Effects of Production-Ecological-Living Land Use Transformation on Eco-environment Quality in Guangdong Province During 1980-2018

Guan Cuiliu; Wen Debao; Li Yuhao; Li Long

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.04.033

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Effects of Production-Ecological-Living Land Use Transformation on Eco-environment Quality in Guangdong Province During 1980-2018

- Effects of Production-Ecological-Living Land Use Transformation on Eco-environment Quality in Guangdong Province During 1980-2018
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 41, Issue 4, Pages: 241-251(2021)
- 作者机构：
  
  广州大学地理科学与遥感学院,广东,广州,510006
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.04.033
  CLC： X24;F301.2
- Published：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Guan Cuiliu, Wen Debao, Li Yuhao, et al. Effects of Production-Ecological-Living Land Use Transformation on Eco-environment Quality in Guangdong Province During 1980-2018[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(4): 241-251.
DOI：

Guan Cuiliu, Wen Debao, Li Yuhao, et al. Effects of Production-Ecological-Living Land Use Transformation on Eco-environment Quality in Guangdong Province During 1980-2018[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(4): 241-251. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.04.033.

摘要

[目的

]

研究基于格网单元的广东省“三生”用地转型对生态环境质量的影响，为区域生态、经济协调发展提供科学依据。[方法

]

基于广东省8期土地利用现状遥感监测数据和“三生”土地利用主导功能分类体系，对该区“三生”用地转型特征及生态环境质量进行定量研究。[结果

]

①1980—2018年，广东省农业生产用地面积大幅减少，共减少了5 369.61 km

，城镇生活用地、工矿生产用地面积大幅增加，分别增加了4 526.02 km

，2 406.93 km

，农业生产用地和林地生态用地间转换现象明显。②“三生”用地空间转型主要表现为工矿生产用地、林地生态用地中心逐渐靠近广东省几何中心，农业生产用地、城镇生活用地中心逐渐远离几何中心。③广东省生态环境质量指数从1980年0.648 1降至2018年的0.641 4，生态环境质量空间分异明显，呈现“沿海低—内陆高”的分布特点。④Getis-Ord G

指数表明，生态环境质量变化热点区域集中在粤东西北地区，冷点区域多位于珠江三角洲地区。⑤广东省生态环境存在改善和恶化两种趋势。[结论

]

建议充分考虑区域自然条件、功能定位以及导致生态环境变化的主导因素，制定土地政策措施，实现土地利用方式创新，更好地推动广东省区域均衡发展。

Abstract

[Objective] The effects of production-ecological-living land use transformation on eco-environment quality in Guangdong Province were studied based upon grid cell in order to provide scientific basis for coordinated development of regional ecology and economic. [Methods] Based on the eight-phase Landsat TM image interpretation data of Guangdong Province and the dominant function classification system of land use in production-ecology-living space

and the characteristics of production-ecological-living land use transformation as well as its eco-environment quality were quantitatively analyzed. [Results] ① From 1980 to 2018

the agricultural productive land decreased greatly

with a total decrease of 5 369.61 km2 and the mining productive land and urban living land increased greatly

with a total increase of 4 526.02 km2 and 2 406.93 km2. The conversion between agricultural production land and woodland ecological land was obvious. ② Spatial transformation of production-ecological-living land use in Guangdong Province was mainly manifested as the mean center of mining productive land and forest ecological land became closer to the geometric center of Guangdong Province

the mean center of agricultural productive land and urban living land moved away from geometric center. ③ The index of eco-environment quality in Guangdong Province was reduced from 0.648 1 in 1980 to 0.641 4 in 2018. The spatial differentiation of ecological environment quality was obvious

and the eco-environment quality in coastal cities was much lower than inland area. ④ The Getis-Ord Gi* index proved that the hot region of the change of eco-environment quality was concentrated on the Eastern

Western and Northern regions of Guangdong Province

while the cold region was chiefly located in Pearl River Delta. ⑤ Guangdong Province had two trends which were ecological improvement and ecological deterioration. [Conclusion] Full consideration should be given to the regional natural considerations

the function positioning and the leading factors of ecological environment changes in order to formulate land policies and measures and promote the balanced development of Guangdong Province.

关键词

Keywords

references

Foley J A, De Fries R, Asner G P, et al. Global consequences of land use[J]. science, 2005, 309(5734):570-574.

Liu Yansui, Fang Fang, Li Yuheng. Key issues of land use in China and implications for policy making[J]. Land Use Policy, 2014, 40:6-12.

龙花楼, 曲艺, 屠爽爽, 等. 城镇化背景下中国农区土地利用转型及其环境效应研究:进展与展望[J].地球科学进展, 2018, 33(5):455-463.

李龙, 吴大放, 王芳, 等. 中国快速城市化区域生态系统服务价值预测及权衡研究:以佛山市为例[J].生态学报, 2020, 40(24):9023-9036.

龙花楼, 陈坤秋.基于土地系统科学的土地利用转型与城乡融合发展[J].地理学报, 2021, 76(2):295-309.

Mather A S. The forest transition[J]. Area, 1992, 24(4):367-379.

Grainger A. The forest transition:an alternative approach[J]. Area, 1995:242-251.

龙花楼.土地利用转型:土地利用/覆被变化综合研究的新途径[J].地理与地理信息科学, 2003, 19(1):87-90.

龙花楼, 屠爽爽.土地利用转型与乡村振兴[J].中国土地科学, 2018, 32(7):1-6.

Hosonuma N, Herold M, De Sy V, et al. An assessment of deforestation and forest degradation drivers in developing countries[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2012, 7(4):044009.

Leblond J P. Revisiting forest transition explanations:The role of "push" factors and adaptation strategies in forest expansion in northern Phetchabun, Thailand[J]. Land Use Policy, 2019, 83:195-214.

Gong Z, Gu L, Yao S, et al. Effects of bio-physical, economic and ecological policy on forest transition for sustainability of resource and socioeconomics development[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 243:118571.

Kozak J, Szwagrzyk M. Have there been forest transitions? Forest transition theory revisited in the context of the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem[J]. Area, 2016, 48(4):504-512.

Lacerda Silva A, Salas Alves D, Pinheiro Ferreira M. Landsat-Based land use change assessment in the Brazilian Atlantic forest:Forest transition and sugarcane expansion[J]. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(7):996.

龙花楼.中国农村宅基地转型的理论与证实[J].地理学报, 2006, 61(10):1093-1100.

宋小青.论土地利用转型的研究框架[J].地理学报, 2017, 72(3):471-487.

陈昌玲, 张全景, 诸培新.经济发达地区城乡建设用地转型时空演变特征:以江苏通州为例[J].土壤通报, 2018, 49(3):537-545.

戈大专, 龙花楼, 杨忍.中国耕地利用转型格局及驱动因素研究:基于人均耕地面积视角[J].资源科学, 2018, 40(2):273-283.

史洋洋, 吕晓, 黄贤金, 等. 江苏沿海地区耕地利用转型及其生态系统服务价值变化响应[J].自然资源学报, 2017, 32(6):961-976.

朱清, 毛召锋.土地利用转型过程及其对区域生态质量的影响分析:以巢湖市为例[J].测绘与空间地理信息, 2019, 42(11):58-62, 65.

胡锋, 安裕伦, 赵海兵.基于土地利用转型视角的"亚喀斯特"区域生态环境效应研究:以黔中部分地区为例[J].地球与环境, 2016, 44(4):447-454.

阿迪莱·如则, 阿依吐尔逊·沙木西, 古丽米热·艾尔肯.开都-孔雀河流域土地利用转型及其功能变化特征[J].水土保持通报, 2020, 40(4):244-251.

张英男, 龙花楼, 屠爽爽, 等. 鄱阳湖生态经济区土地利用转型热点区域识别及其动力机制研究[J].生态环境学报, 2016, 25(11):1828-1835.

郭椿阳, 高尚, 周伯燕, 等. 基于格网的伏牛山区土地利用变化对生态服务价值影响研究[J].生态学报, 2019, 39(10):3482-3493.

蒋超, 龚建周, 陈晓越, 等. 广东省土地利用阶段特征及动态研究框架探讨[J].广东农业科学, 2019, 46(8):146-157.

林珍铭, 夏斌, 董武娟.基于信息熵的广东省土地利用结构时空变化分析[J].热带地理, 2011, 31(3):266-271.

刘振杰, 刘洛, 孙璐, 等. 分时序广东省土地利用变化的时空格局和驱动力分析[J].江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(18):253-260.

吴佩君, 刘小平, 黎夏, 等. 基于InVEST模型和元胞自动机的城市扩张对陆地生态系统碳储量影响评估:以广东省为例[J].地理与地理信息科学, 2016, 32(5):22-28, 36.

龚亚男, 韩书成, 时晓标, 等. 广东省"三生空间"用地转型的时空演变及其生态环境效应[J].水土保持研究, 2020, 27(3):203-209.

邹利林, 王建英, 胡学东.中国县级"三生用地"分类体系的理论构建与实证分析[J].中国土地科学, 2018, 32(4):59-66.

朱琳, 程久苗, 金晶, 等. "三生"用地结构的空间格局及影响因素研究:基于284个城市面板数据[J].中国农业资源与区划, 2018, 39(8):105-115.

刘继来, 刘彦随, 李裕瑞.中国"三生空间"分类评价与时空格局分析[J].地理学报, 2017, 72(7):1290-1304.

吕立刚, 周生路, 周兵兵, 等. 区域发展过程中土地利用转型及其生态环境响应研究:以江苏省为例[J].地理科学, 2013, 33(12):1442-1449.

李晓文, 方创琳, 黄金川, 等. 西北干旱区城市土地利用变化及其区域生态环境效应:以甘肃河西地区为例[J].第四纪研究, 2003, 23(3):280-290.

朱志超, 刘燕燕, 范天瑜.东湖水质状况的面积加权法评价分析[J].环境科学与技术, 2006, 29(1):67-68.

赵璐, 赵作权.中国沿海地区经济空间差异的动态演化[J].世界地理研究, 2014, 23(1):45-54.

范业婷, 金晓斌, 项晓敏, 等. 江苏省土地利用功能变化及其空间格局特征[J].地理研究, 2019, 38(2):383-398.

杨清可, 段学军, 王磊, 等. 基于"三生空间"的土地利用转型与生态环境效应:以长江三角洲核心区为例[J].地理科学, 2018, 38(1):97-106.

郭椿阳, 高尚, 周伯燕, 等. 基于格网的伏牛山区土地利用变化对生态服务价值影响研究[J].生态学报, 2019, 39(10):3482-3493.

何改丽, 李加林, 刘永超, 等. 1985-2015年美国坦帕湾流域土地开发利用强度时空变化分析[J].自然资源学报, 2019, 34(1):66-79.

陈万旭, 李江风, 冉端.长江中游城市群土地利用转型和城镇化之间的空间关系[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(5):1036-1048.

张晓琳, 金晓斌, 范业婷, 等. 1995-2015年江苏省土地利用功能转型特征及其协调性分析[J].自然资源学报, 2019, 34(4):689-706.

杨述河, 闫海利, 郭丽英.北方农牧交错带土地利用变化及其生态环境效应:以陕北榆林市为例[J].地理科学进展, 2004, 23(6):49-55.

Yang Yuanyuan, Bao Wenkai, Li Yuheng, et al. Land Use Transition and Its Eco-Environmental Effects in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration:A Production-Living-Ecological Perspective[J]. Land, 2020, 9(9):285.

Zheng Zihao, Wu Zhifeng, Chen Yingbiao, et al. Exploration of eco-environment and urbanization changes in coastal zones:A case study in China over the past 20 years[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 119:106847.

Views

855

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Characteristics of Land Use Transformation and Its Function Change in Kaidu-Kongque River Basin

Ecosystem Service Value of Land Use Transition in Southeast Coast of China—A Case Study of Yongjiang River Basin

Land Use Transformation and Its Eco-environment Effects of Ecological-Production-Living Spaces in Yellow River Basin

Spatial and temporal Differentiation and Driving Mechanism of Ecological Vulnerability Along Sichuan-Tibet Railway During 2010-2020 Based on SRP Model

Impact of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Service Value in Urban Agglomeration of Central Yunnan Province During 2000-2020

Related Author

Aierken

Gulimire·

Shamuxi

Ayituerxun·

Ruze

Adilai·

Shao Shuyao

Zhao Mengqi

Related Institution

College of Management, Xinjiang Agricultural University

Department of Geography & Spatial Information Technology, Ningbo University

Graduate School, Ningbo University

Donghai Research Institute, Ningbo University

School of Geographical Sciences, Shanxi Normal University

⁰