Ecological Coupling Model and Construction of Ecological Security Patterns in Urban and Rural Space of Harbin City During 1990-2017

Xie Jing; Li Wen

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.01.043

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Ecological Coupling Model and Construction of Ecological Security Patterns in Urban and Rural Space of Harbin City During 1990-2017

- Ecological Coupling Model and Construction of Ecological Security Patterns in Urban and Rural Space of Harbin City During 1990-2017
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 41, Issue 1, Pages: 317-326(2021)
- 作者机构：
  
  东北林业大学园林学院,黑龙江,哈尔滨,150040
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.01.043
  CLC： X37
- Published：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Xie Jing, Li Wen. Ecological Coupling Model and Construction of Ecological Security Patterns in Urban and Rural Space of Harbin City During 1990-2017[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(1): 317-326.
DOI：

Xie Jing, Li Wen. Ecological Coupling Model and Construction of Ecological Security Patterns in Urban and Rural Space of Harbin City During 1990-2017[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(1): 317-326. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.01.043.

摘要

[目的] 探究哈尔滨市中观尺度上城乡空间各类生态要素的衔接模式与生态廊道布局的细节优化措施，旨在实现城市内部与乡村的生态系统联动，提升区域生态效益，为相关生态规划部门提供决策参考。[方法] 基于景观生态学原理及GIS技术，以生态阻力值较大的重要河流廊道为边界，根据城市发展动向，裁切出哈尔滨市城乡空间在中观尺度上的研究范围。通过分析哈尔滨市1990-2017年土地利用变化，得出各类生态要素在时空尺度上的耦合模式演变，为生态安全格局构建及优化提供方向。运用形态学空间格局分析法（MSPA）对研究区域生态要素的核心区、桥接区及岛状斑块等进行识别与评价，根据dPC指数提取出重要生态源地，基于最小累积阻力模型（MCR）得出潜在生态廊道，通过科学计算对连通性较弱的区域进行规划补充，归纳廊道缓冲区宽度、核密度及生态断裂点，并结合生态耦合机制的时空变化对生态安全格局进行细节优化。[结果] 通过各类生态要素在中观尺度上的耦合模式变化，确定了哈尔滨市城乡生态源地及廊道细节优化策略，形成稳定可持续的生态安全格局，归纳总结了因地制宜的优化建设措施。[结论] 哈尔滨市共计15处核心区为原生态源地，重要生态廊道为42条，一般生态廊道为63条，主要分布于研究区域北部。优化后的生态安全格局补充了11处生态源地和220条潜在规划生态廊道，廊道适宜建设宽度为60 m。

Abstract

[Objective] The connection of various ecological elements in urban and rural spaces on a mesoscale and the detailed optimization measures of the layout of ecological corridors of Harbin City was explored to realize the linkage between the urban and rural ecosystems

improve regional ecological benefits

and provide a reference for making decisions in relevant ecological planning departments.[Methods] Based on the principles of landscape ecology and GIS technology

important river corridors with large ecological resistance values were used as boundaries. According to the development trend of the city

the research scope of urban and rural spaces on a mesoscale was determined. Through an analysis of the land use changes of Harbin City during 1990-2017

the evolution of coupling modes of various ecological elements on the temporal and spatial scales was obtained

providing directions for the construction and optimization of ecological security patterns. The morphological spatial pattern analysis method was used to identify and evaluate the core area

bridge area

and island patches of the ecological elements of the study area

and important ecological sources were extracted based on the dPC index. Based on the minimum cumulative resistance model

potential ecological corridors were obtained and areas with weak connectivity were planned and supplemented through calculations. The width of the buffer zones of corridors

nuclear density

and ecological break point were obtained and the ecological security pattern was optimized in detail based on the temporal and spatial changes in the ecological coupling mechanism.[Results] Through the change in the coupling mode of various ecological elements on a mesoscale

ecological sources and the detailed optimization measures for the corridors in the urban and rural spaces of Harbin City were determined

and a stable and sustainable ecological security pattern was formed. In this research

the optimized construction measures were summarized according to local conditions.[Conclusion] Fifteen core areas in Harbin City are the original ecological sources

and there are 42 important ecological corridors and 63 general ecological corridors. The corridors are mainly distributed in the northern part of the study area. The optimized ecological security pattern complements 11 ecological sources and 220 potential planned ecological corridors

and the suitable construction width of a corridor is 60 m.

关键词

Keywords

references

刘世梁,侯笑云,尹艺洁,等.景观生态网络研究进展[J].生态学报,2017,37(12):3947-3956.

木皓可,张云路,马嘉,等.从"其他绿地"到"区域绿地":城市非建设用地下的绿地规划转型与优化[J].中国园林,2019,35(9):42-47.

De Montis A, Ganciu A, Cabras M, et al. Comparative ecological network analysis:an application to Italy[J]. Land Use Policy, 2019,81:714-724.

韩世豪,梅艳国,叶持跃,等.基于最小累积阻力模型的福建省南平市延平区生态安全格局构建[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(2):192-198,205.

Foltête J C. How ecological networks could benefit from landscape graphs:A response to the paper by Spartaco Gippoliti and Corrado Battisti[J]. Land Use Policy, 2019,80:391-394.

穆博,李华威, Audrey L M, 等.基于遥感和图论的绿地空间演变和连通性研究:以郑州为例[J].生态学报,2017,37(14):4883-4895.

Wickham J D, Riitters K H, Wade T G, et al. A national assessment of green infrastructure and change for the conterminous United States using morphological image processing[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2010,94(3/4):186-195.

倪庆琳,丁忠义,侯湖平,等.基于电路理论的生态格局识别与保护研究:以宁武县为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2019,33(5):67-73.

Lookingbill T R, Gardner R H, Ferrari J R, et al. Combining a dispersal model with network theory to assess habitat connectivity[J]. Ecological Applications, 2010, 20(2):427-441.

许峰,尹海伟,孔繁花,等.基于MSPA与最小路径方法的巴中西部新城生态网络构建[J].生态学报,2015,35(19):6425-6434.

Riitters K H, Vogt P, Soille P, et al. Neutral model analysis of landscape patterns from mathematical morphology[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2007,22(7):1033-1043.

谭华清,张金亭,周希胜.基于最小累计阻力模型的南京市生态安全格局构建[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(3):282-288,296,325.

史芳宁,刘世梁,安毅,等.基于生态网络的山水林田湖草生物多样性保护研究:以广西左右江为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(23):8930-8938.

李恒凯,刘玉婷,李芹,等.基于MCR模型的南方稀土矿区生态安全格局分析[J].地理科学,2020,40(6):989-998.

何建华,潘越,刘殿锋.生态网络视角下武汉市湿地生态格局分析[J].生态学报,2020,40(11):3590-3601.

Saura S, Vogt P, Velázquez J, et al. Key structural forest connectors can be identified by combining landscape spatial pattern and network analyses[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2011,262(2):150-160.

杨志广,蒋志云,郭程轩,等.基于形态空间格局分析和最小累积阻力模型的广州市生态网络构建[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(10):3367-3376.

陈利顶,景永才,孙然好.城市生态安全格局构建:目标、原则和基本框架[J].生态学报,2018,38(12):4101-4108.

董菁,左进,李晨,等.城市再生视野下高密度城区生态空间规划方法:以厦门本岛立体绿化专项规划为例[J].生态学报,2018,38(12):4412-4423.

范勇.基于资源要素评价和网络结构分析的乡村绿道规划研究[D].山东泰安:山东农业大学,2016.

刘美.基于遥感的哈尔滨市城乡建设用地变化研究[D].黑龙江哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2018.

Blaschke T. The role of the spatial dimension within the framework of sustainable landscapes and natural capital[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006,75(3/4):198-226.

李苗,臧淑英,万鲁河,等.哈尔滨市城乡结合部土地利用时空变化[J].测绘科学,2018,43(6):52-57.

李康康.基于自行车旅游的哈尔滨市城乡游憩型绿道规划设计研究[D].黑龙江哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2018.

方金萌.基于GIS和Fragstats的兰考县绿地景观格局分析与优化研究[D].河南郑州:郑州大学,2018.

Meng Jijun, Wang Ya, Wang Xiaodong, et al. Construction of landscape ecological security pattern in Guiyang based on MCR model[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2016,25(7):1052-1061.

Clergeau P, Burel F. The role of spatio-temporal patch connectivity at the landscape level:an example in a bird distribution[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1997,38(1/2):37-43.

胡远东.大庆城市异质景观形成对湖泊湿地环境与生物多样性的影响[D].上海:华东师范大学,2015.

蒋思敏,张青年,陶华超.广州市绿地生态网络的构建与评价[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),2016,55(4):162-170.

陈小平,陈文波.鄱阳湖生态经济区生态网络构建与评价[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(5):1611-1618.

朱强,俞孔坚,李迪华.景观规划中的生态廊道宽度[J].生态学报,2005,25(9):2406-2412.

陈德超,施祝凯,王祖静,等.苏州环太湖地区生态网络构建与空间冲突识别[J].生态与农村环境学报,2020,36(6):778-787.

高宇,木皓可,张云路,等.基于MSPA分析方法的市域尺度绿色网络体系构建路径优化研究:以招远市为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(20):7547-7556.

Views

897

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Construction of ecological security pattern at Zhangjiakou section of Bashang region based on landscape connectivity optimization

Spatiotemporal evolution of ecological security pattern under influence of urbanization in Kunming City， Yunnan Province

Construction of ecological security pattern of Kriya River basin based on InVEST-MCR model

Analysis on Spatiotemporal Expansion Process of Construction Land in Urban Fringe of Harbin City

Optimization of Ecological Land Conservation Pattern in Fuzhou City

Related Author

Zhang Xin

Li Lei

Qiu Yan

Xu Zehao

Li Jiashun

Liu Li

Mansuer Shabiti

Chen Hong

Related Institution

College of Architecture and Art， Hebei University of Architecture

Yunnan Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion Prevention and Green Development

Yunnan Water Science Research Institute

Key Laboratory of Lake Environment and Resources in Arid Regions of Xinjiang

College of Geography Science and Tourism， Xinjiang Normal University

⁰