Zhang Yang, Zhu Gaofeng, Zhao Nan, et al. Soil Respiration and Its Components at Vineyard in Dunhuang City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(1): 73-81.
DOI:
Zhang Yang, Zhu Gaofeng, Zhao Nan, et al. Soil Respiration and Its Components at Vineyard in Dunhuang City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2021, 41(1): 73-81. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.01.011.
Soil Respiration and Its Components at Vineyard in Dunhuang City
[Objective] The variation in soil respiration and its components in a vineyard in an arid area in Northwest China were analyzed and the relationship between soil temperature
soil water content
and soil respiration was studied in order to provide some reference for the estimation of soil carbon emission and the development of featured agriculture in arid areas of Northwest China.[Methods] Soil respiration and environmental parameters of a vineyard at South Lake oasis of Dunhuang City
Gansu Province were observed using an LI-8 100 A soil respiration measurement system and automatic meteorological station from June to December 2019
and soil respiration components were distinguished by root exclusion methods.[Results] ① During the observation period
the soil respiration rate in the vineyard reached its maximum on July 3. The soil respiration rate fluctuated significantly from June to September during the growing season
while it decreased gradually from October to December during the non-growing season. Heterotrophic respiration was the main component in this area
and the average contribution rate of heterotrophic respiration was approximately 65%. ② On an hourly scale
the relationship of hysteresis loops between soil respiration
heterotrophic respiration
and soil temperature was obvious because of the time lag effect. On a daily scale
soil respiration and heterotrophic respiration increased exponentially with the increase in soil temperature during the non-growing season (from October to December). However
irrigation and heavy rainfall could cause fluctuations in soil water content
interfering with the above exponential responses during the growing season (from June to September). ③ During the growing season (from June to September)
soil respiration and its components had a quadratic function relationship. The optimal soil water content was approximately in the range of 8.1% to 9.9%. However
there was an exponential relationship from October to December during the non-growing season. The difference was mainly caused by the decrease in soil water content and soil temperature during the non-growing season. The vine branches were buried underground
which caused the heterotrophic and autotrophic respiration to decrease rapidly to a low value and then remain stable.[Conclusion] Soil respiration was regulated by soil temperature and soil water content. The two-factor model could explain the variation in soil respiration well during the non-growing season
but it only explained 32% of the variation during the growing season. Therefore
the multifactor model of soil respiration during the growing season should be further established to better simulate the variation during the growing season.
Hanson P J, Edwards N T, Garten C T, et al. Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration:A review of methods and observations[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2000,48:115-146.
Bond-Lamberty B, Thomson A. Temperature-associated increases in the global soil respiration record[J]. Nature, 2010,464:579-582.
Ruehr N K, Buchmann N. Soil respiration fluxes in a temperate mixed forest:seasonality and temperature sensitivities differ among microbial and root-rhizosphere respiration[J]. Tree Physiology, 2010,30(2):165-176.
Jiao Zhen, Wang Xingchang. Contrasting rhizospheric and heterotrophic components of soil respiration during growing and non-growing seasons in a temperate deciduous forest[J]. Forests, 2019,10(1),1-14.
Li Xudong, Guo Ding, Zhang Chunping, et al. Contribution of root respiration to total soil respiration in a semi-arid grassland on the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018,627:1209-1217.
Savage K, Davidson E A, Tang J. Diel patterns of autotrophic and heterotrophic respiration among phenological stages[J]. Global Change Biology, 2013,19(4):1151-1159.
Tang Jianwu, Baldocchi D D, Xu Liukang. Tree photosynthesis modulates soil respiration on a diurnal time scale[J]. Global Change Biology, 2005,11:1298-1304.
Song Weimin, Chen Shiping, Zhou Yadan, et al. Contrasting diel hysteresis between soil autotrophic and heterotrophic respiration in a desert ecosystem under different rainfall scenarios[J]. Scientific Reports, 2015,5:16779.
Riveros-Iregui D A, Emanuel R E, Muth D J, et al. Diurnal hysteresis between soil CO
2
and soil temperature is controlled by soil water content[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2007,34, L17404.
Curiel Yuste J, Janssens I A, Carrara A, et al. Annual
Q
10
of soil respiration reflects plant phenological patterns as well as temperature sensitivity[J]. Global Change Biology, 2004,10:161-169.
Yan Tao, Song Huanhuan, Wang Zhaoqi, et al. Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration across multiple time scales in a temperate plantation forest[J]. Science of Total Environment, 2019,688:479-485.