Spatial and Temporal Distribution Characteristics of Landscape Ecological Risks in Karst Mountain Watersheds from Productive-Living-Ecological Perspective

Xia Zhaoliang; Lan Anjun; Fan Zemeng; Zhu Na

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20221012.003

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Spatial and Temporal Distribution Characteristics of Landscape Ecological Risks in Karst Mountain Watersheds from Productive-Living-Ecological Perspective

- Spatial and Temporal Distribution Characteristics of Landscape Ecological Risks in Karst Mountain Watersheds from Productive-Living-Ecological Perspective
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 43, Issue 2, Pages: 256-266(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 贵州师范大学地理与环境科学学院,贵州,贵阳,550025
  2. 国家喀斯特石漠化防治工程技术研究中心,贵州,贵阳,550001
  3. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所资源与环境信息系统国家重点实验室,北京,100101
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20221012.003
  CLC： X826
- Published：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Xia Zhaoliang, Lan Anjun, Fan Zemeng, et al. Spatial and Temporal Distribution Characteristics of Landscape Ecological Risks in Karst Mountain Watersheds from Productive-Living-Ecological Perspective[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(2): 256-266.
DOI：

Xia Zhaoliang, Lan Anjun, Fan Zemeng, et al. Spatial and Temporal Distribution Characteristics of Landscape Ecological Risks in Karst Mountain Watersheds from Productive-Living-Ecological Perspective[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(2): 256-266. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20221012.003.

摘要

[目的] 深入分析喀斯特流域景观生态风险变化规律，为山区流域制定生态风险防控措施与景观管理规划提供科学参考。 [方法] 以典型喀斯特流域红水河流域贵州段为研究区域，从“三生”空间视角出发，采用GIS空间分析、景观生态风险指数等方法探究了研究区景观生态风险的时空变化机理，并借助分布指数方法分析了景观生态风险时空分布与地形地貌的关系。 [结果] ①自2000年来，红水河流域基于“三生”空间的用地转型表现为生产、生态空间减少而生活空间快速增加，不同用地类型的转移引起区域景观生态风险变化的贡献率大小不一。 ②2000—2020年期间景观生态风险整体呈缓和趋势，红水河流域南部的景观生态风险总体优于其北部地区。 ③从景观生态风险在地形位梯度上的分布看，景观生态风险程度与地形位梯度成反比关系；另外，非喀斯特区和纯喀斯特区景观生态风险要低于亚喀斯特区。 [结论] 红水河流域景观生态风险虽有所好转，但部分景观生态问题依然突出，需要加强对生态环境的治理保护。

Abstract

[Objective] The factors affecting landscape ecological risk in karst watersheds were determined in order to formulate ecological risk prevention and control measures and landscape management planning in mountain watersheds. [Methods] This study was conducted in the Guizhou section of the Hongshui River basin (a typical karst basin). The study utilized the perspective of “productive-living-ecological” space

and used GIS spatial analysis

landscape ecological risk index

and other methods to explore the temporal and spatial change mechanism of landscape ecological risk in the study area. The relationship between the temporal and spatial distributions of landscape ecological risk and topography was analyzed by means of the distribution index method. [Results] ① Since 2000

land use transformation based on the productive-living-ecological space in the Hongshui River basin was characterized by a reduction in the production and ecological space and a rapid increase in the living space. The contribution rates of regional landscape ecological risk changes caused by the transfer of different land use types were different. ② During the period from 2000 to 2020

the overall landscape ecological risk showed a moderate trend

and the landscape ecological risk in the southern part of the Hongshui River basin was generally better than in the northern part. ③ From the distribution of landscape ecological risk on the terrain gradient

the degree of landscape ecological risk was inversely proportional to the terrain gradient. In addition

the landscape ecological risk in the non-karst area and pure karst area was lower than that in the subkarst area. [Conclusion] Although the landscape ecological risk in the Hongshui River basin has improved

some landscape ecological problems are still prominent

and it will be necessary to strengthen the management and protection of the ecological environment.

关键词

Keywords

references

彭建,党威雄,刘焱序,等.景观生态风险评价研究进展与展望[J].地理学报,2015,70(4):664-677.

Faber J H, van Wensem J. Elaborations on the use of the ecosystem services concept for application in ecological risk assessment for soils [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2012,415:3-8.

张晓东,赵志鹏,赵银鑫,等.银川市景观生态风险评价与生态安全格局优化构建[J].干旱区地理,2022,45(5):1626-1636.

Xie Hualin, Peng Wang, Huang Hongsheng. Ecological risk assessment of land use change in the Poyang Lake ecoeconomic zone, China [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2013,10(1):328-346.

周汝佳,张永战,何华春.基于土地利用变化的盐城海岸带生态风险评价[J].地理研究,2016,35(6):1017-1028.

颜瑜严,杨辽,王伟胜,等.伊犁河谷景观生态风险时空变化及其地形梯度分析[J].生态科学,2020,39(4):125-136.

刘顺鑫,黄云.“三生空间”视角下万州区景观生态安全评价及其耦合特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(6):308-316.

戴文远,江方奇,黄万里,等.基于“三生空间”的土地利用功能转型及生态服务价值研究:以福州新区为例[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(12):2098-2109.

张芊芊,邵战林,林娟,等.“三生空间”视角下乌鲁木齐市土地利用功能转型及其生态服务价值研究[J].环境污染与防治,2022,44(2):218-224.

廖李红,戴文远,陈娟,等.平潭岛快速城市化进程中三生空间冲突分析[J].资源科学,2017,39(10):1823-1833.

于婧,汤昪,陈艳红,等.山水资源型城市景观生态风险评价及生态安全格局构建:以张家界市为例[J].生态学报,2022,42(4):1290-1299.

Kooistra L, Leuven R, Nienhuis P, et al. A procedure for incorporating spatial variability in ecological risk assessment of Dutch River floodplains [J]. Environmental Management, 2001,28(3): 359-373.

Carolyn T, Hunsakerrc, Robin L, et al. Assessing ecological risk on a regional scale [J]. Environmental Management, 1990,14(3): 325-332.

Paul J, Van D, Catherine B,et al. New approaches to the ecological risk assessment of multiple stressors [J].Marine and Freshwater Research,2016,67(4):429-439.

Ahrens C, Chung J, Meyer T, et al. Bentgrass distribution surveys and habitat suitability maps support ecological risk assessment in cultural landscapes [J]. Weed Science, 2011,59(2):145-154.

刘永超,李加林,史小丽,等.1985—2015年美国Tampa Bay流域景观生态风险态势研判[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(3):125-130.

许妍,高俊峰,赵家虎,等.流域生态风险评价研究进展[J].生态学报,2012,32(1):284-292.

Paukert C P, Pitts K L, Whittier J B, et al. Development and assessment of a landscape-scale ecological threat index for the Lower Colorado River basin [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2011,11(2):304-310.

潘竟虎,刘晓.疏勒河流域景观生态风险评价与生态安全格局优化构建[J].生态学杂志,2016,35(3):791-799.

康紫薇,张正勇,位宏,等.基于土地利用变化的玛纳斯河流域景观生态风险评价[J].生态学报,2020,40(18):6472-6485.

巩杰,高彦净,张玲玲,等.基于地形梯度的景观生态风险空间分析:以甘肃省白龙江流域为例[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2014,50(5):692-698.

王有小,刘少坤,陆汝成,等.“三生”空间视角下近40 a广西边疆地区景观生态风险及地形梯度分析[J].生态与农村环境学报,2021,37(12):1586-1595.

赵越,罗志军,李雅婷,等.赣江上游流域景观生态风险的时空分异:从生产—生活—生态空间的视角[J].生态学报,2019,39(13):4676-4686.

于淑会,康园园,邓伟,等.太行山东部县域“三生”用地转型与景观生态风险分析:以河北省平山县为例[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2022,30(7):1113-1122.

高星,刘泽伟,李晨曦,等.基于“三生空间”的雄安新区土地利用功能转型与生态环境效应研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(20):7113-7122.

黄金川,林浩曦,漆潇潇.面向国土空间优化的三生空间研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2017,36(3):378-391.

王珊珊,毋兆鹏,王娟娟,等.新疆乌鲁木齐市“三生”用地的空间冲突研究[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(2):330-337.

李磊,兰安军,钟九生.黔中水利枢纽工程区植被覆盖变化及其对地形与地貌的响应[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(4):176-183.

翟香,兰安军,廖艳梅,等.地形梯度对土地利用格局时空特征的影响[J].湖南师范大学自然科学学报,2022,45(6):70-80.

熊康宁,黎平,周忠发,等.喀斯特石漠化的遥感GIS典型研究:以贵州省为例[M].北京: 地质出版社,2002.

马士彬,安裕伦,杨广斌.基于GIS的喀斯特区域不同岩性基底植被NDVI变化分析[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(2):202-206.

张钰莹.西南地区景观生态风险与生态系统服务价值综合分区研究[D].北京:中国环境科学研究院,2021.

唐敏.赤水河流域生态效应多维评价及其与地形因子的关系[D].贵州贵阳:贵州大学,2021.

施厚军.北盘江流域土地利用变化及生态效应研究[D].贵州贵阳:贵州师范大学,2021.

郭彦君,郭文炯.“三生空间”视角下山西中部盆地城市群景观生态风险分析[J].生态学杂志,2022,41(9):1813-1824.

孙丽蓉,马静,周冬梅,等.石羊河流域景观生态风险时空分布特征[J].生态科学,2022,41(2):194-203.

刘迪,陈海,张敏,等.生态脆弱区景观生态风险时空分异及其地形梯度分析:以陕西省米脂县为例[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(4):239-244.

杨清可,段学军,王磊,等.基于“三生空间”的土地利用转型与生态环境效应:以长江三角洲核心区为例[J].地理科学,2018,38(1):97-106.

李晓文,方创琳,黄金川,等.西北干旱区城市土地利用变化及其区域生态环境效应:以甘肃河西地区为例[J].第四纪研究,2003,23(3):280-290.

崔佳,臧淑英.哈大齐工业走廊土地利用变化的生态环境效应[J].地理研究,2013,32(5):848-856.

马骏,裴燕如,王慧媛,等.鄂尔多斯—榆林地区景观生态风险评价及其驱动因子分析[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(2):275-283.

和春兰,普军伟,沈金祥.2005—2018年澜沧江下游流域景观生态安全时空变化及其驱动因素[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(4):219-227.

张锋,陈伟强,马月红,等.基于景观结构的黄河沿岸土地利用生态风险时空变化分析:以河南省为例[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(2):250-257.

龚德勇,彭扬,王晓敏,等.贵州山地芒果生产优势及产业化前景[J].江西农业学报,2016,28(1):30-34.

钟祺康,王志一,王娜,等.陕北干旱区景观生态风险空间分异特征及驱动因素分析[J].测绘通报,2022,544(7):100-106.

韩会庆,李金艳,陈思盈,等.喀斯特地区贫困乡村景观格局及生态风险分析[J].农业资源与环境学报,2020,37(2):161-168.

Views

721

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Spatiotemporal evolution of productive-living-ecological space at county level of Qinling-Daba Mountains area under background of urban-rural integration

Spatiotemporal variation of soil water erosion and influencing factors in eastern region of agro-pastoral ecotone in northern China

Driving factors and prediction of landscape ecological risk in typical karst basin——A case study in Dabang River basin

Spatiotemporal differentiation and driving factors of cultivated land development intensity in Gansu Province

Characteristics of Soil Moisture on Zanthox ylum Forest Land in Karst Valley of Guizhou Province

Related Author

Li Chenxi

Wu Guochao

Wu Kening

Zhang Letong

Wu Jingyao

Wei Hongbin

Jin Zhikun

Wu Jie

Related Institution

Branch of China National Geological Exploration Center of Building Materials Industry

Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center， Ministry of Natural Resources

Shaanxi Institute of Geological Survey

Geosciences

⁰