Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Soil Erosion in Luoshan County, He’nan Province Based on Geological Formation

Yang Tao; Dong Haogang; Li Xin; Luo Minxuan; Wu Feng; Huang Jinyan; Xie Xiang

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.05.019

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Soil Erosion in Luoshan County, He’nan Province Based on Geological Formation

- Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Soil Erosion in Luoshan County, He’nan Province Based on Geological Formation
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 42, Issue 5, Pages: 151-157(2022)
- 作者机构：
  
  中国地质调查局长沙自然资源综合调查中心,湖南,长沙,410600
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.05.019
  CLC： S157.1
- Published：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Yang Tao, Dong Haogang, Li Xin, et al. Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Soil Erosion in Luoshan County, He’nan Province Based on Geological Formation[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(5): 151-157.
DOI：

Yang Tao, Dong Haogang, Li Xin, et al. Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Soil Erosion in Luoshan County, He’nan Province Based on Geological Formation[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(5): 151-157. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.05.019.

摘要

[目的] 分析各地质建造单元的水土流失情况与生态地质特征之间的关系，为河南省罗山县水土流失防治规划与修复提供参考。[方法] 基于修正的通用水土流失方程(RUSLE)，利用遥感和GIS手段对河南省罗山县主要建造单元的水土流失的情况进行计算和统计，查清水土流失强度及面积；从地质建造及特征角度分析典型建造水土流失的影响因素。[结果] ①由于形成时代、物质成分、地质背景不同，各建造单元生态地质特征存在差异； ②罗山县水土流失分布具有明显的建造空间差异性，白垩纪酸性岩浆岩建造单元水土流失率高达50.1%，泥盆纪变类复理石建造水土流失率仅为13.5%。[结果] 土壤结构、植被因子、地形坡度是影响水土流失分布差异的重要因素，在制定水土流失与修复规划时，应重点考虑相关因素。

Abstract

[Objective] The relationship between soil erosion of each formation unit and ecological geological characteristics was analyzed in order to provide a reference for soil erosion prevention and for control planning and restoration in Luoshan County

He’nan Province. [Methods] Based on the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE)

soil erosion of main formation units in Luoshan County was calculated and counted by means of remote sensing and GIS

and the intensity and the area of soil erosion was determined. The influencing factors of soil erosion in a typical formation were then discussed from the perspectives of geological formation and characteristics. [Results] ① Due to differences in formation times

material compositions

and geological backgrounds

the eco-geological characteristics of each formation unit were different; ② The distribution of soil erosion in Luoshan County had obvious spatial differences. The soil erosion rate of the cretaceous acid magmatic rock formation unit was as high as 50.1%

while the soil erosion rate of the devonian metamorphic flysch formation unit was only 13.5%. [Conclusion] Soil structure

vegetation factors

and terrain slopes were important factors affecting the differences in soil erosion distribution

which should be considered in the planning of soil erosion prevention and rehabilitation.

关键词

Keywords

references

李智广,曹炜,刘秉正,等.我国水土流失状况与发展趋势研究[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,6(1):57-62.

陈国光,刘红樱,陈进全,等.福建长汀县水土流失的地质影响因素及防治对策[J].水文地质工程地质,2020,47(6):26-35.

水利部水土保持监测中心.我国水土保持监测工作发展成就与作用[J].中国水土保持,2021(7):1-4.

常斐杨,行仙峰,王帆.2019年包头市水土流失动态监测研究[J].中国水土保持,2021(7):56-58.

史志华,刘前进,张含玉,等.近十年土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究进展与展望[J].土壤学报,2020,57(5):1117-1127.

王京彬,卫晓锋,张会琼,等.基于地质建造的生态地质调查方法:以河北省承德市国家生态文明示范区综合地质调查为例[J].中国地质,2020,47(6):1611-1624.

中国地质调查局DD2019-02.固体矿产地质调查技术要求(1∶50 000)[S].北京:2019.

卫晓锋,孙厚云,何新泽,等.浅山区生态环境地质调查评价探索:以承德市生态文明建设示范区为例[C]//中国矿物岩石地球化学学会.中国矿物岩石地球化学学会第17届学术年会论文摘要集,2019:2.

刘洪,黄瀚霄,欧阳渊,等.基于地质建造的土壤地质调查及应用前景分析:以大凉山区西昌市为例[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2020,40(1):91-105.

中国地质调查局DD2019-01.区域地质调查技术要求(1:50 000)[S].北京:2019.

郭建军,李惠卓.不同母岩母质土壤特性的分析与研究[J].河北林业科技,2003(2):7-8.

Hd J, Odum E P. Fundamentals of Ecology [J]. Population (French Edition), 1974,29(2):376-376.

陈云明,刘国彬,郑粉莉,等.RUSLE侵蚀模型的应用及进展[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(4):80-83.

傅水龙,梁娟珠,黄路平.基于RUSLE模型的长汀县水土流失评估[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(1):196-200.

Wischmeier W H, Smith D. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: A guide to conservation planning [M]. Department of Agriculture, Science and Education Administration, 1978.

吕喜玺,沈荣明.土壤可蚀性因子

值的初步研究[J].水土保持学报,1992,6(1):63-70.

方纲,阮伏水,吴雄海,等.福建省主要土壤可蚀性特征初探[J].福建水土保持,1997,9(2):19-23.

中华人民共和国水利部,土壤侵蚀分类分级标准SL190-2007[S].北京：2008.

高华端.贵州岩溶地区地质条件对水土流失的影响[J].山地农业生物学报,2003,22(1):20-22.

徐加盼.颗粒组成对花岗岩风化岩土体抗剪强度的影响研究[D]. 湖北武汉:华中农业大学,2020:24-26.

李黎,颜琳,黄晶.砾石量对砾质黏土抗剪强度参数影响规律的试验研究[J].四川建筑,2013,33(2):74-75.

刘洋,李春阳.植被因子对水土流失的影响[J].世界科技研究与发展,2005,27(5):95-99.

刘悦,刚成诚,温仲明,等.降雨和植被因子对延河流域土壤侵蚀影响的定量评估[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(2):35-42.

潘成忠,上官周平.降雨和坡度对坡面流水动力学参数的影响[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2009,17(6):843-851.

邓辉,何政伟,陈晔,等.基于GIS和RUSLE模型的山地环境水土流失空间特征定量分析:以四川泸定县为例[J].地球与环境,2013,41(6):669-679.

陈法扬.不同坡度对土壤冲刷量影响试验[J].中国水土保持,1985(2):20-21.

Views

547

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Runoff and sediment yield characteristics of typical soil slopes in Xin’an River basin under different rainfall intensities and slope gradients

Soil erosion characteristics and assessment of their differences in typical regions of Fujian Province in 2024 based on CSLE model

Distribution of human-disturbed lands and its soil erosion characteristics in Pearl River basin from 2019 to 2024

Erosion characteristics and influencing factors of production roads in Ningxia under heavy rainstorm conditions

Soil erosion changes and driving factors in Qinghai Province from 2004 to 2023

Related Author

Song Zhen

Sun Zelong

Ren Jijun

Yue Zhongshuai

Yuan Wei

Pu Jian

Li Jianming

Wang Wenlong

Related Institution

Changsha General Survey of Natural Resources Center， China Geological Survey

Huangshan Observation and Research Station for Land-Water Resources

The Research Center of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Environment，Chinese;Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Education， State Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and;Desertification Control， Yangling

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute of Changjiang Water Resources;Commission

⁰