Greenhouse Gas Budget and Net Carbon Sequestration of Different Afforestation Types Used in Grain for Green Project —A Case Study in Central South and East China

Yu Tianren; Lu Fei; Yang Shishuai; Zhang Lu; Huang Binbin; Wang Xiaoke; Xian Chaofan; Meng Ling; Ouyang Zhiyun

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.05.041

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Greenhouse Gas Budget and Net Carbon Sequestration of Different Afforestation Types Used in Grain for Green Project —A Case Study in Central South and East China

- Greenhouse Gas Budget and Net Carbon Sequestration of Different Afforestation Types Used in Grain for Green Project —A Case Study in Central South and East China
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 42, Issue 5, Pages: 337-347(2022)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国科学院生态环境研究中心, 城市与区域生态国家重点实验室,北京,100085
  2. 中国科学院大学,北京,100049
  3. 北京京津冀区域生态环境变化与综合治理国家野外科学观测研究站,北京,100085
  4. 全球变化研究协同创新中心,北京,100875
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.05.041
  CLC： S721;X171.4
- Published：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Yu Tianren, Lu Fei, Yang Shishuai, et al. Greenhouse Gas Budget and Net Carbon Sequestration of Different Afforestation Types Used in Grain for Green Project —A Case Study in Central South and East China[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(5): 337-347.
DOI：

Yu Tianren, Lu Fei, Yang Shishuai, et al. Greenhouse Gas Budget and Net Carbon Sequestration of Different Afforestation Types Used in Grain for Green Project —A Case Study in Central South and East China[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(5): 337-347. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.05.041.

摘要

[目的

]

揭示退耕还林工程温室气体泄漏对工程固碳减排的抵消作用，明确工程不同造林模式对固碳减排实际贡献的差异和空间格局。[方法

]

针对退耕还林4种类型造林(即生态林、经济林、用材林和薪炭林)构建了碳核算与净减排评估方法(CANM-GGP)，通过核算典型树种造林的植被和土壤固碳、伐后产品固碳和生物质能源替代化石能源减排等固碳减排效应，以及造林和经营管护的温室气体泄漏，对中南及华东地区退耕还林工程4种类型造林的净碳汇进行评估。[结果

]

2000—2019年，中南及华东地区退耕还林工程的生态林、经济林、用材林固碳和薪炭林减排总计648.43 Tg (以CO

计)，同期工程带来温室气体泄漏96.43 Tg，抵消总固碳减排的14.87%；不同造林类型的温室气体泄漏中，经济林最多，为57.69 Tg，抵消其固碳效应的73.95%；温室气体泄漏分别抵消生态林、用材林和薪炭林固碳减排的5.75%，16.59%和27.05%。工程平均单位面积净碳汇为4.52 t/(hm

·a)(以CO

计)；各省区在2.85~5.74 t/(hm

·a)之间；生态林为5.52～8.89 t/(hm

·a)，经济林为0.72～1.56 t/(hm

·a)，用材林为0.8～1.61 t/(hm

·a)，薪炭林为3.18～5.99 t/(hm

·a)。[结论

]

中南及华东地区退耕还林工程取得了巨大的净固碳减排效益，生态林固碳增汇效果明显，净减排效益最显著，生物质能源替代化石能源燃烧减排的效益非常可观。作为最大的温室气体泄漏因素，化肥相关的温室气体排放对生态工程碳汇的抵消影响不容忽视。

Abstract

[Objective] The offsetting effects of greenhouse gas (GHG) leakage on carbon sequestration and GHG mitigation in the grain for green project (GGP) were analyzed in order to clarify the difference and spatial pattern of actual GHG sequestration and mitigation contribution of different afforestation types to GHG sequestration and mitigation. [Methods] A method for the GHG budget accounting of different types of afforestation (including ecological forest

economic forest

timber forest

and firewood forest) under GGP (i.e.

carbon accounting and net mitigation-GGP) was established. Carbon sequestration effects of afforestation were estimated for selected typical tree species in vegetation and soil. Carbon sequestration of post-logging products and mitigation of fossil fuel substitution by biomass energy were determined. GHG leakage caused by afforestation and management was also determined. The net carbon sequestration of the four afforestation types in GGP in Central South and East China was then evaluated. [Results] The carbon sequestration of ecological forest

economic forest

and timber forest

and the mitigation of firewood forest amounted to a total of 648.43 Tg (CO2) during the period from 2000 to 2019 in Central South and East China. Additionally

the total GHG leakage of GGP reached 96.43 Tg

which could offset 14.87% of the total carbon sequestration and mitigation. The economic forest produced the largest GHG leakage

which reached 57.69 Tg

offsetting 73.95% of its carbon sequestration. The GHG leakage offset 5.75%

16.59%

and 27.05% of the carbon sequestration or mitigation effect of ecological forest

timber forest

and firewood forest

respectively. The average net carbon sequestration per unit area of GGP in this region was 4.52 t/(ha·yr) (CO2)

ranging from 2.85 t/(ha·yr) in Guangxi to 5.74 t/(ha·yr) in Anhui. The net mitigation rate of GGP was 5.52~8.89 t/(ha·yr) for ecological forest

0.72~1.56 t/(ha·yr) for economic forest

0.8~1.61 t/(ha·yr) for timber forest

and 3.18~5.99 t/ha/yr for firewood forest. [Conclusion] GGP in Central South and East China has achieved huge net carbon sequestration and emission mitigation benefits. Ecological forest had an obvious effect on carbon sequestration

and the net mitigation benefit was the most significant. Biomass energy could replace fossil fuel combustion and its mitigation benefit was also very considerable. The influence of fertilizer-related GHG leakage on ecological engineering carbon sequestration cannot be ignored. Fertilizer-related GHG emissions and their offsetting effect on carbon sequestration in the ecological project were nonnegligible because it was the largest GHG emission factor.

关键词

Keywords

references

Doukas H, Nikas A. Decision support models in climate policy [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2020,280(1):1-24.

刘魏魏,王效科,逯非,等.造林再造林、森林采伐、气候变化、CO

浓度升高、火灾和虫害对森林固碳能力的影响[J].生态学报,2016,36(8):2113-2122.

邵全琴,樊江文,刘纪远,等.重大生态工程生态效益监测与评估研究[J].地球科学进展,2017,32(11):1174-1182.

Lu Fei, Hu Huifeng, Sun Wenjuan, et al. Effects of national ecological restoration projects on carbon sequestration in China from 2001 to 2010 [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018,115(16):4039-4044.

陶然,徐志刚,徐晋涛.退耕还林,粮食政策与可持续发展[J].中国社会科学,2004(6):25-38.

徐晋涛,陶然,徐志刚.退耕还林: 成本有效性、结构调整效应与经济可持续性:基于西部三省农户调查的实证分析[J].经济学(季刊),2004,3(4):139-162.

国家林业和草原局.中国林业统计年2000—2019[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2001—2020.

Deng Lei, Liu Guobin, Shangguan Zhouping. Land-use conversion and changing soil carbon stocks in China’s 'Grain-for-Green’ Program: A synthesis [J]. Global Change Biology, 2014,20(11):3544-3556.

刘博杰,张路,逯非,等.中国退耕还林工程温室气体排放与净固碳量[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(6):1693-1707.

周鸿升.退耕还林工程典型技术模式[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2014.

安徽统计年鉴2020[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2020.

江西省统计局国家统计局江西调查总队.江西省2020年国民经济和社会发展统计公报: 2021年3月23日[N].江西日报,2021-03-23(6).

河南省统计局国家统计局河南调查总队.2020年河南省国民经济和社会发展统计公报: 2021年3月7日[N].河南日报,2021-03-07(6).

国家统计局,环境保护部.中国环境统计年鉴(2012)[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2013.

湖北省统计局国家统计局湖北调查总队.2020年湖北省国民经济和社会发展统计公报[N].湖北日报,2021-03-18(4).

广西壮族自治区统计局，国家统计局广西调查总队.2016年广西壮族自治区国民经济和社会发展统计公报: 2017年4月11日[N].广西日报,2017-04-27(15).

广西壮族自治区统计局，国家统计局广西调查总队.2019年广西壮族自治区国民经济和社会发展统计公报:(2020年3月12日)[N].广西日报,2020-03-17(6).

海南省统计局,国家统计局海南调查总队.海南统计年鉴-2013(总第27期)[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2013.

陈泮勤,王效科,王礼茂.中国陆地生态系统碳收支与增汇对策[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.

王兵,魏江生,胡文.中国灌木林—经济林—竹林的生态系统服务功能评估[J].生态学报,2011,31(7):1936-1945.

Nave L E, Vance E D, Swanston C W, et al. Harvest impacts on soil carbon storage in temperate forests [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2010,259(5):857-866.

Crooks S. 2013 supplement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories:Wetlands [J]. IPCCS, witzerland, 2014.

Kroeze C, Mosier A, Nevison C, et al. Revised 1996 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories: Chapter 4.agriculture [M]. Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, 1997.

马忠海,潘自强,贺惠民.中国煤电链温室气体排放系数及其与核电链的比较[J].核科学与工程,1999,19(3):268-274.

Lu Fei, Wang Xiaoke, Han Bing, et al. Modeling the greenhouse gas budget of straw returning in China: Feasibility of mitigation and countermeasures [J]. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2010,1195(Suppl 1):E107-E130.

刘博杰,逯非,王效科,等.中国天然林资源保护工程温室气体排放及净固碳能力[J].生态学报,2016,36(14):4266-4278.

Lu Fei, Wang Xiaoke, Han Bing, et al. Net mitigation potential of straw return to Chinese cropland: Estimation with a full greenhouse gas budget model [J]. Ecological Applications: A Publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2010,20(3):634-647.

北京市统计局,国家统计局北京调查总队.北京统计年鉴(中英文对照)[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2011.

陈舜.中国农田化肥农药生产的温室气体排放估算[D].北京:中国科学院大学,2014.

榆林市林业和草原局.DB 6108/T 28-2021沙地柏营养袋扦插育苗及造林技术规程[S].2021.

张方秋,曾令海,李小川.广东森林碳汇造林理论与实践[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2014.

张红文,雷跃平.河南飞播营造林新技术[M].郑州:黄河水利出版社,2010.

何慎,雷正菊,曹学良,等.麻栎播种育苗及造林技术[J].林业实用技术,2013(9):71-72.

Zheng Xunhua, Han Shenghui, Huang Yao, et al. Re-quantifying the emission factors based on field measurements and estimating the direct N

O emission from Chinese croplands [J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2004,18(2).

国有技术监督局.GB/T 15783-1995主要造林树种林地化学除草技术规程[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1995.

李红勋,马花如.我国速生丰产用材林发展潜力研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2013.

Tian Yihui, Zhu Qinghua, Geng Yong. An analysis of energy-related greenhouse gas emissions in the Chinese iron and steel industry [J]. Energy Policy, 2013,56:352-361.

Wang Yilei, Zhu Qinghua, Geng Yong. Trajectory and driving factors for GHG emissions in the Chinese cement industry [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013,53:252-260.

白秀萍,陈绍志,何友均,等.国外林区道路发展现状及启示[J].世界林业研究,2015,28(1):85-91.

姚巍.陕西天然林保护工程十年建设现状及发展对策研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2010.

Lun Fei, Liu Yu, He Lu, et al. Life cycle research on the carbon budget of the Larix principis-rupprechtii plantation forest ecosystem in North China [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018,177:178-186.

Proietti P, Sdringola P, Brunori A, et al. Assessment of carbon balance in intensive and extensive tree cultivation systems for oak, olive, poplar and walnut plantation [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016,112:2613-2624.

欧光龙,唐军荣,王俊峰,等.云南省临沧市膏桐能源林造林碳汇计量[J].应用与环境生物学报,2010,16(5):745-749.

Khanali M, Akram A, Behzadduction, 2018,170:1654-1664.

Li Nian, Wei Caidi, Zhang Hui, et al. Drivers of the national and regional crop production-derived greenhouse gas emissions in China [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020,257:120503.uve C, et al. Estimating the net carbon balance of boreal open woodland afforestation: A case-study in Québec’s closed-crown boreal forest [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2009,257(2):483-494.

Owari T, Kamata N, Tange T, et al. Effects of silviculture treatments in a hurricane-damaged forest on carbon storage and emissions in central Hokkaido, Japan [J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2011,22(1):13-20.

李梦,施拥军,周国模,等.浙江省嘉兴市高速公路造林碳汇计量[J].浙江农林大学学报,2014,31(3):329-335.

Lemprière T C, Johnston M, Willcocks A, et al. Saskatchewan forest carbon sequestration project [J]. The Forestry Chronicle, 2002,78(6):843-849.

Katircioglu S, Dalir S, Olya H G. Is a clean development mechanism project economically justified? Case study of an international carbon sequestration project in Iran [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016,23(1):504-513.

Jindal R, Swallow B, Kerr J. Forestry-based carbon sequestration projects in Africa: Potential benefits and challenges [J]. Natural Resources Forum, 2008,32(2):116-130.

Sivrikaya F, Keles S, Cakir G. Spatial distribution and temporal change of carbon storage in timber biomass of two different forest management units [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2007,132(1):429-438.

陈欣怡,郑国全.安吉县竹林经营碳汇项目计量分析[J].林业经济问题,2018,38(4):23-29.

李金航,明辉,于伟咏.四川省林业碳汇项目实施的比较分析[J].四川农业大学学报,2015,33(3):332-337.

唐才富,涂云军,代丽梅,等.CCER林业碳汇项目开发现状及建议[J].四川林业科技,2017,38(4):115-119.

Zhou Wangming, Lewis B J, Wu Shengnan, et al. Biomass carbon storage and its sequestration potential of afforestation under natural forest protection program in China [J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2014,24(4):406-413.

尹晓芬,王晓鸣,王旭,等.林业碳汇项目基准线和监测方法学及应用分析:以贵州省贞丰县林业碳汇项目为例[J].地球与环境,2012,40(3):460-465.

Liu Bojie, Zhang Lu, Lu Fei, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions and net carbon sequestration of the Beijing-Tianjin Sand Source Control Project in China [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019,225:163-172.

Chen Jiandong, Gao Ming, Cheng Shulei, et al. County-level CO

emissions and sequestration in China during 1997—2017 [J]. Scientific Data, 2020,7:391.

Guan Yuru, Shan Yuli, Huang Qi, et al. Assessment to China’s recent emission pattern shifts [J]. Earth’s Future, 2021,9(11):e2021EF002241.

Shan Yuli, Huang Qi, Guan Dabo, et al. China CO

emission accounts 2016—2017 [J]. Scientific Data, 2020,7(1):1-9.

Shan Yuli, Guan Dabo, Zheng Heran, et al. China CO

emission accounts 1997—2015 [J]. Scientific Data, 2018,5(1):1-14.

Shan Yuli, Liu Jianghua, Liu Zhu, et al. New provincial CO

emission inventories in China based on apparent energy consumption data and updated emission factors [J]. Applied Energy, 2016,184:742-750.

李世东.中外退耕还林还草之比较及其启示[J].世界林业研究,2002,15(2):22-27.

de la Fuente T, González-García S, Athanassiadis D, et al. Fuel consumption and GHG emissions of forest biomass supply chains in Northern Sweden:A comparison analysis between integrated and conventional supply chains [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2016,32(7):1-33.

Liu Weiwei, Wang Xiaoke, Liu Bojie, et al. Full accounting of the greenhouse gas budget in the forestry of China [J]. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2018,23(5):643-666.

Sun Xiangyang, Wang Genxu, Huang Mei, et al. Forest biomass carbon stocks and variation in Tibet’s carbon-dense forests from 2001 to 2050 [J]. Scientific Reports, 2016,6:34687.

Yue Junwei, Guan Jinhong, Deng Lei, et al. Allocation pattern and accumulation potential of carbon stock in natural spruce forests in northwest China [J]. PeerJ, 2018,6:e4859.

Nakano K, Shibahara N, Nakai T, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions from round wood production in Japan [J]. Journal of Cleaner Pro

Views

524

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Evaluation on Effects of Agricultural Structure Adjustment in the Process of Grain for Green Project in Yan'an City

Phase Analysis of Constructing Commodity-oriented Eco-agriculture After Grain for Green Project in Ansai County of North Shaanxi Provinc

Canopy Hydrological Effects of four Economic Forests in Taihang Mountain, Hebei Province

Discussion on Some Issues About Returning Farmland to Forest or Grassland on Loess Plateau in New Era

Dynamic Monitoring of Grain for Green Program at Chaoyang City, Liaoning Province Based on Landsat Images During 1985-2020

Related Author

LIU Yan-sheng

LIU Xiao-li

YAN Jun-ping

YAO Rong

GAO Liang

ZHANG Nan

MEI Hua

WANG Ji-jun

Related Institution

College of Tourism & Environment,Shaanxi Normal University

The High School Affiliated to Northwest A & F University,Yangling

Party School of Yan’an Municipal Party Committees,Yan’an

Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, CAS & MWR, Yangling

College of Resources and Environment, Northwest A & F University, Yangling

⁰