Analysis and Prediction of Land-Use Change Characteristics in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Wang Tian; Yan Jinfeng; Qiao Haiyan

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.05.039

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Analysis and Prediction of Land-Use Change Characteristics in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

- Analysis and Prediction of Land-Use Change Characteristics in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 40, Issue 5, Pages: 268-275(2020)
- 作者机构：
  
  山东科技大学测绘科学与工程学院,山东,青岛,266590
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.05.039
  CLC： TP79;U412.1
- Published：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Wang Tian, Yan Jinfeng, Qiao Haiyan. Analysis and Prediction of Land-Use Change Characteristics in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(5): 268-275.
DOI：

Wang Tian, Yan Jinfeng, Qiao Haiyan. Analysis and Prediction of Land-Use Change Characteristics in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(5): 268-275. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.05.039.

摘要

[目的

]

揭示快速城市化过程中港口城市土地利用景观格局变化规律，为当地编制土地利用规划提供科学依据。[方法

]

以马来西亚吉隆坡市2000，2005，2010，2015，2020年5期遥感影像为基础数据，基于交互式数据语言（IDL），采用指数分类法提取土地利用信息，并应用RS，GIS技术和景观生态学方法对吉隆坡市2000—2020年土地利用景观格局变化进行研究，最后采用灰色预测模型预测2025年吉隆坡市土地利用数据。[结果

]

2000—2020年吉隆坡市种植园和林地大幅减少，建设用地迅速增加，港口与城市圈中部区域种植园主要转化为建设用地；土地利用景观形状趋于复杂化、不规则化，景观类型空间连通性降低，景观异质性增强；2025年吉隆坡市建设用地和种植园面积分别为1 624.12 km

和2 216.99 km

，与往年相比，建设用地增加，种植园减少。[结论

]

2025年吉隆坡市土地利用类型仍主要以种植园为主。宏观来看，随着城市的快速发展，种植园的数量持续减少。未来发展规划需进一步合理规划土地利用方式，提高土地利用效率，加大对种植园的保护力度。

Abstract

[Objective] The change trend in land-use patterns of a port city during rapid urbanization was studied to provide a scientific basis for local land-use planning.[Methods] This research used five remote sensing images of Kuala Lumpur

Malaysia (for 2000

2005

2010

2015

and 2020) as the source data. The index classification method was used to extract land-use information based on the interactive data language (IDL)

and RS and GIS technology along with landscape ecology methods were used to study the change of the land-use landscape pattern of Kuala Lumpur from 2000 to 2020. Finally

the grey prediction model was used to predict land-use data for Kuala Lumpur in 2025.[Results] From 2000 to 2020

Kuala Lumpur's plantation and forest land decreased significantly

whereas construction land increased rapidly; plantations in the central part of the port and in the city circle were mainly converted into construction lands. The landscape shape of land use tended to be complex and irregular

the spatial connectivity of landscape types was reduced

and the landscape heterogeneity was enhanced. The estimated areas of construction land and plantation in Kuala Lumpur in 2025 were 1624.12 km2 and 2216.99 km2

respectively. Compared with previous years

the area of construction land will increase and the area of plantations will decrease.[Conclusion] In 2025

the main land-use type in Kuala Lumpur will still be plantation. From a macro perspective

with the rapid development of cities

the number of plantations will continue to decrease. Future development plans need to rationally plan land-use patterns

improve land-use efficiency

and strengthen the protection of plantations.

关键词

Keywords

references

韩瑞丹.港口城市扩张及其生态环境效应研究[D].山东泰安:山东农业大学,2017.

王恒.海上丝绸之路沿线港口城市扩张遥感分析研究[D].北京:中国科学院大学(中国科学院遥感与数字地球研究所),2018.

Xu Quanli,Yang Kun,Wang Guilin, et al. Agent-based modeling and simulations of land-use and land-cover change according to ant colony optimization:A case study of the Erhai Lake Basin,China[J]. Natural Hazards, 2015,75(1):95-118.

孙倩,阿丽亚·拜都热拉,依力亚斯江·努尔麦麦提.新疆艾比湖湿地LUCC对景观格局演变的影响[J].土壤,2018,50(3):583-592.

傅伯杰.黄土区农业景观空间格局分析[J].生态学报,1995,15(2):113-120.

Hladnik D. Spatial structure of disturbed landscapes in Slovenia[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2005,24(1):17-27.

陈文波,郑蕉,鄢帮有.鄱阳湖区土地利用景观格局特征研究[J]. 农业工程学报,2007,23(4):79-83.

刘斌寅,赵明松,卢宏亮,等.1985-2015年淮北市土地利用变化特征及其预测研究[J].土壤通报,2019,50(4):807-814.

陈铸,傅伟聪,黄钰麟,等.福州市土地利用景观格局变化及驱动力研究[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2020,45(1):99-107.

田鹏,龚虹波,叶梦姚,等.东海区大陆海岸带景观格局变化及生态风险评价[J].海洋通报,2018,37(6):695-706.

周然,彭士涛,覃雪波,等.港口建设对滨海湿地景观格局的影响及其生态效应[J].水道港口,2012,33(3):245-250.

郭子坚,刘俊舒,王文渊,等.港口时空演化对区域景观格局影响研究[J].港工技术,2016,53(5):60-63.

王丽萍,周寅康,金晓斌. 港口城市土地利用变化特征分析:以江苏省连云港市中心城区为例[J].生态经济,2014,30(12):133-136.

徐涵秋.利用改进的归一化差异水体指数(MNDWI)提取水体信息的研究[J].遥感学报,2005,9(5):589-595.

Lyon J G, Yuan Ding, Lunetta R S, et al. A change detection experiment using vegetation indices[J]. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 1998,64(2):143-150.

Kauth R J, Thomas G S. The tasselled cap:A graphic description of the spectral-temporal development of agricultural crops as seen by LANDSAT[EB/OL]. 1976.

查勇,倪绍祥,杨山.一种利用TM图像自动提取城镇用地信息的有效方法[J].遥感学报,2003,7(1):37-40.

Rikimaru A. Landsat TM data processing guide for forest canopy density mapping and monitoring model[C]//ITTO workshop on utilization of Remote Sensing in site assessment and planning for rehabilitation of logged-over forest. Bangkok, Thailand, 1996:1-8.

王思远,刘纪远,张增祥,等.中国土地利用时空特征分析[J].地理学报,2001,56(6):631-639.

吴婷婷.基于遥感和GIS的土地利用/覆盖变化分析[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2012.

宋伟东,杨冬,李恩宝,等. 盘锦市湿地信息提取与动态变化监测[J]. 测绘科学,2016,41(9):60-65.

马泉来,高凤杰,张志民,等.东北农林交错区土地利用景观及生态服务价值变化[J]. 水土保持通报,2016,36(1):265-271.

范丽娟,田广星.1995-2015年上海市土地利用及其景观格局变化[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(1):287-292.

郑新奇,付梅臣.景观格局空间分析技术及其应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.

李翠漫.钦州湾海岸带景观格局时空演变及生态系统健康评价[D].广西南宁:南宁师范大学,2019.

付刚,肖能文,乔梦萍,等.北京市近二十年景观破碎化格局的时空变化[J].生态学报,2017,37(8):2551-2562.

宗玮.上海海岸带土地利用/覆盖格局变化及驱动机制研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2012.

桑潇,国巧真,潘应阳,等.基于TM和OLI数据山西省潞城市土地利用动态变化分析与预测[J].国土资源遥感,2018,30(2):125-131.

Views

787

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Coupling coordination relationship between urbanization and ecosystem service value in Lanzhou-Xining urban agglomeration

Impacts of landscape patterns in small watersheds of southern Jiangxi Province on water conservation function

Effects of land-use change on aquatic ecosystem services in Yangtze River economic belt during 2012—2022

Environmental Strategy Assessment on Land-use Planning in Ecological Construction of Jilin Province

Landscape Pattern at Different Elevations Above Sea Level in Three Gorges Area Using 3S一A Case Study in Wushan County

Related Author

He Liming

Li Xiaoling

Ma Xiaomei

Liu Yirui

Wang Cheng

Ying Hongkang

Wu Bingchen

Chang Tingting

Related Institution

School of Civil Engineering and Hydraulic Engineering， Qinghai University

School of Public Administration， Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics

Jiangxi Academy of Water Science and Engineering

College of Agricultural Science and Engineering， Hohai University

Jiangxi Provincial Technology Innovation Center for Ecological Water Engineering in Poyang Lake Basin

⁰