Xia Quansheng, Hong Xin, Gui Xiang, et al. A Study on Carbon Fixation Capacity and Its Influencing Factors Based on InVEST Model at Wuhu City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(5): 385-394.
DOI:
Xia Quansheng, Hong Xin, Gui Xiang, et al. A Study on Carbon Fixation Capacity and Its Influencing Factors Based on InVEST Model at Wuhu City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(5): 385-394. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230526.001.
A Study on Carbon Fixation Capacity and Its Influencing Factors Based on InVEST Model at Wuhu City
[Objective] The spatial and temporal distribution pattern of carbon storage at Wuhu City
Anhui Province from 2011 to 2021 were analyzed
and the influence of ecological environmental factors
topographic factors
meteorological factors
and land use degree on carbon sequestration capacity were determined in order to provide a reference for land resource management and green agricultural development at Wuhu City. [Methods] The carbon storage module of the InVEST model was used to quantitatively determine the spatial distribution of carbon storage
to explore the effects of land use degree
topography
meteorology
soil erosion
and other factors
and to calculate the hot spots of carbon storage based on correlation analysis superposition using land use data from 2011
2015
and 2021 at Wuhu City. [Results] ① Carbon storage at Wuhu City has declined by 4.15×105 t in recent years due to land use changes
with an annually decreasing trend. The carbon sequestration capacity of grassland was lower than that of cultivated land. The carbon storage capacity of cultivated land was 7.41×106 t
while that of forest land was 5 489.01 t/km2. ② Land use type
elevation
slope
and land use degree were the most important natural factors determining the spatial distribution of carbon stocks
which increased gradually step by step with altitude and slope. The overall distribution of carbon stocks was “lower in the north and higher in the south.” ③ Carbon storage and soil conservation were significantly and positively associated
mutually reinforcing
and synergistic among ecological and environmental variables; yet
there was a trade-off with soil erosion. ④ Carbon storage in the south showed a pattern of “high-high accumulation”
accounting for 18.77% of the total carbon accumulation
whereas carbon storage in the north showed a pattern of low-low accumulation
accounting for just 2.73% of the total carbon accumulation. The hotspots of carbon storage declined over time as a result of the effect of resource development and usage
with 11.95% of the area classified as excellent concentrated in the southern mountain forest. Certain areas were found to be vulnerable and will need to be conserved and optimized. [Conclusion] From 2011 to 2021
the total amount of carbon sequestration at Wuhu City decreased year by year
and the carbon sequestration rate showed a trend of weakening over time
while carbon sequestration capacity was relatively stable. Carbon sequestration capacity in the northern part of Wuhu City was relatively weak
and could be increased through land management optimization.
Zhao Gang, Bryan B A, King D, et al. Impact of agricultural management practices on soil organic carbon: Simulation of Australian wheat systems [J]. Global Change Biology, 2013,19(5):1585-1597.
Tang Huajun, Qiu Jianjun, van Ranst E, et al. Estimations of soil organic carbon storage in cropland of China based on DNDC model [J]. Geoderma, 2006,134(1/2):200-206.
Xu Shengxiang, Shi Xuezheng, Zhao Yongcun, et al. Carbon sequestration potential of recommended management practices for paddy soils of China,1980—2050[J]. Geoderma, 2011,166(1):206-213.
Yang Jie, Huang Xin. The 30 m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019[J]. Earth System Science Data, 2021,13(8):3907-3925.
Tallis H T, Ricketts T, Guerry A D, et al. InVEST 2.5.3 User's Guide [M]. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford, 2013.
Bai Yang, Zhuang Changwei, Ouyang Zhiyun, et al. Spatial characteristics between biodiversity and ecosystem services in a human-dominated watershed [J]. Ecological Complexity, 2011,8(2):177-183.