Process and Correlation Between Ecosystem Services Value and Ecological Risk in River Basin—A Case Study at Huaihe River Basin in Anhui Province

Jiang Weifeng; Xu Yan; Li Donghua; Bi Shanshan; Li Qian; Lu Lin

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.03.017

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Process and Correlation Between Ecosystem Services Value and Ecological Risk in River Basin—A Case Study at Huaihe River Basin in Anhui Province

- Process and Correlation Between Ecosystem Services Value and Ecological Risk in River Basin—A Case Study at Huaihe River Basin in Anhui Province
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 42, Issue 3, Pages: 120-130(2022)
- 作者机构：
  
  安徽师范大学地理与旅游学院,安徽,芜湖,241000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.03.017
  CLC： X87;X826
- Published：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Jiang Weifeng, Xu Yan, Li Donghua, et al. Process and Correlation Between Ecosystem Services Value and Ecological Risk in River Basin—A Case Study at Huaihe River Basin in Anhui Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(3): 120-130.
DOI：

Jiang Weifeng, Xu Yan, Li Donghua, et al. Process and Correlation Between Ecosystem Services Value and Ecological Risk in River Basin—A Case Study at Huaihe River Basin in Anhui Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(3): 120-130. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.03.017.

摘要

[目的

]

明确流域生态系统服务价值和生态风险的时空格局及相互关系，为保证生态系统健康可持续发展，维护区域生态系统平衡，促进人地关系协调发展提供科学依据，为淮河流域综合治理的政策制定提供科学参考。[方法

]

基于淮河流域安徽段2000—2019年的土地利用数据和社会经济统计数据，利用动态当量法构建生态系统服务价值（ESV）动态评估模型，核算研究区各年份ESV，并结合空间探索性数据分析，探讨ESV与生态风险（ER）时空演化过程的异质性和关联性。[结果

]

①2000—2019年研究区地类转换频繁，其中建设用地、农田转入转出最多（1 488，1 763 km

）。② ESV总量呈波动上升趋势。2000—2019年ESV总量从3.13×10

元增至3.58×10

元，生态系统服务以调节服务为主，农田和水域对ESV总量贡献率达70%以上。ESV高值区主要在六安市以及淮河支干流两侧。③ER指数整体较稳定，研究区ER均值波动幅度在0.01范围内，空间分布整体呈现出中部高、西南低的特征，ER高值区主要在城镇建设用地周围。[结论

]

研究区ESV总量呈动态上升趋势，ESV与ER具有空间集聚性，并且二者存在负向空间关联特征。

Abstract

[Objective] The spatio-temporal pattern and interrelationship between the value of ecosystem services and ecological risks in river basins were analyzed in order to ensure healthy and sustainable development of ecosystems

maintain regional ecosystem balance

and promote the coordinated development of human-land relationships. The results will provide a scientific reference for policy formulation for the comprehensive management of the Huaihe River basin.[Methods] Based on land use data and socio-economic statistical data for the Huaihe River basin in Anhui Province from 2000 to 2019

a dynamic evaluation model of ecosystem service value was established by using the dynamic equivalence method. The ecosystem service value of the study area was calculated for each year. Combined with spatial exploratory data analysis

the heterogeneity and correlation of the spatial and temporal evolution processes of the ecosystem service value (ESV) and ecological risk (ER) were discussed.[Results] ①Conversion of land types in the research area from 2000 to 2019 occurred frequently

with the greatest transfers occurring for construction land and farmland (1 488

1 763 km2

respectively). ② The total amount of ESV exhibited a fluctuating upward trend

from 3.13×1010 yuan to 3.58×1010 yuan. The ecosystem services were mainly regulatory services. Farmland and water contributed more than 70% to the total ESV. The high value ESV area was located mainly in Liu'an City and on both sides of the Huaihe River tributaries. ③ The ER index was stable overall. The average fluctuation of ER in the study area was within the range of 0.01. The spatial distribution showed the characteristics of high in the central part of the region and low in the southwest. The high value ER area was mainly located around urban construction land.[Conclusion] The total number of ESVs in the study area exhibited a dynamic upward trend. ESV and ER exhibited spatial aggregation in the study area

and there were positive spatial association characteristics.

关键词

Keywords

references

Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, et al.The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Ecological Economics, 1998, 25(1):3-15.

Ahmed M T.Millennium ecosystem assessment[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2002, 9(4):219-220.

谢高地, 肖玉, 鲁春霞.生态系统服务研究:进展、局限和基本范式[J].植物生态学报, 2006, 30(2):191-199.

欧阳志云, 郑华.生态系统服务的生态学机制研究进展[J].生态学报, 2009, 29(11):6183-6188.

洪银兴, 刘伟, 高培勇, 等."习近平新时代中国特色社会主义经济思想"笔谈[J].中国社会科学, 2018(9):4-73, 204-205.

黄勤, 曾元, 江琴.中国推进生态文明建设的研究进展[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, 25(2):111-120.

周伟, 官炎俊, 刘琪, 等.黄土高原典型流域生态问题诊断与系统修复实践探讨:以山西汾河中上游试点项目为例[J].生态学报, 2019, 39(23):8817-8825.

王灵恩, 何露, 成升魁, 等.澜沧江流域旅游资源空间分异与发展模式探讨[J].资源科学, 2012, 34(7):1266-1276.

Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, et al.Changes in the global value of ecosystem services[J].Global Environmental Change, 2014, 26:152-158.

Richardson L, Loomis J, Kroeger T, et al.The role of benefit transfer in ecosystem service valuation[J].Ecological Economics, 2015, 115:51-58.

黄木易, 岳文泽, 方斌, 等.1970-2015年大别山区生态服务价值尺度响应特征及地理探测机制[J].地理学报, 2019, 74(9):1904-1920.

谢丽霞, 白永平, 车磊, 等.基于价值-风险的黄河上游生态功能区生态分区建设[J].自然资源学报, 2021, 36(1):196-207.

刘倩, 李葛, 张超, 等.基于系数修正的青龙县生态系统服务价值动态变化研究[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(6):971-980.

邬紫荆, 曾辉.基于meta分析的中国森林生态系统服务价值评估[J].生态学报, 2021, 41(14):5533-5545.

陈心盟, 王晓峰, 冯晓明, 等.青藏高原生态系统服务权衡与协同关系[J].地理研究, 2021, 40(1):18-34.

Hu Mengmeng, Li Zhaotian, Wang Yafei, et al.Spatio-temporal changes in ecosystem service value in response to land-use/cover changes in the Pearl River Delta[J].Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2019, 149:106-114.

Zhang Fei, Yushanjiang A, Jing Yunqing.Assessing and predicting changes of the ecosystem service values based on land use/cover change in Ebinur Lake Wetland National Nature Reserve, Xinjiang, China[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 656:1133-1144.

宋洁, 温璐, 王凤歌, 等.乌兰布和沙漠生态系统服务价值时空动态[J].生态学报, 2021, 41(6):2201-2211.

张晓瑶, 陆林, 虞虎, 等.青藏高原土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值影响的多情景模拟[J].生态学杂志, 2021, 40(3):887-898.

昝欣, 张玉玲, 贾晓宇, 等.永定河上游流域水生态系统服务价值评估[J].自然资源学报, 2020, 35(6):1326-1337.

Yang Wenrui, Wang Rusong, Huang Jinlou, et al.Ecological risk assessment and its research progress[J].Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007, 18(8):1869-1876.

胡云锋, 高戈.城市景观生态风险评估框架与实践:以北京天坛地区为例[J].生态学报, 2020, 40(21):7805-7815.

祝薇, 向雪琴, 侯丽朋, 等.基于Citespace软件的生态风险知识图谱分析[J].生态学报, 2018, 38(12):4504-4515.

Tian Jingyi, Gang Gengshi.Research on regional ecological security assessment[J].Energy Procedia, 2012, 16:1180-1186.

谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8):1243-1254.

胡喜生, 洪伟, 吴承祯.土地生态系统服务功能价值动态估算模型的改进与应用:以福州市为例[J].资源科学, 2013, 35(1):30-41.

奚立平, 张乐勤, 李荣富.安徽省淮河流域湿地土壤养分流失及水质动态研究[J].水土保持学报, 2016, 30(1):131-136.

王文, 胡彦君, 徐川怡.1961-2018年淮河流域热浪事件时空变化特征[J].地理科学, 2021, 41(5):911-921.

孙朋, 渠玮娟, 朱玺, 等.1959-2018年淮河流域水热格局差异研究[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2021, 30(6):1366-1377.

汪佩.安徽省淮河流域行蓄洪生态功能区可持续发展初步研究[D].安徽合肥:合肥工业大学, 2007.

苏海民, 何爱霞.基于RS和地统计学的福州市土地利用分析[J].自然资源学报, 2010, 25(1):91-99.

张艳春, 毛旭锋, 魏晓燕, 等.湟水国家湿地公园湿地价值及其辐射格局研究[J].生态学报, 2022, 42(2):569-580.

王若思, 潘洪义, 刘翊涵, 等.基于动态当量的乐山市生态系统服务价值时空演变及驱动力研究[J].生态学报, 2022, 42(1):76-90.

Goodchild M F.The fundamental laws of GIScience[R].Invited talk at University Consortium for Geographic Information Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, 2003.

谢高地, 鲁春霞, 冷允法, 等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报, 2003, 18(2):189-196.

崔林丽, 史军, 肖风劲.气候要素及El Niño/La Niña事件对中国陆地NPP变化的影响[J].地理学报, 2018, 73(1):54-66.

左玲丽, 彭文甫, 陶帅, 等.岷江上游土地利用与生态系统服务价值的动态变化[J].生态学报, 2021, 41(16):6384-6397.

李俊翰, 高明秀.滨州市生态系统服务价值与生态风险时空演变及其关联性[J].生态学报, 2019, 39(21):7815-7828.

靳甜甜, 张云霞, 朱月华, 等.黄土高原林区生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险时空变化及其关联性:以子午岭区为例[J].应用生态学报, 2021, 32(5):1623-1632.

马晓熠, 裴韬.基于探索性空间数据分析方法的北京市区域经济差异[J].地理科学进展, 2010, 29(12):1555-1561.

徐羽, 钟业喜, 冯兴华, 等.鄱阳湖流域土地利用生态风险格局[J].生态学报, 2016, 36(23):7850-7857.

Tobler W R.A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region[J].Economic Geography, 1970, 46(S1):234-240.

潘洪义, 张琴, 李加安, 等.基于动态当量的彝汉交错深度贫困区生态系统服务价值时空演变研究[J].生态学报, 2020, 40(22):8218-8229.

雷军成, 王莎, 汪金梅, 等.土地利用变化对寻乌县生态系统服务价值的影响[J].生态学报, 2019, 39(9):3089-3099.

姜栋栋, 马伟波, 邹凤丽, 等.乡镇尺度大娄山区生态系统服务价值时空变化研究[J].环境科学研究, 2020, 33(12):2713-2723.

Views

668

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Spatiotemporal evolution of ecosystem service value in mountain- oasis-desert system of typical arid regions——A case study at Manas River basin

Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of ecosystem service value in typical estuarine deltas of China

Topographic gradient characteristics and driving factors of ecosystem service value in Taohe River basin

Prediction of land-use and ecosystem service value in inter-provincial border areas——A case study of Huaihai economic zone

Evaluation of ecosystem service value and prediction of ecological risk in China under SSP-RCP scenarios

Related Author

Fu Shuai

Xu Bingxian

Feng Yingxiang

Yu Jie

Yang Zhili

Liu Yongchao

Wang Rongxue

Li Donglin

Related Institution

School of Public Administration， Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics

Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research， Chinese;Academy of Sciences

Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

Zhejiang Collaborative Innovation Center for Land and Marine Spatial Utilization and;Governance Research， Ningbo University

School of Geography and;Remote Semsing， Ningbo University

⁰