Performance Diagnosis of Farmland Consolidation Project Based on Factor Analysis and Importance-Performance Analysis Methods

Zheng Huawei; Tao Jiachen; Hu Feng

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.02.024

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Performance Diagnosis of Farmland Consolidation Project Based on Factor Analysis and Importance-Performance Analysis Methods

- Performance Diagnosis of Farmland Consolidation Project Based on Factor Analysis and Importance-Performance Analysis Methods
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 40, Issue 2, Pages: 170-176(2020)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 南京农业大学人文与社会发展学院,江苏,南京,210095
  2. 南京农业大学资源与环境科学学院,江苏,南京,210095
  3. 自然资源部海岸带开发与保护重点实验室,江苏,南京,210024
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.02.024
  CLC： F301.2
- Published：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Zheng Huawei, Tao Jiachen, Hu Feng. Performance Diagnosis of Farmland Consolidation Project Based on Factor Analysis and Importance-Performance Analysis Methods[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(2): 170-176.
DOI：

Zheng Huawei, Tao Jiachen, Hu Feng. Performance Diagnosis of Farmland Consolidation Project Based on Factor Analysis and Importance-Performance Analysis Methods[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2020, 40(2): 170-176. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.02.024.

摘要

[目的] 从农户视角剖析农用地整治项目绩效及其影响因素，为提升农用地整治项目绩效水平提供决策依据。[方法] 运用因子分析、IPA法、障碍度模型和问卷调查法诊断了农用地整治项目绩效及其影响因素。[结果] 农户视角下农用地整治项目绩效由后期管护满意度因子，前期阶段满意度因子，社会效益满意度因子，生态效益满意度因子，经济效益满意度因子，施工建设满意度因子共同解释；农用地整治项目绩效测度值为3.742 1，项目绩效总体上处于"良好"水平，项目结果绩效大于项目过程绩效；影响农用地整治项目绩效水平高低的重要因子主要包括后期管护资金供给程度，后期管护措施完善程度，后期管护制度健全程度，后期管护主体明确程度，规划设计征询农户意见情况，立项决策农户意见采纳程度，规划设计农户意见采纳程度，立项决策征询农户意见情况，生物多样性保护，农业规模生产，生产成本降低等。[结论] 为了有效提升农用地整治项目绩效水平，应进一步加强农用地整治项目后期管护，提高农用地整治项目农户有效参与程度，推进农用地整治生态建设，结合农用地整治开展农业适度规模经营。

Abstract

[Objective] The performance of farmland consolidation project and its influencing factors from the perspectives of farmers was analyzed

in order to provide a basis for improving the performance level of farmland consolidation project.[Methods] Factor analysis

importance-performance analysis (IPA) methods

obstacle degree model and questionnaire survey were used to diagnose the performance and its influencing factors of farmland consolidation project.[Results] From the perspectives of farmers

the performance of farmland consolidation project was explained by the factors of final management and maintenance satisfaction

the early stage satisfaction

social benefit satisfaction

ecological benefit satisfaction

economic benefit satisfaction and construction satisfaction. The measurement value of farmland consolidation project performance was 3.742 1

which was in the level of good

and the project result performance level was higher than the process performance level. The important factors impacting project performance level mainly included the supply of funds for the final management and maintenance satisfaction

the improvement degree of later management and maintenance measures

the system of later management and maintenance

the clarity degree of later management and maintenance

the consultation with farmers' opinions in the stage of planning

the adoption degree of farmers' opinions in the stage of the decision making

the adoption degree of farmers' opinions in the stage of planning

the consultation with farmers' opinions in the stage of the decision making

biodiversity conservation

agricultural scale production

and production cost reduction.[Conclusion] The performance level of farmland consolidation project can be effectively enhanced by futher strengthening the later management maintenance

improving the farmers' effective participation

promoting the ecological construction of farmland consolidation

and carrying out the appropriate scale operation of agriculture combined with farmland consolidation.

关键词

Keywords

references

项晓敏,金晓斌,王温鑫,等.供给侧结构性改革视角下的土地整治制度创新初探[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(4):12-21.

唐秀美,潘瑜春,刘玉,等.基于全过程的土地整治项目实施问题、成因及对策研究[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(3):35-42.

管栩,金晓斌,杨绪红,等.中国农用地整理项目安排与耕地资源分布的协调性研究[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(2):226-234.

许新利.土地整治与生态保护的协调发展[J].中国土地,2018(2):42-44.

Luo Wen Bin, Timothy D J. An assessment of farmers' satisfaction with land consolidation performance in China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2017, 61:501-510.

国土资源部,国家发展和改革委员会.《全国土地整治规划(2016-2020年)》[R/OL].(2017-01-10)[2019-08-17]. http://www.mlr.gov.cn/zwgk/zytz/201702/t20170215_1440315.htm.

郑华伟,陈晓,程锦,等.农用地整治项目农户有效参与分析:以江苏省为例[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(19):311-315.

中华人民共和国自然资源部.2017中国土地矿产海洋资源统计公报[R/OL].(2018-05-18)[2019-08-17]. http://gi.mlr.gov.cn/201805/t20180518_1776792.html.

田甜.农民参与农地整治项目的行为机理研究[D].湖北武汉:华中农业大学,2015.

郑华伟,周家俊,刘友兆.利益相关者视角下农地整治项目绩效测度目标分析[J].江苏农业科学,2016,44(5):577-580.

罗文斌.中国土地整理项目绩效评价、影响因素及改善策略[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.

郑华伟.农村土地整理项目绩效的形成、测度与改善[D].江苏南京:南京农业大学,2012.

Pǎsakarnis G, Maliece V. Towards sustainable rural development in Central and Eastern Europe:Applying land consolidation[J].Land Use Policy, 2010,27(2):545-549.

汪文雄,罗冰,杨帆,等.不完全与不确定信息条件下农地整治项目绩效评价研究[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(6):75-81.

文高辉,杨钢桥,李文静,等.基于农民视角的农地整理项目绩效评价及其障碍因子诊断[J].资源科学,2014, 36(1):26-34.

李冰清,王占岐,金贵.新农村建设背景下的土地整治项目绩效评价[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(3):68-74.

王震,王筱明,李连涛.土地整治项目绩效评价的理论、方法与实证研究[M].山东济南:山东人民出版社,2019.

汪文雄,汪萍,罗冰,等.农户有效参与提升农地整治项目绩效的机理研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(7):159-168.

郝祖涛,冯兵,谢雄标,等.基于民生满意度的资源型城市转型绩效测度及群体差异研究[J].自然资源学报,2017,32(8):1298-1310.

罗文斌,吴次芳,倪尧,等.基于农户满意度的土地整理项目绩效评价及区域差异研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013, 23(8):68-74.

江苏省统计局.江苏统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2016:9-30.

李侃桢.土地综合整治的理论创新与实践探索[J].中国土地,2018(2):4-7.

白俊峰,杨雪滢.代建项目过程绩效评价及管理绩效改善[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2012.

余亮亮,蔡银莺.基于农户满意度的耕地保护经济补偿政策绩效评价及障碍因子诊断[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(7):1092-1103.

张锐,邹露,胡锋,等.农用地整治项目农户满意度分析[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(4):350-356.

方凯,王厚俊.基于因子分析的农村公共品农民满意度评价研究[J].农业技术经济,2012(6):30-36.

郑华伟,高洁芝,臧玉杰,等.农村生态文明建设农民满意度分析[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(4):52-57.

杨永梅,郭志林,洪荣昌,等.基于因子分析的格尔木市郊工程移民满意度评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2013,27(9):38-43.

蔡彩云,骆培聪,唐承财,等.基于IPA法的民居类世界遗产地游客满意度评价[J].资源科学,2011,33(7):1374-1381.

郑华伟,胡锋.基于农户满意度的农村环境整治绩效研究[J].南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,17(5):79-86.

Views

1362

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Effect of wood fiber addition on shear strength of waste soil at waste disposal site

Characteristics, source analysis, and health risk assessment of heavy metal pollution in paddy soil at Qianjiangyuan National Park

Assessment of Agricultural Sustainable Development of Typical Karst Counties in Chongqing Municipality

Application of TOPSIS Based Grey Correlation Analysis in Integrated Water Resource Security Evaluation

Analysis on the Spatial-temporal Variation of Landuse Economic Efficiency

Related Author

Chen Qibo

Yang Haozhou

Wang Bo

Gao Fei

Wang Yushuai

Li Min

Hu Jinzhu

Shao Xuexin

Related Institution

Kunming Engineering Corporation Limited of Power China

Central Yunnan Water Diversion Project Construction Bureau

College of Soil and Water Conservation， Southwest Forestry University

Qianjiangyuan National Park Administration Bureau

Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry

⁰