Land Use Transformation and Its Eco-environment Effects of Ecological-Production-Living Spaces in Yellow River Basin

Chang Tianying; Zhang Zhongwu; Qiao Xuning; Zhang Yufang

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.04.036

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Land Use Transformation and Its Eco-environment Effects of Ecological-Production-Living Spaces in Yellow River Basin

- Land Use Transformation and Its Eco-environment Effects of Ecological-Production-Living Spaces in Yellow River Basin
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 41, Issue 4, Pages: 268-275(2021)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 山西师范大学地理科学学院,山西,临汾,041000
  2. 河南理工大学, 土地经济与城乡发展研究中心,河南,焦作,454000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.04.036
  CLC： F301.24
- Published：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Chang Tianying, Zhang Zhongwu, Qiao Xuning, et al. Land Use Transformation and Its Eco-environment Effects of Ecological-Production-Living Spaces in Yellow River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(4): 268-275.
DOI：

Chang Tianying, Zhang Zhongwu, Qiao Xuning, et al. Land Use Transformation and Its Eco-environment Effects of Ecological-Production-Living Spaces in Yellow River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(4): 268-275. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.04.036.

摘要

[目的] 研究黄河流域生产—生活—生态空间（简称“三生”空间）土地利用转型的结构、空间特征及其生态环境效应，定量权衡土地资源开发与生态环境保护之间的关系，为黄河流域的生态保护和高质量发展提供决策支持。[方法] 以黄河流域为例，利用ArcGIS空间分析与制图技术、生态环境质量指数和土地利用转型对生态环境的贡献指数等模型方法。[结果] ①2000—2020年黄河流域“三生”空间土地利用结构表现为生产用地面积减少，生态用地面积相对稳定，生活用地面积不断增加。②2000—2020年黄河流域生态环境质量指数分别为0.450 2，0.450 5和0.456 7，呈稳定上升趋势。③2000—2020年黄河流域生态环境质量指数在空间分布上有明显的差异性，表现为由东南向北部递增。④2000—2020年黄河流域牧草生态用地对流域生态环境质量贡献率最高。20 a间黄河流域生态环境存在改善和恶化两种趋势，前者大于后者，流域生态环境不断改善。[结论] 城乡生活用地和工矿生产用地对农业生产用地的占用是黄河流域生态环境恶化的主要因素，应合理规划“三生”空间，优化国土资源空间配置，落实黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展国家重大战略。

Abstract

[Objective] The land use transformation structure

spatial characteristics and ecological environmental effects of the production-living-ecological space in the Yellow River basin were studied

in order to balance land resource development and ecological environmental protection

and provide decision-making for the ecological protection and high-quality development of the Yellow River basin. [Methods] Taking Yellow River basin as the study area

the land transformation was analyzed by using spatial analysis and mapping functions of ArcGIS platform

ecological environment quality index and the contribution index of land use transition to the ecological environment. [Results] ① From 2000 to 2020

the land use structure showed that production land area was decreasing

ecological land remains relatively stable and living land area was increasing. ② In 2000

2010 and 2020

the eco-environmental quality index of the Yellow River basin was 0.450 2

0.450 5 and 0.456 7 respectively and showed a stable upward trend. ③ There were obvious differences in the spatial distribution of the ecological environment quality index from 2000 to 2020

and the overall trend was increasing from the southeast to the north. ④ From 2000 to 2020

forage ecological land contributed the most to the ecological environment quality of the Yellow River basin. In last two decades

there existed two trends of deterioration and improvement of ecological environment

and the latter was more than the former. Consequently

ecological environment of Yellow River basin had been improved. [Conclusion] The occupation of agricultural production land by urban and rural living land

and industrial and mining production land is the main factor that caused eco-environmental deterioration in the Yellow River basin. The decision makers should rationally plan the production-living-ecological spaces and optimize the spatial allocation of land resources

so as to promote the major national strategy for ecological protection and high-quality development in the Yellow River basin.

关键词

Keywords

references

焦露, 薛哲进, 尹剑, 等. "三生"空间视角下喀斯特地区土地利用转型的生态环境效应:以贵州省为例[J].生态经济, 2020, 36(4):206-212.

Pimm S L, Raven P. Extinction by numbers[J]. Nature, 2000, 403(6772):843-845.

Nabiollahi K, Golmohamadi F, Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi R, et al. Assessing the effects of slope gradient and land use change on soil quality degradation through digital mapping of soil quality indices and soil loss rate[J]. Geoderma, 2018, 318:16-28.

Hankey S, Marshall J D. Land use regression models of on-road particulate air pollution(particle number, black carbon, PM2.5, particle size) using mobile monitoring[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(15):9194-9202.

Huang Jinliang, Huang Yaling, Pontius R G, et al. Geographically weighted regression to measure spatial variations in correlations between water pollution versus land use in a coastal watershed[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2015, 103:14-24.

杨清可, 段学军, 王磊, 等. 基于"三生"空间的土地利用转型与生态环境效应:以长江三角洲核心区为例[J].地理科学, 2018, 38(1):97-106.

Lambin E F, Meyfroidt P. Land use transitions:Socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change[J]. Land Use Policy, 2010, 27(2):108-118.

Liu Xiaoxuan, Yu Le, Si Yali, et al. Identifying patterns and hotspots of global land cover transitions using the ESA CCI land cover dataset[J]. Remote Sensing Letters, 2018, 9(10):972-981.

Long Hualou, Qu Yi, Tu Shuangshuang, et al. Development of land use transitions research in China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(7):1195-1214.

Cao Qian, Yu Deyong, Georgescu M, et al. Impacts of land use and land cover change on regional climate:A case study in the agro-pastoral transitional zone of China[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2015, 10(12):124025.

Yang Yuanyuan, Bao Wenkai, Li Yuheng, et al. Land use transition and its eco-environmental effects in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration:A production-living-ecological perspective[J]. Land, 2020, 9(9):285.

John J, Chithra N R, Thampi S G. Prediction of land use/cover change in the Bharathapuzha river basin, India using geospatial techniques[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2019, 191(6):354.

Bekele D, Alamirew T, Kebede A, et al. Land use and land cover dynamics in the Keleta watershed, Awash River basin, Ethiopia[J]. Environmental Hazards, 2019, 18(3):246-265.

Izquierdo A E, Grau H R. Agriculture adjustment, land-use transition and protected areas in Northwestern Argentina[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90(2):858-865.

Van Vliet N, Mertz O, Heinimann A, et al. Trends, drivers and impacts of changes in Swidden cultivation in tropical forest-agriculture frontiers:A global assessment[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2012, 22(2):418-429.

Qu Y, Jiang G-H, Li Z, et al. Understanding rural land use transition and regional consolidation implications in China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2019, 82:742-753.

Gaglio M, Aschonitis V G, Gissi E, et al. Land use change effects on ecosystem services of river deltas and coastal wetlands:Case study in Volano-Mesola-Goro in Po river delta(Italy)[J]. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 2017, 25(1):67-86.

Qu Yi, Long Hualou. The economic and environmental effects of land use transitions under rapid urbanization and the implications for land use management[J]. Habitat International, 2018, 82:113-121.

Liu Yongqing, Long Hualou, Li Tingting, et al. Land use transitions and their effects on water environment in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain, China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2015, 47:293-301.

高星, 刘泽伟, 李晨曦, 等. 基于"三生"空间的雄安新区土地利用功能转型与生态环境效应研究[J].生态学报, 2020, 40(20):7113-7122.

路昌, 张傲.东北地区土地利用转型及其生态环境效应[J].中国农业大学学报, 2020, 25(4):123-133.

何青泽, 谢德体, 王三, 等. 重庆市北碚区土地利用转型及生态环境效应[J].水土保持研究, 2019, 26(2):290-296.

阿依吐尔逊·沙木西, 刘新平, 祖丽菲娅·买买提, 等. 西部绿洲城市土地利用转型的生态环境效应:以乌鲁木齐市为例[J].农业资源与环境学报, 2019, 36(2):149-159.

刘继来, 刘彦随, 李裕瑞.中国"三生"空间分类评价与时空格局分析[J].地理学报, 2017, 72(7):1290-1304.

张文慧, 吕晓, 史洋洋, 等. 黄河流域土地利用转型图谱特征[J].中国土地科学, 2020, 34(8):80-88.

张佰发, 苗长虹.黄河流域土地利用时空格局演变及驱动力[J].资源科学, 2020, 42(3):460-473.

耿凤娟, 苗长虹, 胡志强.黄河流域工业结构转型及其对空间集聚方式的响应[J].经济地理, 2020, 40(6):30-36.

冉端, 李江风.长江经济带土地利用转型及生态环境效应[J].江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(2):256-263.

李晓文, 方创琳, 黄金川, 等. 西北干旱区城市土地利用变化及其区域生态环境效应:以甘肃河西地区为例[J].第四纪研究, 2003(3):280-290, 348-349.

龚亚男, 韩书成, 时晓标, 等. 广东省"三生"空间用地转型的时空演变及其生态环境效应[J].水土保持研究, 2020, 27(3):203-209.

李旭亮, 杨礼箫, 田伟, 等. 中国北方农牧交错带土地利用/覆盖变化研究综述[J].应用生态学报, 2018, 29(10):3487-3495.

苑韶峰, 唐奕钰, 申屠楚宁.土地利用转型时空演变及其生态环境效应:基于长江经济带127个地级市的实证研究[J].经济地理, 2019, 39(9):174-181.

王威, 胡业翠, 张宇龙.三生空间结构认知与转化管控框架[J].中国土地科学, 2020, 34(12):25-33.

Views

1471

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Characteristics of Land Use Transformation and Its Function Change in Kaidu-Kongque River Basin

Spatiotemporal evolution of agro-ecological resilience and obstacle factors in main grain-producing areas of Yellow River basin

Impact of supporting policies on land-use efficiency for resource-based cities in Yellow River basin

Extraction Method of Spectral Information of Inland Surface Water Body in Yellow River Basin

Coupling and Coordination Situation and Driving Factors of Social Economy and Eco-environment in Yellow River Basin

Related Author

Adilai·

Ruze

Ayituerxun·

Shamuxi

Gulimire·

Aierken

Han Xinru

Xue Xuandeng

Related Institution

College of Management, Xinjiang Agricultural University

Business School， Henan University of Science and Technology

College of Resources and Environment, Shanxi Agricultural University

College of Urban and Environmental Science, Northwest University, Xian

School of Economics and Management, Xian University of Technology, Xian

⁰