Farmers' and Herdsmen' Sustainable Livelihood Capital and Livelihood Strategy in Enclosed Reserves of Desertified Land—Taking Four Enclosed Reserves in Gansu Province as an Example

Zhang Yishan; Luo Yongzhong; Gui Jie

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.021

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Farmers' and Herdsmen' Sustainable Livelihood Capital and Livelihood Strategy in Enclosed Reserves of Desertified Land—Taking Four Enclosed Reserves in Gansu Province as an Example

- Farmers' and Herdsmen' Sustainable Livelihood Capital and Livelihood Strategy in Enclosed Reserves of Desertified Land—Taking Four Enclosed Reserves in Gansu Province as an Example
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 43, Issue 6, Pages: 165-173(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 甘肃农业大学林学院,甘肃,兰州,730070
  2. 通山县林业局,湖北,咸宁,437000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.021
  CLC： F323.8;F323.212
- Published：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Zhang Yishan, Luo Yongzhong, Gui Jie. Farmers' and Herdsmen' Sustainable Livelihood Capital and Livelihood Strategy in Enclosed Reserves of Desertified Land—Taking Four Enclosed Reserves in Gansu Province as an Example[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(6): 165-173.
DOI：

Zhang Yishan, Luo Yongzhong, Gui Jie. Farmers' and Herdsmen' Sustainable Livelihood Capital and Livelihood Strategy in Enclosed Reserves of Desertified Land—Taking Four Enclosed Reserves in Gansu Province as an Example[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(6): 165-173. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.021.

摘要

[目的] 探讨农牧户生计资本与生计策略之间的关系，并对农牧户生计资本的空间分异和生计策略之间的转化进行分析，为降低农牧户的生计脆弱性，最终实现可持续发展提供理论依据。[方法] 从可持续生计分析理论框架出发，通过入户问卷调查，结合Logistic回归模型和单因素方差分析对甘肃省2017年批准建立的玛曲、民勤、山丹县和凉州区国家级沙化土地封禁保护区农牧户的生计资本和生计策略转变的关键因素进行分析。[结果] 沙化土地封禁保护区农牧户生计资本中金融资本最为丰富，自然资本最为缺乏，非农型农牧户拥有的生计资本整体优于纯农型。耕地（草地）面积、耕地（草地）质量以及生产工具显著正向影响纯农型生计策略的选择，家庭劳动力数量、受教育水平以及家庭总收入显著负向影响纯农型生计策略的选择。[结论] 应加大封禁保护区的生态环境保护宣传力度，加强农牧户的生态保护意识，加快推进农业机械化发展，鼓励剩余劳动力向非农行业转型，实现生计方式多样化。

Abstract

[Objective] The relationship between farming and herding households' livelihood capital and livelihood strategies was studied

and the spatial differences of farming and herding households' livelihood capital and the transformation between livelihood strategies were analyzed in order to provide a theoretical basis for reducing farming and herding households' livelihood vulnerability and ultimately achieving sustainable development. [Methods] Starting from the theoretical framework of sustainable livelihood analysis

a household questionnaire survey was used to analyze the key factors of livelihood capital and livelihood strategy transformation for farming and herding households in the national sandy land enclosed reserves in Maqu

Minqin

Shandan County

and Liangzhou District in Gansu Province

which were approved to be established in 2017

by combining a Logistic regression model and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). [Results] Financial capital was the most abundant form of livelihood capital

while natural capital was the least abundant form of livelihood capital for the farmers and herdsmen in the enclosed reserves of desertified land. There were significant differences in the distribution of livelihood capital among farmers and herdsmen with different livelihood strategies

and the livelihood capital of non-agricultural farmers and herdsmen was better than that of purely farming households. Cultivated (or grassland) area

cultivated (or grassland) quality

and production tools had significant positive effects on the choice of purely farming households. The size of the family labor force

the education level and the total household income had a significant negative impact on the choice of purely farming livelihood strategy. [Conclusion] The following countermesures should be promoted in the future. Those are increasing the publicity of ecological environmental protection in enclosed protected areas

strengthening the awareness of ecological protection among farmers and herdsmen

accelerating the development of agricultural mechanization

and encouraging the transformation of the remaining labor force to non-agricultural industries

thereby achieving diversification of livelihoods.

关键词

Keywords

references

韦惠兰,谭柳香.沙化土地封禁保护行为动因的经济分析:以甘肃省干旱区为例[J].生态经济,2016,32(1):197-200.

韦惠兰,周夏伟.基于CVM视角的沙化土地封禁保护补偿标准研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2018,32(8):30-37.

刘思源.陕北农牧交错带沙地农业利用规模的水资源调控研究[D].陕西西安:西安理工大学,2021.

池虹,罗永忠.封禁对沙化土地居民生计及活动影响研究[J].干旱区地理,2020,43(6):1657-1666.

韦惠兰,周夏伟.封禁保护区农户对沙化土地治理的认知度及影响因素实证分析:基于甘肃省659个农户调查数据的对比研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(7):33-37.

田海静,孙涛,刘旭升,等.基于时间序列遥感数据的嵯岗国家沙化土地封禁保护成效评估[J].中国沙漠,2019,39(3):155-162.

韦惠兰,祁应军.农户生计资本与生计策略关系的实证分析:以河西走廊沙化土地封禁保护区外围为例[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(2):540-548.

山琦.半农半牧区农牧户生计可持续性评价研究[D].内蒙古呼和浩特:内蒙古财经大学,2022.

Yin Ke, Xiao Yi.Impact of farmers' livelihood capital differences on their livelihood strategies in Three Gorges Reservoir area [J].Journal of Coastal Research, 2020,103(S1):258-262.

黎春梅,何格.SLA框架下生计资本影响山区农户分化的机理与实证研究:以广西山区农户为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2021,42(11):144-156.

Xu Dingde, Deng Xin, Guo Shili, et al.Sensitivity of livelihood strategy to livelihood capital:an empirical investigation using nationally representative survey data from rural China [J].Social Indicators Research, 2019,144(1):113-131.

时保国,张茜,赵钱,等.城市民族社区居民的生计资本与生计策略研究:以北京市门头社区为例[J].中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,49(4):96-107.

刘精慧,薛东前.陕北黄陵县农户生计资本评价及其生计策略研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2019,40(6):156-163.

郭婉婉.南疆四地州农户生计资本与生计策略关系研究[D].新疆乌鲁木齐:新疆财经大学,2019.

Xu Yuangang, Shi Guoqing, Dong Yingping.Effects of the post-relocation support policy on livelihood capital of the reservoir resettlers and its implications:a study in Wujiang sub-stream of Yangtze River of China [J].Sustainability, 2022,14(5):2488.

Berhanu G, Solomon M W, et al.The interrelationships of sustainable livelihood capital assets deprivations and asset based social policy interventions:the case of Addis Ababa informal settlement areas, Ethiopia [J].Research in Globalization, 2022,4:100081.

方世巧,熊静,刘佳林.边境地区旅游脱贫户可持续生计资本评价及路径选择:基于广西那坡县352户旅游脱贫户的实证研究[J].资源开发与市场,2022,38(9):1145-1152.

吴嘉莘,熊吉安,杨红娟.民族地区农户异质性对生计资本结构的影响研究:以云南沧源县为例[J].云南社会科学,2022(3):63-73.

李治,孙悦,李国平,等.陕北黄土高原贫困农户生计策略对生计资本的敏感性:以佳县为例[J].生态学报,2022,42(19):7818-7829.

杨新宇.沙化土地封禁保护区农户生计资本与生计策略的关系研究:以甘肃河西走廊6个县为例[D].甘肃兰州:兰州大学,2018.

袁俐雯,张俊飚,何可,等.生计资本、多样化非农生计策略与农户清洁能源消费意愿:以生物天然气为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2022,31(1):244-257.

Wan Jiangjun, Deng Wei, Song Xxueqian, et al.Spatio-temporal impact of rural livelihood capital on labor migration in Panxi, southwestern mountainous region of China [J].Chinese Geographical Science, 2018,28(1):153-166.

张凯莉,冯荣荣,刘潭,等.黄河流域城市化与生态系统服务价值协调性及障碍因素研究[J].干旱区地理,2022,45(4):1254-1267.

刘璐璐,李锋瑞.黄土高原退耕农户生计资本对生计策略的影响:以甘肃会宁县为例[J].中国沙漠,2020,40(1):233-244.

刘倩,张戬,何艳冰,等.秦巴山特困区农户生计资本及生计策略研究:以商洛市为例[J].干旱区地理,2020,43(1):237-247.

吴廷美,吴渊,王多斌,等.三江源区牧户生计资本对其生计策略的影响研究[J].草业学报,2019,28(11):12-21.

崔秀娟,杨婕妤,杜月红,等.农牧交错区农牧民生计策略选择及影响因素:以天祝藏族自治县为例[J].草业科学,2022,39(4):829-840.

蒋振,靳乐山.牧户生计资本对其草原畜牧兼业化的影响研究:以四川省红原县和若尔盖县为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2021,35(8):35-41.

赵雪雁,李巍,杨培涛,等.生计资本对甘南高原农牧民生计活动的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(4):111-118.

Mcdonald M, Brown K.Soil and water conservation projects and rural livelihoods:options for design and research to enhance adoption and adaptation [J].Land Degradation & Development, 2015,11(4):343-361.

Views

461

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Livelihood Capital and Livelihood Strategies of Residents in Nature Reserve

Behaviors and Decision-making Model ofregional Par-ttime Farmers on Soil and Water Conservation

Analysis of Farmer's Technology Adoption Behavior in Different Environments of Agr-i technique Diffusion －A Case Study of Water-saving Irrigation Technology in the Arid and Semiarid Area of Northwest China

Evaluation Method of Debris-flow Susceptibility Using GIS and Logistic Model

Influences of Converting Farmland to Forestland Program on Livelihood Sustainability of Rural Households -A Case Study of Laishui County of Baoding City, Hebei Province

Related Author

YANG Binru

MA Qifang

HUANG Xianjin

ZHONG Taiyang

LI Shukui

LI Tongsheng

LI Jiayi

LIU Yan-guo

Related Institution

Gansu Institute of Political Science and Law

Department of Urban and Resources Sciences, Nanjing University

College of Land Resource and Envir onment, Jiangxi Agicultural University

Department of Urban and Resources Science, Northwest University

College of Environmental and Resource, SWUST

⁰