Process of Debris Flow Dam Break Under Different Conditons

Cao Chunran; Chen Huayong; Robin Neupane; Li Huibin; Ruan Hechun

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.03.005

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Process of Debris Flow Dam Break Under Different Conditons

- Process of Debris Flow Dam Break Under Different Conditons
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 40, Issue 3, Pages: 27-34(2020)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国科学院山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室/中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所,四川,成都,610041
  2. 中国科学院大学,北京,100000
  3. 中国科学院青藏高原地球科学卓越创新中心,北京,100101
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.03.005
  CLC： P642.23
- Published：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Cao Chunran, Chen Huayong, Robin Neupane, et al. Process of Debris Flow Dam Break Under Different Conditons[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(3): 27-34.
DOI：

Cao Chunran, Chen Huayong, Robin Neupane, et al. Process of Debris Flow Dam Break Under Different Conditons[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(3): 27-34. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.03.005.

摘要

[目的] 对不同因素作用下的泥石流堰塞坝溃决过程进行试验研究，为泥石流堰塞坝的灾害防治和灾后重建等提供科学支撑。[方法] 开展了不同来水流量、坝体形态、黏粒含量、坝高和初始含水量条件下的溃决试验。将漫顶溃决过程分为4个阶段：坡面侵蚀过程、陡坎侵蚀过程、下切和侧向侵蚀过程和衰退过程。此外，分析了泥石流堰塞坝坝体破坏机理，并给出下游坡面泥沙起动临界条件的计算式。[结果] 溃决流量与来水流量之间呈非线性正相关；溃决洪峰流量随着背水坡坡度增加而增加；溃决洪峰流量随着坝高的增加而迅速增加，泥石流堰塞坝坝体黏粒含量与溃决洪峰流量之间整体呈现负相关；溃决洪峰流量随着土体初始含水量的增加而缓慢降低，但变化的范围不大。[结论] 在泥石流堰塞坝溃决的不同因素中，坝高和黏粒含量影响最大，来水流量次之，背水坡度和初始含水量影响最小。

Abstract

[Objective] To provide scientific support for the disaster prevention and reconstruction of debris flow dams

an experimental study on the process of debris flow dam break under different factors was conducted.[Methods] Dam failure tests were carried out under different inflows

dam shapes

clay contents

dam heights

and initial water contents. The breaking process was divided into four stages:slope surface erosion process

scarp erosion process

lateral erosion process

and decline. The failure mechanism of the debris flow dam was analyzed

and the formula for calculating the critical opening condition for the downstream slope sediment was obtained.[Results] There was a nonlinear positive correlation between the outburst discharge and the inflow water flow. The peak discharge of the outburst increased with the slope degree of the backwater slope. The outburst peak discharge increased rapidly with the increase in the height of the dam

and there was a negative correlation between the clay content and the outburst flow. The peak discharge of the outburst flow decreased slowly with the increase in the initial water content of the soil

but the range of variation was not large.[Conclusion] Among the different factors of debris flow dam break

dam height and clay content have the greatest influence

followed by incoming water flow

backwater slope and initial water content have the least influence.

关键词

Keywords

references

Costa J E, Schuster R L. The formation and failure of natural dams [J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1988,100(7):1054-1068.

Casagli N, Ermini L, Rosati G. Determining grain size distribution of the material composing landslide dams in the Northern Apennines: Sampling and processing methods [J]. Engineering Geology, 2003,69(1/2):83-97.

柴贺军,刘汉超,张倬元,等.天然土石坝稳定性初步研究[J].地质科技情报,2001,20(1):77-81.

Cheng Zunlan, Dang Chao, Liu Jingjing, et al. Experiments of debris flow damming in Southeast Tibet[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2007,14(6):181-185.

陈德明.泥石流与主河水流交汇机理及其河床响应特征[D].北京:中国水利水电科学研究院,2000.

吴积善,康志成,田连权,等.云南蒋家沟泥石流观测研究[M].北京：科学出版社,1990.

杜榕桓,王立伦,王彦龙,等.西藏古乡沟冰川泥石流的形成与发展[J].中国科学院兰州冰川冻土研究所集刊,1984(4):36-47.

吕立群,王兆印,漆力健,等.西藏古乡沟泥石流堰塞湖演化规律[J].泥沙研究,2015(5):14-18.

朱平一,程尊兰,游勇.川藏公路培龙沟泥石流输砂堵江成因探讨[J].自然灾害学报,2000,9(1):80-83.

陈宁生,陈瑞.培龙沟泥石流及其堵江可能性探讨[J].山地学报,2002,20(6):738-742.

余斌,杨永红,苏永超,等.甘肃省舟曲8.7特大泥石流调查研究[J].工程地质学报,2010,18(4):437-444.

刘宁.舟曲白龙江堰塞排险与应急疏通减灾工程管理认知[J].中国工程科学,2011,13(1):25-30.

余斌,马煜,吴雨夫.汶川地震后四川省绵竹市清平乡文家沟泥石流灾害调查研究[J].工程地质学报,2010,18(6):827-836.

游勇,陈兴长,柳金峰.四川绵竹清平乡文家沟“8·13”特大泥石流灾害[J].灾害学,2011,26(4):68-72.

倪化勇,郑万模,唐业旗,等.汶川震区文家沟泥石流成灾机理与特征[J].工程地质学报,2011,19(2):262-270.

唐川,李为乐,丁军,等.汶川震区映秀镇“8·14”特大泥石流灾害调查[J].地球科学,2011,36(1):172-180.

甘建军,孙海燕,黄润秋,等.汶川县映秀镇红椿沟特大型泥石流形成机制及堵江机理研究[J].灾害学,2012,27(1):5-9.

卜祥航,唐川,屈永平,等.烧房沟滑坡型泥石流工程治理及效果分析[J].工程地质学报,2016,24(2):220-227.

黄翔超.汶川震区典型泥石流堵江可能性分析[D].成都:成都理工大学,2012.

郭晓军,向灵芝,周小军,等.高家沟泥石流和深溪沟泥石流灾害特征[J].灾害学,2012,27(3):81-85.

高波,任光明,王军,等.四川汶川高家沟泥石流形成条件与启动机理研究[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2014,25(4):1-5.

吴积善,程尊兰,耿学勇.西藏东南部泥石流堵塞坝的形成机理[J].山地学报,2005,23(4):4399-4405.

匡尚富,汪小刚,黄金池,等.堰塞湖溃坝风险及其影响分析评估[J].中国水利,2008(16):17-21.

陈德明,王兆印,何耘.泥石流入汇对河流影响的实验研究[J].泥沙研究,2002(3):22-28.

徐永年,匡尚富,黄永键,等.泥石流入汇的危险性判别指标[J].自然灾害学报,2002,11(3):33-38.

唐川,黄润秋,黄达,等.金沙江美姑河牛牛坝水电站库区泥石流对工程影响分析[J].工程地质学报,2006,14(2):145-151.

党超,程尊兰,刘晶晶.泥石流堵塞主河条件[J].山地学报,2009,27(5):557-563.

Views

889

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Modified Method for Peak Discharge Calculation of Debris Flows in Southwest Area of Tibet

Identification method for large wood in small watershed channels based on segment anything model

Disaster reduction effects evaluation of debris-flow check dam on village buildings——A case study at Heishui gully of Pingwu County， Sichan Province

Effects of material composition in construction waste sites on debris flow disasters induced by heavy rainfall

Mechanism of watershed environmental degradation impacts on debris flows along mountainous railway

Related Author

HUANG Kai

CHEN Xiao-qing

LI Qiang

YANG Dong-xu

Liu Haitao

Chen Jiangang

Tao Ziqin

Li Dandan

Related Institution

CAS Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Surface Processes

Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Engineering Resilience，Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment， Chinese Academy of Sciences

Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment， Chinese Academy of Sciences

⁰