Spatiotemporal Variability in Ecological Vulnerability of Songnen Plain from 1980 to 2020

Song Chunwei; Xiang Hengxing; Chen Meihong; Du Huishi

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.042

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Spatiotemporal Variability in Ecological Vulnerability of Songnen Plain from 1980 to 2020

- Spatiotemporal Variability in Ecological Vulnerability of Songnen Plain from 1980 to 2020
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 43, Issue 4, Pages: 366-374(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 吉林师范大学旅游与地理科学学院,吉林,四平,136000
  2. 吉林省生态环境遥感大数据重点实验室,吉林,四平,136000
  3. 中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所,吉林,长春,130102
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.042
  CLC： X22;X826
- Published：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Song Chunwei, Xiang Hengxing, Chen Meihong, et al. Spatiotemporal Variability in Ecological Vulnerability of Songnen Plain from 1980 to 2020[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(4): 366-374.
DOI：

Song Chunwei, Xiang Hengxing, Chen Meihong, et al. Spatiotemporal Variability in Ecological Vulnerability of Songnen Plain from 1980 to 2020[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(4): 366-374. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.042.

摘要

[目的] 探究1980—2020年松嫩平原生态脆弱性时空变化特征和驱动机制，为该区生态系统管理与可持续发展提供科学依据。[方法] 从自然和人文两个角度出发，采用“压力—状态—响应”(PSR)模型构建评价指标体系，结合主成分分析法和Moran’I指数开展研究。[结果] ①松嫩平原生态脆弱性以极度、重度和中度脆弱性为主，共占81.72%。2000年之前生态脆弱性整体水平呈现上升趋势，2000年之后生态脆弱性整体水平不断下降。②松嫩平原生态脆弱性以轻度和中度脆弱性变化为主，变幅分别为62.19%和91.30%。③生态脆弱性变化是由于草地、水域、未利用地、建筑用地和耕地间的转化。④生态脆弱性存在空间自相关性，低—低集聚主要分布在研究区西部林地区域。[结论] 近40 a松嫩平原生态脆弱性总体呈现波动降低趋势，空间上生态脆弱性自东向西逐渐增加，气温、降水等自然因素和土地利用等人文因素对生态脆弱性影响较大。

Abstract

[Objetive] The characteristics and driving mechanisms of spatial and temporal changes in the ecological vulnerability of the Songnen Plain from 1980 to 2020 were studied in order to provide a scientific basis for ecosystem management and sustainable development in the region. [Methods] From the perspective of natural factors and human factors

the “pressure-state-response” (PSR) model was used to build an evaluation index system. Principal component analysis was combined with the Moran’I index. [Results] ① The ecological vulnerability of the Songnen Plain was dominated by extreme

severe

and moderate vulnerabilities

accounting for 81.72% of the total vulnerability. The overall level of ecological vulnerability showed an upward trend before 2000

and the overall level of ecological vulnerability declined after 2000. ② The ecological vulnerability of the Songnen Plain was dominated by light (62.19%) and moderate (91.30%) vulnerability changes. ③ Changes in ecological vulnerability were due to conversions between grasslands

waters

unused land

construction land

and cultivated land. ④ Spatial autocorrelation existed in ecological vulnerability

and low-low aggregation was mainly located in the forestland area in the western part of the study area. [Conclusion] The ecological vulnerability of Songnen Plain during the past 40 years generally showed a fluctuating and decreasing trend. The spatial ecological vulnerability gradually increased from east to west. Natural factors such as temperature and precipitation

and human factors such as land use had a great impact on ecological vulnerability.

关键词

Keywords

references

王鹏,赵微,柯新利.基于SRP模型的潜江市生态脆弱性评价及时空演变[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(5):347-354.

魏雨涵,钱建平,范伟伟,等.基于RESI的漓江流域生态环境质量动态监测[J].中国水土保持科学,2021,19(1):122-131.

李洪广,周旭,肖杨,等.基于SRP模型的西南喀斯特山区生态脆弱性时空变化特征[J].生态科学,2021,40(3):238-246.

Okey T A, Agbayabi S, Alidina H M. Mapping ecological vulnerability to recent climate change in Canada’s Pacific marine ecosystems[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2015,106:35-48.

张学玲,余文波,蔡海生,等.区域生态环境脆弱性评价方法研究综述[J].生态学报,2018,38(16):5970-5981.

Ippolito A, Sala S, Fabeer J H, et al. Ecological vulnerability analysis: a river basin case study [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2010,408:3880-3890.

张金茜,李红瑛,曹二佳,等.多尺度流域生态脆弱性评价及其空间关联性:以甘肃白龙江流域为例[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(9):2897-2906.

鄢继尧,赵媛.近三十年我国生态脆弱区研究热点与展望[J].南京师大学报(自然科学版),2020,43(4):74-85.

张学渊,魏伟,周亮,等.西北干旱区生态脆弱性时空演变分析[J].生态学报,2021,41(12):4707-4719.

孙宇晴,杨鑫,郝利娜.基于SRP模型的川藏线2010—2020年生态脆弱性时空分异与驱动机制研究[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(6):201-208.

黄光球,刘权宸,陆秋琴.基于状态Petri网的矿区生态环境脆弱度动态评价方法[J].安全与环境学报,2017,17(4):1583-1588.

郭嘉豪,王会肖,赵茹欣,等.基于最优拟合函数的SPI指数的松嫩平原干旱特征分析[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2020,56(2):240-249.

相恒星,张健,王宗明,等.松嫩平原生态系统服务供需研究[J].生态环境学报,2021,30(8):1769-1776.

路中,雷国平,张露洋,等.1961—2016年松嫩平原月尺度下水分盈亏态势时空分异特征[J].生态与农村环境学报,2020,36(4):459-469.

王子龙,孙建,姜秋香,等.松嫩平原黑土区有机质空间分布特征及影响因素[J].东北农业大学学报,2019,50(10):54-62.

后小仙,陈琪,郑田丹.财政分权与环境质量关系的再检验:基于政府偏好权变的视角[J],财贸研究,2018,38(3):87-98.

肖佳媚,杨圣云. PSR模型在海岛生态系统评价中的应用[J].厦门大学学报(自然科学版),2007,46(1):191-196.

周炳中,杨浩,包浩生,等. PSR模型及土地可持续利用评价中的应用[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(5):541-548.

王志杰,苏嫄.南水北调中线汉中市水源地生态脆弱性评价与特征分析[J].生态学报,2018,38(2):432-442.

刘江,谢遵博,王千慧,等.北方防沙带东部区生态安全格局构建及优化[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(11):3412-3423.

王贝贝,丁明军,管琪卉,等.基于格网的南昌市生态环境脆弱性评价[J].生态学报,2019,39(15):5460-5472.

郭泽呈,魏伟,庞素菲,等.基于SPCA和遥感指数的干旱内陆河流域生态脆弱性时空演变及动因分析:以石羊河流域为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(7):2558-2572.

马骏,李昌晓,魏虹,等.三峡库区生态脆弱性评价[J].生态学报,2015,35(21):7117-7129.

郭泽呈,魏伟,石培基,等.中国西北干旱区土地沙漠化敏感性时空格局[J].地理学报,2020,75(9):1948-1965.

罗庆,李小建,杨慧敏.中国县域经济空间分布格局及其演化研究:1990—2010年[J].经济经纬,2014,31(1):1-7.

林金煌,胡国建,祁新华,等.闽三角城市群生态环境脆弱性及其驱动力[J].生态学报,2018,38(12):4155-4166.

朱琪,王亚楠,周旺明,等.东北森林带生态脆弱性时空变化及其驱动因素[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(11):3474-3482.

Mahapatra M, Ramakrishnan R, Rajawat A S. Coastal vulnerability assessment using analytical hierarchical process for South Gujarat coast, India[J]. Natural Hazards, 2015,76(1):139-159.

郭兵,孔维华,韩芳,等.北方半干旱荒漠草原生态区生态脆弱性变化遥感监测及其驱动机制分析[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2018,26(1):1-12.

张良侠,樊江文,张海燕,等.黄土高原地区生态脆弱性时空变化及其驱动因子分析[J].环境科学,2022,43(9):4902-4910.

Boori M S, Choudhary K, Paringer R, et al. Using RS/GIS for spatiotemporal ecological vulnerability analysis based on DPSIR framework in the Republic of Tatarstan, Russia[J]. Ecological Informatics, 2022,67:1-11.

黄越,程静,王鹏.中国北方农牧交错区生态脆弱性时空演变格局与驱动因素:以盐池县为例[J].干旱区地理,2021,44(4):1175-1185.

徐超璇,鲁春霞,黄绍琳.张家口地区生态脆弱性及其影响因素[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(6):1288-1300.

田盛,桂峰,王柳柱,等.环杭州湾土地利用变化与生态脆弱性评价[J].国土与自然资源研究,2021(6):17-23.

刘丹,李琳娜.1995—2015年中国北方边境样带土地利用时空格局演变及驱动因素[J].资源科学,2021,43(6):1208-1221.

周岩,张艳红,翟羽娟.基于土地利用变化的辉南县生态脆弱性时空变化分析[J].国土与自然资源研究,2013(6):29-32.

曹诗颂,王艳慧,段福洲,等.中国贫困地区生态环境脆弱性与经济贫困的耦合关系:基于连片特困区714个贫困县的实证分析[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(8):2614-2622.

于恩逸,齐麟,代力民,等.“山水林田湖草生命共同体”要素关联性分析:以长白山地区为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(23):8837-8845.

段丽杰,庄雨适,孙大光.长白山生物多样性保护优先区(吉林区域)现状、问题与对策[J].环境保护,2019,47(13):57-60.

Views

700

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Temporal and Spatial Evolutions and Its Driving Factors of Ecological Vulnerability in Wan'an County of Jiangxi Province Based on Geogdetector

Spatio-temporal evolution of coupling coordination between urban resilience and land use efficiency in Guangdong Province from 2013 to 2022

Discussion of Strategies for Sustainable Water Resource Utilization on Songnen Plain

Features of Eco-environmental Changes and Ecological Restoration and Rehabilitation in Ejin Oasis in Lower Reaches of Heihe River

Synthesizing Evaluation of Weihe River’s Ecologic Control Engineering at Baoji Section

Related Author

ZHANG Ying

ZHANG Xueling

CAI Haisheng

Peng Liyao

Xiao Zhi

ZHANG Guang-xin

LIU Pu-xing

LI Xiao-lin

Related Institution

Agriculture and Ecology Engineering Research Center of Po-yang Lake Watershed in Jiangxi Province/Ecology Key Laboratory of Po-yang Lake in Nanchang/Research center of Rural Land Resource Utilization and Protection, JAU

School of Natural Resources and Surveying, Nanning Normal University

Northeast Institute of Geography and Agriculture Ecology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences

School of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University

Key Laboratory of Western China’s Environmental Systems(Lanzhou University),Ministry of Education

⁰