Hydrologic Regime Change and Its Attribution Analysis of River Runoff in Typical Watershed on Loess Plateau

Zhang Shuyu; Zhao Guangju; Mu Xingmin; Tian Peng; Gao Peng; Sun Wenyi

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.04.001

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Hydrologic Regime Change and Its Attribution Analysis of River Runoff in Typical Watershed on Loess Plateau

- Hydrologic Regime Change and Its Attribution Analysis of River Runoff in Typical Watershed on Loess Plateau
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 41, Issue 4, Pages: 1-8(2021)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西北农林科技大学黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨凌,712100
  2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
  3. 西北农林科技大学资源与环境学院, 陕西杨凌,712100
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.04.001
  CLC： TV121.4;P333
- Published：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Zhang Shuyu, Zhao Guangju, Mu Xingmin, et al. Hydrologic Regime Change and Its Attribution Analysis of River Runoff in Typical Watershed on Loess Plateau[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(4): 1-8.
DOI：

Zhang Shuyu, Zhao Guangju, Mu Xingmin, et al. Hydrologic Regime Change and Its Attribution Analysis of River Runoff in Typical Watershed on Loess Plateau[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(4): 1-8. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.04.001.

摘要

[目的] 分析黄土高原典型流域河川径流水文情势变化及其原因，为该区域水土保持与水资源高效利用提供科学支撑。[方法] 选取渭河支流散渡河与无定河支流大理河为研究区，利用甘谷站和绥德站1965—2018年的气象水文资料，采用线性回归、Mann-Kendall检验、累积距平和双累积曲线法分析散渡河和大理河的径流变化特征及其驱动因素，采用改进的RVA法分析梯田和淤地坝为主的水土保持措施对不同河流水文情势变化的影响。[结果] 两条河流的年径流量呈显著减少趋势（p<0.01），并在20世纪90年代前后发生突变。采用改进的变异性范围（RVA）法计算散渡河和大理河的径流综合改变度分别属高度改变（90.12%）和中度改变（60.66%），32个水文变化指标中，流量变化改变率指标受到的影响最为显著。[结论] 以梯田措施为主的散渡河月中值流量和年最小流量均大幅减小，年最小流量发生时间明显延迟且低流量脉冲历时增加。以坝库工程为主的大理河月中值流量受季节变化影响，年最小1 d和3 d流量增加且低流量脉冲次数减小。

Abstract

[Objective] The hydrologic regime change in typical watershed on Loess Plateau was studied

and its attribution analysis was carried out

in order to provide scientific support for soil and water conservation and efficient utilization of water resources in different regions of the Loess Plateau. [Methods] Sandu River (a tributary of Weihe River) and Dali River (a tributary of Wuding River) were selected as the study areas

and the traits in variations of streamflow and their driving factors from 1965 to 2018 were analyzed based on meteorological and hydrological data at Gangu and Suide hydrological stations by using the linear regression

Mann-Kendall test

accumulated anomaly

and double mass curve methods. The improved range of variability approach was employed to analyze the impact of the hydrological alterations in different river by soil and water conservation dominated by terracing and damming. [Results] The annual runoff showed significant decreasing trends(p<0.01) and the abrupt changes occurred in around 1990s in Sandu River and Dali River. The alteration degree of runoff in Sandu River was high (90.12%) and in Dali River was moderate (60.66%) calculated by the improved range of variability approach (RVA) method. Among 32 indicators of hydrologic alteration (IHA)

the rise and fall rate of flow were affected most significantly. [Conclusion] In the Sandu River (dominated by terracing)

both the magnitude of monthly median flow and the annual minimum flow decreased dramatically

timing of annual minimum flow delayed and duration of low pulses increased. In the Dali River (dominated by damming)

the magnitude of monthly median flow depended on the seasonal alteration. The annual 1-day and 3-day minimum flow increased and frequency of low pulses declined.

关键词

Keywords

references

Li Li, Ni Jinren, Fang Chang, et al. Global trends in water and sediment fluxes of the world's large rivers[J]. Science Bulletin, 2020, 65(1):62-69.

Naik P K, Jay D A. Human and climate impacts on Columbia River hydrology and salmonids[J]. River Research & Applications, 2011, 27(10):1270-1276.

Hasan E, Tarhule A, Kirstetter P, et al. Runoff sensitivity to climate change in the Nile River basin[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2018, 561(3/4):312-321.

Xu Jiongxin. Plausible causes of temporal variation in suspended sediment concentration in the upper Changjiang River and major tributaries during the second half of the 20th century[J]. Quaternary International, 2009, 208(1/2):85-92.

胡春宏, 张晓明.论黄河水沙变化趋势预测研究的若干问题[J].水利学报, 2018, 49(9):1028-1039.

赵广举, 穆兴民, 田鹏, 等. 近60年黄河中游水沙变化趋势及其影响因素分析[J].资源科学, 2012, 34(6):1070-1078.

Richter B, Baumgartner J, Wigington R, et al. How much water does a river need?[J]. Freshwater Biology, 1997, 37(1):231-249.

Olden J D, Poff N L. Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes[J]. River Research and Applications, 2010, 19(2):101-121.

Yang Tao, Zhang Qiang, Chen Yongqin David, et al. A spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration caused by dam construction in the middle and lower Yellow River, China[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2008, 22(18):3829-3843.

Zhang Hongbo, Singh V P, Zhang Qiang, et al. Variation in ecological flow regimes and their response to dams in the upper Yellow River basin[J]. Environmental Earth Ences, 2016, 75(11):1-16.

Tian Xiaojing, Zhao Guangju, Mu Xingmin, et al. Hydrologic alteration and possible underlying causes in the Wuding River, China[J]. the Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 693(25):133551-133556.

宁珍, 高光耀, 傅伯杰.黄土高原流域水沙变化研究进展[J].生态学报, 2020, 40(1):2-9.

姚文艺, 冉大川, 陈江南.黄河流域近期水沙变化及其趋势预测[J].水科学进展, 2013, 24(5):607-616.

刘国彬, 上官周平, 姚文艺, 等. 黄土高原生态工程的生态成效[J].中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32(1):11-19.

贾路, 任宗萍, 李占斌, 等. 基于耦合协调度的大理河流域径流和输沙关系分析[J].农业工程学报, 2020, 36(11):86-94.

Burn D H, Elnur M. Detection of hydrologic trends and variability[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2002, 255(1/4):107-122.

穆兴民, 张秀勤, 高鹏, 等. 双累积曲线方法理论及在水文气象领域应用中应注意的问题[J].水文, 2010, 30(4):47-51.

赵阳, 胡春宏, 张晓明, 等. 近70年黄河流域水沙情势及其成因分析[J].农业工程学报, 2018, 34(21):112-119.

Yin X A, Yang Z F, Petts G E. A new method to assess the flow regime alterations in riverine ecosystems[J]. River Research and Applications, 2015, 31(4):497-504.

Grantz K, Rajagopalan B, Clark M. A technique for incorporating large-scale climate information in basin-scale ensemble streamflow forecasts[J]. Water Resources Research, 2005, 41(10):10410-10411.

李文学.黄河治理开发与保护70年效益分析[J].人民黄河, 2016, 38(10):1-6.

姚文艺.新时代黄河流域水土保持发展机遇与科学定位[J].人民黄河, 2019, 41(12):1-7.

刘晓燕, 王富贵, 杨胜天, 等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区水平梯田减沙作用研究[J].水利学报, 2014, 45(7):793-800.

焦菊英, 王万忠, 李靖, 等. 黄土高原丘陵沟壑区淤地坝的减水减沙效益分析[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2001, 15(1):78-83.

冉大川, 赵力仪, 王宏, 等. 黄河中游地区梯田减洪减沙作用分析[J].人民黄河, 2005, 27(1):51-53.

袁水龙, 李占斌, 李鹏, 等. MIKE耦合模型模拟淤地坝对小流域暴雨洪水过程的影响[J].农业工程学报, 2018, 34(13):152-159.

高海东, 贾莲莲, 李占斌, 等. 基于图论的淤地坝对径流影响的机制[J].中国水土保持科学, 2015, 13(4):1-8.

郭文献, 陈鼎新, 李越, 等. 基于IHA-RVA法金沙江下游生态水文情势评价[J].水利水电技术, 2018, 49(8):155-162.

Views

1661

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Dynamics and driving factors of soil organic carbon sequestration during vegetation restoration on Loess Plateau

Review and Enlightenments of Soil and Water Conservation on Loess Plateau in Past 70 Years

Discussion on Control Form of Stock System for Soil and Water Conservation in Loess Plateau

Existing Problems of Silt Arresters on the Loess Plateau

Spatiotemporal changes and driving mechanisms of vegetation cover in Dongting Lake area based on kNDVI and structural equation model

Related Author

Li Zongshan

Hao Wanglin

Li Binbin

Li Rui

Wang Xia 

GAO Zhaoliang

YANG Shiwei

Chen Chuang

Related Institution

Department of Biological and Food Engineering， Lyuliang University， Lüliang

State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology， Research Center for Eco-environmental Sciences， Chinese Academy of Sciences

College of Soil and Water Conservation Science and Engineering， Northwest A&F University， angling

State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau， Institute of Soil and Water Conservation， Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources， Yangling

Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling

⁰