Effects of Ridge Tillage Patterns on Soil Erosion of Sloping Croplands in Black Soil Region of Northeastern China

Mou Tingsen; Shen Haiou; He Yunfeng; Li Chunli; Guo Dan; Liu Dianmin

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.02.004

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Effects of Ridge Tillage Patterns on Soil Erosion of Sloping Croplands in Black Soil Region of Northeastern China

- Effects of Ridge Tillage Patterns on Soil Erosion of Sloping Croplands in Black Soil Region of Northeastern China
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 42, Issue 2, Pages: 22-30(2022)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 吉林农业大学资源与环境学院,吉林,长春,130118
  2. 吉林省商品粮基地土壤资源可持续利用重点实验室,吉林,长春,130118
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.02.004
  CLC： S157.1
- Published：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Mou Tingsen, Shen Haiou, He Yunfeng, et al. Effects of Ridge Tillage Patterns on Soil Erosion of Sloping Croplands in Black Soil Region of Northeastern China[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(2): 22-30.
DOI：

Mou Tingsen, Shen Haiou, He Yunfeng, et al. Effects of Ridge Tillage Patterns on Soil Erosion of Sloping Croplands in Black Soil Region of Northeastern China[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2022, 42(2): 22-30. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.02.004.

摘要

[目的

]

分析黑土区不同垄作方式对坡耕地土壤侵蚀的调控效果，为该区土壤侵蚀防治提供科学指导。[方法

]

在5°和10°坡耕地开展人工模拟降雨试验，降雨强度为50，100 mm/h，垄作方式包括：横坡垄作、垄向区田、顺垄＋底部横垄和横垄＋排水沟，对照处理为传统顺坡垄作。[结果

]

试验条件下，与顺坡垄作处理相比，横坡垄作、垄向区田、顺垄＋底部横垄和横垄＋排水沟处理均可有效调节径流、降低土壤侵蚀量，但不同垄作方式对径流和侵蚀的调控效果随着降雨强度和坡度的增加而减小。在5°坡耕地，横坡垄作方式对径流和侵蚀的调控效果最佳，产流率和土壤侵蚀速率分别稳定在15.0 mm/h和0.2 kg/(m

·h)以下。在50，100 mm/h降雨强度下，与顺坡垄作处理相比，其径流量分别降低92.3%和83.9%，土壤侵蚀量分别降低96.8%和94.6%；而垄向区田方式对径流和侵蚀的调控效果略大于顺垄＋底部横垄处理。在10°坡耕地，横坡垄作方式在降雨前期具有较好的蓄水保土作用，但在降雨后期垄体易损坏，造成土壤侵蚀量剧增；横垄＋排水沟方式在降雨前期能够蓄水保土，在降雨后期能够较好地进行排水。[结论

]

在坡度平缓的坡耕地，应该优选横坡垄作和垄向区田方式；在坡度较大的坡耕地，应该优选横垄+排水沟方式。因此，建议根据地形坡度和降雨特征筛选适宜的垄作方式。

Abstract

[Objective] The effects of ridge tillage patterns on soil erosion at sloping croplands in the black soil region of Northeastern China were analyzed in order to provide scientific guidance for soil erosion control in this region. [Methods] The simulated rainfall experiments were conducted at the sloping croplands with the 5° and 10° slope gradients. The simulated rainfall intensities were 50 and 100 mm/h. This study took the traditional up-and downslope ridge tillage as the control treatment. The ridge tillage patterns included contour ridge tillage

ridge-furrow intervals tillage

up and down slope ridge + bottom contour ridge tillage

and contour ridge + drainage ditch tillage. [Results] Under the experimental conditions

the contour ridge tillage

ridge-furrow intervals tillage

up and down slope ridge + bottom contour ridge tillage

and contour ridge + drainage ditch tillage effectively regulated runoff and decreased soil erosion

compared with control treatment. However

the regulation effect of different ridge tillage patterns on runoff and erosion decreased with the increase of rainfall intensity and slope gradient. For the 5° sloping cropland

the regulation effect of contour ridge tillage treatment on runoff and erosion was the best. The runoff rates and soil erosion rates were stable below 15.0 mm/h and 0.2 kg/(m2·h) . Under the rainfall intensity of the 50 and 100 mm/h

the runoff was reduced 92.3% and 83.9% respectively

and the soil erosion reduced 96.8% and 94.6% respectively

compared with the control treatments. The runoff reduction and soil erosion reduction benefits of ridge-furrow intervals tillage treatment was slightly greater than those of up and down slope ridge + bottom contour ridge tillage treatment at the 5° sloping cropland. For the 10° sloping cropland

the contour ridge tillage treatment showed better soil water storage and soil conservation capacity in the early stage of rainfall events compared with that of the other ridge tillage patterns. However

the ridges were easy to be damaged in the later stage of rainfall events

caused a rapid increase in soil erosion. In contrast

the contour ridge + drainage ditch tillage treatment could store soil and water in the early stage of rainfall events

and better drained away water in the later stage of rainfall events. [Conclusion] As to gentle sloping croplands

the contour ridge tillage and ridge-furrow intervals tillage patterns should be optimized

in the sloping farmland with steep slope

the contour ridge + drainage ditch tillage pattern should be preferred. Therefore

it is suggested to select suitable ridge tillage patterns according to slope gradients and rainfall characteristics.

关键词

Keywords

references

刘卉芳,单志杰,秦伟,等.东北黑土区水土流失治理技术与模式研究评述[J].泥沙研究,2020,45(4):74-80.

Shi X H, Yang X M, Drury C F, et al. Impact of ridge tillage on soil organic carbon and selected physical properties of a clay loam in Southwestern Ontario [J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2012,120:1-7.

刘继龙,刘璐,付强,等.黑土区玉米地土壤温度的时空变异性研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2019,38(1):31-35.

罗键,尹忠,郑子成,等.不同降雨条件下紫色土横垄坡面地表微地形变化特征[J].中国农业科学,2016,49(16):3162-3173.

王磊,师宏强,刘刚,等.黑土区宽垄和窄垄耕作的顺坡坡面土壤侵蚀对比[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(19):176-182.

桑琦明,王磊,郑粉莉,等.东北黑土区坡耕地斜坡垄作与顺坡垄作土壤侵蚀对比分析[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(3):73-78.

牛晓乐,秦富仓,杨振奇,等.黑土区坡耕地几种耕作措施水土保持效益研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2019,38(5):67-72.

朱姝,窦森,陈丽珍.秸秆深还对土壤团聚体中胡敏酸结构特征的影响[J].土壤学报,2015,52(4):747-758.

胡伟,郑粉莉,边锋.降雨能量对东北典型黑土区土壤溅蚀的影响[J].生态学报,2016,36(15):4708-4717.

陈科兵,吴发启,姚冲.黄土高原南部地区人工模拟暴雨条件下不同坡度谷子坡耕地产流产沙过程[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(3):90-95,103.

郑粉莉,赵军.人工模拟降雨大厅及模拟降雨设备简介[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(4):177-178.

Wang Lei, Zheng Fenli, Zhang Xunchang, et al. Discrimination of soil losses between ridge and furrow in longitudinal ridge-tillage under simulated upslope inflow and rainfall [J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2020,198(C):104541.

郑粉莉,边锋,卢嘉,等.雨型对东北典型黑土区顺坡垄作坡面土壤侵蚀的影响[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(2):90-97.

罗亚丽,孙继松,李英,等.中国暴雨的科学与预报：改革开放40年研究成果[J].气象学报,2020,78(3):419-450.

姜义亮,郑粉莉,温磊磊,等.降雨和汇流对黑土区坡面土壤侵蚀的影响试验研究[J].生态学报,2017,37(24):8207-8215.

Polyakov V O, Nearing M A. Sediment transport in rill flow under deposition and detachment conditions [J]. Catena, 2003,51(1):33-43.

沈海鸥,郑粉莉,温磊磊,等.雨滴打击对黄土坡面细沟侵蚀特征的影响[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(8):104-112,89.

王磊,何超,郑粉莉,等.黑土区坡耕地横坡垄作措施防治土壤侵蚀的土槽试验[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(15):141-148.

徐相忠,刘前进,张含玉.降雨类型与坡度对棕壤垄沟系统产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(4):56-62,71.

何晓玲,郑子成,李廷轩.不同耕作方式对紫色土侵蚀及磷素流失的影响[J].中国农业科学,2013,46(12):2492-2500.

张少良,张兴义,刘晓冰,等.典型黑土侵蚀区不同耕作措施的水土保持功效研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(3):11-15.

刘慧,魏永霞,刘超,等.黑土区坡耕地水土保持技术模式对降雨径流过程的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(5):50-55.

何超,王磊,郑粉莉,等.垄作方式对薄层黑土区坡面土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(5):24-28.

林艺,秦凤,郑子成,等.不同降雨条件下垄作坡面地表微地形及土壤侵蚀变化特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(3):32-38.

安娟,殷小琳,李国会,等.雨滴打击与壤中流交互作用对横坡垄作坡面侵蚀过程的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(1):50-55,64.

Laura C, Paolo T, Alessandra C, et al. Evaluation of runoff and soil erosion under conventional tillage and no-till management: A case study in Northeast Italy[J]. Catena, 2021,197:104972.

孙丽丽,査轩,黄少燕,等.不同降雨强度对紫色土坡面侵蚀过程的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(5):18-23.

Parsons A J, Stone P M. Effects of intra-storm variations in rainfall intensity on interrill runoff and erosion [J]. Catena, 2006,67(1):68-78.

张晶玲,周丽丽,马仁明,等.天然降雨条件下横垄与顺垄坡面产流产沙过程[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(5):114-119.

安娟,高开通,丁柳,等.横坡垄作下雨型对褐土坡面细沟侵蚀过程的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(1):32-38.

Yan Youjin, Dai Quanhou, Yuan Yingfei, et al. Effects of rainfall intensity on runoff and sediment yields on bare slopes in a karst area, SW China [J]. Geoderma, 2018,330:30-40.

张兴义,乔宝玲,李健宇,等.降雨强度和坡度对东北黑土区顺坡垄体溅蚀特征的影响[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(16):110-117.

Views

734

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Soil Moisture Content on Slope in Summer Season in Black Soil Region of Northeastern China

Runoff Recession and Surface Roughness on Cropland of Purple Soil

Benefits Assessment for Soil and Water Conservation Projects in Black Soil Region of Northeast China

Effects of Contour Hedgerow Intercropping on Surface Flow Control of Sloping Cropland

Morphological Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Gully Heads in a Typical Agricultural Watershed in Rolling-Hill Black Soil Region of Northeast China

Related Author

LIU Hong-hu

LIU Bao-yuan

YANG Xin

XU Pei

WANG Yu-kuan

FU Bin

LI Xu-feng

SONG Chun-yu

Related Institution

College of Geography and Remote Sense Science, Beijing Normal University,Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster,Ministry of Education

Meteorological I nstitute of Shaanxi Province,Xian

Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Earth Surface Process, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences

⁰