Ecological Value of Multi-scale Cultivated Land Protection and Compensation Standards in Watersheds

Wang Panpan; Gao Jia

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.023

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Ecological Value of Multi-scale Cultivated Land Protection and Compensation Standards in Watersheds

- Ecological Value of Multi-scale Cultivated Land Protection and Compensation Standards in Watersheds
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 43, Issue 6, Pages: 185-192(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 沈阳建筑大学管理学院,辽宁,沈阳,110168
  2. 东北大学土地管理研究所,辽宁,沈阳,110167
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.023
  CLC： F301.21
- Published：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Wang Panpan, Gao Jia. Ecological Value of Multi-scale Cultivated Land Protection and Compensation Standards in Watersheds[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(6): 185-192.
DOI：

Wang Panpan, Gao Jia. Ecological Value of Multi-scale Cultivated Land Protection and Compensation Standards in Watersheds[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(6): 185-192. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.023.

摘要

[目的

]

测算并分析流域多尺度耕地生态价值及补偿标准，为完善耕地保护补偿机制及促进区域协调发展提供科学参考。[方法

]

以吉林省辽河流域为例，运用当量子法、市场替代法、景观格局指数等，综合考虑耕地数量及空间配置情况、耕地质量差异及耕地生态负外部性，建立流域多尺度耕地生态价值核算体系，在此基础上，制定耕地生态补偿标准。[结果

]

①吉林省辽河流域耕地具有非常重要的生态服务价值，且其价值具有显著的空间差异特征及尺度依赖效应。②2020年，辽河流域耕地生态价值为20 502.78元/hm

，各区县耕地生态价值取值在4 261.97～16 873.59元/hm

。不同区域分布不均衡，整体西北地区高于东南地区。③流域耕地生态补偿标准为4 319.36元/hm

，各区县的补偿标准在814.68～3 471.85元/hm

，差异较大。[结论

]

针对不同空间尺度，应结合耕地生态价值及地区实际，建立差别化的耕地保护生态补偿标准及方案。

Abstract

[Objective] The ecological value of cultivated land and compensation standards at multiple scales in a watershed was measured and analyzed in order to provide scientific reference for improving the compensation mechanism for cultivated land protection and promoting coordinated regional development. [Methods] The Liaohe River basin in Jilin Province was taking as an example

and used the equivalent sub-method

the market substitution method

and a landscape pattern index were used to establish a multi-scale cultivated land ecological value accounting system for the basin. The quantity and spatial allocation of cultivated land

differences in cultivated land quality

and the negative ecological externality of cultivated land were taken into account. On this basis

the cultivated land ecological compensation standard was formulated. [Results] ① Cultivated land had very important ecological values in the Liaohe River basin of Jilin Province

and the ecological values had significant spatial differences and scale-dependent effects. ② In 2020

the ecological value of cultivated land in the watershed was 20 502.78 yuan/ha

and the ecological value of cultivated land in each district and county had values between 4 261.97 and 16 873.59 yuan/ha

with values in the northwest region being higher than in the southeast region. ③ The compensation standard for cultivated land protection in the watershed was 4 319.36 yuan/ha

and the compensation standard of each district and county ranged from 814.68 to 3 471.85 yuan/ha. [Conclusion] For different spatial scales

differentiated ecological compensation standards and programs for cultivated land protection should be established

taking into account the ecological value of cultivated land and regional realities.

关键词

Keywords

references

张俊峰,梅岭,张雄,等.长江经济带耕地保护生态价值的时空特征与差别化补偿机制[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2022,32(9):173-183.

张玉周,马彦瑞.我国粮食核心区耕地生态补偿效率测度及影响因素分析[J].地域研究与开发,2022,41(6):153-158.

Wells G J, Stuart N, Furley P A, et al.Ecosystem service analysis in marginal agricultural lands:a case study in Belize [J].Ecosystem Services, 2018,32:70-77.

Wang Kunpeng, Ou Minghao, Wolde Z.Regional differences in ecological compensation for cultivated land protection:an analysis of Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China [J].International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020,17(21):8242.

刘利花,杨彬如.中国省域耕地生态补偿研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(2):52-62.

吴宇哲,钱恬楠,郭珍.休养生息制度背景下耕地保护生态补偿机制研究[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,53(3):27-31,127.

欧名豪,王坤鹏,郭杰.耕地保护生态补偿机制研究进展[J].农业现代化研究,2019,40(3):357-365.

谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(5):911-919.

李晓燕.基于生态价值量和支付能力的耕地生态补偿标准研究:以河南省为例[J].生态经济,2017,33(2):151-155,161.

Costanza R, De Groot R, Sutton P, et al.Changes in the global value of ecosystem services [J].Global Environmental Change, 2014,26:152-158.

崔宁波,生世玉.基于公平视角的耕地生态补偿标准量化研究[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(1):138-143.

胡蓉,邱道持,谢德体,等.我国耕地资源的资产价值核算研究[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,35(11):127-132.

覃洁,秦成,周慧杰,等.基于生态承载力供需与生态服务价值的广西耕地生态补偿研究[J].江西农业学报,2016,28(3):77-81,86.

唐秀美,潘瑜春,刘玉.北京市耕地生态价值评估与时空变化分析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(3):132-140.

崔宁波,生世玉,方袁意如.粮食安全视角下省际耕地生态补偿的标准量化与机制构建[J].中国农业大学学报,2021,26(11):232-243.

许恒周,曲福田,郭忠兴.市场失灵、非市场价值与农地非农化过度性损失:基于中国不同区域的实证研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2011,20(1):68-72.

刘祥鑫,蒲春玲,刘志有,等.区域耕地生态价值补偿量化研究:以新疆为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(5):84-90.

唐秀美,陈百明,刘玉,等.耕地生态价值评估研究进展分析[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(9):256-265.

望晓东,魏玲.耕地生态价值支付意愿的影响因素实证研究:基于武汉市的实地调查[J].生态经济,2015,31(8):121-124.

葛颖,徐崇森,李坦.农户视角下耕地生态服务保护补偿意愿研究[J].云南农业大学学报(社会科学),2020,14(5):104-111.

Yang Xin, Zhang Anlu, Zhang Fan.Farmers' heterogeneous willingness to pay for farmland non-market goods and services on the basis of a mixed logit model:a case study of Wuhan, China [J].International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019,16(20):3876.

张俊峰,贺三维,张光宏,等.流域耕地生态盈亏、空间外溢与财政转移:基于长江经济带的实证分析[J].农业经济问题,2020(12):120-132.

刘利花,张丙昕,刘向华.粮食安全与生态安全双视角下中国省域耕地保护补偿研究[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(19):252-263.

Zhang Junfeng, Zhang Anlu, Song Ming.Ecological benefit spillover and ecological financial transfer of cultivated land protection in river basins:a case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China [J].Sustainability, 2020,12(17):7085.

党昱譞,孔祥斌,温良友,等.中国耕地生态保护补偿的省级差序分区及补偿标准[J].农业工程学报,2022,38(6):254-263.

张宇,张安录.基于生态安全视角的耕地生态补偿财政转移支付研究:以湖北省为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2021,42(11):220-232.

阮熹晟,李坦,张藕香,等.基于生态服务价值的长江经济带耕地生态补偿量化研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2021,42(1):68-76.

钱凤魁,于洋,孙福军,等.不同地貌区县域耕地质量与耕地景观格局关联性特征分析[J].土壤通报,2020,51(6):1282-1289.

张显源,蔡忠亮,李桂娥,等.耕地景观破碎化成因及对农村收入影响分析[J].测绘科学,2020,45(4):134-141.

蔡汉,朱权,罗云建,等.快速城镇化地区耕地景观生态安全格局演变特征及其驱动机制[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2020,44(5):181-188.

朱文娟,李建兵,高阳,等.基于经济-社会-生态价值的耕地价值量核算研究:以Y市为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2022,31(9):2086-2095.

崔宁波,生世玉.粮食安全视角下的东北黑土区耕地生态补偿研究[J].浙江农业学报,2021,33(9):1759-1769.

吴兆娟,丁声源,魏朝富,等.丘陵山区地块尺度耕地生态价值测算与提升[J].农机化研究,2013,35(11):1-8.

Views

550

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Difference Between Ecological Supply and Demand of Cultivated Land Based on Productive-Living-Ecological Functions—A Case Study at Liaohe River Basin in Jilin Province

Spatiotemporal variation characteristics of different grade precipitation in Jilin Province from 1960 to 2024

A study on eco-environmental dynamics, causes, and zoning over Liaohe River basin based on remote sensing ecological index (RSEI)

Assessment on Sensitivity of Soil Erosion in Jilin Province

Effects of Soil and Water Conservation Measures on Soil Properties in the Low Mountain and Hill Area of Jinl in Province

Related Author

Wang Yue

Zhao Yifan

Hu Rui

Ji Lingling

Ma Liangchen

Wang Ning

Song Shuang

Niu Tianyi

Related Institution

Institute of Meteorological Science of Jilin Province

Meteorological Observatory of Jilin Province

Meteorological Service Center of Jilin Province

College of Environment and Resources, Dalian Minzu University

The Environmental Monitoring Center in Jilin Province

⁰