Consturction and Optimination of Urban Ecological Space Network Based on MSPA Model and Ecological Protection Importance Evaluation

Wang Kun; Ma Chunxu; Zheng Yihan; Tian Xin; Hong Li; Liu Dan

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.027

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Consturction and Optimination of Urban Ecological Space Network Based on MSPA Model and Ecological Protection Importance Evaluation

- Consturction and Optimination of Urban Ecological Space Network Based on MSPA Model and Ecological Protection Importance Evaluation
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 43, Issue 4, Pages: 220-228(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 东北农业大学园艺园林学院,黑龙江,哈尔滨,150000
  2. 哈尔滨工业大学城市规划设计研究院有限公司,黑龙江,哈尔滨,150000
  3. 东北农业大学艺术学院,黑龙江,哈尔滨,150000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.027
  CLC： X117.4
- Published：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Wang Kun, Ma Chunxu, Zheng Yihan, et al. Consturction and Optimination of Urban Ecological Space Network Based on MSPA Model and Ecological Protection Importance Evaluation[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(4): 220-228.
DOI：

Wang Kun, Ma Chunxu, Zheng Yihan, et al. Consturction and Optimination of Urban Ecological Space Network Based on MSPA Model and Ecological Protection Importance Evaluation[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(4): 220-228. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.027.

摘要

[目的] 探索基于形态学空间格局分析(MSPA)和生态保护重要性评价的市域生态网络构建方法，为市域生态网络规划与建设提供科学参考。[方法] 以黑龙江省牡丹江市为例，采用MSPA分析结果拓扑叠加研究区生态保护重要性评价，综合得出生态源地；利用最小阻力模型提取研究区潜在生态廊道并结合重力模型进行重要度划分；从源地补充、廊道补充、增补踏脚石三方面进行生态网络结构优化。[结果] ①根据MSPA分析结果，牡丹江市核心区域面积在景观类型中比例最高，为87.41%，其中林地为主要景观类型。②牡丹江市域内有主要生态源地10处，次要生态源地6处。③牡丹江市域内潜在重要生态廊道16条，一般生态廊道104条。④优化前生态网络闭合度(α指数)为0.53，优化后为0.66；网络连接数(γ指数)优化前为0.69，优化后为0.77，线点率(β指数)优化前为2.0，优化后为2.26。[结论] 综合MSPA分析法和生态保护重要性评价法的生态网络构建方法运用，有助于生态网络的结构性和功能性提升。

Abstract

[Objective] The construction method for an urban ecological network based on morphological spatial pattern analysis (MSPA) and ecological protection importance evaluation were studied in order to provide a scientific reference for the planning and construction of urban ecological network. [Methods] The importance of ecological protection at Mudanjiang City

Heilongjiang Province was evaluated using the topological superposition of MSPA analysis results

and the birth source area was comprehensively obtained. We used the minimum resistance model to extract potential ecological corridors in the study area

and combined them with gravity models for importance classification. We optimized the ecological network structure from three aspects: source supplement

corridor supplement

and stepping stone supplement. [Results] ① The MSPA analysis results showed that the core area of Mudanjiang City had the highest proportion of landscape types (accounting for 87.41%) and that forest land was the main landscape type. ② There were 10 main ecological sources and six secondary ecological sources at Mudanjiang City. ③ There were 16 potential important ecological corridors and 104 general ecological corridors at Mudanjiang City. ④ Ecological network closure (α index) before optimization was 0.53

and 0.66 after optimization. Number of network connections (γ index) was 0.69 before optimization

and 0.77 after optimization. Line point rate (β index) was 2.0 before optimization

and 2.26 after optimization. [Conclusion] The application of the comprehensive MSPA analysis method and the ecological protection importance evaluation method in ecological network construction can help improve the structure and functionality of the ecological network.

关键词

Keywords

references

张亚丽,尹伟特,胡希军,等.基于MSPA与MCR模型的资源节约型生态网络构建:以福建省东山岛为例[J].西北林学院学报,2021,36(5):254-261.

胡长生,胡宇喆.习近平新时代生态文明观的理论贡献[J].求实,2018,39(6):4-20,107.

中共中央国务院.关于建立国土空间规划体系并监督实施的若干意见[N].人民日报,2019-05-24(1).

Csermely P. The wisdom of networks: a general adaptation and learning mechanism of complex systems: the network core triggers fast responses to Known Stimulis innovations require the slow network periphery and are encoded by core-remodeling [J]Bioessays, 2017,40(1):1700150.

陈静,左翔,彭建松,等.基于MSPA与景观连通性分析的城市生态网络构建:以保山市隆阳区为例[J].西部林业科学,2020,49(4):118-123,141.

Teng Mingjun, Wu Changguang, Zhou Zhixiang, et al. Multipurpose greenway planning for changing cities: a framework integrating priorities and a least-cost ath model [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2011,103(1):1-14.

Klar N, Herrmann M, Henning H M, et al. Between ecological theory and planning practice: reconnecting forest patches for the wildcat in Lower Saxony, Germany [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2012,105(4):376-384.

Jing Yang, Chen Zeng, YiJiao Cheng, Spatial influence of ecological networks on land use intensity [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020,717:137151.

Walker N J, Schaffer S D, Swenson J J, et al. Improved connectivity analysis using multiple low-cost paths to evaluate habitat for the endangered San Martin titi monkey (

Plecturocebus oenanthe

) in North-central Peru [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2019,34(8):1859-1875.

Kaaapen J P, Scheffer M, Harms B. Estimating habitat isolation in landscape [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1992,23(1):12-16.

周英,施成超,刘滢,等.基于MSPA-MCR模型的云南德昂族乡景观生态安全格局构建[J].西南林业大学学报(社会科学),2022,6(1):54-62.

尹海伟,孔繁花,祈毅,等.湖南省城市群生态网络构建与优化[J].生态学报,2011,31(10):2863-2874.

王添翼,丁金华.基于MCR模型的苏南水网乡村生态安全格局构建[J].中国城市林业,2022,20(4):58-65.

郭家新,胡振琪,李海霞,等.基于MCR模型的市域生态空间网络构建[J].农业机械学报,2021,52(3):275-284.

自然资源部办公厅.自然资源部办公厅关于印发《国土空间调查、规划、用途管制用地用海分类指南(试行)》的通知[EB/OL].[2020-11-17](2022-03-04). http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-11/22/content_5563311.html.

自然资源部国土空间规划局.资源环境承载能力和国土空间开发适宜性评价技术指南(试行)[EB/OL]. [2020-11-17](2019-03-04). https://www.docin.com/p-2469075664.html.

黑龙江省生态环境厅.黑龙江省生态保护红线监管试点工作方案[EB/OL]. [2020-11-17](2021-11-02).http://sthj.hlj.gov.cn/sthj/c112149/202111/c00_30833580.shtml 2021.11.02.

自然资源部.自然生态空间用途管制办法(试行)[EB/OL]. [2020-11-17](2022-03-04).https://www.mnr.gov.cn/gk/tzgg/201704/t20170424_1992172.html 2017.03.24.

生态环境部.生态保护红线划定指南[EB/OL]. [2020-11-17](2022-03-04).https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgt/201707/t20170728_418679.htm 2017.07.20.

栾博,柴民伟,王鑫.绿色基础设施研究进展[J].生态学报,2017,37(15):5246-5261.

牛晓楠,倪欢,陈国光,等.福建省生态保护重要性评价[J].生态学报,2022,42(3):1130-1141.

俞孔坚.生物保护的景观生态安全格局[J].生态学报,1999,19(1):8-15.

陈利顶,傅伯杰,徐建英,等.基于“源—汇”生态过程的景观格局识别方法:景观空间负荷对比指数[J].生态学报,2003,23(11):2406-2413.

潘竟虎,刘晓.基于空间主成分和最小累积阻力模型的内陆河景观生态安全评价与格局优化:以张掖市甘州区为例[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(10):3126-3136.

史瑶.基于MSPA和MCR模型的资兴市生态网络构建研究[D].湖南长沙：中南林业科技大学,2019.

许峰,尹海伟,孔繁花,等.基于MSPA与最小路径方法的巴中西部新城生态网络构建[J].生态学报,2015,35(19):6425-6434.

Forman R T, Baudry J. Hedgerowsand hedgerow networksin landscape ecology [J]. Environmental Management, 1984,8(6):495-510.

蒋大林,曹晓峰,匡鸿海,等.生态保护红线及其划定关键问题浅析[J].资源科学,2015,37(9):1755-1764.

吕东,王云才,彭震伟.基于适宜性评价的快速城市化地区生态网络格局规划：以吉林长白朝鲜族自治县为例[J].风景园林,2013(2):54-59.

黄锰,蔡新冬,李光皓,等.山·水·林·城—伊春市中心城新区南区城市设计[J].城市规划,2009,33(11):93-96.

Views

12394

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Construction of Yunzhong-Xizhou mountains ecological network based on sensitivity evaluation of ecosystem services and ecology

Ecological Network Construction of County Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Based on Least Cost Distance Model

Ecological Coupling Model and Construction of Ecological Security Patterns in Urban and Rural Space of Harbin City During 1990-2017

Construction and Optimization of Ecological Network of Nanchang City Based on MSPA and MCR Model

Construction of an Ecological Network of Natural Reserves in Lancang River Basin, Yunnan Province

Related Author

Wang Xiaojun

Li Hongxia

Dong Xiuli

Mei Aoxue

Cui Jun

FENG Yu

LI Xinfeng

WANG Jinman

Related Institution

Shanxi Wocheng Ecological Environment Research Institute

School of Environmental and Resource Sciences of Shanxi University

School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences(Beijing)

Key Laboratory of Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation, Ministry of Land and Resources

College of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University

⁰