Comprehensive Evaluation of Rural Revitalization Performance in Fujian Province During 2011—2020

Rao Qinghua; You Wu; Zhao Tianyu; Lin Xiuzhu; Chen Fang; Qiu Xuefen; Chen Wenhua; Lin Yunshan

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.02.043

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Comprehensive Evaluation of Rural Revitalization Performance in Fujian Province During 2011—2020

- Comprehensive Evaluation of Rural Revitalization Performance in Fujian Province During 2011—2020
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 43, Issue 2, Pages: 381-388(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 近海流域环境测控治理福建省高校重点实验室(福建技术师范学院), 福建福清,350300
  2. 福建省农业生态环境与能源技术推广总站,福建,福州,350003
  3. 复旦大学社会发展与公共政策学院,上海,200433
  4. 福建省环境监测中心站,福建,福州,350003
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.02.043
  CLC： X32
- Published：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Rao Qinghua, You Wu, Zhao Tianyu, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation of Rural Revitalization Performance in Fujian Province During 2011—2020[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(2): 381-388.
DOI：

Rao Qinghua, You Wu, Zhao Tianyu, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation of Rural Revitalization Performance in Fujian Province During 2011—2020[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(2): 381-388. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.02.043.

摘要

[目的] 从产业兴旺、生态宜居、乡风文明、治理有效、生活富裕等5个维度构建乡村振兴绩效评估指标体系，为乡村振兴绩效评估提供科学参考。 [方法] 引入全排列多边形图示指标模型，对福建省2011—2020年的乡村振兴战略推进绩效水平进行综合评估。 [结果] 福建省“十二五”期间的产业兴旺指数总体优于“十三五”期间(p＜0.05)，与之相反，“十二五”期间的乡风文明指数总体小于“十三五”期间(p＞0.05)。“十三五”期间的生态宜居、治理有效、生活富裕等指数均处于较高水平，其绩效水平均优于“十二五”期间(p＜0.01)。2011—2020年福建省乡村振兴绩效综合评估指数分别为0.001～1.458，总体上呈“上升—下降—上升”的N形变化趋势。2011—2015年的乡村振兴绩效综合评估指数总体小于2016—2020年(p＜0.05)。 [结论] 研究期内，福建省乡村振兴推进绩效水平优劣顺序为：2020，2019，2018，2015，2016，2017，2014，2013，2012，2011年。2018—2020年福建省乡村振兴绩效综合评估指数相对较高。在乡村振兴战略推动过程中，应结合各个地市实际情况，细化绩效考核评价指标体系，构建乡村振兴绩效考核制度。

Abstract

[Objective] The rural revitalization performance evaluation index system was constructed based on five dimensions: thriving businesses

pleasant living environments

social etiquette and civility

effective governance

and prosperity

in order to provide references for comprehensive evaluation of rural revitalization performance. [Methods] Rural revitalization performance in Fujian Province was evaluated by applying the entire-array-polygon synthesis illustration model from 2011—2020. [Results] The thriving businesses index for the 12th Five-Year Plan period was better than that of the 13th Five-Year Plan period (p＜0.05). In contrast

the social etiquette and civility index for the 12th Five-Year Plan period was lower than that of the 13th Five-Year Plan period (p＞0.05). Performance indexes for pleasant living environments

effective governance

and prosperity for the 13th Five-Year Plan period were at a high level

and the performance level was better than that of the 12th Five-Year Plan period (p＜0.01). From 2011 to 2020

the comprehensive evaluation index of rural revitalization performance in Fujian Province ranged from 0.001 to 1.458

showing an N-shaped trend of up-down-up. The performance level from 2011 to 2015 was lower than the level observed from 2016 to 2020 (p＜0.05). [Conclusion] Rural revitalization performance in Fujian Province during the study period decreased following the year order of 2020 > 2019 > 2018 > 2015 > 2016 > 2017 < 2014 > 2013 > 2012 > 2011. Rural revitalization performance in Fujian Province was relatively higher from 2018 to 2020. In the process of promoting rural revitalization strategy

people should refine the performance evaluation index system and construct a rural revitalization performance evaluation system based on the actual situation of each city.

关键词

Keywords

references

周平,渠涛,邵波.战略起点视角下山东省乡村振兴效果评价及影响因素研究[J].青岛科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020,36(3):41-48.

王建英.乡村振兴评价体系构建及实施成效分析:基于河南省市域面板数据的验证[J].山西农业大学学报(社会科学版),2021,20(3):16-22.

Liu Yansui. The basic theory and methodology of rural revitalization planning in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020,75(6):06001120.

Liu Yansui, Zang Yuzhu, Yang Yuanyuan. China’s rural revitalization and development: Theory, technology and management [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020,30(12):1923-1942.

张建伟,图登克珠.乡村振兴战略的理论、内涵与路径研究[J].农业经济,2020(7):22-24.

Han Jun. Prioritizing agricultural, rural development and implementing the rural revitalization strategy [J]. China Agricultural Economic Review, 2019,12(1):14-19.

Chen Mingxing, Zhou Yuan, Huang Xinrong, et al. The integration of new-type urbanization and rural revitalization strategies in China: Origin, reality and future trends [J]. Land, 2021,10(2):1-17.

Zhou Yang, Li Yamei, Xu Chenchen. Land consolidation and rural revitalization in China: Mechanisms and paths [J]. Land Use Policy, 2020,91:104379.

张兰英.乡村振兴战略的理论内涵与实践路径[J].管理观察,2019(18):62-63.

上海市乡村振兴指数研究课题组.上海市乡村振兴指数指标体系构建与评价[J].科学发展,2020(9):56-63.

于战平.基于天津区域特点的乡村振兴评价指标体系研究:兼述如何科学构建和应用指标体系[J].理论与现代化,2020(5):86-95.

华宇佳,马晓旭.江苏省乡村振兴评价指标体系构建与评价方法研究[J].农村经济与科技,2020,31(17):322-324.

Zhang Guangying. Study on a path of precision poverty alleviation in poor rural district in china: A case study of the Chixi village in Fuding Fujian China [J]. Tourism and Hotel Management, 2017,2:47-56.

Wang Chengchao, Gao Bidan, Weng Zudeng, et al. Primary causes of total hamlet abandonment for different types of hamlets in remote mountain areas of China: A case study of Shouning County, Fujian Province [J]. Land Use Policy, 2020,95:104627.

孙杨杰.生态扶贫与乡村振兴有效衔接的福建探索[J].发展研究,2021,38(9):70-76.

陈白璧,华伟平.乡村旅游与精准扶贫耦合评价及发展策略:以南平市为例[J].福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021(5):82-89,169.

韩世锋,蒋长春,郑燕红,等.基于人才供应链视角的乡村人才振兴路径探索[J].莆田学院学报,2022,29(1):41-48.

Wang Jianying, Xu Yumei, Zou Lilin, et al. Does culture affect farmer willingness to transfer rural land? evidence from southern Fujian, China [J]. Land, 2021,10(6):1-19.

李倩,罗昌智.乡村振兴战略下乡村文化建设路径研究[J].山东农业工程学院学报,2021,38(9):72-76.

陈云.乡村振兴发展水平测度研究[J].延边大学学报:自然科学版,2020,46(3):233-241.

陈炎伟,王强,黄和亮.福建省县域乡村振兴发展绩效评价研究[J].福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2019(9):182-190.

陈培彬,谢源,王海平,等.福建省乡村振兴实施成效分析及其优化路径:基于2015—2019年9地市面板数据[J].世界农业,2020(1):98-107.

Views

667

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Soil erosion characteristics and assessment of their differences in typical regions of Fujian Province in 2024 based on CSLE model

Assessing of rural revitalization level in China’s arid regions from 2000 to 2022

Evaluation on Land Ecological Security of Fujian Province

Temporal and Spatial Variation of Soil Erosion in Fujian Province

Analysis of Soil and Water Loss in Fujian Province

Related Author

Lu Shunfa

Zhu Xiudi

Liu Jigen

Xu Wensheng

Zhang Changwei

Wang Zhigang

Wang Wenlong

Li Jianming

Related Institution

Soil and Water Conservation Experimental Station of Fujian Province

Changjiang Water Resources Protection Institute

College of Soil and Water Conservation Science and Engineering，Northwest A&F University， Yangling

Small and Medium-sized Rivers and Mountain;Torrent Disasters Observation and Research Station for Southwest Mountainous Areas， Ministry of Water;Resources

Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute of Changjiang Water Resources;Commission

⁰