Interaction Between Intensive Land Use and New-type Urbanization from Perspective of Spatiotemporal Cone

Zhang Zhongqiu; Zhang Yufeng; WeiJinhong; Hu Baoqing; Song Yingmei

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.01.022

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Interaction Between Intensive Land Use and New-type Urbanization from Perspective of Spatiotemporal Cone

- Interaction Between Intensive Land Use and New-type Urbanization from Perspective of Spatiotemporal Cone
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 43, Issue 1, Pages: 184-195(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 内蒙古师范大学地理科学学院,内蒙古,呼和浩特,010022
  2. 北部湾大学资源与环境学院,广西,钦州,535011
  3. 北部湾大学经济管理学院,广西,钦州,535011
  4. 南宁师范大学北部湾环境演变与资源利用教育部重点实验室,广西,南宁,530001
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.01.022
  CLC： F129.9;F301
- Published：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Zhang Zhongqiu, Zhang Yufeng, WeiJinhong, et al. Interaction Between Intensive Land Use and New-type Urbanization from Perspective of Spatiotemporal Cone[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(1): 184-195.
DOI：

Zhang Zhongqiu, Zhang Yufeng, WeiJinhong, et al. Interaction Between Intensive Land Use and New-type Urbanization from Perspective of Spatiotemporal Cone[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(1): 184-195. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.01.022.

摘要

[目的] 探究土地集约利用与新型城镇化之间的定性交互机理，为区域高质量发展提供参考。[方法] 依据时空锥理论和系统论，从土地集约利用的“资源—资产—资本”属性和新型城镇化的“规模—集聚—红利—财富”效应出发，构建二者的交互机理并据此组建指标体系。以2003—2020年广西壮族自治区14个市的面板数据为样本，采用熵值法、模糊综合评价法和耦合协调模型定量评估二者的发展状态，并运用面板向量自回归模型(PVAR)对两者的交互效应进行实证分析。[结果] ①广西土地集约利用以资源性(0.388)和资产性(0.541)为主，平均综合指数由0.104增至0.318。新型城镇化以规模(0.470)和红利效应(0.306)为主，平均综合指数由0.184增至0.425。 ②二者的耦合协调度由0.367增至0.600，耦合协调状态呈“轻度失调—濒临失调—勉强耦合协调—初级耦合协调”的向好演变态势，但各市级单元的发展差异较大。 ③从PVAR模型结果来看，土地集约利用与新型城镇化之间存在正向的交互作用，二者受自身发展惯性的冲击显著，土地集约利用对新型城镇化的促进程度(47.11%)大于新型城镇化对土地集约利用的促进程度(35.05%)。[结论] 土地集约利用的“资源—资产—资本”属性相对新型城镇化来说属于生产力范畴，新型城镇化的“规模—集聚—红利—财富”效应相对土地集约利用来说属于生产关系范畴，在一定的时空视角下二者之间存在不对等的作用与反作用关系。

Abstract

[Objective] The interaction mechanism between intensive land use and new-type urbanization was determined in order to provide a reference for regional high quality development. [Methods] We qualitatively analyzed the interaction mechanism between the “resource-asset-capital” attribute of intensive land use and the “scale-agglomeration-dividend-wealth” effect of new-type urbanization

and set up an evaluation index system. We used survey data from 14 cities in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region from 2003 to 2020 to quantitatively evaluate the development status of two cities by using an entropy method

a coupling coordination model

and a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. The panel vector autoregressive (PVAR) model was used to empirically analyze the interaction between the two cities as well. [Results] ① Intensive land use in Guangxi was dominated by resource (0.388) and asset (0.541) intensiveness

and the average composite index increased from 0.104 to 0.318. New-type urbanization was dominated by the scale effect (0.470) and the dividend effect (0.306). The average composite index increased from 0.184 to 0.425. ② The coupling coordination degree between intensive land use and new-type urbanization increased from 0.367 to 0.600

and the coupling coordination state showed a good evolution trend of “mild imbalance-near imbalance-low coupling coordination-major coupling coordination”. However

the development of each municipal unit was quite different. ③ According to the PVAR model results

there was a significant interaction between new-type urbanization and intensive land use. However

the influence of intensive land use level on new-type urbanization level was greater (47.11%) than that of new-type urbanization level on intensive land use level (35.05%). [Conclusion] Compared with new-type urbanization

the “resource-asset-capital” attribute of intensive land use belonged to the category of productivity. Compared with intensive land use

the “scale-agglomeration-dividend-wealth” effect of new-type urbanization belonged to the category of production relationship. There was an unequal interaction relationship between new-type urbanization and intensive land use.

关键词

Keywords

references

Dahms F A. “Dying villages”, “counterurbanization” and the urban field: A Canadian perspective [J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 1995,11(1):21-33.

Kottmeier C, Biegert C, Corsmeier U. Effects of urban land use on surface temperature in berlin: Case study [J]. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2007,133(2):128-137.

Gill S E, Handley J F, Ennos A R, et al. Characterising the urban environment of UK cities and towns: A template for landscape planning [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2008,87(3):210-222.

Louw E. Land assembly for urban transformation: The case of 's-Hertogenbosch in the Netherlands [J]. Land Use Policy, 2008,25(1):69-80.

Gabriel S A, Faria J A, Moglen G E. A multiobjective optimization approach to smart growth in land development [J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2006,40(3):212-248.

Chen Ruishan, Ye Chao, Cai Yunlong, et al. The impact of rural out-migration on land use transition in China: Past, present and trend [J]. Land Use Policy, 2014,40:101-110.

Dou Yi, Luo Xiao, Dong Liang, et al. An empirical study on transit-oriented low-carbon urban land use planning: Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis (ESDA) on Shanghai, China [J]. Habitat International, 2016,53:379-389.

Peng Chong, Song Malin, Han Feng. Urban economic structure, technological externalities, and intensive land use in China [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017,152:47-62.

陈明星,叶超,陆大道,等.中国特色新型城镇化理论内涵的认知与建构[J].地理学报,2019,74(4):633-647.

宋婉静.中国土地集约利用水平评价研究[J].世界农业,2017(10):128-133.

孙平军,赵峰,修春亮.中国城镇建设用地投入效率的空间分异研究[J].经济地理,2012,32(6):46-52.

刘铮,金鑫.城镇化进程中的土地集约利用[J].税务与经济,2016(3):13-17.

孙平军,吕飞,修春亮,等.新型城镇化下中国城市土地节约集约利用的基本认知与评价[J].经济地理,2015,35(8):178-183.

陈颜,姜博,初楠臣,等.城市土地利用效益及新型城镇化指标遴选与体系重构[J].中国农业资源与区划,2021,42(3):67-75.

张祚,周敏,金贵,等.湖北“两圈两带”格局下的新型城镇化与土地集约利用协调度分析[J].世界地理研究,2018,27(2):65-75.

雷勋平,Qiu Robin,刘晨.土地集约利用与城镇化协调发展评价及障碍因子诊断[J].农业机械学报,2020,51(6):138-151.

赵丹丹,胡业翠.土地集约利用与城市化相互作用的定量研究:以中国三大城市群为例[J].地理研究,2016,35(11):2105-2115.

陈娟,王龙,赵欣运,等.贵阳市城镇化进程与土地利用转变关系[J].地球科学,2019,44(9):2944-2954.

曾潍嘉.新型城镇化与土地集约利用的时空演变及关系[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(10):109-114.

Cheng Xin, Shao Hua, Li Yang, et al. Urban land intensive use evaluation study based on nighttime light: A case study of the Yangtze River economic belt [J]. Sustainability, 2019,11(3):675.

木合塔尔·艾买提,李细归,周勇,等.武汉城市圈城镇化与土地集约利用响应分析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(4):52-59.

韩海彬,吴伟波.新型城镇化与土地集约利用交互效应分析: 基于PVAR模型的京津冀城市群综合评价[J].城市问题,2020(7):11-20.

吴伟波.新型城镇化和土地集约利用交互效应分析:以京津冀城市群为例[D].天津:天津商业大学,2021.

冯广京.时空锥理论研究[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(4):22-32.

冯现学.城乡统筹中的土地资源、资产、资本综合管理初探:以四川成都地区为例[J].城乡规划,2011(1):63-71.

任杲,赵蕊.中国新型城镇化内涵演进机理、制约因素及政策建议[J].区域经济评论,2022(3):57-65.

周晓林.土地节约集约利用的效益与维度分析[J].中国土地,2021(10):32-34.

谭立力.西南边境新型城镇化的指数型评价体系构建研究:以云南边境县(市)为例[J].广州大学学报(社会科学版),2022,21(2):103-114.

柴铎,周小平,谷晓坤.城市郊野建设用地节约集约利用内涵重构与“5Q5E”评价模型:上海98个乡镇数据实证[J].城市发展研究,2017,24(10):79-85.

Holtz-Eakin D, Newey W, Rosen H S. Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data [J]. Econometrica, 1988,56(6):1371.

张敬岳,张光宏,胡银花.城镇化背景下土地与产业协调发展及互动关系研究[J].农业经济问题,2018,39(4):91-98.

符海月,王昭雅.区域产业结构调整与土地利用效率关系:基于城镇化水平视阈的考察[J].中国土地科学,2020,34(10):69-78.

钟凯扬.对外贸易、FDI与环境污染的动态关系:基于PVAR模型的研究[J].生态经济,2016,32(12):58-64.

连玉君.中国上市公司投资效率研究[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2009.

Love I, Zicchino L. Financial development and dynamic investment behavior: Evidence from panel VAR [J]. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2006,46(2):190-210.

Views

542

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Internal Coordination of Intensive Urban Land Use in He'nan Province

A Study on Spatial Difference of Urban Intensive Land Use Based on PSR Model-A Case Study of Economic Belt on Northern Slope of Tianshan Mountains

Spatial Variation of Urban Land Use Efficiency in Process of New-type Urbanization

Coordinated Development of Time and Space Coupling Between Urbanization and Urban Land Intensive Use in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region During 2009-2018

Coupling Relationship Between New Urbanization and Impervious Surface in Jiangxi Province During 1988-2017

Related Author

CAI Xiao

LIU Wei-dong

FAN Hui

卡斯木

阿里木江·

哈尚辰

DU Danning

Zhou Xing

Related Institution

Institute of Land Science & Real Estate Zhejiang University Hangzhou Zhejiang China

College of Urban and Environmental Sciences Xinyang Normal University Xinjiang Henan China

Institute of Geographical Sciences, Xinjiang Normal University

Center of Xinjiang Urbanization Development Study, Xinjiang Normal University

School of Mechanical Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester,, PL

⁰