Spatial-temporal Changes and Driving Mechanisms of Landscape Ecological Security in Lower Reaches of Lancang River During 2005-2018

He Chunlan; Pu Junwei; Shen Jinxiang

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.04.030

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Spatial-temporal Changes and Driving Mechanisms of Landscape Ecological Security in Lower Reaches of Lancang River During 2005-2018

- Spatial-temporal Changes and Driving Mechanisms of Landscape Ecological Security in Lower Reaches of Lancang River During 2005-2018
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 40, Issue 4, Pages: 219-227(2020)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 云南国土资源职业学院,云南,昆明,652501
  2. 云南大学地球科学学院,云南,昆明,650500
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.04.030
  CLC： X82;P901
- Published：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
He Chunlan, Pu Junwei, Shen Jinxiang. Spatial-temporal Changes and Driving Mechanisms of Landscape Ecological Security in Lower Reaches of Lancang River During 2005-2018[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(4): 219-227.
DOI：

He Chunlan, Pu Junwei, Shen Jinxiang. Spatial-temporal Changes and Driving Mechanisms of Landscape Ecological Security in Lower Reaches of Lancang River During 2005-2018[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(4): 219-227. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.04.030.

摘要

[目的] 分析澜沧江下游流域景观生态安全时空变化规律和驱动机制，为该流域及流经国家的人与自然协调可持续发展提供科学依据。[方法] 以2005，2010，2015和2018年4期遥感影像为数据源，通过景观指数和GIS空间分析方法评价流域景观生态安全，采用双变量空间自相关方法明确城市、道路、河流、高程、坡度、气温和降水等因素对景观生态安全的驱动作用。[结果] ①2005—2018年，澜沧江下游流域的整体景观生态安全度呈先升后降的变化特征。其中，北部和中西部景观生态安全较差，东部、南部和东南部较好，但也有恶化趋势；②各景观类型中，景观生态安全度从大到小为：水域 > 林地 > 草地 > 耕地 > 建设用地 > 裸地。其中，林地和草地的景观生态安全度存在波动，耕地和水域的景观生态安全度一直上升，而建设用地和裸地的景观生态安全度持续下降；③距城市距离、距道路距离、气温和降水等社会和气象因素对景观生态安全时空变化的驱动作用最强，距河流距离也对景观生态安全的时空变化有一定解释作用，而高程和坡度等地形因素并非澜沧江下游流域景观生态安全时空变化的主要驱动因素。[结论] 应尽量降低由人类活动引起的生态环境负荷，积极发挥气象因素对生态安全的正向效应，促进澜沧江下游流域的人与自然协调可持续发展。

Abstract

[Objective] The spatial-temporal changes and the driving mechanisms of landscape ecological security (LES) in the lower reaches of the Lancang River were analyzed to provide scientific basis for the coordinate and sustainable development of human and nature in the basin and the downstream countries. [Methods] By using the remote sensing images of 2005

2010

2015

and 2018

this study assessed the LES of the lower reaches of Lancang River by landscape index and GIS technology. The bivariate spatial autocorrelation was used to simulate the driving mechanism of regional factors (including cities

roads

rivers

elevation

slope

temperature and precipitation) on spatial-temporal changes of LES. [Results] ① From 2005 to 2018

the LES increased firstly and then decreased in the lower reaches of Lancang River. The LES in the northern and mid-west regions was relatively poor

which in the eastern

southern

and southeastern regions was better but also showed a tendency of deterioration. ② The LES of various landscape types was as: waters > forestland > grassland > cultivated land > construction land > bare land. Among them

the LES of forestland and grassland fluctuated

the LES of the cultivated land and waters increased

while the LES of construction land and bare land decreased. ③ Social and meteorological factors

such as distance form cities

distance from roads

temperature and precipitation

showed the strongest influence on spatial-temporal changes of the LES. And the distance from rivers also explained the spatial-temporal change of the LES at certain extent. The topographical factors such as elevation and slope showed no influence on spatial-temporal changes of LES in the lower reaches of Lancang River. [Conclusion] In the future

the eco-environmental load caused by human activities should be reduced as much as possible

and the positive effects of meteorological factors on ecological security should be brought into full play

to promote the coordinate and sustainable development of human and nature in the lower reaches of Lancang River.

关键词

Keywords

references

Chen Xi, Xu Dawei, Fadelelseed S, et al. Spatiotemporal analysis and control of landscape eco-security at the urban fringe in shrinking resource cities:A case study in Daqing, China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019,16(23):4640.

Li Sucui, Xiao Wu, Zhao Yanling, et al. Incorporating ecological risk index in the multi-process MCRE model to optimize the ecological security pattern in a semi-arid area with intensive coal mining:A case study in Northern China[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2020,247:119-143.

傅伯杰.景观生态学原理及应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2001.

Ma Libang, Bo Jie, Li Xiaoyang, et al. Identifying key landscape pattern indices influencing the ecological security of inland river basin:The middle and lower reaches of Shule River basin as an example[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019,674:424-438.

Peng Jian, Pan Yajing, Liu Yanxu, et al. Linking ecological degradation risk to identify ecological security patterns in a rapidly urbanizing landscape[J]. Habitat International, 2018,71:110-124.

梁二敏,张军民.新疆玛纳斯河流域景观格局变化的生态安全分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(3):170-175.

Wang Shudong, Zhang Xiaoyuan, Wu Taixia, et al. The evolution of landscape ecological security in Beijing under the influence of different policies in recent decades[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2019,646:49-57.

王飞,叶长盛,华吉庆,等.南昌市城镇空间扩展与景观生态风险的耦合关系[J].生态学报,2019,39(4):1248-1262.

王媛,周长威.黔中城市群景观生态安全格局构建[J].生态与农村环境学报,2019,35(9):1111-1117.

方雪娟,任海波,毋瑾超,等.海岸带景观生态格局研究进展及启示[J].科技创新与生产力,2019(11):33-37,40.

黄宁,杨绵海,林志兰,等.厦门市海岸带景观格局变化及其对生态安全的影响[J].生态学杂志,2012,31(12):3193-3202.

王涛,肖彩霞,刘娇,等.杞麓湖流域景观时空格局演变及其对景观生态风险的影响[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(6):219-225.

陈昆仑,齐漫,王旭,等.1995-2015年武汉城市湖泊景观生态安全格局演化[J].生态学报,2019,39(5):1725-1734.

奚世军,安裕伦,李阳兵,等.基于景观格局的喀斯特山区流域生态风险评估:以贵州省乌江流域为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(3):712-721.

彭文君,舒英格.喀斯特山区县域耕地景观生态安全及演变过程[J].生态学报,2018,38(3):852-865.

何珍珍,王宏卫,杨胜天,等.渭干河-库车河绿洲景观生态安全时空分异及格局优化[J].生态学报,2019,39(15):5473-5482.

欧朝蓉,朱清科,孙永玉.元谋干热河谷景观生态安全时空变化[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(1):131-140.

曹秉帅,邹长新,高吉喜,等.生态安全评价方法及其应用[J].生态与农村环境学报,2019,35(8):953-963.

赵筱青,王兴友,谢鹏飞,等.基于结构与功能安全性的景观生态安全时空变化:以人工园林大面积种植区西盟县为例[J].地理研究,2015,34(8):1581-1591.

谢花林.基于景观结构的土地利用生态风险空间特征分析:以江西兴国县为例[J].中国环境科学,2011,31(4):688-695.

王娟,崔保山,姚华荣,等.纵向岭谷区澜沧江流域景观生态安全时空分异特征[J].生态学报,2008,28(4):1681-1690.

张猛,曾永年.长株潭城市群湿地景观时空动态变化及驱动力分析[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(1):241-249.

刘吉平,董春月,盛连喜,等.1955-2010年小三江平原沼泽湿地景观格局变化及其对人为干扰的响应[J].地理科学,2016,36(6):879-887.

时卉,杨兆萍,韩芳,等.新疆天池景区生态安全度时空分异特征与驱动机制[J].地理科学进展,2013,32(3):475-485.

彭建,王仰麟,景娟,等.城市景观功能的区域协调规划:以深圳市为例[J].生态学报,2005,25(7):1714-1719.

刘月亮,成方龙,黄勋,等.1995-2015年广州市景观生态安全时空演变研究[J].生态经济,2019,35(7):221-229.

谢高地,张彩霞,张昌顺,等.中国生态系统服务的价值[J].资源科学,2015,37(9):1740-1746.

顾泽贤,赵筱青,高翔宇,等.澜沧县景观格局变化及其生态系统服务价值评价[J].生态科学,2016,35(5):143-153.

谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254.

谈娟娟,董增川,方庆,等.滦河流域景观生态健康演变及驱动力分析[J].中国农村水利水电,2015(9):47-51.

谢余初,巩杰,张玲玲.基于PSR模型的白龙江流域景观生态安全时空变化[J].地理科学,2015,35(6):790-797.

刘世梁,安南南,侯笑云,等.澜沧江下游景观破碎化时空动态及成因分析[J].生态环境学报,2018,27(7):1351-1358.

姚小薇,曾杰,李旺君.武汉城市圈城镇化与土地生态系统服务价值空间相关特征[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(9):249-256.

杨晴青,刘倩,尹莎,等.秦巴山区乡村交通环境脆弱性及影响因素:以陕西省洛南县为例[J].地理学报,2019,74(6):1236-1251.

赵筱青,普军伟,饶辉,等.云南喀斯特山区城乡建设用地开发适宜性及分区[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(1):240-248.

Views

838

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Spatiotemporal changes and driving mechanisms of vegetation cover in Dongting Lake area based on kNDVI and structural equation model

Spatial-temporal pattern and driving factors of rural resilience in Yimeng mountainous counties from 2000 to 2023

Spatio-temporal evolution and driving factors of ecological environment quality in Mu Us sandy land

Topographic gradient characteristics and driving factors of ecosystem service value in Taohe River basin

Spatiotemporal characteristics and driving factors of agricultural carbon emissions in central China considering ‘water-land-energy-carbon’ nexus

Related Author

Chen Chuang

Guo Jun

Chen Da

Wang Xiaoxian

Li Moxin

Li Kun

Zeng Jian

Xiang Li

Related Institution

College of Earth and Environmental Sciences， Lanzhou University

School of Architecture and Civil Engineering， Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology

中国地质大学（武汉）资源学院

School of Resources， China University of Geosciences （Wuhan）

Huangshan Observation and Research Station for Land-Water Resources

⁰