Major Achievements and Future Key Fields of Soil Erosion Research in China

Zhang Keli; Cai Qiangguo; Ke Qihua

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.04.046

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Major Achievements and Future Key Fields of Soil Erosion Research in China

- Major Achievements and Future Key Fields of Soil Erosion Research in China
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 42, Issue 4, Pages: 373-380(2022)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 北京师范大学地理科学学部地理学院地表过程与资源生态国家重点试验室,北京,100875
  2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京,100101
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.04.046
  CLC： S157.1;X171.1
- Published：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Zhang Keli, Cai Qiangguo, Ke Qihua. Major Achievements and Future Key Fields of Soil Erosion Research in China[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(4): 373-380.
DOI：

Zhang Keli, Cai Qiangguo, Ke Qihua. Major Achievements and Future Key Fields of Soil Erosion Research in China[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(4): 373-380. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.04.046.

摘要

[目的] 回顾中国土壤侵蚀研究的发展历程

总结该领域的重大研究成果，分析其现阶段存在的问题及未来关键研究领域，旨在为中国水土保持及区域生态建设与绿色高质量发展提供参考。[方法] 基于多年的土壤侵蚀研究野外调查和学术研究工作经验，对中国土壤侵蚀的有关重大问题进行了长期思考。经过多次学术研讨，并与同行权威专家进行了交流和探讨。[结果] 中国土壤侵蚀研究领域近百年来取得了一系列重大研究成果，也存在着一些不足和问题。中国土壤侵蚀研究未来应从土壤侵蚀预报模型完善推广及精度评价，坡面径流计算方法及模型构建，人工模拟降雨试验和水槽试验结果的代表性及真实性评价等方面开展重点研究，并关注土壤侵蚀过程机理、模型应用、技术方法、响应评价、瓶颈问题等议题的研究。[结论] 近百年来的研究实践证明，中国土壤侵蚀研究只有立足于国情，根据中国土壤侵蚀特点、研究现状及社会需求的变化确定和调整研究方向，才有可能取得标志性成果。同时，在国家大力推行生态文明建设的新时代，土壤侵蚀研究也要调整思路和研究重点。此外，水土保持工作还应与国家乡村振兴和生态建设相结合，以先预防，少扰动为主，改变过去先破坏再治理的模式。

Abstract

[Objective] The developing history of soil erosion research in China was reviewed

the major research achievements were summarized

and the current problems and key research fields in the future were analyzed to provide a reference for China's soil and water conservation

regional ecological construction

and high-quality green development.[Methods] Based on years of work experiences from field investigations and academic research on soil erosion

long-term consideration has been given to major issues related to soil erosion in China through numerous academic discussions and communications with leading experts.[Results] A series of major research achievements have been obtained in the field of soil erosion in China during the last one hundred years

but there have also some drawbacks and problems. In the future

soil erosion research in China should focus on several key fields

such as the improvement

promotion

and accuracy evaluation of soil erosion prediction models; calculation methods and model construction for slope runoff; evaluation of the representativeness and validity of results from simulated rainfall and flume scouring experiments; and so on. More attention should be given to the mechanisms of soil erosion processes

model applications

technical methods

response evaluations

bottleneck problems

and other issues.[Conclusion] Researches over the past century has shown that soil erosion research should be conducted based on national conditions. Symbolic achievements could only be achieved by determining and adjusting research directions according to the characteristics of soil erosion

the research status

and the changes in social demands in China. Meanwhile

in the new era when the country is vigorously promoting the construction of ecological civilization

soil erosion research must be refreshed with new ideas and emphases. Moreover

soil and water conservation practices should also be integrated with rural revitalization and ecological construction by giving priority to soil erosion prevention and reducing disturbance to soil. Besides

we should change the previously used model of instituting laws and regulations after soil destruction and water loss occurred.

关键词

Keywords

references

中华人民共和国水利部.中国水土流失公报(2020年)[EB/OL](2021-12-30)[2022-5-24]. http://www.mwr.gov.cn/sj/tjgb/zgstbcgb/202109/t20210930_1545971.html.

Baver L D. Ewald Wollny:A pioneer in soil and water conservation research[J]. Soil Science Society of American Proceeding, 1938,3:330-333.

Wollny M E. Untersuchungen über das Verhalten der atmosphärischen Niederschläge zur Pflanze und zum Boden[J]. Forschungen Geb. Agric.-Physica, 1890,13:316-356.

Miller M F. Early measurements of runoff and erosion[J]. U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation, 1946, 39(2):99-104.

Forsling C L. A study of the influence of herbaceous plant cover on surface run-off and soil erosion in relation to grazing on the Wasatch Plateau in Utah. Technical Bulletin No. 230[R]. Washington, DC:1931.

Duley F L, Miller M F. Erosion and surface runoff under different soil conditions[M]. Columbia, Missouri:University of Missouri, College of Agriculture, Agricultural Experiment Station, Research Bulletin 63, 1923.

黄秉维.编制黄河中游流域土壤侵蚀分区图的经验教训[J].科学通报,1955(12):15-21.

朱显谟.黄土区土壤侵蚀的分类[J].土壤学报,1956,4(2):99-115.

罗来兴.划分晋西、陕北、陇东黄土区域沟间地与沟谷的地貌类型[J].地理学报,1956(3):201-222.

张宗祜.中国黄土高原地貌类型图[M].北京:地质出版社,1986.

张宗祜.中国黄土高原地貌类型图的编制原则[J].水文地质工程地质,1983(2):29-33.

钱宁,张仁,赵业安,等.从黄河下游的河床演变规律来看河道治理中的调水调沙问题[J].地理学报,1978(1):13-24.

龚时旸,熊贵枢.黄河泥沙来源和地区分布[J].人民黄河,1979(1):7-18.

牟金泽,孟庆枚.论流域产沙量计算中的泥沙输移比[J].泥沙研究,1982(2):62-67.

龚时旸,蒋德麒.黄河中游黄土丘陵沟壑区沟道小流域的水土流失及治理[J].中国科学(A辑),1978,21(6):671-678.

承继成.流域地貌数学模型[M].北京:科学出版社,1986.

陈永宗,景可,蔡强国.黄土高原现代侵蚀与治理[M].北京:科学出版社,1988.

陈永宗.黄河中游黄土丘陵区的沟谷类型[J].地理科学,1984,4(4):321-327.

唐克丽.黄河泥沙与黄土高原水土流失综合治理问题[J].中国水土保持,1985(12):10-12.

蔡强国.坡面细沟发生临界条件研究[J].泥沙研究,1998(1):52-59.

郑粉莉,唐克丽,周佩华.坡耕地细沟侵蚀的发生、发展和防治途径的探讨[J].水土保持学报,1987,1(1):36-48.

张科利,唐克丽,王斌科.黄土高原坡面浅沟侵蚀特征值的研究[J].水土保持学报,1991,5(2):8-13.

唐克丽,张科利,雷阿林.黄土丘陵区退耕上限坡度的研究论证[J].科学通报,1998,43(2):200-203.

中华人民共和国水利部.2002年全国水土流失公告[EB/OL](2003-07-25)[2022-5-25]. http://hhsbjc.com/show.action?c=31&n=874.

中华人民共和国水利部.全国水土保持区划(试行)[EB/OL](2012-11-20)[2022-5-25]. http://www.mwr.gov.cn/zwgk/gknr/201212/t20121214_1442828.html.

全国水土保持规划编制工作小组办公室,水利部水利水电规划设计总院.中国水土保持区划[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2016.

中华人民共和国水利部.SL190-2007 土壤侵蚀分类分级标准[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2008.

朱显谟.黄土高原的形成与整治对策[J].水土保持通报,1991,11(1):1-8,17.

孟庆枚.黄土高原水土保持[M].河南郑州:黄河水利出版社,1996.

Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. Predicting rainfall erosion losses:A guide to conservation planning[R]. USDA, Agriculture Handbook No. 537. Washington, DC:US. Govt. Printing Office, 1978.

江忠善,李秀英.黄土高原土壤流失预报方程中降雨侵蚀力和地形因子的研究[J].中国科学院西北水土保持研究所集刊,1988(1):40-45.

江忠善,宋文经,李秀英.黄土地区天然降雨雨滴特性研究[J].中国水土保持,1983(3):34-38.

卢宗凡,苏敏,李够霞,等.黄土丘陵区水土保持生物和耕作措施的研究[J].水土保持学报,1988(1):37-48.

张宪奎,许靖华,卢秀琴,等.黑龙江省土壤流失方程的研究[J].水土保持通报,1992,12(4):1-9,18.

史学正,于东升,邢廷炎,等.用田间实测法研究中国亚热带土壤的可蚀性K值[J].土壤学报,1997,34(4):399-405.

陈法扬,王志明.通用土壤流失方程在小良水土保持试验站的应用[J].水土保持通报,1992,12(1):23-41.

黄炎和,卢程隆,郑添发,等.闽东南降雨侵蚀力指标R值的研究[J].水土保持学报,1992,6(4):1-5.

王万中,焦菊英,郝小品,等.中国降雨侵蚀力R值的计算与分布(Ⅰ)[J].水土保持学报,1995,9(4):5-18.

Liu Baoyuan, Zhang Keli, Xie Yun. An empirical soil loss equation[C]//Bouman B A M, Xiaoguang Y, Huaqui W, et al. Proceedings of the 12th International Soil Conservation Organization Conference. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2002:21-25.

张科利,彭文英,杨红丽.中国土壤可蚀性值及其估算[J].土壤学报,2007,44(1):7-13.

谢云,章文波,刘宝元.用日雨量和雨强计算降雨侵蚀力[J].水土保持通报,2001,21(6):53-56.

中华人民共和国水利部.第一次全国水利普查公报[EB/OL](2013-03-21)[2022-5-25]. http://www.mwr.gov.cn/sj/tjgb/dycqgslpcgb/201701/t20170122_790650.html.

李智广.《全国水土流失动态监测规划(2018-2022年)》的编制原则与目标任务[J].中国水土保持,2018(5):20-23,68.

刘志刚.广西都安县石灰岩地区土壤侵蚀的特点和水土保持工作的意见[J].林业科学,1963,8(4):354-360.

张信宝,王世杰,贺秀斌,等.碳酸盐岩风化壳中的土壤蠕滑与岩溶坡地的土壤地下漏失[J].地球与环境,2007,35(3):202-206.

张信宝,王世杰.浅议喀斯特流域土壤地下漏失的界定[J].中国岩溶,2016,35(5):602-603.

蒋忠诚,罗为群,邓艳,等.岩溶峰丛洼地水土漏失及防治研究[J].地球学报,2014,35(5):535-542.

张兴义,祁志,张晟旻,等.东北黑土区农田侵蚀沟填埋复垦工程技术[J].中国水土保持科学,2019,17(5):128-135.

张兴义,刘晓冰,赵军.黑土利用与保护[M].北京:科学出版社,2018.

Mishra S K, Singh V P. Soil conservation service curve number (SCS-CN) methodology[M].Springer Science & Business Media, 2003.

Meyer L D, Mccune D L. Rainfall simulator for runoff plots[J]. Agricultural Engineering, 1958,39(10):644-648.

周佩华,豆葆璋,孙清芳,等.降雨能量的试验研究初报[J].水土保持通报,1981(1):51-61.

陈文亮.组合侧喷式野外人工模拟降雨装置[J].水土保持通报,1984(5):43-47.

郑粉莉,赵军.人工模拟降雨大厅及模拟降雨设备简介[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(4):177-178.

Renard K G. Rainfall simulators and USDA erosion research:History, perspective, and future[C]//Lane L J. Proceedings of the Rainfall Simulator Workshop. Tucson, Arizona:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 1985:3-6.

Meyer L D. Simulation of rainfall for soil erosion research[J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 1965,8:63-65.

Young R A, Burwell R E. Prediction of runoff and erosion from natural rainfall using a rainfall simulator[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1972,36(5):827-830.

Barnett A P, Dooley A E. Erosion potential of natural and simulated rainfall compared[J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 1972,15(6):1112-1114.

柯奇画,张科利.人工降雨模拟试验的相似性和应用性探究[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(3):16-20.

Foster G R, Huggins L F, Meyer L D. A laboratory study of rill hydraulics(Ⅰ):velocity relationships[J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 1984,27(3):790-796.

张科利,钟德钰.黄土坡面沟蚀发生机理的水动力学试验研究[J].泥沙研究,1998(3):76-82.

Views

1284

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Coupling Coordination Between Rural Revitalization and Sustainable Land Use in China During 2010—2019

Impacts of seasonal drought on carbon-water coupling mechanism in China’s terrestrial ecosystems

Spatial differentiation and dynamic analysis of land use change in China under different carbon emission scenarios

Assessing of rural revitalization level in China’s arid regions from 2000 to 2022

Land Resource Assessment and Soil and Water Conservation in Low Mountain and Hill Region of Northeastern China--A Case Study on Hongqi Watershed of Eastern Heilongjiang Province

Related Author

Li Bing

Zhou Xing

Chen Haiping

Liu Xiangping

Hu Zhuowei

Wang Yongcai

Wang Mi

Hou Wenxing

Related Institution

College of Natural Resources and Surveying and Mapping, Nanning Normal University

College of Resources Environment and Tourism， Capital Normal University

College of Life Sciences， Northwest A&F University， State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Resistance and High-Efficiency;Production， Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Environmental Microorganism， Yangling

College of;Soil and Water Conservation Science and Engineering， Northwest A&F University， Yangling

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

⁰