi, Li Zhongkui, Yu Yanqin. Ecological compensation in China: A review of the theories and researches [J]. Ecological Economy, 2022,38(3):164-170.

倪琪,张思阳,刘霁瑶,等.公众参与跨区域流域生态补偿的行为研究[J].软科学,2022,36(5):109-114.Ni Qi, Zhang Siyang, Liu Jiyao, et al. Research on the behavior of public participation in transboundary watershed eco-compensation [J]. Soft Science, 2022,36(5):109-114.

陈艳萍,程亚雄.黄河流域上游企业参与生态补偿行为研究: 以甘肃段为例[J].软科学,2018,32(5):45-48.Chen Yanping, Cheng Yaxiong. Enterprises’ ecological compensation behavior of the Yellow River basin upstream： A case of Gansu section [J]. Soft Science, 2018,32(5):45-48.

张永安,周怡园.新能源汽车补贴政策工具挖掘及量化评价[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(10):188-197.Zhang Yongan, Zhou Yiyuan. Policy instrument mining and quantitative evaluation of new energy vehicles subsidies [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2017,27(10):188-197.

臧维,李甜甜,徐磊.北京市众创空间扶持政策工具挖掘及量化评价研究[J].软科学,2018,32(9):56-61.Zang Wei, Li Tiantian, Xu Lei. Policy instrument mining and quantitative evaluation of maker space supporting policy of Beijing [J]. Soft Science, 2018,32(9):56-61.

张少峰,张文英,周锦来.场景驱动视域下长三角科技创新政策量化评价及优化研究[J].南通大学学报(社会科学版),2023,39(4):45-59.Zhang Shaofeng, Zhang Wenying, Zhou Jinlai. Quantitative evaluation and optimization of science and technology innovation strategies in the Yangtze River Delta from a scenario-driven perspective [J]. Journal of Nantong University (Social Sciences Edition), 2023,39(4):45-59.

何林莹,马海群.地方公共数据政策量化评价研究: 基于PMC指数模型[J].现代情报,2023,43(8):14-26.He Linying, Ma Haiqun. Quantitative evaluation of local public data policy： Based on PMC index model [J]. Journal of Modern Information, 2023,43(8):14-26.

Estrada M A R. Policy modeling: Definition, classification and evaluation [J]. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2011,33(4):523-536.

张永安,耿喆.我国区域科技创新政策的量化评价: 基于PMC指数模型[J].科技管理研究, 2015,35(14):26-31.Zhang Yongan, Geng Zhe. The quantitative evaluation of regional science and technology innovation policy: Based on the index of PMC model [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2015,35(14):26-31.

Kuang Bing, Han Jing, Lu Xinhai, et al. Quantitative evaluation of China’s cultivated land protection policies based on the PMC-Index model [J]. Land Use Policy, 2020,99:105062.

陈绍军,吴晓晴,杜建辉.基于PMC指数模型的生态扶贫移民政策量化评价[J].人民长江,2022,53(8):216-222.Chen Shaojun, Wu Xiaoqing, Du Jianhui. Quantitative evaluation on ecological poverty alleviation immigration policies based on PMC index model [J]. Yangtze River, 2022,53(8):216-222.

高秀娟,彭春燕.我国人工智能政策特征与PMC指数模型量化评价研究[J].科技管理研究,2022,42(21):56-65.Gao Xiujuan, Peng Chunyan. Research on policy characteristics of artificial intelligence and PMC model evaluation in China [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2022,42(21):56-65.

张琳,李慧,吴春林.基于PMC指数模型的专业学位研究生教育政策文本量化评价[J].研究生教育研究,2023(3):75-84，97.Zhang Lin, Li Hui, Wu Chunlin. On the construction of first-class disciplines in universities with industrial characteristics from the perspective of joint governance： An exploratory study based on case studies [J]. Journal of Graduate Education, 2023(3):75-84，97.

杜荷花,周环.我国政府数据开放政策量化评价与优化:基于PMC指数模型的分析[J].图书馆建设,2023(3):70-81.Du Hehua, Zhou Huan. Quantitative evaluation and optimization of government data opening policy in China: Based on the analysis of PMC index model [J]. Library Development, 2023(3):70-81.

Li Youzhu, He Rui, Liu Jinsi, et al. Quantitative evaluation of China’s pork industry policy: A PMC index model approach [J]. Agriculture, 2021,11(2):86.

刘德政,丁志华.基于PMC指数模型的中国绿色金融政策量化分析[J].中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版),2024,26(1):139-152.Liu Dezheng, Ding Zhihua. Quantitative analysis of China’s green finance policies based on PMC index model [J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology (Social Sciences), 2024,26(1):139-152.

苏芳荔,李世豪.基于PMC指数模型的非物质文化遗产政策评价研究[J].情报科学,2023,41(11):151-161.Su Fangli, Li Shihao. Policy evaluation of intangible cultural heritage based on PMC index model [J]. Information Science,2023,41(11):151-161.

蔡冬松,柴艺琳,田志雄.基于PMC指数模型的吉林省数字经济政策文本量化评价[J].情报科学,2021,39(12):139-145.Cai Dongsong, Chai Yilin, Tian Zhixiong. Quantitative evaluation of Jilin Province digital economy policy based on PMC index model [J]. Information Science, 2021,39(12):139-145.

刘桂环,王夏晖,文一惠,等. 近20年我国生态补偿研究进展与实践模式[J].中国环境管理,2021,13(5):109-118.Liu Guihuan, Wang Xiahui, Wen Yihui, et al. Research progress, policy evolution and practice of ecological compensation in China in the past 20 years [J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 2021,13(5):109-118.

丁斐,庄贵阳,朱守先.“十四五” 时期我国生态补偿机制的政策需求与发展方向[J].江西社会科学,2021,41(3):59-69.Ding Fei, Zhuang Guiyang, Zhu Shouxian. Policy demand and development direction of ecological compensation mechanism in China during the 14th five-year plan period：Based on the perspective of ecosystem service value accounting [J]. Jiangxi Social Sciences, 2021,41(3):59-69.

宋昌素.生态产品价值实现:现实困境与路径机制[J].行政管理改革,2023(9):43-51.Song Changsu. The realization of ecological products value: Realistic challenges and path mechanism [J]. Administration Reform, 2023(9):43-51.

李国平,刘生胜.中国生态补偿40年:政策演进与理论逻辑[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2018,38(6):101-112.Li Guoping, Liu Shengsheng. 40 Years of ecological compensation in China: Policy evolution and theoretical logic [J]. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences), 2018,38(6):101-112.

Views

264

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Bidirectional Regulation of Water Quality and Quantity of Ecological Compensation Based on Cost Perspective

Measurement， difference source and spatial-temporal evolution of green transformation efficiency in resource-based cities of Yellow River basin

Driving factors and prediction of agricultural carbon emissions in nine provinces of Yellow River basin

Coupling and coordination of intensive land use and ecological civilization construction at cities in Yellow River basin

Spatiotemporal variation in NPP of cultivated land and its driving factors in Yellow River basin of Henan Province

Related Author

Wang Zhonghao

Luo Shaojiang

Wang Ni

Qiang Anfeng

Jiang Yuqi

Yang Yikang

Bai Huarui

Zhang Jianguo

Related Institution

Institute of Water Resources and Hydroelectric Engineering, Xian University of Technology, Xian

State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydrologic Engineering in Northwest Arid Region, Xian University of Technology, Xian

Hanjiang-to-Weihe River Valley Water Diversion Project Construction Co. Ltd., Shaanxi Province, Xian

School of Business， Shanxi Datong University

China Shaanxi Well-facilitated Farmland Construction Group Co.， Ltd

⁰