Evaluation and Optimization of Status Assessment of Territorial Space Development and Protection in Northeast China

Xue Ping; Zhao Yuntai; Niu Shandong; Lü Xiao

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.06.043

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Evaluation and Optimization of Status Assessment of Territorial Space Development and Protection in Northeast China

- Evaluation and Optimization of Status Assessment of Territorial Space Development and Protection in Northeast China
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 42, Issue 6, Pages: 361-368(2022)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 东北大学文法学院,辽宁,沈阳,110169
  2. 中国国土勘测规划院,北京,100035
  3. 辽宁省自然资源厅土地保护与利用重点实验室,辽宁,沈阳,110169
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.06.043
  CLC： F301.2
- Published：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Xue Ping, Zhao Yuntai, Niu Shandong, et al. Evaluation and Optimization of Status Assessment of Territorial Space Development and Protection in Northeast China[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(6): 361-368.
DOI：

Xue Ping, Zhao Yuntai, Niu Shandong, et al. Evaluation and Optimization of Status Assessment of Territorial Space Development and Protection in Northeast China[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(6): 361-368. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.06.043.

摘要

[目的] 探究东北地区37个地市国土空间开发保护现状及内部差异性，及时识别和发现国土空间开发保护的风险和问题，为编制东北地区国土空间规划和探索东北地区国土空间开发保护格局优化路径提供理论依据。 [方法] 运用压力-状态-响应(PSR)模型，以安全、创新、协调、绿色、开放、共享为评价要素构建国土空间开发保护现状评价指标体系，对东北地区37个地市国土空间开发保护的现状水平及其内部各要素的互动关系进行综合评价。 [结果] ①2018年东北地区各地市国土空间开发保护现状评估综合分值在7.35～61.41分之间，各地市平均得分为18.65分。 ②黑龙江省、辽宁省、内蒙古自治区和吉林省国土空间开发保护现状评估得分平均值分别为20.35，18.92，16.77，16.34。 ③东北地区各地市压力层、状态层、响应层平均分值分别为5.21，7.69，5.75。 [结论] 2018年东北地区37个地市国土空间开发保护水平总体不高，且区域联动效应较差；东北地区各地市国土空间开发保护压力层、状态层、响应层得分差异较大，没有统筹安全、创新、协调、绿色、开放、共享的协同发展。

Abstract

[Objective] The status assessment and internal differences of territorial space development and protection in 37 cities in Northeast China were determined in order to identify and discover risks and problems regarding territorial space development and protection in a timely manner in order to provide a theoretical basis for compiling the territorial spatial planning of Northeast China and for exploring the optimization path of territorial spatial development and protection pattern in Northeast China. [Methods] Using a pressure state response (PSR) model

and taking security

innovation

coordination

green

openness

and sharing as the evaluation elements

an evaluation index system of the current situation of land and space development and protection was constructed to comprehensively evaluate the current level of land space development and protection and the interactive relationships of internal factors in 37 prefectures and cities in Northeast China. [Results] ① In 2018

the comprehensive score of the evaluation of the status assessment of territorial space development and protection of 37 cities in Northeast China ranged from 7.35 to 61.41

and the average score was 18.65. ② The average scores of the assessment of the status of territorial space development and protection in Heilongjiang

Liaoning

Inner Mongolia

and Jilin provinces were 20.35

18.92

16.77

and 16.34

respectively. ③ The average scores of the pressure layer

the state layer

and the response layer in prefecture-level cities in Northeast China were 5.21

7.69

and 5.75

respectively. [Conclusion] In 2018

the overall level of territorial space development and protection in 37 cities in Northeast China was not high

and the regional linkage effect was poor. The scores of the pressure layer

the state layer

and the response layer of territorial development and protection in various cities in Northeast China were quite different

and there was no coordinated development of safety

innovation

coordination

green

openness

and sharing.

关键词

Keywords

references

田林,孟浩伟.市县国土空间开发保护现状评估的研究[J].北京规划建设,2021(1):123-125.

自然资源部.自然资源部关于全面开展国土空间规划工作的通知[EB/OL](2019-05-28)[2022-2-02]. http://gi.mnr.gov.cn/201905/t20190530_2439129.html.

自然资源部.市县国土空间开发保护现状评估技术指南(试行)[EB/OL](2019-07-18)[2022-2-02]. http://gi.mnr.gov.cn/202111/t20211129_2708446.html.

中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和2035年远景目标纲要[EB/OL](2021-03-13)[2022-2-02]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-03/13/content_5592681.htm?pc.

樊杰,刘汉初,王亚飞,等.东北现象再解析和东北振兴预判研究:对影响国土空间开发保护格局变化稳定因素的初探[J].地理科学,2016,36(10):1445-1456.

尚嫣然,赵霖,冯雨,等.国土空间开发保护现状评估的方法和实践探索:以江西省景德镇市为例[J].城市规划学刊,2020(6):35-42.

樊欣.面向高质量发展的现状评估体系研究:以拉萨市为例[J].建设科技,2020(21):77-81.

姜奕婷,赵晟宇.浅析国土空间开发保护现状评估指标数据的两类常见问题[J].内蒙古科技与经济,2021(15):78-79,81.

张文文,蔡俊,周晓玉.探索安徽省霍山县国土空间开发保护现状评估概要[J].云南农业大学学报(社会科学),2021,15(3):104-110.

常献伟.市级国土空间开发保护现状评估探索:以洛阳市为例[J].中国土地,2021(9):25-27.

詹美旭,魏宗财,王建军,等.面向国土空间安全的城市体检评估方法及治理策略:以广州为例[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(9):2382-2393.

张晓浩,黄华梅,林静柔.市级海洋国土空间开发保护新格局的规划响应路径研究[J].规划师,2022,38(1):85-90.

Cappelli R, Montobbio F. European integration and knowledge flows across european regions[J]. Regional Studies, 2016,50(4):709-727.

Faludi A. Territorial cohesion policy and the european model of society[J]. European Planning Studies, 2007,15(4):81-104.

Haiko H I, Savchenko I O, Matviichuk I O. Development of a morphological model for territorial development of underground city space[J]. Scientific Bulletin of National Mining University, 2019,3:92-98.

黄雪丹.田东县国土空间开发保护现状评估研究[J].大众科技,2020,22(5):21-26.

国家统计局.中国城市统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2019.

中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.中国城市统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2019.

宋晓勇.历史文化街区保护整治工程的防火技术问题[J].消防科学与技术,2017,36(4):474-476.

杨康煜,王妮菲,黄歌.基于PSR-MSD模型的长江经济带水资源承载力评价研究:以武汉市为例[J].价值工程,2020,39(5):290-293.

刘钢,袁晓梅,黄晶,等.基于PSR框架的城市洪涝弹性评估:以苏锡常地区为例[J].资源开发与市场,2018,34(5):593-598.

金辉,王思.基于PSR模型的武汉城市圈生态安全评价及态势研究[J].安全与环境学报,2020,20(1):352-363.

闫晨,陈锦涛,段芮,等.基于压力-状态-响应模型的历史街区防火韧性评估体系构建及应用:以福州市三坊七巷为例[J].科学技术与工程,2021,21(8):3290-3296.

Maurya S P, Singh P K, Ohri A, et al. Identification of indicators for sustainable urban water development planning[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020,108:105691.

樊杰.我国国土空间开发保护格局优化配置理论创新与"十三五"规划的应对策略[J].中国科学院院刊,2016,31(1):1-12.

朱方霞,陈华友.确定区间数决策矩阵属性权重的方法:熵值法[J].安徽大学学报(自然科学版),2006,30(5):4-6.

武增海,李涛.高新技术开发区综合绩效空间分布研究:基于自然断点法的分析[J].统计与信息论坛,2013,28(3):82-88.

Views

496

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Evaluation on resilience of cultivated land and management in agro-pastoral ecotone of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region

Design and Application of Climatologic Resources and Ecological Environment Information System in Northeast China

Ecological Security Evaluation Based on PSR Model for Shengzhong Reservoir in Sichuan Province

Integrated Assessment of Ecological Security in Zhangjiakou Rigion of Hebei Province Based on PSR Mode

Benefits Assessment for Soil and Water Conservation Projects in Black Soil Region of Northeast China

Related Author

Zhao Huafu

Yan Jiani

Jin Zhikun

Yang Xia

CHEN Gang

ZHANG Yu-shu

HU Wei

BAN Xian-xiu

Related Institution

China Building Materials Industrial Geological Exploration Center， Shaanxi Branch

College of Desert Control Science and Engineering， Inner Mongolia Agricultural University

School of Land Science and Technology， China University of Geosciences Beijing

The Weather Modification Office of Liaoning Province

Institute of Atmospheric Environment, CMA

⁰