Effects of Drought Resistant Afforestation of Pinus Sylvestnis var. Mongolica in Mountainous Area of Southern Ningxia Under Different Planting Patterns

Wang Zhengan; Yu Zhijia; Ma Jie; She Ping; Jia Baoguang; Li Ying

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.030

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Effects of Drought Resistant Afforestation of Pinus Sylvestnis var. Mongolica in Mountainous Area of Southern Ningxia Under Different Planting Patterns

- Effects of Drought Resistant Afforestation of Pinus Sylvestnis var. Mongolica in Mountainous Area of Southern Ningxia Under Different Planting Patterns
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 41, Issue 5, Pages: 226-231(2021)
- 作者机构：
  
  宁夏农林科学院固原分院,宁夏,固原,756000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.030
  CLC： S725.7;S791.253
- Published：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Wang Zhengan, Yu Zhijia, Ma Jie, et al. Effects of Drought Resistant Afforestation of Pinus Sylvestnis var. Mongolica in Mountainous Area of Southern Ningxia Under Different Planting Patterns[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 226-231.
DOI：

Wang Zhengan, Yu Zhijia, Ma Jie, et al. Effects of Drought Resistant Afforestation of Pinus Sylvestnis var. Mongolica in Mountainous Area of Southern Ningxia Under Different Planting Patterns[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(5): 226-231. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.030.

摘要

[目的

]

定量评价干旱半干旱区生态工程建设和造林初期的效果，为该区域筛选出较为适宜的造林处理技术措施提供实践指导依据。[方法

]

对该地区造林树种樟子松进行了覆膜+浇水、覆膜+不浇水、不覆膜+浇水、修剪和对照（CK）5种技术的处理对比试验，对造林初期的3个指标成活率、年均生长量及造林成本为衡量指标，应用模糊数学隶属函数值法定量的对其效果进行综合比较与评价。[结果

]

不同造林处理措施的成活率大小依次为覆膜+浇水（96%）>覆膜+不浇水（95%）>修剪（92.3%）>不覆膜+浇水（91.3%）>对照（CK，89.3%）；保存率大小依次为覆膜+浇水（94.6%）>覆膜+不浇水（94%）>不覆膜+浇水（87.3%）>对照（CK，80%）>修剪（77%）；年均生长量大小依次为覆膜+浇水（14.6 cm）>覆膜+不浇水（13.5 cm）>不覆膜+浇水（11.5 cm）>修剪（10.6 cm）>对照（CK，9.7 cm）；造林成本的大小依次为覆膜+浇水（14 037.5元/hm

）>覆膜+不浇水（11 712.5元/hm

）>不覆膜+浇水（10 450元/hm

）>修剪（8 750元/hm

）>对照（CK，8 125元/hm

）。[结论

]

5种造林处理方式的初期效果综合评价差异明显，由强到弱排序为：覆膜+不浇水（0.674 4）>覆膜+浇水（0.666 7）>修剪（0.508 1）>不覆膜+浇水（0.425 6）>对照（CK，0.333 3），因此覆膜+不浇水造林技术措施具备良好的造林成效，对该技术的推广应用具有非常重要的实践和理论意义。

Abstract

[Objective] The effects of ecological engineering construction and afforestation at the initial stage in arid and semi-arid regions was evaluated quantitatively

in order to provide practical guidance for screening out more suitable afforestation treatment technical measures in this region.[Methods] In a Pinus sylvestnis var. mongolica plantation

five treatments were implemented:film mulching and watering (FW)

film mulching but no watering (F)

watering but no film mulching (W)

pruning (P)

and check (CK

no watering

no mulching

no pruning). Three evaluation indicators (survival rate

average annual growth

and afforestation cost at the initial stage) were measured

compared

and evaluated by using the membership function value method in fuzzy mathematics.[Results] Survival rate of the five treatments followed the order of FW(96%)>F(95%)>P(92.3%)>W(91.3%)>CK(89.3%). Preservation rate followed the order of FW(94.6%)>F(94%)>W(87.3%)>CK(80%)>P(77%). Average annual growth followed the order of FW(14.6 cm)>F(13.5 cm)>W(11.5 cm)>P(10.6 cm)>CK(9.7 cm). Afforestation cost followed the order of FW (14 037.5 yuan/hm2)>F(11 712.5 yuan/hm2)>W(10 450 yuan/hm2)>P(8 750 yuan/hm2)>CK(8 125 yuan/hm2).[Conclusion] Differences in the initial effect were obvious between the five afforestation treatments according to the comprehensive evaluation

and the overall order was F(0.674 4)>FW(0.666 7)>P(0.508 1)>W(0.425 6)>CK(0.333 3). Therefore

the technology of film mulching and no watering (F) provided the best overall effect and had the greatest potential for promotion and application.

关键词

Keywords

references

余优森.我国西部的干旱气候与农业对策[J].干旱地区农业研究, 1992, 10(1):1-8.

王正安, 邸利, 王彦辉, 等.六盘山半干旱区华北落叶松林土壤水分对降雨的响应[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2018, 32(4):144-151.

刘芝芹, 王克勤.人工植被坡面产流问题研究进展[J].西南林学院学报, 2004, 24(2):65-69, 75.

李英武, 柳晔, 海钦.宁南山区抗旱集流整地及树种配置技术[J].林业实用技术, 2008(5):23-24.

王力刚, 李峰, 王炜烨, 等.黑龙江西部地表覆盖保墒的抗旱造林技术[J].中国水土保持科学, 2016, 14(2):147-154.

孙彦楠, 周广柱, 祝龙, 等.抗旱造林技术的应用研究[J].中国农学通报, 2006, 22(2):118-120.

王怀彪, 潘鹏, 高保山.毛乌素沙地樟子松抗旱造林关键技术研究[J].西北林学院学报, 2009, 24(6):70-73.

张源润, 蔡进军, 许畴.宁南半干旱退化山区抗旱造林技术研究[J].水土保持研究, 2005, 12(6):133-135, 141.

曹楗翊, 屈升银, 孙占锋.樟子松浇水覆膜技术及其保水效果研究[J].安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(22):13489-13491.

杨彩霞.宁南山区抗旱造林技术[J].现代农业科技, 2014, (11):180.

高秀琴.宁南山区黄土丘陵沟壑区抗旱造林技术的组装配套与应用[J].宁夏农林科技, 2008, 49(1):94-41.

刘彬彬.六盘山叠叠沟小流域两种典型植被的主要蒸散特征研究[D].甘肃兰州:甘肃农业大学, 2015.

韩瑞宏, 卢欣石, 高桂娟, 等.紫花苜蓿抗旱性主成分及隶属函数分析[J].草地学报, 2006, 14(2):142-146.

杨文治, 马玉玺, 韩仕峰, 等.黄土高原地区造林土壤水分生态分区研究[J].水土保持学报, 1994, 8(1):1-9.

王斌瑞, 罗彩霞, 王克勤.国内外土壤蓄水保墒技术研究动态[J].世界林业研究, 1997, 10(2):38-44.

Views

759

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Field Artificial Cultivation Technology of Moss Dominated Crust in Mu Us Sandland

Growth and Management Effect of Larix Principis-rupprechtii Plantation —A Case Study in Yuanzhou District, Guyan City, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region

Structure and variation characteristics of agricultural non-point source pollution in Qinghai Province from 2009 to 2023

Causes and mitigation measures of group-occurring slope debris flows in Mentougou District， Beijing City

Influence of soluble salt content on strength of Ili loess under wet-dry cycle conditions

Related Author

YANG Yanzhe

ZHANG Kankan

YANG Yongsheng

BU Chongfeng

Wang Zhengan

Wang Zhenzhong

Wu Miao

She Ping

Related Institution

Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, CAS and MWR, Yangling

College of Resources and Environment, Northwest A & F University, Yangling

Guyuan Yuanzhou District Bureau of Natural Resources

⁰