Welfare Effect of Farmers' Participation in Soil Conservation: Concept, Connotation and Evaluation Index Framework

Wang Min; Wei Jie; Tang Qiang; He Xiubin; Li Jinlin

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.031

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Welfare Effect of Farmers' Participation in Soil Conservation: Concept, Connotation and Evaluation Index Framework

- Welfare Effect of Farmers' Participation in Soil Conservation: Concept, Connotation and Evaluation Index Framework
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 43, Issue 6, Pages: 256-262(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 重庆师范大学三峡库区地表生态过程重庆市野外科学观测研究站,重庆,401331
  2. 西南大学地理科学学院重庆金佛山喀斯特生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站,重庆,400715
  3. 中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所山地表生过程与生态调控重点实验室,四川,成都,610299
  4. 中国科学院重庆绿色智能技术研究院,重庆,400714
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.031
  CLC： S157.2
- Published：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Wang Min, Wei Jie, Tang Qiang, et al. Welfare Effect of Farmers' Participation in Soil Conservation: Concept, Connotation and Evaluation Index Framework[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(6): 256-262.
DOI：

Wang Min, Wei Jie, Tang Qiang, et al. Welfare Effect of Farmers' Participation in Soil Conservation: Concept, Connotation and Evaluation Index Framework[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(6): 256-262. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.031.

摘要

[目的] 系统梳理农户参与水土保持的福利效应概念、内涵与评价指标框架，为水土保持福利效应的综合评价提供依据。[方法] 结合已有研究报道、相关标准等，阐释水土保持福利效应的概念与内涵，厘清水土保持效益与水土保持福利效应的逻辑关系，梳理水土保持福利效应的评价尺度并提出福利效应评价指标框架。[结果] 水土保持福利效应具有评价客体明确、价值可货币化、与参与程度高度相关、个体差异和群体一致等内涵特征。水土保持福利效应评价是对水土保持效益评估的深化和拓展，二者是被包含与包含的关系。水土保持福利效应评价应立足于水土保持效益综合评价，其指标框架包含经济福利、社会福利和生态福利等多个要素。[结论] 当前人们对农户参与水土保持的福利效应关注不够。水土保持福利效应的评价着眼于政策性水土保持工程，其评价指标和方法未形成统一认识，还需进一步研究水土保持福利效应的理论及方法体系，以便为新时代水土保持建设提供决策支持。

Abstract

[Objective] A concept

connotation and evaluation index framework of welfare effect of farmers' participation in soil conservation practices was systematically reviewed

which could provide a scientifical basis for comprehensive evaluation of the welfare effect of soil conservation. [Methods] By assembling existing publications and relevant standard documents

the concept and connotation of welfare effect of soil conservation were formulated

and the logical relationship between soil conservation benefits and soil conservation welfare effect. Furthermore

the evaluation scale of the welfare effect of soil conservation was sorted out

and an evaluation index framework for the welfare effect was proposed. [Results] The welfare effect of soil conservation had intrinsic characteristics of clear evaluation objects

monetizable value

high correlation with participation degree

individual difference

and group consistency. It is also considered to be deepened and expanded understandings of the benefits of soil conservation

and this relationship is inter-contained and inter-included. Evaluation of the soil conservation welfare effect should be based on a comprehensive evaluation of soil conservation benefits

and its index framework should include multiple elements such as economic welfare

social welfare

and ecological welfare. [Conclusion] The welfare effect of farmers' participation in soil and water conservation has not yet gained enough attention currently. The evaluation of the welfare effect of soil and water conservation only focuses on policy-based soil and water conservation projects

and its evaluation indicators and methods have not formed a unified understanding. It is necessary to further study the theory and methodology of the welfare effect of soil and water conservation

thereby providing references for decision-making in the construction of soil and water conservation in the new era.

关键词

Keywords

references

余新晓,贾国栋.统筹山水林田湖草系统治理带动水土保持新发展[J].中国水土保持,2019(1):5-8.

余新晓.议"民生水土保持"[J].中国水土保持科学,2013,11(4):116-122.

洪兰,韦杰,李进林.三峡库区农户水土保持行为类型及其机理[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(5):163-168.

张旭锐,高建中.农户新一轮退耕还林的福利效应研究:基于陕南退耕还林区的实证分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2021,35(2):14-20.

蔡旭东,周怡雯,刘窑军,等.南方红壤区坡耕地不同耕作措施综合生态效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(5):281-287.

庹玉莲,杨庆媛,陈国建,等.小流域综合治理对农村家庭经济的影响研究:以永川区狮子村为例[J].重庆大学学报,2012,35(S1):62-66.

王昕,曹梦,李帅.基于PSM的自发合作供给小型水利设施对农户福利影响研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2019,40(8):201-208.

蔡荣,汪紫钰,刘婷.节水灌溉技术采用及其增产效应评估:以延津县318户胡萝卜种植户为例[J].中国农业大学学报,2018,23(12):166-175.

王一鸣,高鹏,穆兴民,等.南方红壤丘陵区小流域水土保持综合效益评价:以江西阳坑小流域为例[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(5):6-13.

Fumagalli R.Theories of well-being and well-being policy:a view from methodology [J].Journal of Economic Methodology, 2021,28(1):124-133.

Karabchuk T S, Sal'nikova D V.Objective and subjective welfare [J].Russian Social Science Review, 2018,59(5):385-403.

Katchova A L.A comparison of the economic well-being of farm and nonfarm households [J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2008,90(3):733-747.

杨均华,刘璨.精准扶贫背景下农户脱贫的决定因素与反贫困策略[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2019,36(7):3-21.

胡初枝,黄贤金,张力军.农户农地流转的福利经济效果分析:基于农户调查的分析[J].经济问题探索,2008(1):184-186.

杨蒙,王飞,王蕾钦,等.近15年黄土丘陵区退耕农户特征变化研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(6):44-50.

Luo Han, Hu Xiaoning, Xie Yongsheng, et al.Constructions of an evaluation framework for soil and water conservation techniques [J].Catena, 2020,186:104378.

Liu Li, Shangguan Dingyi, Li Xiaofang, et al.Influence of peasant household differentiation and risk perception on soil and water conservation tillage technology adoption-an analysis of moderating effects based on government subsidies [J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020,288:125092.

Jiru E B, Wegari H T.Soil and water conservation practice effects on soil physicochemical properties and crop yield in Ethiopia:review and synthesis [J].Ecological Processes, 2022,11(1):1-16.

蒋碧瑶,史兴民,秦语晗.水土保持增加了沙漠-黄土过渡带农户福祉吗?:基于PSM的实证研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2023,37(4):37-44.

臧漫丹,诸大建,刘国平.生态福利绩效:概念、内涵及G20实证[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(5):118-124.

中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.水土保持综合治理效益计算方法:GB/T15774-2008[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.

叶延琼,张信宝,冯明义,等.水土保持效益分析与社会进步[J].水土保持学报,2003(2):71-73,113.

陈发虎,傅伯杰,夏军,等.近70年来中国自然地理与生存环境基础研究的重要进展与展望[J].中国科学(地球科学),2019,49(11):1689-1696.

黄丹晨,吴海涛,亢庆,等.农户对水土保持措施满意度的影响因素分析[J].统计与决策,2013(23):97-99.

张前东,史春彦,张晓平,等.长清区农业干旱灾害风险评价与区划[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(S2):341-344.

张家熊,柳笑,汪成成,等.基于空间异质性的秦岭水源涵养能力评价指标体系构建[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(6):290-297.

刘国彬,上官周平,姚文艺,等.黄土高原生态工程的生态成效[J].中国科学院院刊,2017,32(1):11-19.

刘应元.现代农业产业发展的生态福利感知及评价指标体系构建[J].社会科学家,2015(6):58-62.

邱孝枰,方一平,杨雪婷,等.中国农民福利的研究进展与展望[J].山地学报,2022,40(3):434-449.

洪兰,韦杰,李进林,等.三峡库区水土保持工程农户参与行为调查[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(2):244-249.

李国平,石涵予.比较视角下退耕还林补偿的农村经济福利效应:基于陕西省79个退耕还林县的实证研究[J].经济地理,2017,37(7):146-155.

Views

515

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Evaluation of Ecological Functions in Returning Farmland to Afforestation Project Area in Datong County of Qinghai Province

Comprehensive Evaluation on Eco-environmental Quality of Wuqi County, Shaanxi Province

Degradation and Evaluaton Indexes of Eroded Red Soil Fertility

Research on Ecological Recovery Evaluation along the Highway from Mian County to Ningqiang County

Study of Scale Dependence of Sediment Yield Reduction by Soil Conservation Practices

Related Author

ZHOU Xin-cheng

ZHAO Wan-qi

LI Fu-yuan

LI Wen-zhong

LI Shi-rong

ZHU Qing-ke

QIN Wei

FANG Bin

Related Institution

Forestry and Tourism Bureau of Datong County,Datong County

College of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University

Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Deserti fication Combating of the Ministry of Education,Beijing Forestry University

Shanghai Institute of Technology

College of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang University

⁰