Liu Jiawei, Cai Hong, Zheng Tingting, et al. Annual Distribution Characteristics of Chishui River Watershed Runoff and Its Response to Precipitation Based on SWAT Model[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(3): 180-187.
DOI:
Liu Jiawei, Cai Hong, Zheng Tingting, et al. Annual Distribution Characteristics of Chishui River Watershed Runoff and Its Response to Precipitation Based on SWAT Model[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(3): 180-187. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20220401.001.
Annual Distribution Characteristics of Chishui River Watershed Runoff and Its Response to Precipitation Based on SWAT Model
[Objective] The variation characteristics of non-uniformity for the distribution of annual runoff of Chishui River and its response to precipitation was analyzed in order to provide a basis for decision-making regarding the development and utilization of water resources and flood control in the upper and middle reaches of the Chishui River basin.[Methods] We constructed a database for the SWAT model to simulate watershed runoff. The model was calibrated and validated with measured monthly runoff data. Model output data were combined with precipitation/runoff concentration degree (PCD/RCD) and concentration period (PCP/RCP)
and the characteristics of annual runoff distribution and its response to precipitation were determined.[Results] The coefficient of determination (R2) and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (Ens) values for two hydrological stations were greater than 0.83 for the calibration period
and greater than 0.69 for the validation period
which meet the accuracy requirements. The annual distributions of precipitation and runoff was significantly uneven
and the change trends for the two were relatively consistent
with precipitation and runoff mainly concentrated in June to August. The temporal and spatial distributions of RCD were significantly affected by PCD. Due to infiltration and evapotranspiration
watershed RCD was usually greater than PCD. But when PCD<0.3
RCD was no longer dominated by PCD. Due to the lag in the response of watershed runoff to precipitation changes
RCP was often greater than PCP
and a small
short-term increase in precipitation had a significant impact on PCP
but a limited effect on RCP.[Conclusion] Precipitation was the leading factor causing changes in RCD and RCP in Chishui River watershed. Changes in the runoff coefficient in different periods were the main reason for the different response characteristics of RCD/RCP compared with PCD/PCP.
Zhang Lujun, Qian Yongfu.Annual distribution features of precipitation in China and their interannual variations[J].Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 2003, 17(2):146-163.
Romanowicz A A, Vanclooster M, Rounsevell M, et al.Sensitivity of the SWAT model to the soil and land use data parametrisation:A case study in the Thyle catchment, Belgium[J].Ecological Modelling, 2005, 187(1):27-39.
Abbaspour K C, Johnson C A, van Genuchten M T.Estimating uncertain flow and transport parameters using a sequential uncertainty fitting procedure[J].Vadose Zone Journal, 2004, 3(4):1340-1352.
Schuol J, Abbaspour K C, Srinivasan R, et al.Estimation of freshwater availability in the West African sub-continent using the SWAT hydrologic model[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2008, 352(1/2):30-49.
Merz R, Blöschl G.A regional analysis of event runoff coefficients with respect to climate and catchment characteristics in Austria[J].Water Resources Research, 2009, 45(1):1-19.