Effects of Different Field-returning Materials on Soil Fertility After Remediation in Vacant Village

ZHANG Lu; WEI Jing

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.03.012

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Effects of Different Field-returning Materials on Soil Fertility After Remediation in Vacant Village

- Effects of Different Field-returning Materials on Soil Fertility After Remediation in Vacant Village
- Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation Vol. 38, Issue 3, Pages: 74-78(2018)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 陕西省土地工程建设集团,陕西,西安,710075
  2. 陕西地建土地工程技术研究院,陕西,西安,710075
  3. 国土资源部退化及未利用土地整治工程重点实验室,陕西,西安,710075
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.03.012
  CLC：
- Published：2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
ZHANG Lu, WEI Jing. Effects of Different Field-returning Materials on Soil Fertility After Remediation in Vacant Village[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(3): 74-78.
DOI：

ZHANG Lu, WEI Jing. Effects of Different Field-returning Materials on Soil Fertility After Remediation in Vacant Village[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2018, 38(3): 74-78. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.03.012.

摘要

[目的

]

评估还田材料在空心村整治为农用地后对土壤养分的影响效应，为提高新增耕地质量提供科学的参考。[方法

]

在农村废弃宅基地的整治中使用不同的还田材料进行复垦还田，通过TS （改良剂FeSO

）、TF （有机肥鸡粪）、TC （粉煤灰）、TSF （改良剂+有机肥）、TFC （粉煤灰+有机肥）、TSC （改良剂+粉煤灰）和T

（无培肥措施）7种处理来监测土壤0-105 cm剖面上养分含量的变化趋势。[结果

]

土壤剖面平均有效磷含量在处理TSF下最大，且覆土30 cm的TSF处理相对高于T

处理254.49%，0-105 cm的则相对高146.37%。土壤剖面平均速效钾含量在处理TSF下最大，且覆土30 cm的TSF处理相对高于T

处理19.13，0-105 cm的则相对高14.01。土壤剖面平均全氮含量在处理TSC下最大，且覆土30 cm的TSC处理相对高于T

处理29.63%，0-105 cm的则相对高27.06%。土壤剖面平均有机质含量在处理TF下最大，且覆土30 cm的TF处理相对高于T

处理247.47%，0-105 cm的则相对高于42.63%。[结论

]

综合比较，同时添加改良剂（FeSO

）和有机肥（鸡粪）时在玉米-小麦-玉米三季作物种植过后土壤养分增加迅速，对空心村整治后生土熟化促进效果明显。

Abstract

[Objective] To evaluate the effect of returning field materials on soil nutrient after remediation in vacant villages for agricultural land in order to provided scientific references for improving the quality of new cultivated land.[Methods] This study was conducted in the rural abandoned homestead using different field returning materials. The trend of nutrient content was monitored by 7 different kinds of treatments including TS (ameliorant

FeSO4)

TF (organic fertilizer

manure)

TC (fly ash)

TSF (ameliorant + organic fertilizer)

TFC (fly ash + organic fertilizer)

TSC (ameliorant + fly ash) and T0 (no fertilization measures) in 0-105 cm soil profile.[Results] The average available phosphorus content was the highest in the treatment of TSF

and the available phosphorus in TSF treatment with 30 and 0-105 cm soil cover was 254.49% and 146.37% higher than that in the treatment of T0

respectively. The average available potassium content was the largest in the TSF treatment

and the available potassium in TSF treatment with 30 and 0-105 cm soil cover was 19.13% and 14.01%higher than that in T0 treatment

respectively. The average total nitrogen content in the soil profile was the highest in the treatment of TSC

and the total nitrogen in TSC treatment with 30 and 0-105 cm soil cover was 29.63% and 27.06% higher than that in the T0 treatment

respectively. The average organic matter content in the soil profile was the highest in the treatment of TF

and the organic matter in the treatment of TF with 30 and 0-105 cm soil cover was 247.47% and 42.63% higher than that in the treatment of T0

respectively.[Conclusion] Soil nutrient increases rapidly with the addition of ameliorant (FeSO4) and organic manure (chicken manure) after the planting of three-season crop with maize-wheat-maize

and immature soil is improved into cultivated land of remedied vacant village.

关键词

Keywords

references

吴海潮.对园田土壤高度熟化问题的几点认识[J].中国农业科学,1961,2(3):41-45.

于寒青,孙楠,吕家珑,等.红壤地区三种母质土壤熟化过程中有机质的变化特征[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(1):92-98.

李来荣,黄锡琨,庄伊美,等.红壤丘陵山地柑桔园土壤熟化问题的初步探讨[J].生态学报,1981,1(4):3-10.

牛翠芳.土壤熟化改造技术试验与研究[J].农业技术与装备,2010(4):45-46.

孙云秀.浅谈垦区低产土壤培肥[J].新疆农垦科技,1993(4):10-12.

梁利宝,洪坚平,谢英荷,等.不同培肥处理对采煤塌陷地复垦不同年限土壤熟化的影响[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(3):140-144.

薛力.城市化背景下的"空心村"现象及其对策探讨:以江苏省为例[J].城市规划,2001,25(6):8-13.

钟在明.农村宅基地闲置原因与治理探析[J].农业经济,2008(6):57-58.

王海兰.农村"空心村"的形成原因及解决对策探析[J].农村经济,2005(9):21-22.

冯文勇,陈新莓.晋中平原地区农村聚落扩展分析[J].人文地理,2003,18(6):93-96.

雷振东.乡村聚落空废化概念及量化分析模型[J].西北大学学报:自然科学版,2002,32(4):421-424.

高亚军,朱培立,黄东迈,等.水旱轮作地区土壤长期休闲与耕种的肥力效应[J].中国生态农业学报,2001,9(3):67-69.

李晓莎,武宁,刘玲,等.不同秸秆还田和耕作方式对夏玉米农田土壤呼吸及微生物活性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(6):1765-1771.

黄婷苗,郑险峰,侯仰毅,等.秸秆还田对冬小麦产量和氮、磷、钾吸收利用的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(4):853-863.

李硕,李有兵,王淑娟,等.关中平原作物秸秆不同还田方式对土壤有机碳和碳库管理指数的影响[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(4):1215-1222.

付国占,李潮海,王俊忠,等.残茬覆盖与耕作方式对土壤性状及夏玉米水分利用效率的影响[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(1):52-56.

孙召靖.秸秆还田对推广玉米机械化收获的影响[J].农业技术与装备,2011(9):57-57.

赵鑫,陈长智.浅析制约吉林市玉米收获机械化的因素及建议[J].农业机械,2010(7):94-96.

吕开宇,仇焕广,白军飞,等.中国玉米秸秆直接还田的现状与发展[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(3):171-176.

徐侠,陈月琴,汪家社,等.武夷山不同海拔高度土壤活性有机碳变化[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(3):539-544.

徐侠,王丰,栾以玲,等.武夷山不同海拔植被土壤易氧化碳[J].生态学杂志,2008,27(7):1115-1121.

Moreno B, Garcia-Rodriguez S, Caizares R, et al. Rainfed olive farming in south-eastern Spain:Long-term effect of soil management on biological indicators on soil quality[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2009,131(3):333-339.

周丽霞,丁明懋.土壤微生物学特性对土壤健康的指示作用[J].生物多样性,2007,15(2):162-171.

蔡健,兰伟.农村闲置废弃宅基地复垦耕种方式研究[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(1):160-163.

许广波,全明道,梁运江,等.不同耕种方式对草甸土熟化的影响[J].延边大学农学学报,1997,19(3):151-156.

Views

1265

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Effects of Different PAM Application Modes Mixed with Soil Conditioners on Rainfall Infiltration and Soil Erosion

Effect of Organic Fertilizer and Planting Density on Root Growth and Function of Maize in Dryland

Soil Physiochemical Properties in Economic Fruit Forest Under Different Fertilization Pattern

Evaluation of Land Consolidation Potential of Vacant Villages under Background of Rural Revitalization -Taking Wulian County of Shandong Province as an Example

Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction and Chemical Fertilizer Applied with Organic Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Vitis Vinifera Merlot

Related Author

TANG De-qiang

LI Yu-lan

ZHANG Jun-sheng

LI Ping

YU Jian

YU Hai-long

ZHANG Sui-qi

LIU Jing-bo

Related Institution

Civil Engineering Co. , Ltd. , Sixth Engineering Bureau of China Construction

Xilin Gol League Water Survey and Design Team

Inner Mongolia Agricultural University

Inner Mongolia Academy of Water Conservancy Sciences

College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University

⁰