Scenario Simulation and Prediction of Land Use Patterns in Guilin City Considering Impact of Scenic Spot Expansion

Wu Zhenhua; Yu Qinping; Wang Yabei; Bai Qingguo

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.05.017

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Scenario Simulation and Prediction of Land Use Patterns in Guilin City Considering Impact of Scenic Spot Expansion

- Scenario Simulation and Prediction of Land Use Patterns in Guilin City Considering Impact of Scenic Spot Expansion
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 42, Issue 5, Pages: 131-139(2022)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 桂林电子科技大学商学院,广西,桂林,541000
  2. 北京鹏升建筑工程有限公司,北京,100161
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.05.017
  CLC： F592.7;F301.2
- Published：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Wu Zhenhua, Yu Qinping, Wang Yabei, et al. Scenario Simulation and Prediction of Land Use Patterns in Guilin City Considering Impact of Scenic Spot Expansion[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(5): 131-139.
DOI：

Wu Zhenhua, Yu Qinping, Wang Yabei, et al. Scenario Simulation and Prediction of Land Use Patterns in Guilin City Considering Impact of Scenic Spot Expansion[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(5): 131-139. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.05.017.

摘要

[目的] 研究广西壮族自治区桂林市景区扩容对土地利用格局的影响，为应对旅游需求激增带来的风险，整治优化国土空间以及科学引导旅游业发展提供理论参考。[方法] 通过设置常规情景与景区扩容情景，运用核密度分析法以及未来土地利用模拟(FLUS)模型模拟与预测桂林市2025年不同情景下的土地利用格局，并根据逐像元对比及景观指数分析不同情景下的土地利用格局差异。[结果] ①对景区的扩容能够在一定程度上减少桂林市旅游热点区域的游客接待压力，但并不利于旅游热点区域周边区县城镇化的推进。②对景区的扩容有利于阳朔县、兴安县等“增长极”旅游业的发展，并辐射与带动周边的大多区县。建设用地扩张加剧，耕地扩张减缓。而桂林市北部由于建设用地分布较为分散，各区县间的辐射与带动作用相对局限，景区扩容情景下兴安县、全州县、龙胜各族自治县旅游业更迅猛的发展对于资源县与灌阳县的辐射与带动作用并不显著，反而使资源县与灌阳县对建设用地资源的竞争力相对更低。③景观指数表明，对景区的扩容会导致耕地、林地、草地与灌木等农业与生态空间遭到更严重的干扰与侵占，但对于水体与湿地的保护更有利，建设用地的扩张也更具整体性。[结论] 桂林市对景区扩容工作的推进会降低旅游热点区域的游客接待压力，促进“增长极”及周边大多区县旅游业的发展，但并不利于热点区域周边以及较为偏远、不在各区县相互辐射范围内区域的发展。

Abstract

[Objective] The impact of scenic spot expansion on the land use pattern of Guilin City

Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region was analyzed in order to provide a theoretical reference for coping with the risks brought by a surge in tourism demand

leading to reasonable urban land planning and scientifically guiding the development of tourism. [Methods] The nuclear density analysis method and the future land use simulation (FLUS) model were used to predict and simulate the land use pattern of Guilin City in 2025 under a conventional scenario and under a scenario with scenic spot expansion. Differences in land use patterns between the two scenarios were analyzed by pixel comparison and by landscape indices. [Results] ① Scenic spot expansion will reduce the reception pressure in tourism hot spots in Guilin City

but it would not be conducive to the urbanization of districts and counties close to the tourism hot spots. ② Scenic spot expansion would be conducive to the development of tourism in “growth poles”

such as Yangshuo and Xing’an County

and the influence of the “growth poles” would also impact most surrounding districts and counties

resulting in a greater expansion of construction land

but a smaller expansion of cultivated land. However

due to the scattered distribution of construction land in the north part of Guilin City

the radiations and driving factors among districts and counties would be relatively limited. Under the scenic spot expansion scenario

more rapid development of tourism in Xing’an

Quanzhou

and Longsheng County had no significant radiation and driving effects on tourism in Ziyuan and Guanyang County

but made these areas less competitive in construction land. ③ The landscape indices showed that scenic spot expansion would lead to more serious disturbance and occupation of agricultural and ecological space such as cultivated land

forest land

grassland

and shrubland. However

scenic spot expansion would promote protection of water bodies and wetlands

and the expansion of construction land would be more integrated. [Conclusion] Scenic spot expansion in Guilin City would reduce the reception pressure in tourism hot spots and promote the development of tourism in “growth poles” and most regions surrounding the “growth poles”. However

scenic spot expansion would not be conducive to the development of areas around tourism hot spots and areas that are relatively remote and not within the radiation ranges.

关键词

Keywords

references

王祺,蒙吉军,毛熙彦.基于邻域相关的漓江流域土地利用多情景模拟与景观格局变化[J].地理研究,2014,33(6):1073-1084.

席建超,王新歌,孔钦钦,等.从传统乡村聚落到现代滨海旅游度假区:过去20年大连金石滩旅游度假区土地利用动态演变[J].人文地理,2016,31(1):130-139.

Liu Shidong, Zhang Jianjun, Geng Yuhuan, et al. Plausible response of urban encroachment on ecological land to tourism growth and implications for sustainable management, a case study of Zhangjiajie, China [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021,132:108253.

McMurry K C. The use of land for recreation [J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1930,20(1):7-20.

Hammes D L. Resort development impact on labor and land markets [J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 1994,21(4):729-744.

Papatheodorou A. Exploring the evolution of tourism resorts [J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2004,31(1):219-237.

王慧,王兵,牛香,等.面向生态康养功能提升的风景区土地利用格局模拟优化[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(10):3391-3400.

Lanya I, Dibia I N, Diara I W, et al. Analysis of subak landuse change due to tourism accomodation development in North Kuta Sub-district, Badung Regency, Indonesia [J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2017,98:012024.

胡可可,秦凤蕾,胡业翠.旅游乡村用地格局演变微尺度分析：以北京市怀柔区西庄村为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(9):238-248.

Hof A, Schmitt T. Urban and tourist land use patterns and water consumption: Evidence from Mallorca, Balearic Islands [J]. Land Use Policy, 2011,28(4):792-804.

Leka A, Lagarias A, Panagiotopoulou M, et al. Development of a Tourism Carrying Capacity Index (TCCI) for sustainable management of coastal areas in Mediterranean Islands: Case study Naxos, Greece [J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2022,216:105978.

Abd-Elmabod S K, Fitch A C, Zhang Zhenhua, et al. Rapid urbanisation threatens fertile agricultural land and soil carbon in the Nile Delta [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019,252:109668.

Estifanos T K, Polyakov M, Pandit R, et al. Managing conflicts between local land use and the protection of the Ethiopian wolf: Residents’ preferences for conservation program design features [J]. Ecological Economics, 2020,169:106511.

褚玉杰,赵振斌,张铖,等.旅游社区多群体态度差异和冲突倾向的空间特征:以西安汤峪镇为例[J].地理学报,2016,71(6):1045-1058.

王建英,邹利林,李梅凎.基于“三生”适宜性的旅游度假区潜在土地利用冲突识别与治理[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(24):279-288.

Zhang Yingsha, Li Xiang, Su Qin. Does spatial layout matter to theme park tourism carrying capacity? [J]. Tourism Management, 2017,61:82-95.

明庆忠,刘安乐.基于功能性分析的旅游景区转型发展研究: 以云南为例[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2020,42(12):117-125.

麻学锋,刘玉林.旅游产业成长与城市空间形态演变的关系: 以张家界为例[J].经济地理,2019,39(5):226-234.

宁志中,王婷,杨雪春.2001年以来中国旅游景区时空格局演变与景区群形成[J].地理研究,2020,39(7):1654-1666.

李琼.灾后游客让渡价值对旅游景点认知度的影响研究:以汶川地震后都江堰景区为例[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2011,32(8):141-145.

席建超,王新歌,孔钦钦,等.旅游地乡村聚落演变与土地利用模式: 野三坡旅游区三个旅游村落案例研究[J].地理学报,2014,69(4):531-540.

王俊华,张廷斌,易桂花,等.DMSP/OLS夜间灯光数据的四川省GDP空间化分析[J].测绘科学,2019,44(8):50-60.

杨洁,张德罡,陈建纲.基于土地利用变化的中国生境质量时空演变分析[J].草原与草坪,2020,40(5):36-42.

Liu Xiaoping, Liang Xun, Li Xia, et al. A future land use simulation model (FLUS) for simulating multiple land use scenarios by coupling human and natural effects [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2017,168:94-116.

苏迎庆,刘庚,赵景波,等.基于FLUS模型的汾河流域生态空间多情景模拟预测[J].干旱区研究,2021,38(4):1152-1161.

赵林峰,刘小平,刘鹏华,等.基于地理分区与FLUS模型的城市扩张模拟与预警[J].地球信息科学学报,2020,22(3):517-530.

Zhu Jie, Sun Yizhong, Song Shuyin, et al. Cellular automata for simulating land-use change with a constrained irregular space representation: A case study in Nanjing City, China [J]. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 2021,48(7):1841-1859.

王家丰,王蓉,冯永玖,等.顾及轨道交通影响的浙中城市群土地利用多情景模拟与分析[J].地球信息科学学报,2020,22(3):605-615.

崔杨林,董斌,位慧敏,等.县域尺度下景观指数的粒度效应[J].浙江农林大学学报,2020,37(4):778-786.

邓元杰,姚顺波,侯孟阳,等.退耕还林还草工程对生态系统碳储存服务的影响: 以黄土高原丘陵沟壑区子长县为例[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(4):826-844.

张世伟,魏璐瑶,金星星,等.基于FLUS-UGB的县域土地利用模拟及城镇开发边界划定研究[J].地球信息科学学报,2020,22(9):1848-1859.

王保盛,廖江福,祝薇,等.基于历史情景的FLUS模型邻域权重设置: 以闽三角城市群2030年土地利用模拟为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(12):4284-4298.

赵轩,彭建东,樊智宇,等.“双评价”视角下基于FLUS模型的武汉大都市区土地利用模拟和城镇开发边界划定研究[J].地球信息科学学报,2020,22(11):2212-2226.

龙远,李萍,唐月亮,等.耕地保护情景下长浏平丘陵区土地利用变化模拟: FLUS模型的应用[J].江西农业学报,2020,32(5):126-134.

蔡成瑞,舒帮荣,朱慧,等.顾及区域异质性驱动的土地利用变化模拟模型研究[J].中国土地科学,2020,34(11):38-47.

罗楠,滕耀宝,胡金龙,等.漓江流域土地利用变化及与旅游发展关系研究[J].西北林学院学报,2021,36(5):262-268.

袁承程,张定祥,刘黎明,等.近10年中国耕地变化的区域特征及演变态势[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(1):267-278.

李婷,王志芳,高伟明.基于景观格局的河北省月岛生态风险评价[J].海洋湖沼通报,2021,43(6):169-178.

Views

504

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Spatio-temporal Evolution of Land Use and Ecological Service Value in Urban Agglomeration on Northern Slope of Tianshan Mountains

Spatial and Temporal Distribution Characteristics of Carbon Storage in Handan City Based on PLUS and InVEST Models

Spatiotemporal evolution of productive-living-ecological space at county level of Qinling-Daba Mountains area under background of urban-rural integration

Soil erosion characteristics and assessment of their differences in typical regions of Fujian Province in 2024 based on CSLE model

Prediction of land-use and ecosystem service value in inter-provincial border areas——A case study of Huaihai economic zone

Related Author

Liu Yaru

Li Li

Jü Chunyan

Zhang Peng

Li Liangtao

Su Yujiao

Wang Qingtao

Han Hongying

Related Institution

School of Management, Xinjiang Agricultural University

School of Landscape and Ecological Engineering, Hebei University of Technology

Handan Forestry and Grassland Research Center

Handan City Landscape Bureau

School of Public Administration， Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology

⁰