Manning Roughness Coefficient Characteristics of Concentrated Flow on Slope in Karst Trough Valley Hillslope

Zeng Rongchang; Li Tianyang; He Binghui

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.04.036

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Manning Roughness Coefficient Characteristics of Concentrated Flow on Slope in Karst Trough Valley Hillslope

- Manning Roughness Coefficient Characteristics of Concentrated Flow on Slope in Karst Trough Valley Hillslope
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 40, Issue 4, Pages: 266-273(2020)
- 作者机构：
  
  西南大学资源环境学院三峡库区生态环境教育部重点实验室,重庆,400715
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.04.036
  CLC： S157.1
- Published：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Zeng Rongchang, Li Tianyang, He Binghui. Manning Roughness Coefficient Characteristics of Concentrated Flow on Slope in Karst Trough Valley Hillslope[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(4): 266-273.
DOI：

Zeng Rongchang, Li Tianyang, He Binghui. Manning Roughness Coefficient Characteristics of Concentrated Flow on Slope in Karst Trough Valley Hillslope[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(4): 266-273. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.04.036.

摘要

[目的

]

探究喀斯特槽谷区不同岩石与坡面夹角影响下地表集中水流阻力变化特征，为该区土壤侵蚀模型构建提供科学依据。[方法

]

在3个坡度（10°，15°，20°），3个冲刷流量（5，7.5，10 L/min）和6个岩石与坡面夹角角度（30°，60°，90°，120°，150°，180°）组合条件下开展室内放水冲刷试验，研究喀斯特槽谷区不同岩石与坡面夹角下地表集中水流曼宁系数的变化规律及其影响因素。[结果

]

①地表集中水流曼宁系数n随冲刷历时呈迅速增大再缓慢增长或趋于稳定的变化趋势。不同夹角的n值大小顺序为：n

180°

> n

150°

> n

90°

> n

30°

> n

120°

> n

60°

。②当岩石与坡面夹角大于30°时，n与水深h显著相关，夹角为30°时，二者关系不显著；试验条件下，n与雷诺数Re关系不显著，与弗汝德数Fr呈显著幂函数负相关。③相对水深曼宁系数n/h随夹角增大呈先增后减的变化趋势。④岩石与坡面夹角大于30°时，n/h与Re均呈幂函数负相关，夹角为30°时，二者关系不显著；不同岩石与坡面夹角的n/h与Fr关系均不显著。[结论

]

喀斯特槽谷区坡面集中水流曼宁系数n受岩石与坡面夹角的显著影响，随夹角增大总体呈先减后增的趋势。

Abstract

[Objective] The variation characteristics of concentrated water flow resistance influenced by different angles between bedrocks and ground surface on the hillslope were explored to provide scientific basis for the construction of soil erosion model in the karst trough valley area.[Methods] To investigate the changes of Manning roughness coefficient (n) of concentrated flow and its influencing factors on the karst trough valley hillslope with different angles between bedrocks and ground surface

the laboratory scouring simulation experiments were conducted under the conditions of three slope gradients (10°

15° and 20°)

three inflow rates (5

7.5

10 L/min) and six angles between bedrocks and ground surface (30°

60°

90°

120°

150° and 180°) . [Results] ① The Manning coefficient n of concentrated flow increased rapidly and then increased slowly or tended to be stable with the scouring time. The average value of n was ranked as: 180° > 150° > 90° > 30° > 120° > 60°. ② When the angle between rock and slope surface was greater than 30 °

the relationship between n and water depth (h) was significant

and when the angle was 30 °

the relationship between n and Reynolds number (Re) was not significant

and there was a significant negative power function correlation between n and Froude number (Fr). ③ The ratio of Manning roughness coefficient to flow depth (n/h) increased at first and then decreased with the increase of angles between bedrocks and ground surface. ④ The n/h presented negative power correlation with Re when the angle between bedrocks and ground surface was greater than 30 °

and n/h showed no significant relationship with Re when the angle between bedrocks and ground surface was 30°. The relationship between n/h and Fr was always not significant. [Conclusion] Manning coefficient n was strongly affected by the angles between bedrocks and ground surface

and decreased first and then increased with the increase of angles between bedrocks and ground surface on the karst trough valley hillslope.

关键词

Keywords

references

Hessel R, Jetten V, Zhang Guanghui. Estimating Manning's n for steep slopes[J].Catena, 2003,54(1/2):77-91.

Al-Hamdan O Z, Pierson Jr F B, Nearing M A, et al. Characteristics of concentrated flow hydraulics for rangeland ecosystems:Implications for hydrologic modeling[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2012,37(2):157-168.

Li Tianyang, He Binghui, Wang Renxin, et al.Comparison of hydrodynamic parameters for predicting soil and water loss on simulation landslide deposit slope in Wenchuan earthquake area, China[J].Environmental Earth Sciences, 2017,76(4):1-10.

张科利.黄土坡面细沟侵蚀中的水流阻力规律研究[J].人民黄河,1998,20(8):13-15.

汤珊珊,李占斌,鲁克新,等.覆沙坡面水动力学参数与径流产沙的关系[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(20):136-143.

Xia Lu, Song Xiaoyu, Fu Na, et al.Effects of rock fragment cover on hydrological processes under rainfall simulation in a semi-arid region of China[J].Hydrological Processes, 2018,32(6):792-804.

拜亚茹,赵锦程,邱秀云,等.人工渠道糙率系数影响因素的试验研究[J].水资源与水工程学报,2014,25(4):229-232.

李永红,牛耀彬,王正中,等.工程堆积体坡面径流水动力学参数及其相互关系[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(22):83-88.

Abrahams A D, Parsons A J. Resistance to overland flow on desert pavement and its implications for sediment transport modeling[J].Water Resource Research, 1991,27(8):1827-1836.

李朝栋,李占斌,马建业,等.不同长度小麦秸秆覆盖下黄土耕地坡面流水动力学特性[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(4):153-160.

蒋勇军,刘秀明,何师意,等.喀斯特槽谷区土地石漠化与综合治理技术研发[J].生态学报,2016,36(22):7092-7097.

Gan Fengling, He Binghui, Qin Ziyang. Hydrological response and soil detachment rate from Dip/Anti-dip slopes as a function of rock strata dip in Karst Valley revealed by rainfall simulations[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2019,581:124416.

王恒松,熊康宁,张芳美.地形因子对喀斯特坡面水土流失影响的机理研究[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(4):1-7.

张信宝,王世杰,曹建华,等.西南喀斯特山地水土流失特点及有关石漠化的几个科学问题[J].中国岩溶,2010,29(3):274-279.

Akdim B. Karst landscape and hydrology in Morocco:Research trends and perspectives[J].Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015,74(1):251-265.

彭旭东,戴全厚,李昌兰,等.模拟雨强和地下裂隙对喀斯特地区坡耕地养分流失的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(2):131-140.

Dai Quanhou, Peng Xudong, Zhao Longshan, et al. Effects of underground pore fissures on soil erosion and sediment yield on Karst slopes[J].Land Degradation & Development, 2017,28(7):1922-1932.

姚文艺.坡面流阻力规律试验研究[J].泥沙研究,1996(1):74-82.

梁心蓝,赵龙山,吴佳,等.地表糙度与径流水力学参数响应规律模拟[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(19):123-131.

李勉,姚文艺,陈江南,等.草被覆盖下坡面-沟坡系统坡面流阻力变化特征试验研究[J].水利学报,2007,38(1):112-119.

严友进,戴全厚,伏文兵,等.喀斯特裸坡产流产沙过程试验研究[J].生态学报,2017,37(6):2067-2079.

张光辉,卫海燕,刘宝元.坡面流水动力学特性研究[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(1):58-61.

傅斌,王玉宽,徐佩.紫色土坡地径流退水过程与地表糙率试验研究[J].水土保持通报,2009,29(1):36-39.

田风霞,刘刚,郑世清,等.草本植物对土质路面径流水动力学特征及水沙过程的影响[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(10):25-29.

甘凤玲,何丙辉,覃自阳.喀斯特槽谷区的顺/逆层坡面对水动力学参数的影响[J].土壤学报,2019,56(4):825-837.

Fraga I, Cea L, Puertas J. Experimental study of the water depth and rainfall intensity effects on the bed roughness coefficient used in distributed urban drainage models[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2013,505:266-275.

丁文峰,李占斌,鲁克新,等.坡面细沟发生临界水动力条件初探[J].土壤学报,2003,40(6):822-828.

王仁新,何丙辉,李天阳,等.汶川震区滑坡堆积体土石混合坡面细沟水流曼宁系数特征研究[J].水电能源科学,2016,34(4):115-119.

Emmett, William W M. The Hydraulics of Overland Flow on Hillslopes[M].Geological Survey Professional. A.U.S.Government Printing Office, Washington, 1970.

郑良勇,李占斌,李鹏.黄土区陡坡径流水动力学特性试验研究[J].水利学报,2004,35(5):46-51

郝好鑫,杜一凡,曹丹妮,等.红壤缓坡水流动力学特性及其对侵蚀影响的试验研究[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(2):1-8.

Yang Ting, Su Lijun, Wu Laosheng, et al. Overland flow along stone covered slope land simulated with semi-analytical and numerical models[J].Water Resources Management, 2020,34(1):51-69.

吴淑芳,刘政鸿,霍云云,等.黄土坡面细沟侵蚀发育过程与模拟[J].土壤学报,2015,52(1):48-56.

Guo Tailong, Wang Quanjiu, Li Dingqiang, et al.Flow hydraulic characteristic effect on sediment and solute transport on slope erosion[J].Catena,2013,107:145-153.

Views

956

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Characteristics of Soil Moisture on Zanthox ylum Forest Land in Karst Valley of Guizhou Province

Dynamic Change of Soil Moisture in Karst Region of Northwest Guangxi Province

Research on Soil Moisture in the Typical Shrub-grass Zone in Karst Regions

Discussion on Scientific Connotation of Karst Rocky Desertification

Vertical Variability of Soil Moisture in the Representative Depression Areas of Karst Region

Related Author

PENG Xi

QIAN Xiao-gang

YANG-bin

ZHANG Ji-guang

SU Yi-rong

CHEN Hong-song

ZHANG Wei

YANG Sheng-tian

Related Institution

College of Agriculture,Guizhou University

Research Center of Karst Resources,Environment and Development of Guizhou,Guizhou Academy of Sciences

Huanjiang Experimental Station of Karst Ecosystem, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Huanjiang

Key Laboratory of Subtropical Agroecology, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences,, Hu’nan

⁰