Micromorphology and Erosion Characteristics of Rills on Feldspathic Sandstone Slopes Under Natural Rainfall Conditions

Li Long; Zhang Peng; Guo Yue; Yu Ying

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.003

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Micromorphology and Erosion Characteristics of Rills on Feldspathic Sandstone Slopes Under Natural Rainfall Conditions

- Micromorphology and Erosion Characteristics of Rills on Feldspathic Sandstone Slopes Under Natural Rainfall Conditions
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 41, Issue 6, Pages: 15-22(2021)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 内蒙古农业大学沙漠治理学院,内蒙古,呼和浩特,100018
  2. 荒漠生态系统保护与修复国家林业和草原局重点实验室,内蒙古,呼和浩特,100018
  3. 鄂尔多斯市林业和草原局,内蒙古,鄂尔多斯,017010
  4. 宜宾林竹产业研究院,四川,宜宾,644000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.003
  CLC： S157.1
- Published：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Li Long, Zhang Peng, Guo Yue, et al. Micromorphology and Erosion Characteristics of Rills on Feldspathic Sandstone Slopes Under Natural Rainfall Conditions[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(6): 15-22.
DOI：

Li Long, Zhang Peng, Guo Yue, et al. Micromorphology and Erosion Characteristics of Rills on Feldspathic Sandstone Slopes Under Natural Rainfall Conditions[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(6): 15-22. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.06.003.

摘要

[目的] 研究自然降雨条件下砒砂岩坡面细沟微形态及其侵蚀特征，为区域土壤侵蚀机制研究提供理论参考。[方法] 选择裸露砒砂岩坡面为研究对象，采用野外径流小区原位监测与三维激光扫描技术结合的方法，分析砒砂岩坡区13次降雨过程中坡面细沟数量、形态以及几何特征的动态变化特征，揭示细沟微形态变化过程对坡面产流产沙的影响机制。[结果] 观测期研究区总降雨量为267.40 mm，总降雨历时为5 893 min，总径流量为294.05 L，总泥沙量为111.34 kg。降雨对径流和泥沙的贡献率表现为：中雨（10.0～24.9 mm）>大雨（25.0～49.9 mm）>小雨（<10.0 mm）。中雨对坡面侵蚀影响程度最高。水力侵蚀导致坡面细沟形态上趋于复杂化，其总长达为40.52 m，平均宽度为4.31 cm，平均深度为1.22 cm。次降雨坡面细沟的发育过程表现为：溅蚀—片蚀—宽浅型细沟—连续细沟网—沟壁坍塌—沟道稳定；细沟趋于向窄深型发育。[结论] 细沟各形态指标均呈现明显的二次多项式相关关系，细沟宽深比与沟壑密度对坡面产沙量存在显著影响。

Abstract

[Objective] The micromorphology and erosion characteristics of the feldspathic sandstone under natural rainfall conditions were studied

in order to provide theoretical reference for understanding the mechanism of soil erosion in this region.[Methods] The exposed feldspathic sandstone slope was selected as the research object

and the field monitoring and 3D laser scanning technology were combined to analyze the dynamic changes of the number

shape and geometric characteristics of the rills during 13 rainfall events. The influence of rill micro-morphological change processes on slope runoff and sediment yield was analyzed.[Results] The total rainfall in the study area during the observation period was 267.40 mm

the total rainfall duration was 5 893 min

the total runoff was 294.05 L

and the total sediment was 111.34 kg. The contribution of rainfall to runoff and sediment followed the order of moderate rain>heavy rain>light rain. Moderate rain had the highest impact on slope erosion. After the erosion stopped

the overall morphology of the rill became more complicated

with a total length of 40.52 m

an average width of 4.31 cm

and an average depth of 1.22 cm. The development process of the rills on the slope surface during a single rainfall was as follows:splash erosion-sheet erosion-wide and shallow rills-continuous rill network-ditch wall collapse-channel stability

the rills tend to be narrow and deep.[Conclusion] The morphological indicators of the rills all present an obvious quadratic polynomial correlation

the ratio of rill width to depth and gully density have significant effects on sediment yield.

关键词

Keywords

references

姚文艺, 刘国彬.新时期黄河流域水土保持战略目标的转变与发展对策[J].水土保持通报, 2020, 40(5):333-340.

张建文.覆沙坡面细沟侵蚀发育过程与形态特征研究[D].陕西西安:西安理工大学, 2020.

卫午毓, 肖培青, 张攀, 等.复合侵蚀作用下砒砂岩坡面产流产沙过程试验[J].水土保持学报, 2020, 34(2):18-22.

Niu Yaobin, Gao Zhaoliang, Li Yonghong, et al. Cha-racteristics of rill erosion in spoil heaps under simulated inflow:A field runoff plot experiment[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2020, 202:104655.

常平, 李晓丽, 李明玉, 等.冲蚀条件下砒砂岩坡面细沟侵蚀特性分析[J].人民黄河, 2018, 40(5):98-102, 106.

张若曦, 秦富仓, 李龙, 等.水力侵蚀对砒砂岩区土壤有机碳空间变异性的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2020, 34(6):117-124.

胡剑汝, 饶良懿, 申震洲.基于WEPP的砒砂岩坡面复合侵蚀治理生态水文效应评价[J].水土保持学报, 2020, 34(2):123-129, 238.

师晨迪, 王曙光, 李娟, 等.砒砂岩与沙复配土耕种后团聚体变化研究[J].人民黄河, 2020, 42(S1):65-66, 68.

李玉进, 胡澍, 焦菊英, 等.黄土丘陵区不同侵蚀环境下土壤有机碳对植被恢复的响应[J].生态学报, 2017, 37(12):4100-4107.

秦富仓, 杨振奇, 李龙.砒砂岩区土壤侵蚀机理与生态修复技术研究进展[J].北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(12):142-150.

杨振奇.裸露砒砂岩区人工植被对水力侵蚀的调控机制研究[D].内蒙古呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2020.

王伦江, 张兴昌.苜蓿影响砒砂岩陡坡侵蚀的水动力学机理研究[J].土壤学报, 2020, 57(2):284-295.

王其东, 高海鹰, 梁止水, 等.新型亲水性聚氨酯对砒砂岩边坡抗降雨侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2016, 30(3):29-32, 114.

杨吉山, 姚文艺, 郑明国, 等.原状砒砂岩坡面产流产沙规律试验研究[J].人民黄河, 2017, 39(1):98-101, 109.

钱秋颖, 秦富仓, 李龙, 等.自然降雨条件下坡面侵蚀地表粗糙度的空间异质性[J].水土保持学报, 2021, 35(3):46-52.

杨振奇, 郭建英, 秦富仓, 等.裸露砒砂岩区降雨条件下坡面微地形变化规律[J].水土保持学报, 2021, 35(3):111-118.

李霞, 金鑫, 谢斯琴, 等.间歇降雨对红壤坡面土壤侵蚀特征的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2021, 35(1):96-102.

安娟, 高开通, 丁柳, 等.横坡垄作下雨型对褐土坡面细沟侵蚀过程的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2019, 33(1):32-38.

吴淑芳, 吴普特, 原立峰.坡面径流调控薄层水流水力学特性试验[J].农业工程学报, 2010, 26(3):14-19.

安晨, 方海燕, 王奋忠.密云水库上游坡面产流产沙特征及降雨响应:以石匣小流域为例[J].中国水土保持科学, 2020, 18(5):43-51.

李霞, 金鑫, 谢斯琴, 等.间歇降雨对红壤坡面土壤侵蚀特征的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2021, 35(1):96-102.

Tu Anguo, Xie Songhua, Yu Zhongbo, et al. Long-term effect of soil and water conservation measures on runoff, sediment and their relationship in an orchard on sloping red soil of Southern China[J]. Plos One, 2018, 13(9):e0203669.

沈海鸥, 郑粉莉, 温磊磊, 等.降雨强度和坡度对细沟形态特征的综合影响[J].农业机械学报, 2015, 46(7):162-170.

吕刚, 贾晏泽, 刘雅卓, 等.褐土与棕壤坡耕地细沟侵蚀发生的阶段性水沙变化[J].水土保持学报, 2020, 34(5):42-48.

Views

1041

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Effects of rainfall intensity and gravel content on runoff and sediment production from loam and aeolian sandy soil accumulation bodies

Effects of Nitrogen Input on Characteristics of Nitrogen Loss from Sloping Fields Under Natural Rainfall in Central Yunnan Province

Experimental Study on Thawing Settlement Performance of Feldspathic Standstone Subjected to Various Factors

Water-physical Properties of Feldspathic Sandstone Modified by Hydraulic Polyurethane

Effects of Humic Acids and Plant Growth-promoting Bacillus on Stress Resistance of Ryegrass and Characterstics of Feldspathic Sandstone Soil

Related Author

Luo Han

Wei Yuhang

Li Zhen

Wei Yuchao

Tang Kaijin

Zhao Junqi

Zhang Yibo

WANG Ping

Related Institution

China Power Construction;Corporation Kunming Institute of Survey， Design & Research Co.， Ltd.

Weinan Soil and Water;Conservation and Resettlement Work Center

Institute of Soil and Water Conservation， Chinese Academy of;Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources， Yangling

College of Soil and Water Conservation Science and Engineering，Northwest A&F University， Yangling

Southwest Forestry University, School of Environmental Sciences

⁰