Qiang Anfeng, Wang Ni, Luo Shaojiang, et al. Bidirectional Regulation of Water Quality and Quantity of Ecological Compensation Based on Cost Perspective[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(2): 144-149.
DOI:
Qiang Anfeng, Wang Ni, Luo Shaojiang, et al. Bidirectional Regulation of Water Quality and Quantity of Ecological Compensation Based on Cost Perspective[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(2): 144-149. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.02.020.
Bidirectional Regulation of Water Quality and Quantity of Ecological Compensation Based on Cost Perspective
[Objective] The ecological compensation amount for the bidirectional regulation of water quality and quantity in the Shaanxi area of the Yellow River basin was determined in order to provide a theoretical basis for solving the contradiction of ecological rights distribution in the upper and lower reaches of the Yellow River basin
and will promote equitable development between regions of the basin. [Methods] This study considered the simultaneous factors of cost
value
and rewards and punishments
and established a compensation standard calculation model of water quality and quantity using the water quality improvement coefficient method and the water quantity contribution method based on the basic compensation standard. [Results] The basic compensation standard for ecological compensation in the Yellow River basin of Shaanxi Province was 1.37×109 yuan. The water quality and water volume adjustment values were -5.66×108 yuan and 6.84×108 yuan
respectively. Shaanxi Province received ecological compensation of 1.49×109 yuan for 2018. [Conclusion] Compared with previous calculation models
the calculation results of this model are more in line with the actual situation and more suitable for changes in external environmental factors.
关键词
Keywords
references
Wang Yizhou, Yang Rongjin, Li Xiuhong, et al. Study on trans-boundary water quality and quantity ecological compensation standard: A case of the Bahao Bridge section in Yongding River, China [J]. Water, 2021,13(11):1488.
Farber S C, Costanza R, Wilson M A. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services [J]. Ecological Economics, 2002,41(3):375-392.
Asquith N M, Vargas M T, Wunder S. Selling two environmental services: In-kind payments for bird habitat and watershed protection in Los Negros, Bolivia [J]. Ecological Economics, 2008,65(4):675-684.
Kosoy N, Corbera E. Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism [J]. Ecological Economics, 2010,69(6):1228-1236.