Evaluation on Effects of Oilfield Roads on Soil and Water Conservation Function

WANG Haiyan; WANG Haijiun; ZHANG Changyin; ZHAO Yongjun; SONG Xiaoqiang; JIA Guodong

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.06.019

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Evaluation on Effects of Oilfield Roads on Soil and Water Conservation Function

- Evaluation on Effects of Oilfield Roads on Soil and Water Conservation Function
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 38, Issue 6, Pages: 127-131(2018)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 水利部水土保持监测中心,北京,100055
  2. 陕西省水土保持局,陕西,西安,710004
  3. 北京林业大学,北京,100083
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.06.019
  CLC：
- Published：2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
WANG Haiyan, WANG Haijiun, ZHANG Changyin, et al. Evaluation on Effects of Oilfield Roads on Soil and Water Conservation Function[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(6): 127-131.
DOI：

WANG Haiyan, WANG Haijiun, ZHANG Changyin, et al. Evaluation on Effects of Oilfield Roads on Soil and Water Conservation Function[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(6): 127-131. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.06.019.

摘要

[目的] 对生产运营期因油田道路占压和硬化损失的水土保持功能价值进行定量评价，为生产运营期石油天然气项目水土保持补偿费的计征标准提供测算依据。[方法] 采用国内外较为常用的生态服务价值测算方法，选取陕西省志丹县境内油田为研究对象，测算生产运营期内油田道路造成水土保持功能价值的损失量。水土保持功能服务价值等于固持土壤、水源涵养、固碳供氧、防风固沙等价值之和。[结果] 初步估算，生产运营期油田道路造成的水土保持功能价值的损失量，每口井每年约为1 827元。按照油田道路占油田总面积30%～50%的比例进行折算，则石油、天然气项目在生产运营期造成的年度水土保持功能损失值为3 654～6 090元/井。[结论] 现行的水土保持补偿费按年度计征的方式和征收标准（每口井不超过2 800元）是合理可行的。

Abstract

[Objective] In order to provide a calculation basis for the standard of soil and water conservation compensation fees for oil and gas projects

the values of water and soil conservation function loss due to oilfield road pressure and hardening during production period were quantitatively evaluated.[Methods] The ecological service value evaluation method was used to estimate the loss value of the soil and water conservation function of oilfield by calculating the model of the oilfield in Zhidan County of Shaanxi Province. According to this method

the value of soil and water conservation function is equal to the sum values of holding soil

water conservation

carbon fixation and oxygen supply

air purification

wind and sand fixation

and biodiversity maintenance.[Results] Roads in oilfield can reduce the value of the soil and water conservation function

the average annual loss of soil and water conservation function of each well reached 1 827 yuan. According to 30%~50%

usual proportion of the road area to total area of oil field

the average annual loss of soil and water conservation function of each well was 3 654~6 090 yuan higher than the current standard which is not more than 2 800 yuan.[Conclusions] It is reasonable and feasible for the current method of soil and water conservation compensation to be collected according to the year and the standard of collection(no more than 2 800 yuan per well).

关键词

Keywords

references

夏承斌,张雪琴,夏琼.地面工程优化简化与节约集约用地[J].油气田地面工程,2011,30(8):98.

毛雅静,油田企业与地方道路共建共管模式探析:以辽河油田为例[J].国土资源,2012(5):50-53.

李飞,郜风涛,周英,等.水土保持法释义[M].北京:法律出版社,2011:38-39.

柳仲秋.水土保持功能研究[J].科学之友,2010(10):110-111.

余新晓,吴岚,饶良懿,等.水土保持生态服务功能价值估算[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,6(1):83-86.

田红卫.陕西高速公路投资及其水土保持生态服务功能价值研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2013.

鲁克新,李占斌,李鹏,等.基于径流侵蚀功率的流域次暴雨产沙模型研究[J].长江科学院院报,2008,25(3):31-34.

张彪,李文华.森林生态系统的水源涵养功能及其计量方法[J].生态学杂志,2009,28(3):529-534.

霍竹,邵明安.黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错带降水及灌木林冠截流特性研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2005,23(5):88-92.

司今,韩鹏,赵春龙.森林水源涵养价值核算方法评述与实例研究[J].自然资源学报,2011,26(12):2100-2110.

环境保护部. 中国生物多样性保护战略与行动计划(2011-2030年)[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2011.

黎燕琼,郑绍伟,龚固堂,等.生物多样性研究进展[J].四川林业科技,2011(4):12-19.

常虹,翟琇,孙海莲等.内蒙古西乌珠穆沁旗草地防风固沙功能价值研究[J].畜牧与饲料科学,2017,38(2):45-49.

康玲玲,李进敏.伊克昭盟项目区水土保持的生态效益[J].生态学杂志,2003,22(5):142-145.

张宇.宁夏草地生态系统服务价值评估[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2012.

梁洁,徐艳红,姚喜军,等.基于生态足迹的鄂尔多斯市生态补偿标准量化研究[J].内蒙古师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2015,44(2):125-129.

Views

1042

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Construction of Evaluation Model for Soil and Water Conservation Function of Vegetation at Community Scale -Taking Jinzhai County, Anhui Province at Northern Foot of Dabie Mountains as an Example

Effects of vegetation restoration duration on runoff and sediment yield in slopes of waste dumps in alpine mining areas

Changes and its driving factors of ecological environment quality in Yellow River Source Park from 2000 to 2024

Spatiotemporal changes and driving mechanisms of vegetation cover in Dongting Lake area based on kNDVI and structural equation model

Structure and shear strength of amorphous iron oxide-kaolinite cementation system in red soil

Related Author

Zhang Hongda

Zhao Chuanpu

Dai Yuting

Yuan Li

Yang Qimengdi

Wu Ao

Liu Xia

Related Institution

Collaborative Innovation Center of Sustainable Forestry in Southern China of Jiangsu Province, Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab of Soil Erosion and Ecological Restoration, Nanjing Forestry University

Monitoring Center Station of Soil and Water Conservation, Huaihe River Commission, Ministry of Water Resources

⁰