Farmers' Satisfaction of Rural Land Consolidation Project

ZHANG Rui; ZOU Lu; HU Feng; ZHENG Huawei

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.04.055

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Farmers' Satisfaction of Rural Land Consolidation Project

- Farmers' Satisfaction of Rural Land Consolidation Project
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 38, Issue 4, Pages: 350-356(2018)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 南京农业大学资源与环境科学学院,江苏,南京,210095
  2. 南京农业大学人文与社会发展学院,江苏,南京,210095
  3. 南京农业大学区域农业研究院,江苏,南京,210095
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.04.055
  CLC：
- Published：2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
ZHANG Rui, ZOU Lu, HU Feng, et al. Farmers' Satisfaction of Rural Land Consolidation Project[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(4): 350-356.
DOI：

ZHANG Rui, ZOU Lu, HU Feng, et al. Farmers' Satisfaction of Rural Land Consolidation Project[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(4): 350-356. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.04.055.

摘要

[目的]诊断基于农户满意度的农用地整治项目绩效水平，为相关政策的制定提供科学依据。[方法]建立基于农户满意度的农用地整治项目绩效测度指标体系，运用综合评价法、配对样本T检验、IPA分析法分析农用地整治项目绩效水平及其影响因素。[结果]农用地整治项目农户满意度得分达到3.747 5，其绩效水平达到“良好”等级，农用地整治项目结果绩效水平高于过程绩效水平。影响农用地整治项目农户满意度高低的因素主要包括立项决策农户意见采纳程度、规划设计征询农户意见情况、规划设计农户意见采纳程度、后期管护主体明确程度、生产成本降低、后期管护制度健全程度、后期管护资金供给程度、后期管护措施完善程度、立项决策农户参与程度、农业规模生产、生物多样性保护、农田抗灾能力、农田防护林质量、竣工验收中农户参与情况等。[结论]基于农户满意度建立的农用地整治项目绩效测度指标体系和运用综合评价法、配对样本T检验、IPA分析法分析农用地整治项目绩效水平是合理可行的。

Abstract

[Objective] This paper aimed to diagnosis the level of the rural land consolidation project performance based on the farmers' satisfaction in order to provide some references for policy making.[Methods] The evaluation index system of rural land consolidation project performance was constructed based on the farmers' satisfaction

then the empirical analysis was conducted by comprehensive evaluation method

paired sample T test and the IPA(importance performance analysis) analysis.[Results] The farmers' satisfaction of the rural land consolidation project was 3.747 5

and the rural land consolidation project performance level was in the "good" class. The project result performance level was higher than the process performance level. The important factors impacting rural land consolidation project performance level mainly included the adoption degree of farmers' opinions in the stage of the decision-making

consultation with farmers' opinions in the stage of planning programming

the adoption degree of farmers' opinions in the stage of planning programming

the clear subject of final management maintenance

production cost reduction

the sound system of final management maintenance

the supply of funds for the final management maintenance

the perfect measures of final management maintenance

the degree of farmers' participation in the stage of the decision making

agricultural scale production

the biodiversity conservation

the ability of fighting natural calamities for farmland

quality of farmland shelterbelts

farmers' participation in the completion acceptance

and so on.[Conclusion] They are reasonable and feasible that the evaluation index system of the rural land consolidation project performance was established based on the farmers' satisfaction

while the level of the rural land consolidation project performance was diagnosed by comprehensive evaluation method

paired sample T test and the IPA analysis.

关键词

Keywords

references

项晓敏,金晓斌,王温鑫,等.供给侧结构性改革视角下的土地整治制度创新初探[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(4):12-21.

曲衍波,朱伟亚,郧文聚,等.基于压力-状态-响应模型的土地整治空间格局及障碍诊断[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(3):241-249.

管栩,金晓斌,杨绪红,等.中国农用地整理项目安排与耕地资源分布的协调性研究[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(2):226-234.

黄学锋,金晓斌,张晓霞,等.土地整治项目对农田生态系统影响的能值分析[J].中国农业大学学报,2017,22(4):47-57.

Luo Wenbin, Timothy D J. An assessment of farmers' satisfaction with land consolidation performance in China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2017,61:501-510.

郑华伟,陈晓,程锦,等.农用地整治项目农户有效参与分析[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(19):311-315.

国土资源部,国家发展和改革委员会.《全国土地整治规划(2016-2020年)》[R/OL].(2017-01-10)[2018-05-10]. http://www.mlr.gov.cn/zwgk/zytz/201702/t20170215_1440315.htm.

唐秀美,潘瑜春,刘玉,等.基于全过程的土地整治项目实施问题、成因及对策研究[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(3):35-42.

郑华伟,周家俊,刘友兆.利益相关者视角下农地整治项目绩效测度目标分析[J].江苏农业科学,2016,44(5):577-580.

罗文斌.中国土地整理项目绩效评价、影响因素及改善策略[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.

郑华伟.农村土地整理项目绩效的形成、测度与改善[D].江苏南京:南京农业大学,2012.

Giedrius P, Vida M. Towards sustainable rural development in Central and Eastern Europe:Applying land consolidation[J].Land Use Policy, 2010,27(2):545-549.

汪文雄,罗冰,杨帆,等.不完全与不确定信息条件下农地整治项目绩效评价研究[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(6):75-81.

文高辉,杨钢桥,李文静,等.基于农民视角的农地整理项目绩效评价及其障碍因子诊断[J].资源科学,2014,36(1):26-34.

李冰清,王占岐,金贵.新农村建设背景下的土地整治项目绩效评价[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(3):68-74.

Jia wentao, Liu Junming, Yu Lina, et al. Design and implementation of a GPS-based field survey system for land consolidation and rehabilitation Projects[J].New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 2007,50(5):879-885.

汪文雄,汪萍,罗冰,等.农户有效参与提升农地整治项目绩效的机理研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(7):159-168.

郝祖涛,冯兵,谢雄标,等.基于民生满意度的资源型城市转型绩效测度及群体差异研究[J].自然资源学报,2017,32(8):1298-1310.

罗文斌,吴次芳,倪尧,等.基于农户满意度的土地整理项目绩效评价及区域差异研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(8):68-74.

余亮亮,蔡银莺.基于农户满意度的耕地保护经济补偿政策绩效评价及障碍因子诊断[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(7):1092-1103.

郑华伟,高洁芝,臧玉杰,等.农村生态文明建设农民满意度分析[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(4):52-57.

邓维斌,周玉敏,刘进,等.SPSS23(中文版)统计分析实用教程[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2017.

吴云青,张再生,蔡为民.城乡建设用地增减挂钩区农户满意度的IPA分析:以天津市华明镇为例[J].东北大学学报:社会科学版,2013,15(2):175-181.

蔡彩云,骆培聪,唐承财,等.基于IPA法的民居类世界遗产地游客满意度评价[J].资源科学,2011,33(7):1374-1381.

王钦安,彭建,孙根年.基于IPA法的传统型景区游客满意度评价[J].地域研究与开发,2017,36(4):110-115.

方凯,王厚俊.基于因子分析的农村公共品农民满意度评价研究[J].农业技术经济,2012(6):30-36.

卢松,吴霞.古村落旅游地写生游客满意度评价[J].地理研究,2017,36(8):1570-1582.

Views

1005

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Construction of ecological security pattern at Zhangjiakou section of Bashang region based on landscape connectivity optimization

Influence of different restoration measures on vegetation characteristics and diversity of degraded grasslands in Ili， Xinjiang

Effects of land use and climate change on water-related ecosystem services in Hebei Province

Research status and hotspots of plant diversity in desertified areas of China based on CiteSpace

Research progress and trends of ecological environment of key lakes in Yangtze River economic belt based on bibliometric analysis

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

⁰