Spatial and Temporal Distribution Characteristics of Carbon Storage in Handan City Based on PLUS and InVEST Models

Zhang Peng; Li Liangtao; Su Yujiao; Wang Qingtao; Han Hongying; Han Hongwei; Li Xiaojing

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230111.001

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Spatial and Temporal Distribution Characteristics of Carbon Storage in Handan City Based on PLUS and InVEST Models

- Spatial and Temporal Distribution Characteristics of Carbon Storage in Handan City Based on PLUS and InVEST Models
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 43, Issue 3, Pages: 338-348(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 河北工程大学园林与生态工程学院,河北,邯郸,056000
  2. 邯郸市林业和草原科研中心,河北,邯郸,056000
  3. 邯郸市园林局,河北,邯郸,056000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230111.001
  CLC： X87;F124.5
- Published：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Zhang Peng, Li Liangtao, Su Yujiao, et al. Spatial and Temporal Distribution Characteristics of Carbon Storage in Handan City Based on PLUS and InVEST Models[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(3): 338-348.
DOI：

Zhang Peng, Li Liangtao, Su Yujiao, et al. Spatial and Temporal Distribution Characteristics of Carbon Storage in Handan City Based on PLUS and InVEST Models[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(3): 338-348. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230111.001.

摘要

[目的

]

分析河北省邯郸市近20 a土地利用格局及碳储量分布，并探讨生态保护政策下未来10 a的土地利用变化趋势，为增加城市碳汇和实现城市可持续发展提供参考依据。[方法

]

使用PLUS模型，选取自然、社会驱动因素及生态规划限制因子，分析邯郸市在2000—2020年及自然发展情景和生态保护情景下2030年的土地利用变化规律，并结合InVEST模型，评估邯郸市2000—2030年3期碳储量。[结果

]

①邯郸土地利用类型的分布呈现“西部林地，东中部耕地”的总体空间分布特征，耕地和人造地表之间的土地利用转移占总土地利用变化的96.58%； ②邯郸市碳密度空间分布呈现西部高东部低的特点，碳储量总体呈下降趋势，碳损失在2010年突增，耕地的过度侵占是导致邯郸市碳损失的最主要原因； ③与自然发展情景相比，生态保护情景下土地利用变化趋于克制，虽然生态用地的提升潜力一般，但由于人类活动受到限制，避免了生态资源的消耗； ④2020—2030年自然发展情景和生态保护情景下邯郸市碳储量变化分别为减少4.23×10

t和增加2.16×10

t。各区县碳损失风险显著降低，不同区县碳汇潜力差异明显。[结论

]

人造地表侵占耕地是导致碳损失的主要原因。生态保护政策干预下，各区县碳损失风险显著降低，不同区县也存在明显差异，碳损失更易发生于东中部平原地区，西南部的太行山东麓县区则具有较强的碳汇潜力，需针对差异化表现灵活布局。

Abstract

[Objective] The land use patterns and carbon storage distribution in Handan City

Hebei Province during the recent 20 years were analyzed

and the trends in land use changes under an ecological protection policy duirng the next 10 years were determined

in order to provide evidence for both increasing urban carbon sinks and realizing sustainable urban development.[Methods] Based on the PLUS model

natural and social driving factors were selected to analyze land use change patterns in Handan City in 2030 under the scenarios of natural development and ecological protection from 2000 to 2020. Carbon storage was also evaluated by the InVEST model in Handan City from 2000 to 2030.[Results] ① The spatial distribution of land use types in Handan City showed the characteristics of "woodland in the west and cultivated land in the east". The land use transfer between cultivated land and artificial habitats accounted for 96.58% of the total land use change. ② The spatial distribution of carbon density was characterized as "high in the west and low in the east" in Handan City. Carbon storage decreased over time. Excessive encroachment of cultivated land led to a dramatic increase in carbon loss in Handan City in 2010. Excessive encroachment of cultivated land was the main cause of carbon loss in Handan City. ③ Compared with the natural development scenario

land use change under an ecological protection scenario tended to be restrained. Although the potential for ecological land improvement was average

consumption of ecological resources was avoided due to limited human activities. ④ Under both the natural development and ecological protection scenarios

carbon storage from 2020 to 2030 in Handan City was simulated to decrease by 4.23×106 t and increase by 2.16×104 t

respectively. The risk of carbon loss was significantly reduced across the city

and the potential of carbon sinks in different areas of the city appeared to differ significantly.[Conclusion] The encroachment of cultivated land was the main cause of carbon loss over time. Implementation of ecological protection policies significantly reduced the risk of carbon loss in each district and county

and there are obvious differences among different districts and counties. Carbon loss was more likely to occur in the east-central plain region

while the districts and counties at the eastern foot of the Taihang Mountain in the southwest had strong carbon sink potential

therefore a flexible plan should be made according to location differences.

关键词

Keywords

references

Li Wei, Ciais P, Peng Shushi, et al. Land-use and land-cover change carbon emissions between 1901 and 2012 constrained by biomass observations[J]. Biogeosciences, 2017,14(22):5053-5067.

Feng Yongjiu. Modeling changes in China's 2000-2030 carbon stock caused by land use change[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020,252:119659.

Willcock S, Phillips O L, Platts P J, et al. Land cover change and carbon emissions over 100 years in an African biodiversity hotspot[J]. Global Change Biology, 2016,22(8):2787-2800.

Wang Zhuo, Zeng Jie, Chen Wanxu. Impact of urban expansion on carbon storage under multi-scenario simulations in Wuhan, China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022,29(30):45507-45526.

Yang Jianxin, Gong Jian, Tang Wenwu, et al. Patch-based cellular automata model of urban growth simulation:Integrating feedback between quantitative composition and spatial configuration[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2020,79:101402.

Liang Xun, Guan Qingfeng, Clarke C K, et al. Understanding the drivers of sustainable land expansion using a patch-generating land use simulation (PLUS) model:A case study in Wuhan, China[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2021,85:101569.

Bai Yang, Zheng Hua, Ouyang Zhiyun, et al. Modeling hydrological ecosystem services and tradeoffs:A case study in Baiyangdian watershed, China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2013,70(2):709-718.

Shi Mingjie, Wu Hongqi, Fan Xin, et al. Trade-offs and synergies of multiple ecosystem services for different land use scenarios in the Yili River valley, China[J]. Sustainability, 2021,13(3):1577.

Wang Ziyao, Li Xin, Mao Yueting, et al. Dynamic simulation of land use change and assessment of carbon storage based on climate change scenarios at the city level:A case study of Bortala, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022,134:108499.

Tian Lei, Tao Yu, Fu Wenxue, et al. Dynamic simulation of land use/cover change and assessment of forest ecosystem carbon storage under climate change scenarios in Guangdong Province, China[J]. Remote Sensing, 2022,14(10):2330.

Zhang Xiaomian, Wang Jun, Yue Chunlei, et al. Exploring the spatiotemporal changes in carbon storage under different development scenarios in Jiangsu Province, China[J]. PeerJ, 2022,10:e13411.

Xie Ling, Wang Hongwei, Liu Suhong. The ecosystem service values simulation and driving force analysis based on land use/land cover:A case study in inland rivers in arid areas of the Aksu River Basin, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022,138:108828.

朱文博,张静静,崔耀平,等.基于土地利用变化情景的生态系统碳储量评估:以太行山淇河流域为例[J].地理学报,2019,74(3):446-459.

赫晓慧,徐雅婷,范学峰,等.中原城市群区域碳储量的时空变化和预测研究[J].中国环境科学,2022,42(6):2965-2976.

彭建,汪安,刘焱序,等.城市生态用地需求测算研究进展与展望[J].地理学报,2015,70(2):333-346.

刘青柳.基于遥感的邯郸市土地利用/覆被变化及驱动力分析[D].河北邯郸:河北工程大学,2011.

Liu Qing, Yang Dongdong, Cao Lei, et al. Assessment and prediction of carbon storage based on land use/land cover dynamics in the tropics:A case study of Hainan Island, China[J]. Land, 2022,11(2):244.

李瑾璞,夏少霞,于秀波,等.基于InVEST模型的河北省陆地生态系统碳储量研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2020,36(7):854-861.

徐丽,何念鹏,于贵瑞.2010s中国陆地生态系统碳密度数据集[J].中国科学数据,2019,4(1):90-96.

邢鹏飞,李刚,赵祥,等.山西暖性草地碳密度分布特征及其区域差异[J].草地学报,2019,27(6):1667-1676.

岑宇,王成栋,张震,等.河北省天然草地生物量和碳密度空间分布格局[J].植物生态学报,2018,42(3):265-276.

张妍,谷志云,裴瑞亮,等.河南商丘地区土壤有机碳密度及其空间分布特征[J].矿产勘查,2021,12(10):2153-2160.

张滨,张丽娜,刘秀萍,等.河北省北部森林植被碳储量和固碳速率研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2016,24(3):392-402.

李豪杰.基于高密度剖面的河南省土壤有机碳储量精确估算[D].河南郑州:郑州大学,2016.

王海稳.太行山区不同土地利用方式下生态系统碳贮量研究[D].河北保定:河北农业大学,2007.

Li Jingye, Gong Jian, Guldmann J M, et al. Carbon dynamics in the Northeastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau from 1990 to 2030 using landsat land use/cover change data[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020,12(3):528.

陆汝成,黄贤金,左天惠,等.基于CLUE-S和Markov复合模型的土地利用情景模拟研究:以江苏省环太湖地区为例[J].地理科学,2009,29(4):577-581.

Popp A, Calvin K, Fujimori S, et al. Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2017,42:331-345.

吕笑飞.石家庄市城镇建设用地扩张模拟研究[D].河北石家庄:河北地质大学,2022.

Zhai Han, Lv Chaoqun, Liu Wanzeng, et al. Understanding spatio-temporal patterns of land use/land cover change under urbanization in Wuhan, China,2000-2019[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021,13(16):3331.

罗芳,潘安,陈忠升,等.四川省宜宾市1980-2018年耕地时空格局变化及其驱动因素[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(6):336-344.

Zhou Junju, Zhao Yaru, Huang Peng, et al. Impacts of ecological restoration projects on the ecosystem carbon storage of inland river basin in arid area, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020,118:106803.

Liu Xiaoping, Wang Shaojian, Wu Peijun, et al. Impacts of urban expansion on terrestrial carbon storage in China[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019,53(12):6834-6844.

Rimal B, Sharma R, Kunwar R, et al. Effects of land use and land cover change on ecosystem services in the Koshi River Basin, Eastern Nepal[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2019,38:100963.

Views

568

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Soil Erodibility K Value in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

Scenario Simulation and Prediction of Land Use Patterns in Guilin City Considering Impact of Scenic Spot Expansion

Spatiotemporal evolution of productive-living-ecological space at county level of Qinling-Daba Mountains area under background of urban-rural integration

Soil erosion characteristics and assessment of their differences in typical regions of Fujian Province in 2024 based on CSLE model

Carbon storage and carbon sequestration potential of new afforestation areas in hilly region of Loess Plateau——A case study of Youyu County， Shanxi Province

Related Author

LIU Bin-tao

TAO He-ping

SHI Zhan

SONG Chun-feng

GUO Bing

Wu Zhenhua

Yu Qinping

Wang Yabei

Related Institution

Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences

University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

Business School, Guilin University of Electronic Technology

Beijing Pengsheng Construction Engineering Co., Ltd

School of Public Administration， Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology

⁰