Land Use Conflict Identification in Southeast Hilly Area from Perspective of “Productional-Living-Ecological” Space

Luo Shasha; Lai Qingbiao; Lin Bin; Zhen Jianghong

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.03.020

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Land Use Conflict Identification in Southeast Hilly Area from Perspective of “Productional-Living-Ecological” Space

- Land Use Conflict Identification in Southeast Hilly Area from Perspective of “Productional-Living-Ecological” Space
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 42, Issue 3, Pages: 148-156(2022)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 福建省农业科学院农业经济与科技信息研究所,福建,福州,350003
  2. 福建省地质测绘院,福建,福州,350005
  3. 内蒙古师范大学地理科学学院,内蒙古,呼和浩特,010022
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.03.020
  CLC： F205;F301.23
- Published：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Luo Shasha, Lai Qingbiao, Lin Bin, et al. Land Use Conflict Identification in Southeast Hilly Area from Perspective of “Productional-Living-Ecological” Space[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(3): 148-156.
DOI：

Luo Shasha, Lai Qingbiao, Lin Bin, et al. Land Use Conflict Identification in Southeast Hilly Area from Perspective of “Productional-Living-Ecological” Space[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(3): 148-156. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.03.020.

摘要

[目的] 在“三生”空间视角下进行乡镇区域土地利用冲突分析，为提高土地利用冲突的定量与定位治理精度和准确度，探索综合协调管理路径与策略提供科学依据。[方法] 通过构建“三生”空间用地竞争力测度指数，以福建省南平市浦城县仙阳镇为研究对象，从适宜性和驱动力两方面构建“三生”空间用地竞争力评价指标体系，识别其土地利用冲突类型，并提出相应的冲突管理建议。[结果] 仙阳镇共存在12种土地利用冲突类型，其中高度冲突区和中度冲突区的冲突程度较为激烈，占土地面积比例分别为18.00%和22.41%。[结论] 研究区土地利用冲突范围较大，风险较高。应积极发展用地竞争优势区，并严格实行土地用途管制，在保护生态用地和永久基本农田的前提下，平衡各类土地利用冲突。

Abstract

[Objective] The land use conflict in township areas was analyzed from the perspective of "productional-living-ecological" space in order to provide a scientific basis for improving the precision and accuracy of the quantitative and positioning management of land use conflicts

and for exploring integrated and coordinated management paths and strategies.[Methods] Taking Xianyang town

Pucheng County

Nanping City

Fujian Province as the research object

we established an evaluation index system from the aspects of suitability and driving force. We identified the types of land use conflict

and put forward the corresponding conflict management recommendations.[Results] There were 12 types of land use conflicts in Xianyang Town

among which the degree of conflict in high conflict zone and moderate conflict zone was more intense

accounting for 18.00% and 22.41% of the land area respectively.[Conclusion] Land use space conflicts in the study area were large in scope

and high risk. We recommend a strategy of actively developing the competitive advantage area of land use and strictly implementing land use control

and of balancing all kinds of land use conflicts under the premise of protecting ecological land and permanent basic farmland.

关键词

Keywords

references

Campbell D J, Gichohi H, Mwangi A, et al.Land use conflict in Kajiado District, Kenya[J].Land Use Policy, 2000, 17(4):337-348.

于伯华, 吕昌河.土地利用冲突分析:概念与方法[J].地理科学进展, 2006, 25(3):106-115.

周德, 徐建春, 王莉.近15年来中国土地利用冲突研究进展与展望[J].中国土地科学, 2015, 29(2):21-29.

邹利林, 刘彦随, 王永生.中国土地利用冲突研究进展[J].地理科学进展, 2020, 39(2):298-309.

Pavón D, Ventura M, Ribas A, et al.Land use change and socio-environmental conflict in the Alt Empordà County (Catalonia, Spain)[J].Journal of Arid Environments, 2003, 54(3):543-552.

De Groot R.Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes[J].Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006, 75(3/4):175-186.

Iojǎ C I, Nitǎ M R, Vȃnǎu G O, et al.Using multi-criteria analysis for the identification of spatial land-use conflicts in the Bucharest Metropolitan Area[J].Ecological Indicators, 2014, 42:112-121.

Orr A, Mwale B.Adapting to adjustment:Smallholder livelihood strategies in Southern Malawi[J].World Development, 2001, 29(8):1325-1343.

王爱民, 马学广, 闫小培.基于行动者网络的土地利用冲突及其治理机制研究:以广州市海珠区果林保护区为例[J].地理科学, 2010, 30(1):80-85.

赵杰, 罗志军, 赵越, 等.基于改进灰靶模型的区域土地利用冲突强度诊断:以南昌市为例[J].江西农业大学学报, 2017, 39(6):1256-1263.

闵婕, 汪洋, 白茹月, 等.基于多目标适宜性的山地城市土地利用潜在冲突研究:以重庆市綦江区为例[J].重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 35(3):82-89.

杨永芳, 安乾, 朱连奇.基于PSR模型的农区土地利用冲突强度的诊断[J].地理科学进展, 2012, 31(11):1552-1560.

代亚强, 陈伟强, 高涵, 等.基于用地倾向性评价的农村潜在土地利用冲突识别研究:以西峡县东坪村为例[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(10):2410-2418.

李俏, 吴秀芹, 王曼曼.荒漠化地区县级潜在土地利用冲突识别[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 54(3):616-624.

刘巧芹, 赵华甫, 吴克宁, 等.基于用地竞争力的潜在土地利用冲突识别研究:以北京大兴区为例[J].资源科学, 2014, 36(8):1579-1589.

梁发超, 刘诗苑, 刘黎明.基于用地竞争力的闽南地区乡村景观功能冲突的识别[J].农业工程学报, 2017, 33(9):260-267.

贺艳华, 唐承丽, 周国华, 等.基于地理学视角的快速城市化地区空间冲突测度:以长株潭城市群地区为例[J].自然资源学报, 2014, 29(10):1660-1674.

闵婕, 汪洋, 刘睿.三峡库区(重庆段)生态屏障带土地利用冲突演变特征分析[J].山地学报, 2018, 36(2):334-344.

彭佳捷, 周国华, 唐承丽, 等.基于生态安全的快速城市化地区空间冲突测度:以长株潭城市群为例[J].自然资源学报, 2012, 27(9):1507-1519.

陈竹安, 冯祥瑞, 洪志强, 等.南昌市土地利用的空间冲突测算与分析[J].地域研究与开发, 2020, 39(3):150-155.

黄金川, 林浩曦, 漆潇潇.面向国土空间优化的三生空间研究进展[J].地理科学进展, 2017, 36(3):378-391.

Luck G W.A review of the relationships between human population density and biodiversity[J].Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2007, 82(4):607-645.

戴文远, 江方奇, 黄万里, 等.基于"三生空间"的土地利用功能转型及生态服务价值研究:以福州新区为例[J].自然资源学报, 2018, 33(12):2098-2109.

谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8):1243-1254.

陈鹏.厦门湿地生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].湿地科学, 2006, 4(2):101-107.

谢高地, 肖玉, 甄霖, 等.我国粮食生产的生态服务价值研究[J].中国生态农业学报, 2005, 13(3):10-13.

Views

584

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Analysis of land use conflict agglomeration and evolution in Wanjiang urban belt based on optimal spatial threshold

Spatiotemporal dynamic process of land use conflicts and multi-scenario simulation —A case study in Wuhu City, Anhui Province

Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of ecosystem service value in typical estuarine deltas of China

Effectiveness evaluation of ecological product value realization in northwest China——An analysis of 29 typical cases

Collapsibility characteristics and microscopic mechanisms of loess in Ili region under freeze-thaw cycles

Related Author

WU Wei

LU Ping-shan

Wang Yuchun

Ang Yufeng

Wang Bingyi

Bai Qingyang

Cheng Jiumiao

Cheng Chao

Related Institution

College of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University

Faculty of Public Administration, Anhui Jianzhu University

School of Geography and Tourism, Anhui Normal University

⁰