Comparative Analysis of Soil Aggregates and Organic Carbon Distribution in Grassland and Cultivated Land -A Case Study in Siziwang Banner of Inner Mongolia
|更新时间:2025-03-12
|
Comparative Analysis of Soil Aggregates and Organic Carbon Distribution in Grassland and Cultivated Land -A Case Study in Siziwang Banner of Inner Mongolia
Bulletin of Soiland Water ConservationVol. 39, Issue 1, Pages: 50-54(2019)
Li Qingchun, Li Yuejin, Wang Danlan, et al. Comparative Analysis of Soil Aggregates and Organic Carbon Distribution in Grassland and Cultivated Land -A Case Study in Siziwang Banner of Inner Mongolia[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(1): 50-54.
DOI:
Li Qingchun, Li Yuejin, Wang Danlan, et al. Comparative Analysis of Soil Aggregates and Organic Carbon Distribution in Grassland and Cultivated Land -A Case Study in Siziwang Banner of Inner Mongolia[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2019, 39(1): 50-54. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.01.008.
Comparative Analysis of Soil Aggregates and Organic Carbon Distribution in Grassland and Cultivated Land -A Case Study in Siziwang Banner of Inner Mongolia
[Objective] To investigate the effects of grassland reclamation on the variation of soil aggregates and organic carbon distribution
in order to provide theoretical basis for land use optimization and grassland protection of Siziwang Banner
Inner Mongolia. [Methods] Three soil types (chestnut soil
gray cinnamon soil and meadow soil) were selected from the grassland and cultivated land in the farming-pastoral ecotone of Siziwang Banner
Inner Mongolia. The composition of soil aggregates
soil organic carbon
and soil organic carbon of aggregates with different particle sizes and their contribution rate in the 0-10 cm soil layer were analyzed. [Results] The content of aggregates with particle sizes >3 mm and 0.25~3 mm were lower
but the content of aggregates with particle size ≤0.25 mm was higher in cultivated land than in grassland with chestnut soil and gray cinnamon soil. Moreover
and soil organic carbon of each soil aggregates with different particle size were lower in cultivated land
compared with the other two soil types. The main body of organ carbon storage transformed from soil aggregate with particle size >3 mm to 0.25~3 mm soil aggregate. The contribution rate of non-aggregates to soil organic carbon was increased in the cultivated land soil. The structure of meadow soil was poor with low organic carbon content
which was mainly caused by the salinization
but it was improved by the long-term cultivation and application of organic fertilizer after reclamation for arable land. [Conclusion] After reclamation of the grassland with chestnut soil and gray cinnamon soil into cultivated land
soil structure was degraded and the stability of soil organic carbon was decreased
however
proper reclamation in meadow soil was feasible under suitable conditions.
Sodhi G P S, Beri V, Benbi D K. Soil aggregation and distribution of carbon and nitrogen in different fractions under long-term application of compost in rice-wheat system[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2009,103(2):412-418.
Tisdall J M, Oades J M. Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2006,33(2),141-163.
Six J, Bossuyt H, Degryze S D, et al. A history of research on the link between(micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2004,79(1):7-31.
Effects of Different Land Utilization Methods on Soil Aggregate Stability and Organic Carbon Content in Alpine Grassland
Precise measurement and caculation of carbon sink on check dams in Loess Plateau——A case study at Gaoxigou small watershed, Yulin City, Shaanxi Province
Effects of hydrochar from sunflower straw on soil organic carbon and its mineralization characteristics
Characteristics and influencing factors of soil organic carbon at Picea crassifolia forests in middle part of Qilian Mountains
Meta-analysis on responses of soil particulate organic carbon and mineral-associated organic carbon to climate change
Related Author
Li Keyi
Yu Guangling
Chen Mo
Maidinuer·Abulaizi
Hu Yang
Jia Hongtao
Huo Shaofeng
Zhao Mengfan
Related Institution
College of Resources and Environment, Xinjiang Agricultural University
College of Grassland Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Soil and Plant Ecological Processes
College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling
College of Soil and Water Conservation Science and Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling