Evolution and Optimization Strategy of Productive-Living-Ecological Spatial Pattern in Perspective of Rural Revitalization—A Case Study at Gaoxigou Village, Mizhi County, Shaanxi Province
|更新时间:2025-03-12
|
Evolution and Optimization Strategy of Productive-Living-Ecological Spatial Pattern in Perspective of Rural Revitalization—A Case Study at Gaoxigou Village, Mizhi County, Shaanxi Province
Bulletin of Soiland Water ConservationVol. 43, Issue 2, Pages: 372-380(2023)
Tu Wen, Ma Lihui, Feng Zhe. Evolution and Optimization Strategy of Productive-Living-Ecological Spatial Pattern in Perspective of Rural Revitalization—A Case Study at Gaoxigou Village, Mizhi County, Shaanxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(2): 372-380.
DOI:
Tu Wen, Ma Lihui, Feng Zhe. Evolution and Optimization Strategy of Productive-Living-Ecological Spatial Pattern in Perspective of Rural Revitalization—A Case Study at Gaoxigou Village, Mizhi County, Shaanxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(2): 372-380. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.02.042.
Evolution and Optimization Strategy of Productive-Living-Ecological Spatial Pattern in Perspective of Rural Revitalization—A Case Study at Gaoxigou Village, Mizhi County, Shaanxi Province
[Objective] The characteristics of land use transformation of Gaoxigou village
Mizhi County
Shaanxi Province
an ecological demonstration village under the rapid development of urbanization were studied in order to provide reference for the sustainable development of rural productive-living-ecological space in the Loess Plateau region of Northern Shaanxi Province. [Methods] The dynamic attitude of land use and land use transfer matrix were used to analyze the spatial characteristics of productive-living-ecological space at Gaoxigou village from 1953 to 2022. Combined with field research
the spatial pattern evolution characteristics and corresponding spatial governance optimization strategies were analyzed. [Results] ① from 1953 to 2022
the production space of Gaoxigou village decreased
while the living space and ecological space increased. From 1953 to 1973
the ecological space changed the most
the green space increased from 12.07 hm2 to 100.33 hm2
the other ecological space decreased from 12.07 hm2 to 100.33 hm2
and the production space gradually decreased from 145.67 hm2 to 110.07 hm2. From 1986 to 2022
the production space decreased by 42.4 hm2
the living space increased by 5 hm2
and the ecological space increased by 37.39 hm2. ② From 1986 to 2022
the transformation of productive-living-ecological space at Gaoxigou village reflected in the increase of green space and rural living space
and the decrease of agricultural production space
other ecological space and water ecological space. There were 67.83 hm2 of agricultural production space and 59.95 hm2 of other ecological space transformed into green space
and part of green space ecological space transformed into agricultural production space and rural living space
with the transfer area of 21.20 hm2 and 3.22 hm2
respectively. ③ To solve the problem of insufficient production space efficiency
Gaoxigou village adopt the measures to change the cultivation method of wide planting and low harvest
greatly increase the grain yield
change the single agricultural production situation
and realize the coexistence of multiple business modes; In response to the low quality of living space
Gaoxigou village had taken measures to strengthen infrastructure
build new homes
and encourage young people to go out and engage in other industries. In view of the serious damage to ecological space
measures have been taken to control soil erosion
return farmland to forest or grassland
build tourism culture and promote ecological scenery. [Conclusion] According to the main problems of early productive-living-ecological space
Gaoxigou village made appropriate optimization strategies to improve the utilization rate of land
expand the area of forest and grass
so that the green ecological space reached 80%. The efficient development of agriculture
forestry and animal husbandry
and the overall improvement of production
life and ecology make Gaoxigou village an ecological demonstration representative of the loess hilly region.
Zou Lilin, Liu Yansui, Yang Jianxin, et al. Quantitative identification and spatial analysis of land use ecological-production-living functions in rural areas on China’s southeast coast [J]. Habitat International, 2020,100:102182.
Duan Yaming, Wang Hui, Huang An, et al. Identification and spatial-temporal evolution of rural “production-living-ecological” space from the perspective of villagers’behavior: A case study of Ertai Town, Zhangjiakou City [J]. Land Use Policy, 2021,106:105457.
Li Jiangsu, Sun Wei, Li Mingyue, et al. Coupling coordination degree of production, living and ecological spaces and its influencing factors in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021,298:126803.
Liao Tian, Li Dang, Wan Qing. Tradeoff of exploitation-protection and suitability evaluation of low-slope hilly from the perspective of “production-living-ecological” optimization[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2020,120:102943.
Spatiotemporal evolution of productive-living-ecological space at county level of Qinling-Daba Mountains area under background of urban-rural integration
Soil erosion characteristics and assessment of their differences in typical regions of Fujian Province in 2024 based on CSLE model
Coupling and coordination of intensive land use and ecological civilization construction at cities in Yellow River basin
Temporal and spatial distribution of soil erosion in Guanzhong region of Shaanxi Province from 2018 to 2022
Distribution and evolution of orchard rocky desertification in Guanyan underground river basin along eastern bank of Lijiang River
Related Author
Li Chenxi
Wu Guochao
Wu Kening
Zhang Letong
Wu Jingyao
Wei Hongbin
Jin Zhikun
Pu Jian
Related Institution
School of Public Administration, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology
Joint Technology Innovation Center for Land Engineering and
Human Settlements of Shaanxi Land Engineering Construction Group Co., Ltd. and Xi’an Jiaotong
University
School of Land Science and Technology, China University of