Gao Zhiyuan, Xie Yuanli, Wang Ninglian, et al. Response of Three Global DEM Data Accuracy to Different Terrain Factors in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(2): 184-191.
DOI:
Gao Zhiyuan, Xie Yuanli, Wang Ninglian, et al. Response of Three Global DEM Data Accuracy to Different Terrain Factors in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(2): 184-191. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.02.030.
Response of Three Global DEM Data Accuracy to Different Terrain Factors in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
[Objective] This study investigated the response of three global DEM data's accuracy to different terrain factors in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau region in order to provide support for application and research of global DEM in various fields.[Methods] This study takes GLAH14 DEM data of ICESat/GLAS as referential data to explore the responses of accuracies of SRTM DEM
ASTER GDEM and HydroSHEDS DEM to terrain factors
e.g.
slope
aspect
and terrain roughness.[Results] In general
the accuracy of STRM DEM was the highest
while that of HydroSHEDS DEM was the lowest. Different terrain factors had different effects on three DEM accuracy. Three DEM errors present several trends because of aspect distribution. Specifically
positive and negative measurement deviation values in the SRTM DEM located in southern and northwestern aspects
ASTER GDEM in northwestern and southeastern aspects
and HydroSHEDS DEM in eastern and southwestern aspects. There was obvious quadratic polynomial relationship between DEM accuracy and terrain roughness expressed as fractal dimension D.[Conclusion] In the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau region
there have different levels of correlation between DEM accuracy and terrain factors
where SRTM DEM accuracy is the highest with slight influence from terrain factors
on the contrary HydroSHEDS DEM accuracy is the lowest with intense influence from terrain factors.
关键词
Keywords
references
Belz J E, Rodriguez E, Morris C S. A global assessment of the SRTM performance[J]. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 2015,72(3):249-260.
Shortridge A, Messina J. Spatial structure and landscape associations of SRTM error[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2011,115(6):1576-1587.
Braun A, Fotopoulos G. Assessment of SRTM, ICESat, and survey control monument elevations in Canada[J]. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 2007,73(12):1333-1342.
Hirt C, Filmer M S, Featherstone W E. Comparison and validation of the recent freely available ASTER-GDEM ver1, SRTM ver 4.1 and GEODATA DEM-9 S ver 3 digital elevation models over Australia[J]. Journal of the Geological Society of Australia, 2010,57(3):337-347.
Enßle F, Heinzel J, Koch B. Accuracy of vegetation height and terrain elevation derived from ICESat/GLAS in forested areas[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observations & Geoinformation, 2014,31(1):37-44.
Yue Linwei, Shen Huanfeng,Zhang, Liangpei,et al. High-quality seamless DEM generation blending SRTM-1, ASTER GDEM v2 and ICESat/GLAS observations[J]. Isprs Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 2017,123:20-34.
Liu Jun, Tong Xiaohua, Liu Shijie, et al. Glacier mass change evaluation in Lambert-Amery area from 2002 to 2012 using ASTER stereo images and ICESat GLAS laser altimetry[J]. IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science, 2014,17(1):1-5.
Zhang Guoqing, Xie Hongjie, Kang Shichang, et al. Monitoring lake level changes on the Tibetan Plateau using ICESat altimetry data(2003-2009)[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2011,115(7):1733-1742.
Clarke K C. Computation of the fractal dimension of topographic surfaces using the triangular prism surface area method[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 1986,12(5):713-722.
Xie Heping, Wang Jin-an, Stein E. Direct fractal measurement and multifractal properties of fracture surfaces[J]. Physics Letters A, 1998,242(1/2):41-50.
Zhang Quan, Yang Qinke, Wang Chunmei. SRTM error distribution and its associations with landscapes across China[J]. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 2016,82(2):135-148.