Li Keyi, Yu Guangling, Chen Mo, et al. Effects of Different Land Utilization Methods on Soil Aggregate Stability and Organic Carbon Content in Alpine Grassland[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(1): 332-340.
DOI:
Li Keyi, Yu Guangling, Chen Mo, et al. Effects of Different Land Utilization Methods on Soil Aggregate Stability and Organic Carbon Content in Alpine Grassland[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(1): 332-340. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230221.001.
Effects of Different Land Utilization Methods on Soil Aggregate Stability and Organic Carbon Content in Alpine Grassland
[Objective] The soil aggregate stability and differences in organic carbon distribution for Bayanbulak alpine grassland
Xinjiang Wei Autonomous Region under different land utilization methods were analyzed in order to provide a theoretical basis for the evaluation of soil aggregate organic carbon and other ecological functions in this region. [Methods] Three land utilization methods for an alpine grassland in Bayinbuluk were evaluated: reclamation
abandoning farming to grazing
and grazing. Soil aggregates were screened by dry screening and wet screening
mean weight diameter (MWD)
geometric mean diameter (GMD)
percentage of aggregate destruction (PDA)
and soil organic carbon (SOC) contents of soil aggregates were measured and calculated to quantify differences in soil aggregate stability and organic carbon in an alpine grassland under different land utilization methods. [Results] ① Under the three land utilization methods
soil aggregates in an alpine grassland were primarily large aggregates (≥0.25 mm). In the subsurface (10—20 cm) soil
the PDA for the treatment of abandoning farming to grazing was significantly lower than that of the grazing treatment (p<0.05)
and was not significantly different from the PDA for the reclamation treatment (p>0.05). In addition
the soil PDA values of the remaining soil layers in the treatment of abandoning farming to grazing were significantly greater than those observed for the reclamation treatment and the grazing treatment (p<0.05). In the surface layer (0—10 cm)
there was no significant difference in PDA between the reclamation treatment and the grazing treatment (p>0.05). The PDA values of the other soil layers in the reclamation treatment were significantly greater than in the grazing treatment. ② The SOC content
soil aggregate organic carbon content
and the contribution rate of soil aggregates in the treatment of abandoning farming to grazing were significantly less than those in the other treatments (p<0.05). In the 0—10 cm soil layer
organic carbon content and its contribution rate of aggregates with particle size greater than 5 mm in the grazing treatment were greater than those in the reclamation treatment (27.89 g/kg
6.34%) and the treatment of abandoning farming to grazing (36.96 g/kg
14.3%). In the subsurface layer (10—20 cm)
lower layer (20—30 cm)
and deep layer (30—40 cm)
the organic carbon content and contribution rate of soil aggregates with a particle size of ≥5 mm in the treatment of abandoning farming to grazing were significantly less than those in the reclamation treatment and the grazing treatment (p<0.05). ③ The mass percentage of soil aggregates and their stability were significantly correlated with SOC content (p<0.05). The mass percentage of soil aggregates ≥2 mm
MWD and GMD of soil aggregates were significantly positively correlated with SOC content (p<0.05)
of which soil aggregates ≥5 mm showed a very significant positive correlation (p<0.01) with SOC content. The mass percentage of soil aggregates less than 2 mm and the stability of soil aggregates were significantly negatively correlated with SOC content (p<0.05)
of which soil aggregates <1 mm were extremely significantly negatively correlated with SOC content (p<0.01). [Conclusion] Grassland reclamation activities reduced the stability of soil aggregates and their SOC contents. Soil aggregate stability and SOC content were the lowest in the treatment of abandoning farming to grazing. It is recommended that grassland should be moderately restored (fertilized
sown
etc.) after abandonment for grazing and utilization.
关键词
Keywords
references
Fang Jingyun, Guo Zhaodi, Piao Shilong, et al. Terrestrial vegetation carbon sinks in China,1981—2000[J]. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 2007,50(9):1341-1350.
Six J, Bossuyt H, Degryze S, et al. A history of research on the link between (micro) aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2004,79(1):7-31.
Mikha M M, Rice C W. Tillage and manure effects on soil and aggregate-associated carbon and nitrogen [J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,2004,68(3):809-816.
Tai J C, Pan G X. Change in Agricultural Soil Organic Carbon Fractions with Land Uses in Soil from Different Origins in Jianghan Plain [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012,26(6):153-157.
Tang Yiqun, Li Jun, Zhang Xiaohui, et al. Fractal characteristics and stability of soil aggregates in karst rocky desertification areas [J]. Natural Hazards, 2013,65(1):563-579.
Tang Xinyi, Liu Shuguang, Liu Juxiu, et al. Effects of vegetation restoration and slope positions on soil aggregation and soil carbon accumulation on heavily eroded tropical land of Southern China [J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2010,10(3):505-513.
Comparative Analysis of Soil Aggregates and Organic Carbon Distribution in Grassland and Cultivated Land -A Case Study in Siziwang Banner of Inner Mongolia
Precise measurement and caculation of carbon sink on check dams in Loess Plateau——A case study at Gaoxigou small watershed, Yulin City, Shaanxi Province
Effects of land use patterns on water infiltration in red soil region of southern China
Effects of hydrochar from sunflower straw on soil organic carbon and its mineralization characteristics
Characteristics and influencing factors of soil organic carbon at Picea crassifolia forests in middle part of Qilian Mountains
Related Author
Li Qingchun
Li Yuejin
Wang Danlan
Yu Yajing
Wang Ding
Huo Shaofeng
Zhao Mengfan
Wang Jian
Related Institution
Key Laboratory of Soil Quality and Nutrient Resources in Inner Mongolia
College of Grassland, Resources and Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University
College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling
College of Soil and Water Conservation Science and Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling
Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences