Li Lun, Liu Haijun, Gao Zhuangzhuang, et al. Soil Evaporation and Its Influencing Factors Under Poplar Shelterbelts[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(6): 82-88.
DOI:
Li Lun, Liu Haijun, Gao Zhuangzhuang, et al. Soil Evaporation and Its Influencing Factors Under Poplar Shelterbelts[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(6): 82-88. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.012.
Soil Evaporation and Its Influencing Factors Under Poplar Shelterbelts
[Objective] Soil evaporation under poplar shelterbelts was investigated
and the in situ soil evaporation estimating method was developed
in order to provide support for water cycle pattern and efficient water use research in forestry.[Methods] Soil evaporation and water surface evaporation under the forest were measured by micro-lysimeters and the standard 20 cm evaporation pan. Reference water temperature in the pan and soil temperatures were also measured. Then the relative evaporation (RE)
the ratio of soil evaporation to pan evaporation
and the relative temperature difference (RT)
the ratio of temperature difference between soil and water temperature to water temperature were calculated.[Results] The solar radiation was the major factor for the evaporations of the under-forest soil and water surface. Air temperature
humidity
and wind speed have poor correlation with soil evaporation because of the low soil water content. The relationship between RE and RT could be described with a two-stage function
RE decreased with the RT increasing for RT being less than 0.11
after that the RE approached a constant of 0.164
indicating a water vapor diffusion process.[Conclusion] Under poplar shelterbelts
RE decreases gradually with the growth of RT and eventually tends to be a constant. The developed method was validated using an independent data set with relative error of less than 2%
indicating an excellent predication of soil evaporation. Therefore
this study provides a new method for the estimation of soil evaporation and the developed method can be used to estimate soil evaporation.
Zhou Jie, Zhang Zhiqiang, Sun Ge, et al. Response of ecosystem carbon fluxes to drought events in a poplar plantation in Northern China[J]. Forest Ecology Management, 2013, 300:33-42.
Petzold R, Schwarzel K, Feger K H. Transpiration of a hybrid poplar plantation in Saxony (Germany) in response to climate and soil conditions[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2011, 130(5):695-706.
Fox M J. A technique to determine evaporation from dry stream beds[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 1968, 7(4):697-701.
Benasher J, Warrick A W, Matthias A D. Bare-soil evaporation determined in situ by infrared thermometry[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1984, 69(1/4):325-334.
Alvenas G, Jansson P E. Model for evaporation, moisture and temperature of bare soil:Calibration and sensitivity analysis[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1997, 88(1/4):47-56.
Zhao Peng, Li Sien, Li Fusheng, et al. Comparison of dual crop coefficient method and Shuttleworth-Wallace model in evapotranspiration partitioning in a vineyard of northwest China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2015, 160:41-56.
Agam N, Evett S R, Tolk J A, et al. Evaporative loss from irrigated interrows in a highly advective semi-arid agricultural area[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2012, 50:20-30.
Kool D, Agam N, Lazarovitch N, et al. A review of approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2014, 184:56-70.