Quantitative Research on Cultivated Land Ecological Compensation Standard Based on Equity

Cui Ningbo; Sheng Shiyu

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.01.020

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Quantitative Research on Cultivated Land Ecological Compensation Standard Based on Equity

- Quantitative Research on Cultivated Land Ecological Compensation Standard Based on Equity
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 41, Issue 1, Pages: 138-143(2021)
- 作者机构：
  
  东北农业大学经济管理学院,黑龙江,哈尔滨,150030
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.01.020
  CLC： X32;F323.21
- Published：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Cui Ningbo, Sheng Shiyu. Quantitative Research on Cultivated Land Ecological Compensation Standard Based on Equity[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(1): 138-143.
DOI：

Cui Ningbo, Sheng Shiyu. Quantitative Research on Cultivated Land Ecological Compensation Standard Based on Equity[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(1): 138-143. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.01.020.

摘要

[目的

]

基于公平视角量化2011-2018年东北地区的耕地生态补偿标准和优先级，为东北地区耕地生态保护提供理论指引。[方法

]

从生态系统服务价值出发，在对耕地生态补偿行为和标准进行理论分析的基础上，构建当量因子和水足迹模型。[结果

]

①东北地区耕地生态系统服务价值呈现东高西低的特点，在2011-2018年，各省份均出现先上升后下降再上升的趋势。②在剔除耕地经营者自身消费的生态系统服务价值并结合不同地区支付能力后，黑龙江省、吉林省、辽宁省的耕地生态补偿标准近几年较之前偏低，2018年的额度分别应为5.73×10

，3.13×10

，1.33×10

元。③考虑各省份的经济发展水平，生态补偿优先级由高到低分别为黑龙江省、吉林省、辽宁省，应当率先向黑龙江省支付耕地生态补偿。[结论

]

在今后进行耕地生态补偿时，要科学合理地测度补偿标准并健全跨区域补偿机制。

Abstract

[Objective] Based on the perspective of equity

the standards and priorities of cultivated land ecological compensation in Northeast China from 2011 to 2018 were quantified to provide theoretical guidance for the ecological protection of cultivated land in the region.[Methods] Based on the ecosystem service value

the equivalent factor and water footprint model were constructed based on a theoretical analysis of farmland ecological compensation behavior and standards.[Results] ① The service value of cultivated land ecosystems in Northeast China was high in the east and low in the west. From 2011 to 2018

all three provinces showed the trend of rising first

then decreasing

and rising again. ② After excluding the ecosystem service value consumed by cultivated land managers and combining the payment capacities of different regions

the cultivated land eco-compensation standards in Heilongjiang

Jilin

and Liaoning Province were lower than those in previous years

and the quota for 2018 should be 5.73×1010

3.13×1010

and 1.33×1010 yuan

respectively. ③ Considering the economic development level of each province in Northeast China

the priority ranking of eco-compensation was Heilongjiang Province

Jilin Province

and Liaoning Province

from high to low

thereby implying that the cultivated land eco-compensation should be paid first to Heilongjiang Province.[Conclusion] When conducting cultivated land eco-compensation in the future

it is necessary to measure the compensation standard of cultivated land in a scientific and reasonable way and to perfect the compensation mechanism across regions.

关键词

Keywords

references

吴大放,刘艳艳,刘毅华,等.耕地生态安全评价研究展望[J].中国生态农业学报,2015,23(3):257-267.

宋敏,金贵.规划管制背景下差别化耕地保护生态补偿研究:回顾与展望[J].农业经济问题,2019,40(12):77-85.

牛志伟,邹昭晞.农业生态补偿的理论与方法:基于生态系统与生态价值一致性补偿标准模型[J].管理世界,2019,35(11):133-143.

Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Ecological Economics, 1998,25(1):3-15.

Pagiola S. Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008,65(4):712-724.

Thu Thuy P, Campbell B M, Garnett S. Lessons for pro-poor payments for environmental services:An analysis of projects in Vietnam[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 2009,31(2):117-133.

刘利花,李全新.基于耕地非市场价值和机会成本的耕地保护补偿标准研究:以江苏省为例[J].当代经济管理,2018,280(6):43-46.

马爱慧,蔡银莺,张安录.基于土地优化配置模型的耕地生态补偿框架[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2010,20(10):97-102.

谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(5):911-919.

任平,吴涛,周介铭. 耕地资源非农化价值损失评价模型与补偿机制研究[J].中国农业科学,2014,47(4):786-795.

苏浩,雷国平,李荣印.基于生态系统服务价值和能值生态足迹的河南省耕地生态补偿研究[J].河南农业大学学报,2014,48(6):765-769.

Xie Gaodi, Zhang Caixia, Zhen Lin, et al. Dynamic changes in the value of China's ecosystem services[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017,26:146-154.

柯新利,祁凌云,黄翔.城镇化对农地利用强度的影响[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2015,14(2):20-26.

赵青,许皞,郭年冬.粮食安全视角下的环京津地区耕地生态补偿量化研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2017,25(7):1052-1059.

郭庆海."粮改饲"行动下的生态关照:基于东北粮食主产区耕地质量问题的讨论[J].农业经济问题,2019,40(10):89-99.

谢高地,肖玉.农田生态系统服务及其价值的研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报,2013,21(6):645-651.

田义超,白晓永,黄远林,等.基于生态系统服务价值的赤水河流域生态补偿标准核算[J].农业机械学报,2019,50(11):312-322.

孟雅丽,苏志珠,马杰,等.基于生态系统服务价值的汾河流域生态补偿研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017(8):76-81.

王奕淇,李国平.流域生态服务价值供给的补偿标准评估:以渭河流域上游为例[J].生态学报,2019,39(1):108-116.

于洋,杨光,张今华.基于外部效益的吉林省耕地保护经济补偿标准的实证分析[J].湖北农业科学,2013,52(16):4008-4010.

张猛,崔海兰,梁成华,等.基于生态系统服务价值的区域生态补偿研究:以辽宁省为例[J].国土与自然资源研究,2014(2):53-55.

Views

1019

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Design and Application of Climatologic Resources and Ecological Environment Information System in Northeast China

Benefits Assessment for Soil and Water Conservation Projects in Black Soil Region of Northeast China

Comparison of Spatial Interpolation Methods for Soil Total Nitrogen Content at Large Scale Using Low Density Soil Survey Data in Northeast China

Spatiotemporal Evolution of Drought and Flood Under Drying-warming Climate in Northeast China

Calculating Method of Ecological and Social Benefits from Cultivated Land Resource and Its Application in Anhui Province

Related Author

CHEN Gang

ZHANG Yu-shu

HU Wei

BAN Xian-xiu

FENG Rui

LI Xu-feng

ZHANG Xing-yi

GAO Yan

Related Institution

The Weather Modification Office of Liaoning Province

Institute of Atmospheric Environment, CMA

Songliao Water Resources Commission

College of Resources and Environment, Northeast Agriculture University

Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences

⁰