Effects of Soil Moisture Content and Dry Bulk Density of Different Vegetation Types on Slope Soil Shear Strength

WANG Nan; ZHAO Youpeng; GUO Xiaoping; ZHANG Jinchi; LIU Shenglong

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.06.014

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Effects of Soil Moisture Content and Dry Bulk Density of Different Vegetation Types on Slope Soil Shear Strength

- Effects of Soil Moisture Content and Dry Bulk Density of Different Vegetation Types on Slope Soil Shear Strength
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 38, Issue 6, Pages: 88-94(2018)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 南方现代林业协同创新中心江苏省水土保持与生态修复重点实验室南京林业大学林学院,江苏,南京,210037
  2. 环境保护部南京环境科学研究所,江苏,南京,210042
  3. 浙江凤阳山-百山祖国家级自然保护区凤阳山管理处, 浙江龙泉,323700
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.06.014
  CLC：
- Published：2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
WANG Nan, ZHAO Youpeng, GUO Xiaoping, et al. Effects of Soil Moisture Content and Dry Bulk Density of Different Vegetation Types on Slope Soil Shear Strength[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(6): 88-94.
DOI：

WANG Nan, ZHAO Youpeng, GUO Xiaoping, et al. Effects of Soil Moisture Content and Dry Bulk Density of Different Vegetation Types on Slope Soil Shear Strength[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(6): 88-94. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.06.014.

摘要

[目的

]

探究边坡土壤的含水率和干容重对土壤抗剪强度的影响，建立经验公式，为提高边坡稳定性提供理论依据。[方法

]

以浙江省凤阳山国家级自然保护区内黄棕壤地带3种植被类型（常绿阔叶林、针阔混交林、灌草林地）边坡土壤为对象，进行重塑土直剪试验，分析不同含水率分级（25%，27%，29%，31%，33%）和干容重分级（0.8，0.9，1.0，1.1，1.2 g/cm

）对抗剪强度指标（内摩擦角φ和黏聚力c）的影响规律。[结果

]

①黏聚力和干容重呈显著正相关，和含水率（mc）呈显著负相关。内摩擦角和干容重（ρ

）呈显著正相关。②土壤黏聚力随含水率的增加而减小，随干容重的增加而增加；随着干容重的增加，内摩擦角有明显增加的趋势，总是在高密实度的情况下，内摩擦角较大。相对于黏聚力，内摩擦角受含水率的影响较小，随含水率的增大，在灌草林地和针阔混交林表现出非线性减小的特征，在常绿阔叶林则呈现先增大后减小的趋势，考虑出现最优含水率。③在同一含水率下，干容重对土壤黏聚力具有增强作用，黏聚力的对数和干容重呈线性正相关。考虑含水率和干容重的综合影响，加入影响系数β，建立了经验公式。[结论

]

黏聚力的对数与含水率呈显著负相关，与干容重呈显著正相关。土壤干容重对土壤内摩擦角影响显著，呈显著正相关。含水率对内摩擦角影响不明显。

Abstract

[Objective] The influence of soil moisture content and dry bulk density on the shear strength of soil in the study area was explored and an empirical formula was established in order to provide a theoretical basis for improving the stability of the slope and protecting the soil and water environment.[Methods] Three typical forest stands (evergreen broadleaved forest

coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest

shrub-grass forest)was sampled in Fengyang Mountain Nature Reserve

Zhejiang Province. Remolded soil direct shear experiment was conducted to analyze the effect of different classification of moisture content (25%

27%

29%

31%

33%) and dry bulk density (0.8

0.9

1.0

1.1

1.2 g/cm) on the shear strength parameters (the internal frictional angle φ and cohesive force c).[Results] ① There were a significant positive correlation between cohesive force and dry bulk density

and a significant negative correlation between cohesive force and moisture content. There was a significant positive correlation between the internal frictional angle and the dry bulk density. ② The soil cohesive force decreased with the increase of moisture content

and increased with the increase of dry bulk density

it had obvious regularity; with the increase of dry bulk density

the internal frictional angle had a tendency of obvious increase

which in the case of high compactness

the internal frictional angle was always large. In relate to the cohesive force

the internal frictional angle was less affected by the moisture content. With the increase of the moisture content

the characteristics of non-linear decrease in shrub-grassland forests and coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest were showed. In the evergreen broad-leaved forest

there was a trend of increasing first and then decreasing

considering the occurrence of optimal moisture content. ③ At the same moisture content

the dry bulk density had an enhanced effect on the cohesive force of the three types of soils. The logarithm of cohesion and the dry density showed a positive linear correlation. We consider the combined effects of moisture content and dry bulk density

add the influence coefficient β

and establish an empirical formula

respectively.[Conclusion] The logarithm of cohesive force and moisture content were significantly negatively correlated with each other

and there was a significant positive correlation with dry bulk density and cohesive force. Soil dry bulk density had a significant effect on soil internal frictional angle

and moisture content had no significant effect on internal frictional angle.

关键词

Keywords

references

王玉平,曾志强,潘树林.边坡稳定性分析方法综述[J].西华大学学报:自然科学版,2012,31(2):101-105.

嵇晓雷.基于植被根系分布形态的生态边坡稳定性研究[D].江苏南京:南京林业大学,2013.

倪九派,高明,魏朝富,等.干密度和含水率对岩溶地区黄壤抗剪强度的影响:以重庆市南川区木渡河小流域为例[J].中国岩溶,2012,31(1):82-86.

夏艳华.黄土抗侵蚀能力与抗剪强度的关系研究[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院,2003.

De Guzman E M B, Stafford D, Alfaro M C, et al. Large-scale direct shear testing of compacted frozen soil under freezing and thawing conditions[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2018,151:138-147.

郑子成,张锡洲,李廷轩,等.玉米生长期土壤抗剪强度变化特征及其影响因素[J].农业机械学报,2014,45(5):125-130.

李想,王瑄,盛世博,等.不同土地利用方式土壤抗剪强度及其影响因子分析[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(5):102-106.

陈高峰,杨帅东,苏涛,等.不同含水率下土体抗剪强度试验及破坏过程分析[J].人民珠江,2016,37(12):37-41.

Liu Jie, Chen Pan, Li Wwentao. Assessing Hydraulic Hysteresis Models to Characterize Unsaturated Flow Behavior under Drying and Wetting Conditions[J]. International Journal Geomechanics, 2018,18(7):8.

倪九派,袁天泽,高明,等.土壤干密度和含水率对2种紫色土抗剪强度的影响[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(3):72-77.

黄琨,万军伟,陈刚,等.非饱和土的抗剪强度与含水率关系的试验研究[J].岩土力学,2012,33(9):2600-2604.

Qi Shunchao, Vanapalli S K. Simulating hydraulic and mechanical responses of unsaturated expansive soil slope to rainfall:Case study[J].International Journal of Geomechanics, 2018,18(6)05018002.

陈红星,李法虎,郝仕玲,等.土壤含水率与土壤碱度对土壤抗剪强度的影响[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(2):21-25.

杨永红,刘淑珍,王成华.土壤含水量和植被对浅层滑坡土体抗剪强度的影响[J].灾害学,2006,21(2):50-54.

申春妮,方祥位,王和文,等.吸力、含水率和干密度对重塑非饱和土抗剪强度影响研究[J].岩土力学,2009,30(5):1347-1351.

张万儒,许本彤.森林土壤定位研究方法[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1986.

林敬兰,黄炎和,张德斌,等.水分对崩岗土体抗剪切特性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(3):55-58.

张晓明,丁树文,蔡崇法.干湿效应下崩岗区岩土抗剪强度衰减非线性分析[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(5):241-245.

边加敏,王保田.含水量对非饱和土抗剪强度参数的影响研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2011, 7(1):17-21.

李雪梅,陈玉明,袁利伟,等.含水率对尾矿抗剪强度影响的试验研究[J].黄金,2016,37(4):70-73.

Sun Pinghe, Tian Mingjin, Cao Han, et al. Study on the mechanism of ENI action on preventing drilling fluid overflowing in HDD[J]. Tunn Undergr Space Technol, 2018,77:94-102.

Georgiannou V N, Coop M R, Altuhafi F N, et al. Compression and strength characteristics of two silts of low and high plasticity[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2018,144(7):12.

钟茫.非饱和紫色土抗剪强度影响因素研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2014.

王晨沣,张守红,王彬,等.不同土壤前期含水量对土壤分离临界水动力学特性及其抗剪强度的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(1):91-96.

林金石,庄雅婷,黄炎和,等.不同剪切方式下崩岗红土层抗剪特征随水分变化规律[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(24):106-110.

Perfect E, Mclaughlin N B, Kay B D, et al. An improved fractal equation for the soil water retention curve[J]. Water Resources Research, 1996,32(2):281-288.

施威,魏继红,宋京雷,等.含水率对下蜀土抗剪强度的影响[J].西华大学学报:自然科学版,2016,35(3):97-101.

王丽,梁鸿.含水率对粉质黏土抗剪强度的影响研究[J].内蒙古农业大学学报:自然科学版,2009,30(1):170-174.

张奎,李梦姿,杨贝贝.含水率和干密度对重塑黄土抗剪强度的影响[J].安徽理工大学学报:自然科学版,2016,36(3):74-79.

李振,邢义川.干密度和细粒含量对砂卵石及碎石抗剪强度的影响[J].岩土力学,2006,27(12):2255-2260.

许旭堂,简文彬,柳侃.含水率和干密度对残积土抗剪强度参数的影响[J].地下空间与工程学报,2015,11(2):364-369.

Su Lijun, Zhou Wanhua, Chen Weibin, et al. Effects of relative roughness and mean particle size on the shear strength of sand-steel interface[J]. Measurement,2018,122:339-346.

Gyssels G, Poesen J, Bochet E, et al. Impact of plant roots on the resistance of soils to erosion by water:A review[J]. Progress in Physical Geography, 2005,29(2):189-217.

Views

1821

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Mechanical Properties of Topsoil Anti-erodibility Under Four Different Vegetation Community Types

Structure and shear strength of amorphous iron oxide-kaolinite cementation system in red soil

Response of shear resistance of Hippophae rhamnoides root-soil complex to stubble rejuvenation

Grey Rational Degree Analyses for Effects of Different Vegetation Types on Overland Flow

Mechanics Research on Vetiver Grass in Railway Side Slope Protection

Related Author

Ge Rile

Hao Xuting

Su Rina

Sun Baoping

Huang Jing

Cui Tianmin

Lü Yihao

Xu Mengyao

Related Institution

College of Desert Control Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University

School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University

College of Resources and Environmental Sciences， Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University

College of Desert Control Science and Engineering， Inner Mongolia Agricultural University

College of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University

⁰